Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fatherboxx)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
socialsecurity
Aug 30, 2003

Gully Foyle posted:

Ukraine is about 1/3 the size of Russia in population. Significantly smaller yes, but it's really stupid to exaggerate that they are "orders of magnitude smaller in every way".

I would consider 1/3 the size to be orders of magnitude when we are talking a peer conflict between neighbors.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

socialsecurity posted:

I would consider 1/3 the size to be orders of magnitude when we are talking a peer conflict between neighbors.

mind explaining that math?

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






socialsecurity posted:

I would consider 1/3 the size to be orders of magnitude when we are talking a peer conflict between neighbors.

"I would consider the number three to be the number ten."

socialsecurity
Aug 30, 2003

i say swears online posted:

mind explaining that math?

Nah, cause it's an opinion based on feeling, not math. I don't feel any explanation would work for someone that is here to mine for SYQ and parrot the propaganda of a fascist regime.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

socialsecurity
Aug 30, 2003

spankmeister posted:

"I would consider the number three to be the number ten."

And I suppose every use of decimate means to cut out one of out of every 10?

Blut
Sep 11, 2009

if someone is in the bottom 10%~ of a guillotine

socialsecurity posted:

And I suppose every use of decimate means to cut out one of out of every 10?

"another word is often used incorrectly therefore I am right to use this phrase completely incorrectly" isn't exactly a great defense.

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






socialsecurity posted:

And I suppose every use of decimate means to cut out one of out of every 10?

I wouldn't if I were you.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!
Ukraine claims some Russian drones hit Romanian soil.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-says-russian-drones-detonated-romanian-territory-during-danube-strike-2023-09-04/

Romania, a NATO country, prefers not to acknowledge that.

quote:

At no time did Russia's means of attack generate direct military threats on Romanian national territory or waters.

Coincidentally, there was a Polish military helicopter that Belarus claimed crossed its border a week or so ago, while Lukashenko was preparing for another round of joint military exercises at Poland's doorstep. Today Lukashenko's officials also decided that it wasn't a big deal, and an incompetent Polish pilot can be forgiven for a little whoopsie.

Deltasquid
Apr 10, 2013

awww...
you guys made me ink!


THUNDERDOME
Regardless of semantics, the aggressor having 3x the population you have does not appear to be a significant advantage in industrial war, in my opinion. Getting those people in the field, armed, and doing something useful is not guaranteed (especially not in Putin's Russia...) and neither country is fighting to the last man. It's much more relevant to look at numbers of soldiers mobilised, and potentially mobilised in short and medium term. Millions of Russian men of conscriptable age are moving abroad because they don't fancy dying in Putin's trenches.

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

Deltasquid posted:

Millions of Russian men of conscriptable age are moving abroad because they don't fancy dying in Putin's trenches.

Do you have some sources of the numbers of people moving abroad? I know it's happening at scale, but I'm not aware of specific numbers involved.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




mllaneza posted:

That's just ridiculously effective.

This conflict seems like a change where serious structural changes to how fighting occurs are starting. Sort of analogous to how changes that really start showing up in the US civil war proceed the industrial war of WWI.

It’s terrifying frankly.

Llamadeus
Dec 20, 2005

Tomn posted:

Do you have some sources of the numbers of people moving abroad? I know it's happening at scale, but I'm not aware of specific numbers involved.
https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2023/08/23/russians-have-emigrated-in-huge-numbers-since-the-war-in-ukraine

quote:

Re: Russia, an analysis and policy network, has examined various estimates and available data from countries that have accepted large numbers of Russian émigrés. They found that between 817,000 and 922,000 people have left Russia since February 2022.

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

steinrokkan posted:

Cardboard: $10
Proprietary performance enhancing cardboard lacquer: $10,000,000

TBF, the cardboard drones are actually $750 per unit, so they are already priced at military MSRP.

madeintaipei
Jul 13, 2012

Mr. Apollo posted:

I remember during the Gulf War, the Missouri used a RQ-2 Pioneer drone as a spotter to correct its fire.

