|
Shut production down and redo it with Mike Murdock
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2023 01:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 17:32 |
|
|
Oh no, I'm a different actor. Charlie is... my brother? My name is uhhh Chester Cox.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2023 01:38
|
|
|
Honestly that article makes it sound like marvel is being run by absolute shitheads and some of the changes are absolute no brainer both for a better product and to keep costs low which is business 101.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2023 01:52
|
|
|
StumblyWumbly posted:If Daredevil isn't wearing his costume for 3 episodes, then Foggy better be handing a sweater saying "I'm Not Daredevil" every other scene. Any time Daredevil isn’t on screen all the other characters should be asking, “Where’s Daredevil?”
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2023 04:26
|
|
|
Lobok posted:Oh no, I'm a different actor. Charlie is... my brother? My name is uhhh Chester Cox. Hmmm... I'd say that was ridiculous, but you wear pretty loud outfits compared to Charlie so I believe you
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2023 06:33
|
|
|
90sgamer posted:Honestly that article makes it sound like marvel is being run by absolute shitheads and some of the changes are absolute no brainer both for a better product and to keep costs low which is business 101.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2023 12:19
|
|
|
Assepoester posted:It seems to be the result of movie execs thinking they can make prestige tv just like they make movies but it turns out that nope, that just makes extra long padded out movies, and when you try to make something closer to a traditional TV show (like say making 18 episodes of Daredevil at a time) then it just falls apart completely I agree. TV and Movies have different rules, they are made in different ways, and there are reasons for that beyond simple inertia. Still, every once in a while someone will do a grand experiment, only to find out once again that yes, the Earth really is round.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2023 23:16
|
|
|
Kraven officially never going to be a Spider-Man villain. No Way Home would have been a much different movie with Kraven as the villain. https://twitter.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1712912931149459581
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2023 21:27
|
|
|
Meanwhile Spider-Man 2 the game is just like "WELP HERES KRAVEN."
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2023 21:38
|
|
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:Kraven officially never going to be a Spider-Man villain. It honestly felt like such a natural thing, to have the third movie include Kraven. Peter's outed and people think Spider-Man is a dangerous murderer. Enter a guy who loves to hunt dangerous beasts, and sees Peter as a new challenge. Maybe he's even hired by JJJ to catch Spider-Man (also throw Scorpion in there). But instead, they did a weird reboot with lots of fan-service that, while fun, was filled with huge plot holes if you think about it for more than a second. I'm glad to know that I'm not crazy and that there were people who were probably considering this, but Sony gotta Sony, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2023 22:41
|
|
|
I wish we had footage of the meeting where Marvel and the writers submitted their first draft pitch for No Way Home and the Sony execs said, "No, we have big plans for a Kraven solo movie. Please rewrite this Spider-Man movie. It's a second-tier priority compared to the Kraven origin movie."
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2023 22:45
|
|
|
There must be a vault at Sony with like, a hundred terrible pitches for solo movies about the Spider-Man-adjacent characters they have the rights to. The ones we've heard about have to be just the tip of the iceberg. A decade-long, totally misguided attempt to ape what Marvel's doing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2023 23:37
|
|
|
Omnomnomnivore posted:There must be a vault at Sony with like, a hundred terrible pitches for solo movies about the Spider-Man-adjacent characters they have the rights to. The ones we've heard about have to be just the tip of the iceberg. A decade-long, totally misguided attempt to ape what Marvel's doing. Except Marvel started out with the less popular characters they had left over . There's no reason these movies of Sony's can't involve Spider-Man. He's theirs to include whenever! I feel like it's actually Batman they're looking towards, who has villains that can and have headlined their own projects with little to no Bat. Lobok fucked around with this message at 23:56 on Oct 13, 2023 |
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2023 23:54
|
|
|
The deal they have says Marvel has creative input when it’s the MCU version of Spider-Man and that’s why Sony doesn’t use him. They want to do their own thing in all the other properties.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 00:02
|
|
|
Omnomnomnivore posted:There must be a vault at Sony with like, a hundred terrible pitches for solo movies about the Spider-Man-adjacent characters they have the rights to. The ones we've heard about have to be just the tip of the iceberg. A decade-long, totally misguided attempt to ape what Marvel's doing. God, if the Aunt May movie was the cream of the crop...
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 00:10
|
|
|
catlord posted:God, if the Aunt May movie was the cream of the crop... They attempted to make an Aunt May solo movie twice. TWICE. They didn't pull the trigger on it the first time, but thought they really should give it another shot. I am honestly a little amazed that it never happened given how badly someone there wanted to make it happen.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 00:15
|
|
|
Doesn’t the Madame Web movie likely have Aunt May as a major player
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 00:18
|
|
|
I would watch a 90 minute Aunt May movie that is Marisa Tomei having a wine lunch with a friend and talking about Peter Parker and all his dumb attempts to solve his teenage problems. She may or may not mention that he's Spider Man, but she would use the phrase "Peter Tingle" a few times. That is definitely not the movie Sony had planned.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 00:37
|
|
|
The only Aunt May movie we deserve is an adaptation of the 'Trouble' comic
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 00:42
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:The deal they have says Marvel has creative input when it’s the MCU version of Spider-Man and that’s why Sony doesn’t use him. They want to do their own thing in all the other properties. Right but they don't need to use the MCU version. If there can be multiple Batmen, and if there already are multiple Peter Parkers (including the animated versions) it's really just a limitation they're putting on themselves.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 00:55
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Doesn’t the Madame Web movie likely have Aunt May as a major player Maybe if it's the old as gently caress Madame Web from the 90s cartoon and any non-Marisa Tomei version of Aunt May they can start a book club
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 01:16
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Doesn’t the Madame Web movie likely have Aunt May as a major player I don't think so, no.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 01:22
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:I don't think so, no. I thought Adam Scott was rumored to be Ben Parker?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 01:37
|
|
|
Lobok posted:Right but they don't need to use the MCU version. If there can be multiple Batmen, and if there already are multiple Peter Parkers (including the animated versions) it's really just a limitation they're putting on themselves. Ever since NWH there have been rumors that is actually what they’re doing. I imagine they were afraid to make another Spider-Man audiences would consider the fake one. But now that the old ones are back on the table and nostalgia has people thinking those movies were good for some reason, there you go.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 01:47
|
|
|
You can't have multiple Spider-men running around, that would be much too confusing Large flashing sign with the Spider verse box office blinking behind me
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 01:58
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:I thought Adam Scott was rumored to be Ben Parker? Yeah, but I don't think May is gonna be involved. Just that spoiled person and someone else related to them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 02:02
|
|
|
Omnomnomnivore posted:There must be a vault at Sony with like, a hundred terrible pitches for solo movies about the Spider-Man-adjacent characters they have the rights to. The ones we've heard about have to be just the tip of the iceberg. A decade-long, totally misguided attempt to ape what Marvel's doing. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 02:42
|
|
|
 This is the Aunt May movie I want
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 04:36
|
|
|
Put it in the ASM-verse and it's her and Richard doing secret agent stuff. Also a tough mudder
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 04:46
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:It honestly felt like such a natural thing, to have the third movie include Kraven. You're not the only one to think this. It seemed like an absolutely natural way to introduce one of Spidey's main villains. Kraven's motivation is unique as well. It would fill out the "Villains can't know my secret identity or they will hurt the people I love" thread as well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 04:57
|
|
|
I cannot imagine how exasperating it must be to be a Marvel rep in a conversation with coked out Sony Pictures idiots shooting down good story ideas because they need to keep their ammo dry for the Aunt May solo movie or some poo poo
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 07:05
|
|
|
Still waiting on the aunt may as carnage movie
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 07:10
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:Still waiting on the aunt may as carnage movie Aunt May-hem
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 08:52
|
|
|
Davros1 posted:Aunt May-hem MAY-XIMUM CARNAGE
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 09:09
|
|
|
Sockser posted:
I just want to commission some artist to crank out more of these. Lemme get Auntivenom, Senior Citizen V, and A-May's-Balls right away. The last one is Speedball, thank you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2023 20:12
|
|
|
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/matthew-vaughn-kick-rear end-reboot-argylle-author-x-men-nycc-1235618721/ Matthew Vaughn talks about some of his movies, including the reason he quit X-Men 3. quote:He spoke openly about his experiences in Hollywood, frequently throwing jabs at the machine and industry politics. He had a lot to say about his time in the X-Men universe, including one of the major reasons he decided to walk away from the job.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2023 17:44
|
|
|
I wish vaughn directed X3. We would of at least had a solidly directed x trilogy to look back on
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2023 02:43
|
|
|
90sgamer posted:I wish vaughn directed X3. We would of at least had a solidly directed x trilogy to look back on Well also Brett Ratner wouldn't have been able to be such a fuckhead to Elliot Page, too.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2023 03:11
|
|
|
I really want Elliott Page to make a cameo in Deadpool 3 as a now transitioned Kit Pryde. Maybe Deadpool could make a "Did you get a haircut?" Joke or something, I don't know. Or maybe Deadpool never met Shadowcat and finds out he's Colossus' ex leading him to think Colossus is gay and hit on him even more? Come on X-Men, go gay or go home!
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2023 16:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 17:32 |
|
|
Sgt. Politeness posted:I really want Elliott Page to make a cameo in Deadpool 3 as a now transitioned Kit Pryde. Maybe Deadpool could make a "Did you get a haircut?" Joke or something, I don't know. I very much do not trust the Deadpool producers or movie audiences to take this as anything other than punching down
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2023 16:48
|
|
