coelomate posted:Jake Tapper on CNN: "Reading the tea leaves and doing basic math, 6 house Rs have already voted to remove. If vote continues as expected, likely means McCarthy will lose, which means for the first time in the history of the U.S., a speaker will have been removed from his leadership position" Yes... ha ha ha... yes! How quick will they vote on a successor?
|
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:35 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 06:10 |
|
BDawg posted:Trump! (not happening) let me tell you about the last time people said that...
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:35 |
|
JosefStalinator posted:Yes... ha ha ha... yes! It took 15 rounds of voting to elect McCarthy, and that was after McCarthy had emerged as the frontrunner. Right now no one even knows who they'd be voting for
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:36 |
|
JosefStalinator posted:Yes... ha ha ha... yes! Immediately, because they can't actually do anything without a Speaker.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:36 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:So this ends one of three ways right? Not going to happen. Their power comes from their ability to rally a frothing base, and if they break and run in something this high stakes they would get killed back home, or worse, primary challenged from even further right. quote:Or the moderate Republicans convert to Democrats quote:Or some of the Democrats vote for a Republican Never would happen. Most likely outcome is the dems let the republicans twist in the wind for a few days.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:36 |
|
in my opinion the clearest choice to replace mccarthy is mccarthy
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:37 |
haveblue posted:It took 15 rounds of voting to elect McCarthy, and that was after McCarthy had emerged as the frontrunner. Right now no one even knows who they'd be voting for Oh I figured it would take a while - was more curious when the hilariously tortured process would begin.
|
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:37 |
|
Yeah, I assume the Republicans will get back to a majority eventually. Maybe Gaetz and company will frame just vacating him (and maybe a few failed votes) as enough of a rap on the knuckles, along with some more vague promises and hypothetical concessions. Maybe they go so far as to prop up another member of the Republican leadership as speaker, just to change the face in charge and shake off Kevin's bad mojo. I can't see a bunch of moderate Republicans becoming Democrats (the margin's just too big), or Democrats supporting Kevin in return for nothing, or Kevin keeping the rest of his caucus's support if he tries to strike a power-sharing deal with the Democrats that isolates the hardliners. It'll be something internal to the caucus shifting before anything else, I think.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:38 |
|
Oh gently caress me, he's going down
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:39 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:So this ends one of three ways right? Or McCarthy gives the tea party folk some “we won” banner type deal and they vote for him again.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:39 |
|
coelomate posted:let me tell you about the last time people said that... Trump or not, I don't see them electing a non-Rep.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:40 |
|
Remember that no matter what happens, any member of the house can say the magic words and start this whole process all over again
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:40 |
|
Seems like there's a small chance too that some conservative Dems could come to some sort of deal or agreement with McCarthy and declare themselves Problem Solvers or Non Labeled or whatever dumb poo poo name they use
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:40 |
|
Fork of Unknown Origins posted:Or McCarthy gives the tea party folk some “we won” banner type deal and they vote for him again. Yeah. I'd be shocked if McCarthy doesn't end back in the chair simply because... Who else?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:40 |
|
Dubar posted:Remember that no matter what happens, any member of the house can say the magic words and start this whole process all over again This is pretty inside baseball, but what would it take to get that rule removed? Can it only happen with a new congress?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:41 |
|
I still think its more likely that Republicans find someone willing to bite the bullet than come to democrats for help
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:42 |
|
So we're at 216 to 207, they have to get to 218 to oust him right?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:42 |
|
Kloaked00 posted:So we're at 216 to 207, they have to get to 218 to oust him right? Yup, two more yea votes and its over.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:43 |
|
Kloaked00 posted:So we're at 216 to 207, they have to get to 218 to oust him right? Simple majority of those voting to oust. He's toast. You'd need 218 to get a replacement assuming the whole house is present.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:43 |
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:My vote for speaker goes to the widening gyre. There's always someone who's the right mix of ambitious and arrogant to think that they, somehow, will have less trouble with it than McCarthy did. If you're naive enough or narcissistic enough to not realize it's an unwinnable situation, then being Speaker of the House is way cooler than being just one of 200+ Republican members of the House.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:43 |
Kloaked00 posted:So we're at 216 to 207, they have to get to 218 to oust him right? Just needs a majority of those present - he's done.
|
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:43 |
|
Looks like final tally is 216 - 210.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:46 |
|
The wish is granted, long live Jambi.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:46 |
|
Yays are 216 Nays are 210 Resolution is adopted
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:47 |
|
The office of speaker of the house of us representatives is hearby declared vacant
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:47 |
|
Edit: wrong thread
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:48 |
|
some bowtie is now crowning himself speaker pro tem
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:49 |
|
Lol that’s a hella gavel bang by bowtie thor there
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:49 |
coelomate posted:some bowtie is now crowning himself speaker pro tem Bah gawd, is that George Santos' music!?
|
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:49 |
|
Puck42 posted:Do we get the return of Wild and Crazy CSPAN Cameras again? That's part of the rules package separate from the speaker (but voted on after the speaker was first elected) so I don't think so? I'm not sure if it's even possible to replace the rules package mid-session, my thought is 'probably' just via a vote but the package is not actually tied to the speakership. It just can't happen until after there's a speaker at the start of each session.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:49 |
|
Lmao, just slamming that gavel
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:49 |
|
pursuant to clause 12(a) of rule 1 bowtie-chair declares the house in recess lol lmao
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:49 |
|
This rules. We're off the precipice.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:50 |
|
Congrats to Kevin for making history with the shortest speakership in American history and becoming the only Speaker to ever be forcibly removed on the same day.
Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 21:54 on Oct 3, 2023 |
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:50 |
|
So how long until Gaetz is found floating face down in the reflecting pool?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:51 |
|
Cimber posted:This is pretty inside baseball, but what would it take to get that rule removed? Can it only happen with a new congress?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:53 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:Congrats to Kevin for making history with the shortest speakership in American history and become the only Speaker to ever be forcibly removed on the same day. Longest serving Republican speaker was Dennis Hastert. Wonder why he rarely gets brought up.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:53 |
|
The best part is that he did it to himself. He sold the possibility of a vote to vacate as part of the deal to get the speakership in the first place (rather than going for the 16th vote) and shockingly, shockingly the clowns used it against him.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:54 |
|
Gaetz is already floating Scalise
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:54 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 06:10 |
|
McCarthy, who instituted the leopard eating face rule to appease the leopard eating face party, currently shocked that the leopard eating face party votes to eat McCarthy’s face
|
# ? Oct 3, 2023 21:57 |