The South Africans used the Seeker drone during the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale ('87-'88), in Angola, to scout attack routes for their airforce and direct long-range artillery fire. Employment of the Seeker lead to the unforeseen (but welcomed by the SAAF) consequence of forcing Cuban AA to expend pricey and scarce missiles against them, distracting them from engaging South African aircraft and opening avenues for same to approach targets.

Considering the long ranges that SADF artillery and aircraft had to operate at there, the drones provided a great amount of information about their enemies that otherwise may have resulted in many casualties to obtain by more conventional means.

Deltasquid
Apr 10, 2013

awww...
you guys made me ink!


THUNDERDOME

Tomn posted:

Do you have some sources of the numbers of people moving abroad? I know it's happening at scale, but I'm not aware of specific numbers involved.

I may be exaggerating, the figure I had in mind was actually "more than a million" but that presumably includes their families.

Deltasquid posted:

Saw this on Reddit, can't vouch for its accuracy.



Somebody earlier in the thread was wondering where the labor force shortage of 300k people comes from if casualties were half of that. I'm guessing this has a hand in it.

I had a friend in Georgia last week and he told me the place (Tbilisi in particular) is flooded with Russian expats. They're apparently opening a lot of Russian-Italian restaurants (as in, Russians who have no Italian background whatsoever are opening Italian restaurants and selling the food they remember eating in Rimini and reproducing the dishes by memory and via googling recipes)

He talked to some of them. Most seemed to be anti-Putin but still thought Russia was the greatest country in the world.

Georgians' opinions ranged from mildly annoyed to livid at the situation

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Deltasquid posted:

Regardless of semantics, the aggressor having 3x the population you have does not appear to be a significant advantage in industrial war, in my opinion. Getting those people in the field, armed, and doing something useful is not guaranteed (especially not in Putin's Russia...) and neither country is fighting to the last man. It's much more relevant to look at numbers of soldiers mobilised, and potentially mobilised in short and medium term. Millions of Russian men of conscriptable age are moving abroad because they don't fancy dying in Putin's trenches.

Finding motivated able bodied men for a war of aggression is not easy, though having a larger reserve pool to draw from makes it possible to replace losses - but for every grunt replaced, you need both some very expensive personal equipment and months of training for them to be any use in combat. Though Russia's size allows for even some unorthodox recruiting tactics, like offering pardon to prisoners who volunteer. It takes a country of certain size and with enough population in prisons to quickly get 50000 new men, many of whom have killed before. Regardless, the size difference means that Ukraine is going to have far more disabled people per capita than Russia, not least because Ukraine's civilians are also under fire.

The estimates I have seen of Russians who have fled the country is more in the hundreds of thousands region. It's partly hard to calculate because there was a wave of people fleeing when the war first started, many of whom then returned to Russia when they ran out of money and couldn't find work. More have left since then, though. Meanwhile over 6 million people have left Ukraine.

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 3 days!)

And this fact also explains how North Vietnam (pop 23 million in 1974) was crushed by the US military (population 210 million in 1974).

Deltasquid
Apr 10, 2013

awww...
you guys made me ink!


THUNDERDOME

Nenonen posted:

Finding motivated able bodied men for a war of aggression is not easy, though having a larger reserve pool to draw from makes it possible to replace losses - but for every grunt replaced, you need both some very expensive personal equipment and months of training for them to be any use in combat. Though Russia's size allows for even some unorthodox recruiting tactics, like offering pardon to prisoners who volunteer. It takes a country of certain size and with enough population in prisons to quickly get 50000 new men, many of whom have killed before. Regardless, the size difference means that Ukraine is going to have far more disabled people per capita than Russia, not least because Ukraine's civilians are also under fire.

The estimates I have seen of Russians who have fled the country is more in the hundreds of thousands region. It's partly hard to calculate because there was a wave of people fleeing when the war first started, many of whom then returned to Russia when they ran out of money and couldn't find work. More have left since then, though. Meanwhile over 6 million people have left Ukraine.

I recall many Ukrainians initially fled but returned since then. I can't find reliable sources with numbers but this website (https://visitukraine.today/blog/1825/why-ukrainian-refugees-are-returning-home-important-reasons) claims 18 million initially fled while 10 million have since returned.

Another question is whether the Ukrainian refugees are all men of fighting age or not. The media perception certainly was that these were overwhelmingly women and children (OECD estimates that at least 70% of adult Ukrainian refugees are women: https://www.oecd.org/ukraine-hub/policy-responses/what-are-the-integration-challenges-of-ukrainian-refugee-women-bb17dc64/)

I can't be certain, but I expect the Russian emigration numbers to skew towards men (dodging the draft) whereas Russian women have no particular reason to flee unless they're joining their male relatives, and Ukrainian numbers to skew towards women and children (fleeing the war coming to their doorstep) while a lot of men of fighting age chose or were forced to remain in Ukraine.

khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.

Rust Martialis posted:

And this fact also explains how North Vietnam (pop 23 million in 1974) was crushed by the US military (population 210 million in 1974).

I don't think they are really comparable when Vietnam fared poorly when they tried to fight the war on more conventional terms (ie, the Tet offensive), and Ukraine has been probably the most conventional war since the Iran-Iraq war.

On the other hand, its worth mentioning that North Vietnam wasn't just fighting America but also South Vietnam, Australia and South Korea, though a huge amount of nominally South Vietnamese fought for the North and there wasn't really many people doing the opposite.

Staluigi
Jun 22, 2021

My partner in posting crime has noted over the past week that russian yuan based borrowing is "remarkably accelerated" in a way that suggests loopy future financial outcomes so I'm going to call it the belt and owned initiative

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Deltasquid posted:

Regardless of semantics, the aggressor having 3x the population you have does not appear to be a significant advantage in industrial war, in my opinion. Getting those people in the field, armed, and doing something useful is not guaranteed (especially not in Putin's Russia...) and neither country is fighting to the last man. It's much more relevant to look at numbers of soldiers mobilised, and potentially mobilised in short and medium term. Millions of Russian men of conscriptable age are moving abroad because they don't fancy dying in Putin's trenches.

Well, true, it is not a simple bring two stacks and hit autoresolve thing from Total War games but having a large initial force and being able to mobilize enough greedy and desperate idiots has let Russia to hold for huge parts of the country so far. And it was able to mobilize precisely because of large population, i.e. also having a big pool of people that it relies on without having a support of moral motivation, just cash.

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC
A Rusi article on the tactical aspects of the Ukrainian Counter Offensive was released today. It is quite a good read if you are interested in that kind of stuff.

https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/special-resources/stormbreak-fighting-through-russian-defences-ukraines-2023-offensive


Some choice quotes on adaptations by the RuAF...

quote:

The Russian military has also determined to tactically exploit opportunities
when Ukrainian forces have become bogged down by aggressive flanking with
armour to knock out Ukrainian systems. It is worth noting that Russia often
loses the tanks used for these counterattacks but they inflict disproportionate
damage because the mines constrain Ukrainian vehicles in their ability to
Self-propelled howitzers preparing to move, manoeuvre or respond. This willingness to counterattack and a decision to
defend forwards highlight how training for Russian tank crews and other
specialisms has continued to function, generating new crews with some tactical
competence compared with the disruption in collective training that has hampered
Russian infantry

....

Russian forces have also assessed that the practice of setting pre-registered fires
to engage their own positions once they are lost is inefficient and dangerous
when the enemy has an artillery advantage in terms of counterbattery detection,
range and accuracy. The problems with this method have included the exposure
of friendly guns, reduced effectiveness because of the Ukrainian tendency to
displace from the fighting positions as soon as possible, and a dependency on
communications. To solve these problems the Russians have resorted to preparing
their fighting positions for reserve demolition. This is often done with improvised
charges. The template is to detonate the first line once Ukrainian troops enter
the fighting positions, while Russian forces withdraw through the rear of the
trenches. The Russians assess this to be more responsive and assured than the
application of artillery fire, and to threaten the boldest and most capable assault
troops in Ukrainian formations, deterring attacks on firing posts.

...and on training challenges for the AFU

quote:

Planning remains a significant challenge for Ukrainian units because of the
limited availability of trained staff officers. The rapid expansion of the AFU with
the mobilisation of civilians means that there are many more units than staffs.
Although brigades have technical specialists able to run the communications
and support systems they need, and often have skilled commanders, planning
shops and experienced G3 staff are scarce. This limits the scale at which brigades
can combine arms, especially during offensive operations where planning times
are compressed. This was an area of support identified as a requirement as early
as June 2022 but Ukraine’s partners have not effectively provided it. It is vital that
any staff training that is offered is not premised on putting Ukrainian staff through
academic courses aimed at creating NATO staff officers. A relatively small number
of staff applying NATO processes will have to revert to the mean once they are
back in Ukraine and working with the bulk of a staff who has not received training
on the same procedures. Instead, training should be based on observation of
how Ukrainian brigade staffs operate and the tools they depend on and then
offering training on techniques that maximise the efficiency of how those staffs
function within this context. The training must be bespoke. Ideally, it would be
of a whole staff. It must also accurately represent the communications and ISR
tools employed by Ukrainian brigades.

.....

Another area of critical priority is training junior leaders to conduct tactical battle
drills. Again, attrition and the expansion of the Ukrainian military mean that
junior leaders with deep expertise in offensive operations are not universally
available across Ukraine’s formations. This manifests in referring of combat
management to higher echelons, where there are more experienced officers.
This drives the continuation of combat management at higher echelon and limits
mission command. Additional pressure is placed on the brigade, limiting the
scale and complexity at which it can operate. This was demonstrated during the
attack on Rivnopil. Only 3% of Ukrainian artillery-fire missions are smoke
missions. As demonstrated during the assault on the company position north of
Rivnopil, smoke can be extremely useful in confusing the enemy ground force
and obscuring assault actions. But smoke also has the effect of obscuring the
view from UAVs which higher Ukrainian echelons and command posts use to
coordinate activity and conduct combat management. Commanders persistently
prioritise maintaining their own understanding of the battlefield over laying
down smoke and concealing their personnel’s movements. Given the criticality
of rapid application of artillery to support movement, this prioritisation is
understandable, but it also reflects limitations in the ability of the brigade to trust
tactical commanders to execute actions when not directed by high headquarters
with greater situational awareness.

...

Collective training outside Ukraine is hampered by the fact that because of the
safety culture in NATO, Ukrainian troops cannot train as they fight. Moreover,
many NATO tactics either require a level of training that is not feasible within
the timeframe available, or are not validated in the modern threat environment.
A good example here is that Ukrainian training emphasises the threat from
artillery even when teaching squad tactics. For Western armies that build skills
incrementally, artillery is introduced into training after basic infantry tactics are
mastered. More complex training involving artillery cannot be conducted until
troops are certified in their basic skills to be able to exercise safely. For Ukraine,
however, troops who are not prepared to deal with artillery are not prepared for
the fight. Another example is the shaping effect of UAVs. Most NATO training
areas are severely restricted in the types of UAVs that can be flown and how they
can be used. This is because of fears that UAVs will malfunction and fly into
controlled airspace, such as the area around civilian airports. The problem is
that for collective training above company, Ukrainian troops need to be prepared
for and practise tactics in an environment where there are up to 25 UAVs observing
their movements, while UAVs are also critical to their own combat management.

Jamsque
May 31, 2009

Rust Martialis posted:

And this fact also explains how North Vietnam (pop 23 million in 1974) was crushed by the US military (population 210 million in 1974).

Incredible that they defeated a nation with an exponentially larger population

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

khwarezm posted:

I don't think they are really comparable when Vietnam fared poorly when they tried to fight the war on more conventional terms (ie, the Tet offensive), and Ukraine has been probably the most conventional war since the Iran-Iraq war.

On the other hand, its worth mentioning that North Vietnam wasn't just fighting America but also South Vietnam, Australia and South Korea, though a huge amount of nominally South Vietnamese fought for the North and there wasn't really many people doing the opposite.

I think Rust is somewhat referencing claims that the weaker country in order to limit suffering should surrender as the war is ultimately hopeless, while the Vietnam war is a good counter example.

Separately to this point; North Vietnam did win a conventional war too though, vs the South when the US withdrew. And also against Cambodia. Different countries try to adapt to the circumstance of the war they're fighting; Ukraine needs to fight a conventional war because a guerilla war is the war of last resort in this instance, and they have the means of fighting a conventional war. Mao/Ho, etc fighting a "People's War" is a result of circumstance, which eventually calls for the shift to conventional fighting once initiative, and warfighting material conditions shifts to their favour.

The balance of forces and material conditions of the war are sufficiently in Ukraines favour that they don't need to retreat to the sunflower fields to avoid Russian conventional forces to strike where they are weak, they are capable of holding the line with conventional forces so these steps can be skipped. While Vietnam had both the issue of the American enforced demiliterized zone and the need to rely on engaging the South via asymmetrical warfare until the US left; then they shifted to armoured spearheads and conventional warfare.

Moon Slayer
Jun 19, 2007

Hey speaking of how drones are causing a huge shift in tactics, the New York Times as an apropos article on the US Navy:

Faced With Evolving Threats, U.S. Navy Struggles to Change

quote:

But the focus from Washington on producing a stream of new warships is also creating a fleet that some inside the Pentagon think is too wedded to outdated military strategies and that the Navy might not be able to afford to keep running in decades to come.

Half a world away, at a U.S. Navy outpost in Bahrain, a much smaller team was testing out a very different approach to the service’s 21st-century warfighting needs.

Bobbing in a small bay off the Persian Gulf was a collection of tiny unmanned vessels, prototypes for the kind of cheaper, easier-to-build and more mobile force that some officers and analysts of naval warfare said was already helping to contain Iran and could be essential to fighting a war in the Pacific.

Operating on a budget that was less than the cost of fuel for one of the Navy’s big ships, Navy personnel and contractors had pieced together drone boats, unmanned submersible vessels and aerial vehicles capable of monitoring and intercepting threats over hundreds of miles of the Persian Gulf, like Iranian fast boats looking to hijack oil tankers.

Now they are pleading for more money to help build on what they have learned.

Granted almost every time someone has said "the age of x is over" in military history they've been wrong to some degree, I can't help but wonder if we're on the cusp of something similar to when naval aviation replaced ships of the line.

Cicero
Dec 17, 2003

Jumpjet, melta, jumpjet. Repeat for ten minutes or until victory is assured.

Jamsque posted:

Incredible that they defeated a nation with an exponentially larger population
drat yoouuuuuuu

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

socialsecurity posted:

Nah, cause it's an opinion based on feeling, not math. I don't feel any explanation would work for someone that is here to mine for SYQ and parrot the propaganda of a fascist regime.

Opinions <> facts. "Order of magnitude" means "multiple of ten". This is not subject to opinion. It is just a fact based on math. FFS

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






Ynglaur posted:

Opinions <> facts. "Order of magnitude" means "multiple of ten". This is not subject to opinion. It is just a fact based on math. FFS

What I got from their post is that if you don't consider 3.3333 repeating to be the same as 10, you support the fascists. Very confusing.

Telsa Cola
Aug 19, 2011

No... this is all wrong... this whole operation has just gone completely sidewaysface

Ynglaur posted:

Opinions <> facts. "Order of magnitude" means "multiple of ten". This is not subject to opinion. It is just a fact based on math. FFS

While I think he was way off base in his usage of the word and his subsequent reasoning for using said word this framing is almost as bad given the technically incorrect yet still commonly used and accepted usage of decimate and, related, the use of the word literally.

This is way off topic though.

Fuschia tude
Dec 26, 2004

THUNDERDOME LOSER 2019

Ynglaur posted:

Opinions <> facts. "Order of magnitude" means "multiple of ten". This is not subject to opinion. It is just a fact based on math. FFS

Eh, technically it means "multiple of [some number]", which is typically but not always ten; two is the next most common multiplier, then probably e if you're using logarithms in some way.

The real reason their statement was wrong was because they used the plural, so it's more like if you don't believe 3 = 100 or 1000.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 3 days!)

spankmeister posted:

What I got from their post is that if you don't consider 3.3333 repeating to be the same as 10, you support the fascists. Very confusing.

You're near the root of the issue

Ed: in a base-10 system, one order of magnitude means a factor of 10.

Rust Martialis fucked around with this message at 22:11 on Sep 4, 2023

Xiahou Dun
Jul 16, 2009

We shall dive down through black abysses... and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory forever.



Telsa Cola posted:

While I think he was way off base in his usage of the word and his subsequent reasoning for using said word this framing is almost as bad given the technically incorrect yet still commonly used and accepted usage of decimate and, related, the use of the word literally.

This is way off topic though.

There’s a world of difference between normal semantic drift and the misuse of technical vocabulary.

Telsa Cola
Aug 19, 2011

No... this is all wrong... this whole operation has just gone completely sidewaysface

Xiahou Dun posted:

There’s a world of difference between normal semantic drift and the misuse of technical vocabulary.

In a professional or academic setting where the technical vocabulary is necessary for the level of precision needed to facilitate good work, yeah totally.

When people are just shooting the poo poo or whatever, not really.

I'm not going to defend someone using it incorrectly in an academic paper or when discussing engineering tolerances or whatever, but this ain't that.

Telsa Cola fucked around with this message at 00:00 on Sep 5, 2023

Bashez
Jul 19, 2004

:10bux:
I can't believe we've come full circle from discussing a tweet using "order of magnitude" where I said it was likely meant to mean a multiple rather than x10 back to discussing its usage in thread again. It shouldn't be shocking to see it used in this way.

mutata
Mar 1, 2003

Bashez posted:

I can't believe we've come full circle from discussing a tweet using "order of magnitude" where I said it was likely meant to mean a multiple rather than x10 back to discussing its usage in thread again. It shouldn't be shocking to see it used in this way.

It wasn't even a tweet, it was my hyperbolic but otherwise forgettable shitpost.

wet_goods
Jun 21, 2004

I'M BAAD!
Cinci would have sniped that derail so fast

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




evil_bunnY posted:

The dirt they're buried into offers ridiculously good protection against HE. You need dedicated mine-clearing equipment (typically rocket-propelled line charges) to assault through, and even that only buys you a single lane's worth of cleared ground.

Even then you still have to have a plow on the lead vehicle. If the line charge misses even one, you have an armored column stuck in a mine field, which we have seen end badly several times.

Here's the training video on US Army breaching tactics. Note that that's how it's supposed to go according to the manual, the heavy reliance on aircraft of all types (except drones), the vastly smaller size of the minefield than what Russia put out, and the massive disparity in force between attacker and defender.

Ukraine simply put up drones with thermal imaging and had dudes crawl out at night to clear mines. And there a loving lot of mines.

Theory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ-sCT_maAQ

Practice:
CW: the first part of the video (before the timestamp) calls some rando Russian warship a "battleship".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO8CWts2-P8&t=148s

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013

wet_goods posted:

Cinci would have sniped that derail so fast

Orders of magnitude faster

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

wet_goods posted:

Cinci would have sniped that derail so fast

Ironically, it probably wouldn't have taken Cinci long to make a rule about posts saying that we miss him. Which of course is why we miss him in the first place.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
#freecinci

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply