Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Why were the Jesuits owning land on such a mythologically significant spot anyway?

Someone get Dan Brown on this.

e: A 103 is a Japanese Pacer

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Guavanaut posted:

Someone get Dan Brown on this.

Somewhere, an :umberto: sheds a single tear :smith:

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
He's not ready to come back among us yet, he's hiding in the hollow earth.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001


I stole that and shitposted it on twitter. Someone replied with Sycamore Gaptain Tom. lol

e: I'm loving the fractures going on within the right. Certain people and stations are now woke traitors, and people like Darren Grimes are being shat upon for not speaking out etc. etc.

It's loving beautiful to watch :allears:

fuctifino fucked around with this message at 23:25 on Sep 29, 2023

zhar
May 3, 2019

Jakabite posted:

I’d say people extremely rarely do want a serious thought from you. Not unless you can phrase it snappily and in a way that gives them ample room to respond without feeling like they’re being preached at, talked down to, attacked or debated. It’s a loving tricky thing to do which is why i think most people would be well advised to take the more subtle approach.

I used to be one to bring up the concepts and ideas as the material of the conversation, but as time goes on I’ve found that being a good man is far more something you do than something you talk about. It’s a set of behaviours to model and have others aspire to, and to gently guide them in the direction of. People very rarely stay engaged once you’re just saying ‘this is feminism this is why it’s good for you’. And whatever else has been said tonight, we are losing the battle currently. If you’re defending the general left’s (as nebulous a concept as that is) approach to this then you’re fundamentally defending a losing strategy and should re-evaluate. The world we want to live in isn’t the world we live in and although we’d all like to be honest and forthright at all times that isn’t how human society has ever worked and I doubt it ever will be.

E: also Rugz, you don’t have the best arguing style and your idea of a minister for men comes off as a it mad to people in this thread but personally I apologise for being a bit of a dick about agreeing with you on this. Hope you stick around!

I just want to shout you out as I read the last few pages and you have the best posts on this imo. I haven't watched any of Tate but it's my impression he sells a lifestyle and is quite good at marketing it and while it may not be fair or broadly true what springs to mind if I think of someone who self-identifies as a "male feminist" is someone who has neon dyed hair and talks a lot about feminism which as a lifestyle seems comparably a lot less sexy. Ultimately it's most important to have role models demonstrating a different worldview that leads to deeper albeit less flashy happiness that can be emulated.

I was watching this tv show called jury duty which stars some random guy who doesn't realise it's a scripted show as part of a jury while everyone else is an actor (I feel like Derren Brown has had similar premises in the past). He didn't strike me as particularly intellectual and I doubt he'd call himself feminist but I feel like even just watching him on this show reacting as a real stand up dude to whatever the producers throw at him and the "problems" of his fellow jurors would be far more powerful in reframing someones ideas of masculinity positively than four hours of lectures of feminism for the vast majority of people and a lot more pleasant to boot.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

zhar posted:

I just want to shout you out as I read the last few pages

Welcome to the thread and please feel free to post more!

Jakabite is currently on bullshit probation so I'm here to reply on their behalf without permission. But also I want to encourage lurkers and others to post in here without fear.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I would prefer if we could get some that aren't here to explain how we need to deal with travellers, cops shouldn't be prosecuted for killing people, or how we need to compromise with andrew tate fans. I could personally live without that.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

OwlFancier posted:

I would prefer if we could get some that aren't here to explain how we need to deal with travellers, cops shouldn't be prosecuted for killing people, or how we need to compromise with andrew tate fans. I could personally live without that.

That's why I picked my quoted poster. Don't make the one who isn't a piece of poo poo doubt themselves!

Rugz
Apr 15, 2014

PLS SEE AVATAR. P.S. IM A BELL END LOL
You don't need to compromise with them. Just keep telling them your feminism is the actual answer to their worries I'm sure they will pay attention next time.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

TBH Rugz I've not really engaged with your posts due to being busy this week but it seems a little rich that your retort is that other people haven't engaged with your position given you've been a main character in this generally light-hearted thread on two topics of rather deep political meaning.

Rugz
Apr 15, 2014

PLS SEE AVATAR. P.S. IM A BELL END LOL

Tesseraction posted:

TBH Rugz I've not really engaged with your posts due to being busy this week but it seems a little rich that your retort is that other people haven't engaged with your position given you've been a main character in this generally light-hearted thread on two topics of rather deep political meaning.

That's not what my retort is at all but OK. Sorry that debate & discussion of deep political topics makes people with very specific ideas about what should and should not be complain that 'other' positions get posted I guess.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

It's pretty impressive that you reply with "that's not what I said" and then rather than clarify you go on some weird diatribe. Are you posting for the sake of an external audience?

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
just dont "debate" with owlfancier. they're immune to it.

They already know the way they want things to work and thats that.

Rugz
Apr 15, 2014

PLS SEE AVATAR. P.S. IM A BELL END LOL

Tesseraction posted:

weird diatribe


Rugz posted:

Sorry that debate & discussion of deep political topics makes people with very specific ideas about what should and should not be complain that 'other' positions get posted I guess.


OwlFancier posted:

I would prefer if we could get some that aren't here to explain how we need to deal with travellers, cops shouldn't be prosecuted for killing people, or how we need to compromise with andrew tate fans. I could personally live without that.

Not that weird.


Tesseraction posted:

Are you posting for the sake of an external audience?

Odd question. If I was posting for an internal audience I would just monologue in my head, surely?

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

NotJustANumber99 posted:

just dont "debate" with owlfancier. they're immune to it.

They already know the way they want things to work and thats that.

Are you genuinely suggesting that OwlFancier agues in bad faith when directly addressing a poster's points?

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I think the assertion is that I am incapable of having my mind changed. Which I don't think is necessarily true but it is correct that I very rarely find arguments persuasive on a lot of subjects, so it's broadly accurate.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Rugz posted:

Not that weird.

Odd question. If I was posting for an internal audience I would just monologue in my head, surely?

Addressing line 1: true, I give Owl more lenience in his diatribe because he's a known entity, likewise NJAN99 even though I tend to disagree with him.

For line 2: legit question - is English your native language?

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

Tesseraction posted:

Are you genuinely suggesting that OwlFancier agues in bad faith when directly addressing a poster's points?

i didnt think so but if I google what arguing in bad faith means then maybe.

but then that would be all of us.

radmonger
Jun 6, 2011
If i can make a modest proposal, how about replacing the word ‘feminism’, in particular as it applies to men. with ‘woke’?

It’s a nice short, gender neutral, non-academic word. It currently lacks any kind of definition, so it is a blank space to define as required. In contrast, the word ‘feminism’ is the opposite of all those,, having more conflicting meanings than any political term other than perhaps liberalism.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

The culprit has been identified:
https://twitter.com/OfSymbols/status/1707846556756345163

After the alpaca murders, he needed a bigger fix

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
He had to do it just in case somebody hugged it.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

zhar posted:

I just want to shout you out as I read the last few pages and you have the best posts on this imo. I haven't watched any of Tate but it's my impression he sells a lifestyle and is quite good at marketing it and while it may not be fair or broadly true what springs to mind if I think of someone who self-identifies as a "male feminist" is someone who has neon dyed hair and talks a lot about feminism which as a lifestyle seems comparably a lot less sexy. Ultimately it's most important to have role models demonstrating a different worldview that leads to deeper albeit less flashy happiness that can be emulated.

I was watching this tv show called jury duty which stars some random guy who doesn't realise it's a scripted show as part of a jury while everyone else is an actor (I feel like Derren Brown has had similar premises in the past). He didn't strike me as particularly intellectual and I doubt he'd call himself feminist but I feel like even just watching him on this show reacting as a real stand up dude to whatever the producers throw at him and the "problems" of his fellow jurors would be far more powerful in reframing someones ideas of masculinity positively than four hours of lectures of feminism for the vast majority of people and a lot more pleasant to boot.

Thank you! Finally some recognition for my hand-crafted, non-GMO, artisan posts!!!

I know what you mean about Jury Duty, great example. Such a wonderful show. You’ll be pleased to know Ronald is now doing all sorts of fun things and meeting famous people and generally going round being a hell of a good chap, and I believe is currently working with an animal sanctuary to help their publicity. He’s definitely a good example of what I meant - you don’t necessarily have to identify as a feminist to act like one.

Thanks also Tess for replying on my behalf, no idea what that probe was about, there’s something stranger than usual happening in the Elon threads but it’s all a bit over my head.

Rugz I’d suggest you continue posting but maybe if you’re finding yourself vehemently arguing against most others, take a step back from whatever post you’re currently writing and do something else for a bit. It’s really easy to get too into debates in this thread in particular and end up writing daft things and because it’s a pretty close knit community that usually ends more poorly than elsewhere. I usually put the phone down and do something else for a bit (or, if I’m lazy read another thread lol) if I find that happening. Sorry if this seems patronising but I only learnt to do it like a year ago and I’ve been posting here for 10+ lol.

Mega Comrade
Apr 22, 2004

Listen buddy, we all got problems!

Tesseraction posted:

Are you genuinely suggesting that OwlFancier agues in bad faith when directly addressing a poster's points?

Owlfancier is a good egg but even he would admit his brain works a bit different from most people. He's very articulate but a little naive to how other people understand the world.

Like his idea to just teach feminism. There is a clip which I will post if I can find it of a journalist asking some women if the believe in equality for women, they all say yes. They are then asked if they are feminists, they all say no.

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.

Mega Comrade posted:

Like his idea to just teach feminism. There is a clip which I will post if I can find it of a journalist asking some women if the believe in equality for women, they all say yes. They are then asked if they are feminists, they all say no.

Sounds familiar

"should utilities be publicly owned?" "yes that sounds delightful :)"

"should they be nationalised?" "no that's communism :mad:"

serious gaylord
Sep 16, 2007

what.

Mega Comrade posted:

Owlfancier is a good egg but even he would admit his brain works a bit different from most people. He's very articulate but a little naive to how other people understand the world.

Like his idea to just teach feminism. There is a clip which I will post if I can find it of a journalist asking some women if the believe in equality for women, they all say yes. They are then asked if they are feminists, they all say no.

That's a fairly classic thing though isn't it? People don't understand the actual beliefs of eg feminism, but broadly support is principles so they are feminists without actually understanding what feminists are.

Skulker
Jan 27, 2021

Duuuuuude!
My mum is unionising her workplace because she's sick of "management that does gently caress all but bully the people who actually work", volunteers in a homeless hostel and every week gives £100 of food to a food bank and yet will argue to her last breath that she's a true blue Tory.

People are strange.

notaspy
Mar 22, 2009

Skulker posted:

My mum is unionising her workplace because she's sick of "management that does gently caress all but bully the people who actually work", volunteers in a homeless hostel and every week gives £100 of food to a food bank and yet will argue to her last breath that she's a true blue Tory.

People are strange.

Conservative and UNIONIST party

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Skulker posted:

My mum is unionising her workplace because she's sick of "management that does gently caress all but bully the people who actually work", volunteers in a homeless hostel and every week gives £100 of food to a food bank and yet will argue to her last breath that she's a true blue Tory.

People are strange.

So you're saying she's against Tory policies on the economy but presumably supports them for their social stances like sinking boats trying to cross the channel and stopping whatever woke means this week?

Aramoro
Jun 1, 2012




Skulker posted:

My mum is unionising her workplace because she's sick of "management that does gently caress all but bully the people who actually work", volunteers in a homeless hostel and every week gives £100 of food to a food bank and yet will argue to her last breath that she's a true blue Tory.

People are strange.

People are strange. My dad was a shop steward for the union working on the rigs and refineries, my mum worked for the NHS her entire career on principle. But at some stage in the late 80s my Dad voted Tory. Now my sister and myself turned that ship around and despite his complaints about immigrants he stopped doing that. But being a Tory worms its way into people's brain.

Where I work just now I manage a bunch of people who are young, earn a bunch of money and would not describe themselves as Tories. But a few of them are holidaying in Dubai, complaining about taxes, buying property to become landlords. They're going to be true blues by the time they're 40. The thing is they don't really care about politics, don't read the news and are unengaged with the world generally.

Skulker
Jan 27, 2021

Duuuuuude!

forkboy84 posted:

So you're saying she's against Tory policies on the economy but presumably supports them for their social stances like sinking boats trying to cross the channel and stopping whatever woke means this week?

That's not what I'm saying at all. What a strange and offensive thing to say.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

forkboy84 posted:

So you're saying she's against Tory policies on the economy but presumably supports them for their social stances like sinking boats trying to cross the channel and stopping whatever woke means this week?

This is weirdly hostile and also a very beep boop robot way of looking at people.

My mum voted Tory for years partly because she mixed up what Keynesian and Friedmanite economics were. As in supported Keynesian (actual) but thought that was what Thatcher was basically doing. I informed it was the other way round and she was quite embarrassed. She’s an extremely intelligent woman but in general has had far too much to worry about in her real life to look too deeply into these things.

Jakabite fucked around with this message at 09:13 on Sep 30, 2023

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Skulker posted:

That's not what I'm saying at all. What a strange and offensive thing to say.

Well why would you support a party you disagree with on economic and social issues? It's hardly offensive, well, I guess my hyperbolic summary of the Tory positions could be but it's hardly like I'm going to care about being rude about Tories and making them sound a modicum worse than they are.

But I will try to resist comic exaggerations if it's so offensive now.

Granted, I have absolutely no comprehension of how people who aren't politically engaged think.

forkboy84 fucked around with this message at 09:20 on Sep 30, 2023

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

forkboy84 posted:

Well why would you support a party you disagree with on economic and social issues? It's hardly offensive, well, I guess my hyperbolic summary of the Tory positions could be but it's hardly like I'm going to care about being rude about Tories and making them sound a modicum worse than they are

Woah it’s almost like people aren’t rational actors

Mega Comrade
Apr 22, 2004

Listen buddy, we all got problems!

serious gaylord posted:

That's a fairly classic thing though isn't it? People don't understand the actual beliefs of eg feminism, but broadly support is principles so they are feminists without actually understanding what feminists are.

Yes.
Feminism has a branding problem (as does socialism)
Tate was offering no new ideas, just sexism and bootstraps but he branded them in such a way it got kids to believe it and give him money.

forkboy84 posted:

So you're saying she's against Tory policies on the economy but presumably supports them for their social stances like sinking boats trying to cross the channel and stopping whatever woke means this week?

How people in this thread perceive the Tories is not how a lot of other people do and have almost characrature like view on people who do vote conservative.

My mum voted Tory a couple of years ago, I asked her what policies she agreed with, she couldn't name any.

And if anyone is paying attention to the news, arnt labour just promising those things ATM as well?

happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug

Jakabite posted:

Woah it’s almost like people aren’t rational actors

They watch Ant and Dec shows.
People are hosed up.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Jakabite posted:

Woah it’s almost like people aren’t rational actors

There's a difference between being the mythical rational actor and being pig ignorant. Especially when that ignorance leads to you making the world and the country crueler, more inequal and just all over shittier. If that's offensive, I'm offensive I guess.

Aramoro
Jun 1, 2012




forkboy84 posted:

There's a difference between being the mythical rational actor and being pig ignorant. Especially when that ignorance leads to you making the world and the country crueler, more inequal and just all over shittier. If that's offensive, I'm offensive I guess.

Not offensive. Just deeply ignorant of how people actually work in reality.

It's a actually a huge problem for the left generally. Surely people know they're doing the bad thing, no they don't. That's why the culture wars are so effective.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

forkboy84 posted:

There's a difference between being the mythical rational actor and being pig ignorant. Especially when that ignorance leads to you making the world and the country crueler, more inequal and just all over shittier. If that's offensive, I'm offensive I guess.

If you realised your posting was contributing to the world overall being that bit crueler would you seek to change it or shrug and continue?

DreddyMatt
Nov 25, 2002
MY LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF CURRENT EVENTS IS EXCEEDED ONLY BY MY UNQUENCHABLE THIRST FOR PISS. FUK U AMERIKKKA!!
Sure is a suprise that pm Corbyn isn't nailed on for re-election next year

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Miftan
Mar 31, 2012

Terry knows what he can do with his bloody chocolate orange...

drat forkboy, I didn't know you were secretly jerembly corbnylyn??

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply