Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

OwlFancier posted:

The police in the US are already armed to the teeth and people commit mass shootings all the time. Police, however heavily armed, are not an effective deterrant against mass violence.

I’m not sure the situation with mass violence is comparable between the US and here. I totally agree that in the vast majority of situations the police are wrong to be shooting people and deserve to be prosecuted as well as held to a higher standard, I just don’t think they should never, ever under any circumstances do it. Terrorism is still a thing that happens in the UK, and if I or a family member were hurt or killed in such an incident and armed police had stood by rather than stopping me being suddenly full of machete shaped holes, I’d be quite mad about it to say the least. I reckon you would too tbh man.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I would be rather more annoyed at all the people producing the general state of the world which leads people to go on murder sprees. I don't, honestly, expect to be protected by cops at this point. It isn't what they're for. My life is more likely to be made worse by a cop than saved by it.

Besides I think a trickle of fired cops is an acceptable price to pay if stops them killing a few people.

DesperateDan
Dec 10, 2005

Where's my cow?

Is that my cow?

No it isn't, but it still tramples my bloody lavender.
cops killed someone they shouldn't have, once again, under even murkier circumstances than duggan or de menezes, to the point the scuffers couldn't cover it up or control the narrative and a cop might even face very limited consequences for their actions of straight up shooting someone to death

this runs at slight odds with all the other people they shot under incredibly murky circumstances and blatantly got away with it by doing things like having the "independent" police complaints commission run a vicious and racially coded hit piece before the victim was even on the morgue slab

as a result a few other cops made noises about not being a pork banger anymore and they should be allowed to kill easier because it made them sad otherwise and the press rolled with it because no-one was arming bully xl dogs with zombie knives coated in mephedrone that day and suella deville wanted to play at politics


is that about the long and the short of it?

or just pie in the sky thinking?

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

DesperateDan posted:

cops killed someone they shouldn't have, once again, under even murkier circumstances than duggan or de menezes, to the point the scuffers couldn't cover it up or control the narrative and a cop might even face very limited consequences for their actions of straight up shooting someone to death

this runs at slight odds with all the other people they shot under incredibly murky circumstances and blatantly got away with it by doing things like having the "independent" police complaints commission run a vicious and racially coded hit piece before the victim was even on the morgue slab

as a result a few other cops made noises about not being a pork banger anymore and they should be allowed to kill easier because it made them sad otherwise and the press rolled with it because no-one was arming bully xl dogs with zombie knives coated in mephedrone that day and suella deville wanted to play at politics


is that about the long and the short of it?

or just pie in the sky thinking?

That’s pretty much the long, short and tall of it, yep.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
If I was approached by armed members of one of the most notorious gangs in the country, it's members with a long and public history of deadly violence and rape, I would hope to be able to use my general right as a member of the public to use deadly force in my own self defence.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010
BREAKING: Notorious Gang Member Crushed by Amateur JCB Enthusiast

Gort
Aug 18, 2003

Good day what ho cup of tea
I'm happy with armed police being arrested and charged with murder if they murder someone. They're trained not to do that.

And if the other armed police can't handle that condition, we can hire new armed police.

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

DreddyMatt
Nov 25, 2002
MY LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF CURRENT EVENTS IS EXCEEDED ONLY BY MY UNQUENCHABLE THIRST FOR PISS. FUK U AMERIKKKA!!
If I were being stabbed to death, I would simply tut at the state of the world that led to this situation

Clyde Radcliffe
Oct 19, 2014

Jakabite posted:

Eh, if I was one of the people being chased about by the knife wielding mass murderer with the explosive vest I’d be quite annoyed if they didn’t shoot that person as soon as possible. In general police shouldn’t have guns (well; they shouldn’t exist, but here we are), but I think it’s a bit hyperbolic to say there are zero situations where armed police should be able to shoot someone. If this was the case it wouldn’t be too hard to get hold of a firearm and just start blasting; and there wouldn’t be a ton to be done about you until you ran out of ammo. Obviously I think police in general are bloodthirsty bastards but I think it’s a bit of a case of political theory taking precedence over practical reality to say that never, ever shoot anyone no matter what is sensible.

You'd probably be grateful if they didn't shoot straight away as anyone with a real suicide vest would likely have it wired to a dead man's switch. Sometimes there's even a second person with a remote detonator in case the poor kid strapped to the bomb chickens out.

The standard procedure is to clear everyone the gently caress away from the suspect as quickly as possible and determine if it's a viable device. I'd imagine de-escalation is sometimes possible, once the suspect realises they're done for and nobody but them is going to get exploded. Shooting the suspect in a crowd of people and crossing fingers in the hope his vest malfunctions isn't the way to go.

grobbo
May 29, 2014
The whole argument is bizarre, because we've gone down a pointless rabbit hole of 'well, what would you have done differently? / shouldn't lethal force be justified in situation X or Y?', but the actual context is the trustworthiness and accountability of the Metropolitan Police in the year 2023 - in the wake of the Casey report, Daniel Morgan, Wayne Couzens, Deniz Jaffer, what happened to Shabnam Chaudhri, etc, etc.

Rugz can joke that maybe the officer should have sat down for a cup of tea with Chris Kaba instead of shooting him, but they did that with Smiley Culture and somehow he still wound up with a knife in his chest.

Just 29% of Londoners said they trusted the Met, back in April. 60% said they didn't expect to see effective reform any time soon.

You can try and make the case that armed officers need to be given the right protections to do their job, or that hard decisions need to be made in the heat of the moment, including lawful killing - but you're not arguing an abstract principle here.

You're playing defence for a specific institution which unequivocally does not have the public's trust to make the right decisions in the heat of the moment (especially when it comes to the deaths of black men), and whose members have a long and evidenced history of abusing their protections, covering up wrongdoing, and closing ranks out of tribal loyalty rather than, say, a desire to clear up contradictory CPS guidance.

I don't have an expert opinion on what the man who shot Chris Kaba should have done. I do know you'd have to be daft to trust him, his employer, or his workmates, in how they handle it.

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
it's like watching mime, hearing GB people get all flappy about polis with guns - i understand it, but i just can't relate to it in any meaningful way

growing up here, police and army carrying big guns were just everywhere in public and i'm clearly utterly desensitised to it

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Yeah it started out as "he shouldn't even be prosecuted and doing so is a waste of court time" and progressed to "the cops need to be allowed to get on with their jobs" so I very much doubt there's anything to it beyond being a cheerleader for the boot.

Gort
Aug 18, 2003

Good day what ho cup of tea

crispix posted:

it's like watching mime, hearing GB people get all flappy about polis with guns - i understand it, but i just can't relate to it in any meaningful way

growing up here, police and army carrying big guns were just everywhere in public and i'm clearly utterly desensitised to it

hosed up if true

Rugz
Apr 15, 2014

PLS SEE AVATAR. P.S. IM A BELL END LOL

grobbo posted:

You're playing defence for a specific institution which unequivocally does not have the public's trust to make the right decisions in the heat of the moment (especially when it comes to the deaths of black men), and whose members have a long and evidenced history of abusing their protections, covering up wrongdoing, and closing ranks out of tribal loyalty rather than, say, a desire to clear up contradictory CPS guidance.

I'm going to need you to substantiate that 'especially when it comes to the deaths of black men' with some evidenced history given the incredibly low rate of any direct police related death at all let alone a black man. This whole thing reads like a bingo card of 'Why American cops are bad'

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
If you're not aware that British police also kill black and minority ethnic people at a severely disproportionate rate, and that this has been the subject of considerable scholarship and reportage over the years, then honestly, that's a you problem. This is hardly niche knowledge when talking about police violence.

kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008

Rugz posted:

I'm going to need you to substantiate that 'especially when it comes to the deaths of black men' with some evidenced history given the incredibly low rate of any direct police related death at all let alone a black man. This whole thing reads like a bingo card of 'Why American cops are bad'

code:
Total BAME deaths in police custody or otherwise following contact with the police, England & Wales 1990-date
Type								Metropolitan Police				Other Forces				Total
Custody								93						90					183
Shooting							16						6					22
All custody and shooting deaths					108						96					205
This is from the link Darth Walrus posted

kingturnip fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Sep 25, 2023

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


DesperateDan posted:

cops killed someone they shouldn't have, once again, under even murkier circumstances than duggan or de menezes, to the point the scuffers couldn't cover it up or control the narrative and a cop might even face very limited consequences for their actions of straight up shooting someone to death

this runs at slight odds with all the other people they shot under incredibly murky circumstances and blatantly got away with it by doing things like having the "independent" police complaints commission run a vicious and racially coded hit piece before the victim was even on the morgue slab

as a result a few other cops made noises about not being a pork banger anymore and they should be allowed to kill easier because it made them sad otherwise and the press rolled with it because no-one was arming bully xl dogs with zombie knives coated in mephedrone that day and suella deville wanted to play at politics


is that about the long and the short of it?

or just pie in the sky thinking?

Cops kill someone, family makes a fuss and starts protests. In response, the Met invites them into watch the bodycam footage, after which they step back from their campaign. Later, the CPS charge the officer with murder. So the video contains one of two things .

A. Evidence that Chris Kaba was being aggressive enough towards the police (driving straight at an armed police officer etc) that even his family watched it and couldn't defend his actions, and agreed the officer acted in self-defence.

B. Evidence that Chris Kaba was murdered by the police, and the video showing this came with assurances from senior officers of "We're gonna charge him for murder but legal stuff takes time, please stop your protests and making this a bigger issue than it has to be"

If it's A, then the officer shouldn't have been charged by the CPS, because dragging a man to court with clear evidence of his defence available is wasting his time, the courts time, and the juries time, pushing other crimes further in the backlog.

If it's B, then the officer obviously should be charged for murder.

We won't know which it is until the trial starts, which isn't till next year, so it can be another simmering culture war issue until then.

Nothingtoseehere fucked around with this message at 19:55 on Sep 25, 2023

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler
I think it's relevant to post some extracts from Baroness Casey's recent report on the Met, specifically about the Met's firearms unit:

Baroness Casey Review posted:


Resourcing and restructuring challenges in frontline Met policing and Public
Protection stand in stark contrast to what we saw in examining two of the Met’s
specialist units: the Specialist Firearms (MO19) and Parliamentary and Diplomatic
Protection (PaDP) Commands. Well resourced, with elitist attitudes and toxic
cultures of bullying, racism, sexism and ableism, normal rules do not seem to
apply or be applied in MO19.
Junior ranking officers and trainers hold
disproportionate power in their relationships with senior officers because of the
importance of their ‘blue card’ firearms status to Met operations.

...

Undoubtedly, we are indebted to those police officers who train and work in one of
the most challenging areas of policing. Carrying a firearm that can be discharged on
home soil and directed at a fellow citizen is extraordinary, and pressured in its own
way, with enormous responsibilities to the public at large. We are fully aware of that,
and thank and admire those that step up to that responsibility.
This is why we were so concerned with what we encountered.

...

Working in MO19 is seen as a prestigious and ‘elite’ part of the Met. In a survey of
people who had left MO19, ‘prestige of the role’ was the most common reason
officers reported as a reason for joining MO19. 80 to 90% of respondents rated
prestige as an important reason for joining the Command.
This has led to a widely held view in the Command and in the rest of the Met that
firearms officers ‘need to be allowed’ to bend or break the rules because they are
volunteers who could at any point decide not to carry a firearm or ‘hand in their blue
card’.

We were told of one senior Met officer telling others in their chain of command that it
was alright to “colour outside the lines” – to bend and break rules – because firearms
officers are harder to replace than other officers and need to be cherished.

You can read the whole thing here:

https://www.met.police.uk/SysSiteAs...march-2023a.pdf

Being sceptical about the Met shooting people has to be seen in this context.

grobbo
May 29, 2014

Rugz posted:

I'm going to need you to substantiate that 'especially when it comes to the deaths of black men' with some evidenced history given the incredibly low rate of any direct police related death at all let alone a black man. This whole thing reads like a bingo card of 'Why American cops are bad'

Well, the lack of public trust can't really be disputed so I don't know why you'd need me to substantiate it: from the same BBC survey in April, three-quarters of Londoners agree that the Met discriminates.

The cause of that distrust can be linked back to a long history of cases where black men died under strange circumstances or in situations involving UK police force or restraint - Colin Roach and Nicholas Bramble are famous ones that had a huge cultural impact back in the 80s. More recently you've got Rashan Charles and Sean Rigg as a couple of examples, and I already mentioned Smiley Culture.

If you want stats, the Angiolini report in 2017 has some good ones; over the course of a decade, 16% of prisoners who died in custody after the use of police force were black (they made up 9% of all arrests).

I understand the numbers are much smaller - thankfully - than the US, but you are wrong to suggest people are parroting an imported narrative about a problem that doesn't apply to this country.

Clyde Radcliffe
Oct 19, 2014

crispix posted:

it's like watching mime, hearing GB people get all flappy about polis with guns - i understand it, but i just can't relate to it in any meaningful way

growing up here, police and army carrying big guns were just everywhere in public and i'm clearly utterly desensitised to it

It never phased me seeing police here walk around with guns because it's always been that way for all of my life.

Having armed police in London pointing guns at me while screaming to get down on the ground was a different experience.

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014




OwlFancier posted:

I would be rather more annoyed at all the people producing the general state of the world which leads people to go on murder sprees. I don't, honestly, expect to be protected by cops at this point. It isn't what they're for. My life is more likely to be made worse by a cop than saved by it.

Besides I think a trickle of fired cops is an acceptable price to pay if stops them killing a few people.

Actually lowering crime is unfortunately, far left radicalism or something, outside the Overton window.

Remove all welfare and you'll get a massive crime wave overnight, it doesn't matter how much you appeal to "morality" *insert a very Karl Marx like laugh here*

Or that abortion ban in some of the US states, that is going to increase crime, we saw this a few decades ago when allowing abortion lowered crime, though it is hard to know how much was abortion and how much was the realisation that Lead was making humanity more stupid and aggressive. Though we have microplastics now that are already in every new born baby to the point that scientists couldn't find a control to compare against.

Individualism is a brain disease that is incapable of seeing the bigger picture. It renders people unable to see society as a supersystem where everything interacts with everything else.

Brendan Rodgers fucked around with this message at 20:14 on Sep 25, 2023

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

https://twitter.com/PhilipProudfoot/status/1706193386292543864

Pro click :allears:

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I dunno, I'm just pretty intensely aware that I can only live by the consent of everyone around me all of the time. Every second of the day I am reliant on other people to voluntarily conduct themselves in a manner that is conducive to my continued wellbeing, and if people don't want to do that then there's really just... not much you can do to stop them? Not before they hurt someone.

So I don't spend much time thinking about "how do we react to people behaving antisocially" and instead think about "how do I stop people wanting to do that in the first place" because that and statistical probability are really the only things I can count on.

DesperateDan
Dec 10, 2005

Where's my cow?

Is that my cow?

No it isn't, but it still tramples my bloody lavender.

Nothingtoseehere posted:

Cops kill someone, family makes a fuss and starts protests. In response, the Met invites them into watch the bodycam footage, after which they step back from their campaign. Later, the CPS charge the officer with murder. So the video contains one of two things .

A. Evidence that Chris Kaba was being aggressive enough towards the police (driving straight at an armed police officer etc) that even his family watched it and couldn't defend his actions, and agreed the officer acted in self-defence.

B. Evidence that Chris Kaba was murdered by the police, and the video showing this came with assurances from senior officers of "We're gonna charge him for murder but legal stuff takes time, please stop your protests and making this a bigger issue than it has to be"

If it's A, then the officer shouldn't have been charged by the CPS, because dragging a man to court with clear evidence of his defence available is wasting his time, the courts time, and the juries time, pushing other crimes further in the backlog.

If it's B, then the officer obviously should be charged for murder.

We won't know which it is until the trial starts, which isn't till next year, so it can be another simmering culture war issue until then.

you kinda exclude other options, like option C where the cops lay a bunch of pressure on the family to shut up lest they want to become the next lawrence family

or maybe someone would axe them a question in a pub car park one night

good job the police and cps have such an excellent record with being truthful, honest officers of the peace, eh?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Brendan Rodgers posted:

Or that abortion ban in some of the US states, that is going to increase crime
It's definitely going to increase the crime of "performing an abortion" because criminalization is worthless at reducing the number of actual abortions compared to, say, Colorado's free IUD program that the GOP cut.
But it was never about that in the first place really.

Brendan Rodgers posted:

Individualism is a brain disease that is incapable of seeing the bigger picture. It renders people unable to see society as a supersystem where everything interacts with everything else.
We've already had "police shootings are statistically tiny, plus we need armed police because of the [statistically far tinier] chances of a mad-knifeman terror attack." And I bet you could save more quality adjusted life years by using a large chunk of the money to give free non-slip bathmats to low income households. Or allow armed police to use circus cannon to fire XL Bullys at groups of anti-ULEZ protestors. Less chance of them shooting their own radios or grievously injuring a guy having lunch the other side of the river too.

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014




Guavanaut posted:

Less chance of them shooting their own radios or grievously injuring a guy having lunch the other side of the river too.

What's the story behind that?

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I vaguely recall one of the knife attacks in london had them shooting a guy in a pub somehow, although I don't think it was fatal.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Brendan Rodgers posted:

What's the story behind that?
Shot own radio was Mark Duggan shooting, not especially close 'bystander' seriously injured by stray bullet was the bridge attack.

e: ^^ Yeah, he survived, but required a metal plate for a while, and apparently still gets serious tinnitus and flashes in vision. Stray bullets in urban environments are often underestimated as to how much damage they can cause.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

I've changed my mind and I believe that every policeman must be armed with a sword and provided a horse and they have free reign to kill anyone they wish as long as they use the sword while riding the horse.

As long as they're on duty and under the limit.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

OwlFancier posted:

I vaguely recall one of the knife attacks in london had them shooting a guy in a pub somehow, although I don't think it was fatal.

The rest of my SWAT team jump out of the van and head towards London Bridge where the suspect is reported active, I swerve left and burst into The George and Dragon, unloading my MP5 into that oval office Aaron. Steal my pint now you poo poo

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
Disease-carrying mosquitoes to plague London by mid-century, experts warn
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/mosquitoes-yellow-fever-dengue-zika-london-climate-change/
Yellow fever mosquitoes could call the capital home for up to four months a year by 2060

quote:

It will not be the first time insects have caused disease and death in London. Malaria was common along the River Thames until the middle of the Victorian era, especially in marshland areas to the south east of the capital. It was likely spread by the native Anopheles atroparvus, and was stamped out as drainage and housing conditions improved.

But climate change is bringing the threat of mosquito-spread pathogens back

Holiday hotspots in southern Europe could be even worse hit than the UK, with the Aedes aegypti mosquitoes potentially able to survive year round in southern Spain, Italy and Croatia by the end of the century.

Yellow fever mosquitoes have already been found in Cyprus and their cousin, the tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (which survives cooler temperatures) is now well established in 13 European countries, including France, Switzerland, Greece and Spain.

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014




Guavanaut posted:

Stray bullets in urban environments are often underestimated as to how much damage they can cause.

All these guys would become deaf at least:

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Microplastics posted:

Disease-carrying mosquitoes to plague London by mid-century, experts warn
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/mosquitoes-yellow-fever-dengue-zika-london-climate-change/
Yellow fever mosquitoes could call the capital home for up to four months a year by 2060
lmao at the Telegraph implying that the biggest downside of the half of Europe turning back into a malarious swamp is that 'Holiday hotspots in southern Europe' might be affected.

gently caress the people who live there, I won't be able to shout at waiters in English without taking prophylactic medicine that advises against drinking a dozen Peronis :bahgawd:

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014




The ecosystem is collapsing and this is very concerning for the tourism industry.

Brendan Rodgers fucked around with this message at 21:32 on Sep 25, 2023

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
British newspapers, May 1940
Express: England Still Triumphant
Mail: France Provokes Germany
Telegraph: Could Your Holiday In France Be Affected?

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

I see Russell tweeted to his 11.3m followers on twitter that he's streaming on Rumble about how he's been silenced, at the same time the Met announce that more potential victims have come forward

https://twitter.com/coldwarsteve/status/1706407810957803857

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

A bunch of advertisers have vocally pulled out of advertising on Rumble due to his presence as well. Which is interesting because Rumble has been a hotbed of terrible shitheads for a while but I guess Brand was a little too hot to handle.

Scientastic
Mar 1, 2010

TRULY scientastic.
🔬🍒


Microplastics posted:

Disease-carrying mosquitoes to plague London by mid-century, experts warn
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/mosquitoes-yellow-fever-dengue-zika-london-climate-change/
Yellow fever mosquitoes could call the capital home for up to four months a year by 2060

It’s not every day you find out how you’re going to die, but as the most bitten person in my family, it seems it’s my fate to save my wife and children from zika and yellow fever

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Perhaps rather a lot of attention and also despite his protests it's not "because he's political" but rather "because he's a horrific sex criminal"

Although the latter is apparently political now.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply