Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

pantslesswithwolves posted:

competent military power


We're talking about Australia, here.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Deus Ex Macklemore
Jul 2, 2004


Zelensky's Zealots

A.o.D. posted:

We're talking about Australia, here.

Hey I met some Aussie sailors while I was on active duty and those good could loving drink

What were we talking about again?

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon

psydude posted:

Yes, because the post revolutionary Iran of the 1970s and 1980s was definitely receptive to Western attempts at diplomacy and modernization.

Next you'll be telling me that the Red Army Faction was simply trying to improve the level of discourse in West Germany.

A situation we caused nearly entirely by our actions. The Iranian's had a lot of agency, so its not solely due to US intervention, but we were a fat hand at tipping the scales.

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




A.o.D. posted:

We're talking about Australia, here.

Australia spent most of the 20th century producing really good infantry, 1915-1972 anyway. They did okay in Iraq too, so they still have some institutional knowledge that was paid for the hard way.

Murgos
Oct 21, 2010

CommieGIR posted:

Amazing how our choices were moderate, possible socialist uprising in the 50s and 70s, but no, the repressive hardliners was somehow deemed the better choice :doh:

You do understand that our nation is run by rich people and anything to do with “socialism” is the worst fear they have, right?

Socialism can’t be seen to work or else they’re hosed.

Splorange
Feb 23, 2011

CommieGIR posted:

Amazing how our choices were moderate, possible socialist uprising in the 50s and 70s, but no, the repressive hardliners was somehow deemed the better choice :doh:

Don't word it as if the choice was made by the satanic overlords, the Shah was supported and handed weapons but dictators are really poo poo at handing over power in a orderly fashion. Also US policy was absolute inconsistent garbage even when the violence became undeniably horrible. The main reason the hardliners won was because the moderates were splintered and naive enough to ally themselves with the hardline islamists - the enemy of my enemy etc. They then got unscrupulously murdered when the ayatollah consolidated power.

I'm saying that Iran's people had a more agency than can be condensed into a few paragraphs but it ended in tragedy nonetheless. Kinda like the lesson here is, you should never hand it to any flavor of extremist.. or expect to be able to moderate extremist tendencies by sharing power with them.

psydude
Apr 1, 2008

Murgos posted:

You do understand that our nation is run by rich people and anything to do with “socialism” is the worst fear they have, right?

Socialism can’t be seen to work or else they’re hosed.

Nearly every "socialist" movement from that era was being equally backed by the USSR for identical reasons of superpower competition. And in the ones that were truly independent, like Vietnam, more moderate voices like Ho Chi Minh were eventually overwhelmed by hardliners like Le Duan.

Does that excuse any meddling from that era? No, but there's this weird persistent leftist myth that the history of socialism in the mid 20th century is one of plucky Marxists being crushed by the US, and let's just ignore the heaps of evidence to the contrary. And you can draw a direct line from that to modern day tankie defenses of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

psydude fucked around with this message at 08:02 on Aug 12, 2023

AlternateNu
May 5, 2005

ドーナツダメ!

Dandywalken posted:

Mirage IIIs and A-4 Skyhawks?

Huh. For some reason, I thought they had Harriers, too but that obviously doesn’t make sense in retrospect. Yeah. You can ignore me on that point.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

mllaneza posted:

Australia spent most of the 20th century producing really good infantry, 1915-1972 anyway. They did okay in Iraq too, so they still have some institutional knowledge that was paid for the hard way.

How's the competence of their procurement?

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

A.o.D. posted:

How's the competence of their procurement?

We pretty much take whatever the US decides to send us.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

The Lone Badger posted:

We pretty much take whatever the US decides to send us.

Ah, I was under the impression that it was the one place in Australia you could see Canada from.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Murgos posted:

You do understand that our nation is run by rich people and anything to do with “socialism” is the worst fear they have, right?

Socialism can’t be seen to work or else they’re hosed.

Very much understood. Just it's loving dumb as all hell

Carth Dookie
Jan 28, 2013

A.o.D. posted:

How's the competence of their procurement?

A.o.D. posted:

Ah, I was under the impression that it was the one place in Australia you could see Canada from.

I don't think we're that bad? We have pretty modern stuff; F35s, AWACS, tanks etc. I'd say perhaps our Navy isn't as good as it should be given the size of our coastline and small population. Probably the only major black mark I can think of is our previous Collins class subs which were a huge political quagmire and not as quiet as they should have been. HOPEFULLY the lessons were learned there and as pissed off as the French are about the whole thing, I think the current AUKUS deal is better (despite the humungous cost) because there should at least be a few tried and tested American Virginias included in early batches to cover us between Collins retirement and the new joint venture sub.

I'm sure some griping will go back and forth over the years (and different governments) about cost, location and all that other crap, but I don't expect the same bullshit as Canadian procurement.

Wingnut Ninja
Jan 11, 2003

Mostly Harmless
Australia managed to procure an AWACS so good that the US is now going to buy it. Between that and the other modern, high-end stuff they're buying (FA-18, F-35, P-8, subs) they seem to be doing pretty well.

Skanky Burns
Jan 9, 2009
Then again, Australia loves nothing more than MOTS(modified). We just can't help modifying kit once it is in service.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006
I guess the Australian procurement situation was an invention of my imagination. Sorry.

Skanky Burns posted:

Then again, Australia loves nothing more than MOTS(modified). We just can't help modifying kit once it is in service.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUz0TBtRBO8

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

Aus naval procurement was bad for a long tome, I thought.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006
There's some footage of what purports to be the Kerch bridge on fire in multiple locations. I don't know how true it is, but here, have a link to some Twitter video.

https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1690313845842014209

bennyfactor
Nov 21, 2008

A.o.D. posted:

There's some footage of what purports to be the Kerch bridge on fire in multiple locations. I don't know how true it is, but here, have a link to some Twitter video.

https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1690313845842014209

Well, we can hear a little bit of Hard Bass in the background, so who knows it may be legit.

AlternateNu
May 5, 2005

ドーナツダメ!

in a well actually posted:

Aus naval procurement was bad for a long tome, I thought.

They got a bunch of our Perry class FFGs and actually made them menacing. I remember being on my old ship, passing an Aussie Perry port-to-port through the Strait of Malacca and feeling quite emasculated. :v:

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




bennyfactor posted:

Well, we can hear a little bit of Hard Bass in the background, so who knows it may be legit.

Maybe, Google Maps is showing a lot of red-level traffic, particularly on the side trying to leave the peninsula.

Pine Cone Jones
Dec 6, 2009

You throw me the acorn, I throw you the whip!
https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/1690353932982431744?t=_CUIKwbNMnOooxzQvZxJwQ&s=19

psydude
Apr 1, 2008

I wouldn't be surprised if the operational plan is to fix the Russian main body along the southern and Eastern front and then build pontoon bridges across the Dnipro to enable a rapid mechanized assault around their flank. If they've already managed to secure the far shore and push Russian heavy artillery out of range, then that's the likely next step.

Resplendentoops
Dec 24, 2002

A man, a plan, a canal, Nicaragua!

A.o.D. posted:

There's some footage of what purports to be the Kerch bridge on fire in multiple locations. I don't know how true it is, but here, have a link to some Twitter video.

The smoke is purportedly smoke generators to try and obscure the bridge.

Latest report was that Ukraine launched a couple repurposed S-200s at the bridge, (or at least at Crimea, CEP on those things can't be great) which were intercepted, along with a bunch of drones.

Coasterphreak
May 29, 2007
I like cookies.
Corner them in Pripyat and blow up the power plant (again)

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Coasterphreak posted:

Corner them in Pripyat and blow up the power plant (again)
Better to use the golden sphere

Cimber
Feb 3, 2014

Resplendentoops posted:

The smoke is purportedly smoke generators to try and obscure the bridge.

Latest report was that Ukraine launched a couple repurposed S-200s at the bridge, (or at least at Crimea, CEP on those things can't be great) which were intercepted, along with a bunch of drones.

I wonder how many drones Ukraine can launch at them vs the number of AA missiles Russia has to defend against that. Also, are the drone strikes in and around Moscow forcing the Russians to reduce the (limited?) number of AA batteries in the combat areas, or are they denuding other areas of the country?

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

Resplendentoops posted:

The smoke is purportedly smoke generators to try and obscure the bridge.

Latest report was that Ukraine launched a couple repurposed S-200s at the bridge, (or at least at Crimea, CEP on those things can't be great) which were intercepted, along with a bunch of drones.

While that's certainly possible, what good are smoke generators for defending a stationary piece of architecture? The Russian government has, at best, an adversarial relationship with the truth. Regardless, we'll have a clearer picture in a day or so.

Alan Smithee
Jan 4, 2005


A man becomes preeminent, he's expected to have enthusiasms.

Enthusiasms, enthusiasms...
Explosives are a smoke generator of sorts

goatsestretchgoals
Jun 4, 2011

A boombox playing hard bass and a pile of track suits is too.

E: Dammit now I want to hear Werner Herzog narrate a gopnik documentary.

Alan Smithee
Jan 4, 2005


A man becomes preeminent, he's expected to have enthusiasms.

Enthusiasms, enthusiasms...
Pwiiiiiiisssshh vrooooooowowowowooooow

“You must never listen to zhis”

PurpleXVI
Oct 30, 2011

Spewing insults, pissing off all your neighbors, betraying your allies, backing out of treaties and accords, and generally screwing over the global environment?
ALL PART OF MY BRILLIANT STRATEGY!
https://twitter.com/COUPSURE/status/1690316111395299328

More excitement at the Kerch Strait Bridge again today, unclear what/if any damage was done, but a lot of smoke and a lot of worried beachgoers nearby.

Snowy
Oct 6, 2010

A man whose blood
Is very snow-broth;
One who never feels
The wanton stings and
Motions of the sense




https://twitter.com/alexgoyaca/status/1690326748464844801?s=46&t=oql5ML5-7u4J72W8bn7HAw

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice
Smoke generators on a miles long, stationary bridge just sounds ridiculous to me. You're not hiding it all and it isn't moving out of harm's way.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



bird food bathtub posted:

Smoke generators on a miles long, stationary bridge just sounds ridiculous to me. You're not hiding it all and it isn't moving out of harm's way.
Might make people feel like you're protecting them/their one road out of town

Aren't they in a hilariously bad position if that bridge goes down?

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
I love how everyone is just accepting that Moscow is telling the truth about smoke generators

Turrurrurrurrrrrrr
Dec 22, 2018

I hope this is "battle" enough for you, friend.

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

I love how everyone is just accepting that Moscow is telling the truth about smoke generators

Well, the white smoke points to it?

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

No no, the smoke is just a side effect of the heat sources set up to confuse IR seekers.

windshipper
Jun 19, 2006

Dr. Whet Faartz would like to know if this smells funny to you?

in a well actually posted:

No no, the smoke is just a side effect of the heat sources set up to confuse IR seekers.

Coincidentally, the heat sources are missiles. But not Ukrainian missiles. No sir.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Wrong Theory
Aug 27, 2005

Satellite from days of old, lead me to your access code
Found the E-4 and below smoke pit :chord:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply