Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!

notaspy posted:

I think we should start a list of things that will cause massive derails:

1) university
2) chrispchat
3) dog

4) warhams

Edit 1931 Chinese Soviet Republic proclaimed by Mao Zedong

keep punching joe fucked around with this message at 08:53 on Sep 12, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

Gorn Myson posted:

The problem with dog chat is that cat owners feel the need to join the conversation due to their jealousy that they picked an animal inferior to a dog.

I think the problem are comments like this and people like you.

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Have you had your slaneesh cultists spayed / neurered?

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

NotJustANumber99 posted:

look I'm scared of them and my feelings are more important than yours so please respect them and by please i mean gently caress you

I'm talking about dogs

or maybe travellers

All I can say to that is no traveller ever stuck their cold wet nose against the back of my knee and made me shriek like a loon in the queue at PetsAtHome.

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

Lord Ludikrous
Jun 7, 2008

Enjoy your tea...

Bobby Deluxe posted:

No it loving isn't, and don't weaponise neurodiversity/typicality that that.

From earlier in this thread.

Jakabite posted:

What’s your alternative suggestion? I’m sorry if my extremely tame, literally never nipped or growled at anyone in her life, 8 year old Labrador coming up to give you a sniff scares you, genuinely, but that’s life. Sometimes you’ll have to go through things you don’t love because society can’t be expected to adapt to every single fear people have.

Make people who are scared of dogs walk round in big cages like an armoured zorb is what I’m really saying


Julio Cruz posted:

uh keep your dog on a lead? it’s not exactly a hard alternative to come up with

thinking that your freedom to let your dog roam is more important than other peoples’ freedoms to not have panic attacks is really making you sound like a Tory


Jakabite posted:

Knew that was coming. No, sorry, my dog’s happiness at being able to run around in the park is more important to me than that, particularly if they’re going to act like a oval office about it like you do about almost everything.

E: particularly given that in my lifetime of dog ownership this has never happened. I’m sure it does but the fact you want all dogs leashed because an extreme minority are scared of them is beyond ridiculous.

In short I let my dog do whatever the gently caress it wants and gently caress everyone else, and if you disagree I’ll call you a oval office.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

Lord Ludikrous posted:

From earlier in this thread.





In short I let my dog do whatever the gently caress it wants and gently caress everyone else, and if you disagree I’ll call you a oval office.

He didn't call him a oval office because of his opinions on dogs, he called him a oval office for being a oval office.

Lord Ludikrous
Jun 7, 2008

Enjoy your tea...

NotJustANumber99 posted:

He didn't call him a oval office because of his opinions on dogs, he called him a oval office for being a oval office.

Saying people should keep dogs on leads around strangers makes them worthy of being called a oval office? Really?

Mourning Due
Oct 11, 2004

*~ missin u ~*
:canada:

Bobby Deluxe posted:

No it loving isn't, and don't weaponise neurodiversity/typicality that that.

Are you saying that sensory sensitivity isn't real? Or that sudden unexpected loud noise and unwanted physical contact cannot trigger it?

I'm not saying "all neurodiverse people hate dogs", I'm saying that selfish people don't consider the possibility that other people may not love being lunged at by your poorly controlled animal.

DesperateDan
Dec 10, 2005

Where's my cow?

Is that my cow?

No it isn't, but it still tramples my bloody lavender.
gor' blimey whole threads gone to the dogs it has



sort it aaahhhht

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

Lord Ludikrous posted:

Saying people should keep dogs on leads around strangers makes them worthy of being called a oval office? Really?

No mate. That's what I just explained.

Dead Goon
Dec 13, 2002

No Obvious Flaws



I have a story about the time I shouted at an old lady to control her dog.

It's a good one.

Inexplicable Humblebrag
Sep 20, 2003

Gorn Myson posted:

The problem with dog chat is that cat owners feel the need to join the conversation due to their jealousy that they picked an animal inferior to a dog.

it is an absolute rookie mistake

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

What’s happened to this threads glorious Pedigree? I thought we were all Chums?

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

smellmycheese posted:

What’s happened to this threads glorious Pedigree? I thought we were all Chums?

Now you see how easily that falls apart

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Spangly A posted:

Moved on a bit but I went over the dangerous dogs act the other day for a vet thing and it's hilarious that Dog Phrenologist is a specialist position within the police. They are the only people authorised to say if a big mastiff is legally a big mastiff, based on how much it looks like another dog used to catch slaves in South America, that wasn't extant in the UK at the time of legislation.
I was reading something last night about how the majority of these so called ancient fighting breeds and so on pretty much appeared in the 19th century, and came out of a big crackdown on dog fighting and other cruel sports by way of the Cruelty to Animals Act 1835/1849 and the promotion of kennel clubs and obedience shows as what was seen as a healthy and disciplined alternative to breeding for aggression.

Of course because it was the Victorians knowing that they were the finest scientific brains in the world while having no clue what they were doing they managed to introduce a ton of horrific genetics that probably leave some classic breeds as evolutionary dead ends, but overall the obsession with civilization, discipline, and paperwork did seem to reduce animal cruelty and dog attacks, and it's only when we decided that there's no such thing as society and chucked all that out in the 80s to replace it with tabloid sensationalism and "lol just get one off gumtree they train themselves" that it goes back up again.

Maybe we should try some of that again without obsessing over dog phrenology to the point a bunch can't breathe properly.

:discourse:

DreddyMatt
Nov 25, 2002
MY LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF CURRENT EVENTS IS EXCEEDED ONLY BY MY UNQUENCHABLE THIRST FOR PISS. FUK U AMERIKKKA!!
If the prospect of interacting with a dog is a problem for you, then maybe just don't go to places where you're likely to encounter them.

Like, if you're gonna have a big freakout because a dog might run over and give your a sniff, then perhaps parks aren't for you

Roller Coast Guard
Aug 27, 2006

With this magnificent aircraft,
and my magnificent facial hair,
the British Empire will never fall!


DreddyMatt posted:

If the prospect of interacting with a dog is a problem for you, then maybe just don't go to places where you're likely to encounter them.

Like, if you're gonna have a big freakout because a dog might run over and give your a sniff, then perhaps parks aren't for you

Also if any dogs get walked on the pavement outside your house you should just never go outside.

Mega Comrade
Apr 22, 2004

Listen buddy, we all got problems!

Lord Ludikrous posted:

Saying people should keep dogs on leads around strangers makes them worthy of being called a oval office? Really?

Well that poster in particular wants dogs leashed at all times which is a bit more extreme than "don't let your dog go up to strangers unless they seem receptive "

Mourning Due posted:

Are you saying that sensory sensitivity isn't real? Or that sudden unexpected loud noise and unwanted physical contact cannot trigger it?

I'm not saying "all neurodiverse people hate dogs", I'm saying that selfish people don't consider the possibility that other people may not love being lunged at by your poorly controlled animal.

Your wording was that dog owners think "gently caress neurodivergent people" which was the issue. If you said people not thinking about these issues is thoughtless (which I think is what you meant) I don't think people would have had the same reaction.

DreddyMatt
Nov 25, 2002
MY LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF CURRENT EVENTS IS EXCEEDED ONLY BY MY UNQUENCHABLE THIRST FOR PISS. FUK U AMERIKKKA!!

Roller Coast Guard posted:

Also if any dogs get walked on the pavement outside your house you should just never go outside.

Goon status: achieved

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
I like doggies

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

Gonzo McFee posted:

I like doggies

Burn the Heretic!

The Question IRL
Jun 8, 2013

Only two contestants left! Here is Doom's chance for revenge...

Mourning Due posted:

Dogchat:

For me it's essentially the exact same as gunchat.


This is an interesting comparison. I think it's a bit apt, with one sticking point.

It makes sense why dog owners would have an attachment to their dogs. Dogs are living creatures, we can bond with them. We see they have personalities and forgive or ignore any flaws/mistakes on their part out of love. That's perfectly human.

But what does it say about gun owners that they have a similar level of attachment to a tool designed to kill people?

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

The only thing that stops a bad guy with a dog is a good guy with a dog.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Also while the stats are debatable there's good positive associations with dog ownership in older people and cardio fitness and mental health, whereas people who hide in their basement bunker stockpiling ammunition don't seem to be big on walking or happy about anything.

Doctor_Fruitbat
Jun 2, 2013


I feel like the current media panic hasn't helped itself by naming the dogs XL Bullies. They sound like the villains of a 90s platformer.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

Lord Ludikrous posted:

From earlier in this thread.





In short I let my dog do whatever the gently caress it wants and gently caress everyone else, and if you disagree I’ll call you a oval office.

Congrats, you are also a oval office. I didn’t say a dog should be able to do whatever the gently caress it wants and jump up on people, did I? I said go over and give them a bit of a sniff. If a massive fear of dogs to the point you can’t tolerate one calmly approaching you was a common thing, then sure. But there are very few people who suffer with that, and I don’t think every dog in the country should no longer be allowed to run about enjoying themselves in a park with other dogs and people who enjoy their company because of that extreme minority.

Like, I know a couple of people who are poo poo scared of cats but I notice none of the ‘leash all dogs at all times’ people have said a thing about the people who let their cats out and about.

For the record I agree with microchipping and licenses and your dog having good recall and such, but no dog or owner or indeed situation is perfect and if it’s genuinely going to gently caress up your day if a dog comes and sniffs you in a park, I’d suggest the parks known for being dog walking spots (oi oi) might not be a great place to hang out, in the same way I don’t spend a great deal of time in central London at night because cops scare the poo poo out of me.

And people can gently caress off making this into an ableist thing - plenty of ND people love dogs and plenty of NT people really don’t. A fear of dogs isn’t a mental illness.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Why is the media so biased again my beloved dog breed, the Alabama Throatripper?

Convex
Aug 19, 2010
It is absolutely clear that taxpayers up and down the country want to stop the wokeness, ban dangerous dogs and get back to naming them the "n" word like we did in the war

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

The Aberdeen Throatnipper?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Doctor_Fruitbat posted:

I feel like the current media panic hasn't helped itself by naming the dogs XL Bullies. They sound like the villains of a 90s platformer.
Have they found out whether the most recent one even was an Excel Bully?

I know the papers used to do that poo poo all the time, "pitbull means dog that bites children, this child got bit therefore dog was a pitbull" and then it turns out to be some random terrier or the dog phrenologist cop just puts down 'unknown breed'.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

Tesseraction posted:

Why is the media so biased again my beloved dog breed, the Alabama Throatripper?

Because it spits chewing tobacco everywhere

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Mourning Due posted:

Are you saying that sensory sensitivity isn't real? Or that sudden unexpected loud noise and unwanted physical contact cannot trigger it?

I'm not saying "all neurodiverse people hate dogs", I'm saying that selfish people don't consider the possibility that other people may not love being lunged at by your poorly controlled animal.
I'm saying don't start throwing concepts like neurodiversity and racism (why the gently caress would you mention people from india / the middle east) at people letting dogs off the leash for fucks sake.

Were you raised in either of those countries? Do you have sensory sensitivity, or are you arguing on behalf of an imaginary person who does? Because I do have sensory sensitivities, so you're going to have to find some people filled with less straw.

Dogs which are safe and do not attack people are a normal part of society. I will absolutely concede that dogs who are not safe should be muzzled and on leash. But does that mean Jakabite's good boy should have to be muzzled and leashed?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say no. If someone is triggered (and I mean that in the legitimate psychological sense of entering fight-or-flight mode because of previous legit trauma) by a dog coming up to them, that person needs help in the same way they'd need help if they were triggered by cars, or shouting, or open spaces.

Those are all normal things most people in society will be able to deal with. It would be bezerk to expect all owners of dogs to muzzle and leash their pets in case someone has ptsd from an attack, in the same way society would break down if we had to remove all cars from the roads because some people have been in crashes (arguably way, way more than have been attacked by dogs).

This whole conversation is deranged, there's some powerful conflation of basic concepts being thrown around. My dog going up to someone and giving them a sniff is not the same as a cane corso leaping at you snarling.

If someone has been attacked by a dog and has trauma, then I am genuinely sorry about that, and if anyone cannot tell if a dog coming toward them is friendly or not, I also feel sorry for them. But you cannot seriously be expecting every dog, even ones with no history of violence to be restricted just in case they happen to come across a tiny minority who wrongly thinks they might be dangerous?

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Guavanaut posted:

Have they found out whether the most recent one even was an Excel Bully?

Well I've never seen a powerpoint bully.

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
I support leashing dog owners to their dogs, particularly around strangers. Some people shouldn't be allowed outside at all unless they're leashed to a cute dog

Lord Ludikrous
Jun 7, 2008

Enjoy your tea...

Jakabite posted:

Congrats, you are also a oval office. I didn’t say a dog should be able to do whatever the gently caress it wants and jump up on people, did I? I said go over and give them a bit of a sniff. If a massive fear of dogs to the point you can’t tolerate one calmly approaching you was a common thing, then sure. But there are very few people who suffer with that, and I don’t think every dog in the country should no longer be allowed to run about enjoying themselves in a park with other dogs and people who enjoy their company because of that extreme minority.

Like, I know a couple of people who are poo poo scared of cats but I notice none of the ‘leash all dogs at all times’ people have said a thing about the people who let their cats out and about.

For the record I agree with microchipping and licenses and your dog having good recall and such, but no dog or owner or indeed situation is perfect and if it’s genuinely going to gently caress up your day if a dog comes and sniffs you in a park, I’d suggest the parks known for being dog walking spots (oi oi) might not be a great place to hang out, in the same way I don’t spend a great deal of time in central London at night because cops scare the poo poo out of me.

And people can gently caress off making this into an ableist thing - plenty of ND people love dogs and plenty of NT people really don’t. A fear of dogs isn’t a mental illness.

A bit touchy aren’t you? Just admit it, as long as your pet is happy you don’t give a poo poo about anyone else.

The point is I as a stranger don’t know if your pet is calmly approaching me to investigate or if it’s going to try and jump on me or take a bite out of me or whatever. So maybe for the safety of others and your own dog unless you’re in an actual dog park or something just keep it leashed?

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

Tijuana Bibliophile posted:

I support leashing dog owners to their dogs, particularly around strangers. Some people shouldn't be allowed outside at all unless they're leashed to a cute dog

I agree for my own sake though Lexi would likely not thank me for this as she very much enjoys laying down and doing nothing after and sometimes during her walks.

E: ^^^ Bobby put it far better than I ever could and I’d like to see you respond to their post. Also your username is extremely appropriate.

Jakabite fucked around with this message at 10:38 on Sep 12, 2023

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


Lord Ludikrous posted:

A bit touchy aren’t you? Just admit it, as long as your pet is happy you don’t give a poo poo about anyone else.

The point is I as a stranger don’t know if your pet is calmly approaching me to investigate or if it’s going to try and jump on me or take a bite out of me or whatever. So maybe for the safety of others and your own dog unless you’re in an actual dog park or something just keep it leashed?

Why do you matter more than a dog?

That's the fundamental question here. There's a tension between comfort for humans, and comfort for animals, which in many ways occupy a child-like place in social perception, and such have many humans defending them. Whose comfort is more important in outdoor spaces, yours or the dogs?

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Tesseraction posted:

Well I've never seen a powerpoint bully.

well at my family gatherings we don't have a pedantic tedious rear end in a top hat

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Tesseraction posted:

Well I've never seen a powerpoint bully.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply