Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
im_sorry
Jan 15, 2006

(9999)
Ultra Carp

That disk has to be my age at least.

Just imagine, you're trying to launch a missile, you pop in the disk, and "General failure reading drive A. A)bort, R)etry, I)gnore".

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005


ibm series/1??? hello :wiggle:


quote:

Announced by IBM's General Systems Division (GSD) on November 16, 1976, the IBM Series/1 was a small, general purpose computing system offering both communications and sensor-based capabilities. It also allowed users to attach a large number and variety of input and output devices, including custom-built devices for special application requirements.

Initially provided in two versions -- the Model 3 (IBM 4953) and the Model 5 (IBM 4955) -- the Series/1 was offered on a purchase-only basis at prices ranging from $10,000 to $100,000 depending upon configuration. The 19-inch, rack-mountable units were available in 16K increments of memory from 16,384 to 65,536 bytes in the Model 3 and from 16,384 to 131,072 bytes in the Model 5. The Model 3 had a storage cycle time of 800 nanoseconds (billionths of a second) and the Model 5, of 660 nanoseconds.

Also available at announcement were such devices as the IBM 4962 disk storage unit containing 9.3 million bytes of storage space, IBM 4964 diskette unit, IBM 4974 serial printer, IBM 4979 display station, IBM 4982 sensor input/output unit, IBM 4959 input/out expansion units, IBM 4999 battery backup unit, user attachment features and three communications features.

The Series/1 was developed and manufactured at GSD's facility in Boca Raton, Fla. The first Series/1 machines were delivered to Citibank N.A. in New York City and to Quaker City Motor Parts in Middletown, Del. under a test marketing program begun in April 1976.

IBM offered several follow-on Series/1 processors (e.g., the IBM 4954 and IBM 4956) in the late-1970s and early-1980s, but all models were withdrawn from marketing in the mid- and late-1980s. (VV4024)

captainbananas
Sep 11, 2002

Ahoy, Captain!

im_sorry posted:

That disk has to be my age at least.

Just imagine, you're trying to launch a missile, you pop in the disk, and "General failure reading drive A. A)bort, R)etry, I)gnore".

gen z PFC using magnets to keep the floppies stuck up against the drive bay so they don't have to deal with taking them out and putting them away

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005
for the young goons out there, the gao report is very thorough



as you can see, the 8-inch floppy disk got its name from its size and propensity to need blue chews

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

im_sorry posted:

That disk has to be my age at least.

Just imagine, you're trying to launch a missile, you pop in the disk, and "General failure reading drive A. A)bort, R)etry, I)gnore".

I'm the senator who owns the one floppy disk factory still in operation that survives solely off defence contracts.

"Yeah we can't use more modern technology in our critical systems. Only proven, robust. We're going back to tape reels soon."

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




Hatebag posted:

lol the antimissile system mirvs negate is anti-proliferation treaties. they were created because treaties were signed limiting the number of carrier vehicles so instead they slap a bunch of warheads on one missile.
it's impossible to shoot down an icbm or slbm when it's coming down anyway because they're going like mach 13 or some crazy poo poo

nah you just create a shield of friendly nuclear explosions over canada to limit the damage to the us from trans polar attack

im_sorry
Jan 15, 2006

(9999)
Ultra Carp

DancingShade posted:

I'm the senator who owns the one floppy disk factory still in operation that survives solely off defence contracts.

Only they had to increase profits and cut materials costs, so when they try to use the disk, the cheap oxide coating flakes off and wrecks the drive.

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
Just order the 8" floppy disk from China.

Pomeroy
Apr 20, 2020

Centrist Committee posted:

lol I’ve never watched a politics on my youtube and this one in my recommendations too. love to live in freedomlamd baby

YouTube is presently spamming me with Epoch Times ads, below all the Breakthrough News and PSL videos I'm watching, it's more intense than the Prager U ads were.

Fish of hemp
Apr 1, 2011

A friendly little mouse!
Nuclear weapons are things where "if it works, don't fix it" really is true.

I'd rather have them use floppy disks than Windows ME.

Complications
Jun 19, 2014

I'd really rather the US modernized the systems away from whatever was built when the government still did things on the grounds that the US being able to nuke people is a bad thing.

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

captainbananas posted:

modern hardware and code will be the sneaky route to disarmament. ancient-rear end FORTRAN or whatever the gently caress SACCS was built on is orders of magnitude more stablethan some fuckin python quilted together from stackoverflow and khan academy tutorials courtesy of BAH's team of crackpot software engineers led by shrike82

a lot of science still runs on Fortran. noob scientists and machine learners are into Python but the poo poo breaks if you look at it wrong. posix shell, c89, awk, and Fortran are more than enough.

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*
yeah, i've heard you get a really high paying job if you specialise in the dead languages that all our old industrial machinery runs on.

FuzzySlippers
Feb 6, 2009

Yeah please let silicon valley grifters get all over our nuclear arsenal and turn them into web 3.0 apps with always on drm that runs entirely on Chinese hardware. It's a good thing for the safety of the world if the nukes are quietly rendered entirely useless (assuming some of the old hardware does work and the whole thing isn't already a contractor scam).

Hatebag
Jun 17, 2008


nuke silo software by chatgpt

Hatebag
Jun 17, 2008


Real hurthling! posted:

nah you just create a shield of friendly nuclear explosions over canada to limit the damage to the us from trans polar attack

the us system was designed to shoot 30 5 mT abm missiles (abmms?) and 70 smaller kt missiles. in the event of nuclear holocaust the us plan was basically just to nuke the poo poo out of canada with the equivalent of 3 or 4 tsar bombas

Hatebag has issued a correction as of 10:42 on Oct 20, 2023

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
In Postman 2, Kevin Costner is the last Fortran programmer who walks the earth to repair dying nuclear count down machines.

captainbananas
Sep 11, 2002

Ahoy, Captain!

mawarannahr posted:

a lot of science still runs on Fortran. noob scientists and machine learners are into Python but the poo poo breaks if you look at it wrong. posix shell, c89, awk, and Fortran are more than enough.

:haibrow:

atelier morgan
Mar 11, 2003

super-scientific, ultra-gay

Lipstick Apathy

FuzzySlippers posted:

Yeah please let silicon valley grifters get all over our nuclear arsenal and turn them into web 3.0 apps with always on drm that runs entirely on Chinese hardware. It's a good thing for the safety of the world if the nukes are quietly rendered entirely useless (assuming some of the old hardware does work and the whole thing isn't already a contractor scam).

the silos are in hilariously bad shape and have been for decades (though in ways that terrify about the possibility of accidental leak or launch; command and control is a good read) unfortunately the submarines still work and have active maintenance all the time

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

crepeface posted:

yeah, i've heard you get a really high paying job if you specialise in the dead languages that all our old imperial machinery runs on.

Presumably this is why I had to learn Greek and Latin

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.
Fortran really isn't so bad. It's good at its niche. People just see Fortran 77 and assume everything is still done like that.

captainbananas
Sep 11, 2002

Ahoy, Captain!

atelier morgan posted:

unfortunately the submarines still work and have active maintenance all the time

alternatively,

atelier morgan
Mar 11, 2003

super-scientific, ultra-gay

Lipstick Apathy

captainbananas posted:

alternatively,



unfortunately they aren't being run aground fast enough judging by how often trains go by my house on the way to bangor

Gripweed
Nov 8, 2018

atelier morgan posted:

unfortunately they aren't being run aground fast enough judging by how often trains go by my house on the way to bangor

The trains are on the way to your mom?

ProfessorBooty
Jan 25, 2004

Amulet of the Dark
I was on the USS Connecticut, SSN-21, from 2007 to 2011. Due to the difficulty in procuring parts for that platform we always had some thing that was just permanently broken.

The submarine ran aground in 2021 I guess, due to faulty bottom sounders.

There is no way the US Navy is in operating condition.

lol.

Brandon Proust
Jun 22, 2006

"Like many intellectuals, he was incapable of scoring a simple goal in a simple way"

Frosted Flake posted:

Presumably this is why I had to learn Greek and Latin

lmao

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Hatebag posted:

the us system was designed to shoot 30 5 mT abm missiles (abmms?) and 70 smaller kt missiles. in the event of nuclear holocaust the us plan was basically just to nuke the poo poo out of canada with the equivalent of 3 or 4 tsar bombas

Might as well nuke the Nazi colony

ProfessorBooty
Jan 25, 2004

Amulet of the Dark
Always figured if anyone gets nuked, it would be the US nuking itself, or it's own vassals.

At least I can live in comfort knowing if I was British we'd vote for a referendum to nuke ourselves.

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

KomradeX posted:

Might as well nuke the Nazi colony

All the Nazis will just flee south like every other time.

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*

atelier morgan posted:

unfortunately they aren't being run aground fast enough judging by how often trains go by my house on the way to bangor

Gripweed posted:

The trains are on the way to your mom?

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer

ProfessorBooty posted:

Always figured if anyone gets nuked, it would be the US nuking itself, or it's own vassals.

At least I can live in comfort knowing if I was British we'd vote for a referendum to nuke ourselves.

When Corbyn was asked if he'd first strike our enemies, resulting in the total destruction of the UK in response, he said no. This made all the old men in the audience go bright red in anger. If you've ever seen that 3x3 grid of angry british men, i think most if not all of them were from that episode of question time.

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

ProfessorBooty posted:

Always figured if anyone gets nuked, it would be the US nuking itself, or it's own vassals.

At least I can live in comfort knowing if I was British we'd vote for a referendum to nuke ourselves.

I assume at least half of the nuke in a nuclear exchange won't pop due to bad maintenance. And other countries will rebuild back to industrial state eventually on less polluted lands. And one country will be left in forever ruin, the country that is obsessed with post-apocalyptic fictions.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Regarde Aduck posted:

When Corbyn was asked if he'd first strike our enemies, resulting in the total destruction of the UK in response, he said no. This made all the old men in the audience go bright red in anger. If you've ever seen that 3x3 grid of angry british men, i think most if not all of them were from that episode of question time.

In 1998, the Runnymede Trust set up a Commission on the “Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain” which set out to produce a review of the current state of multi-ethnic Britain. After two years of extensive consultation and discussion, the Commission produced a report which argues that Britain in the year 2000 was at a turning point or crossroads with different potential roads ahead:

"Will it try to turn the clock back, digging in, defending old values and ancient hierarchies, relying on a narrow English-dominated, backward-looking definition of the nation? Or will it seize the opportunity to create a more flexible, inclusive, cosmopolitan image of itself?"

:thunk:

How did the past 23 years turn out?

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005

stephenthinkpad posted:

I assume at least half of the nuke in a nuclear exchange won't pop due to bad maintenance. And other countries will rebuild back to industrial state eventually on less polluted lands. And one country will be left in forever ruin, the country that is obsessed with post-apocalyptic fictions.

i have a nightmare that the mass exchange will be a dud, with only a small number of missiles launching on day zero. everyone then gets to spend the next couple weeks holding their breath and squeezing their sphincters while silos come online and launch, one by one, and random cities disappear with a poof after an antagonizing delay

cock hero flux
Apr 17, 2011



Delta-Wye posted:

i have a nightmare that the mass exchange will be a dud, with only a small number of missiles launching on day zero. everyone then gets to spend the next couple weeks holding their breath and squeezing their sphincters while silos come online and launch, one by one, and random cities disappear with a poof after an antagonizing delay

maybe this is just the optimist in me but you'd have to think that the collective heart attack caused by an actual failed attempt at nuclear war would lead to at least some reconsideration and hesitation not allowed for in the traditional "the enemy's missiles are in the air, you are going to die and have five minutes to decide whether they will suffer the same fate as you" scenario

skooma512
Feb 8, 2012

You couldn't grok my race car, but you dug the roadside blur.

Delta-Wye posted:

i have a nightmare that the mass exchange will be a dud, with only a small number of missiles launching on day zero. everyone then gets to spend the next couple weeks holding their breath and squeezing their sphincters while silos come online and launch, one by one, and random cities disappear with a poof after an antagonizing delay

To throw more tires on your fire: There are many escalation scenarios that involve demonstrative attacks (attacking a sparsely populated area of the target nation), strictly counter-force (military targets), and then counter-value (cities). It is not necessarily a guarantee that full MAD gets triggered the first time there's a launch and they could go days or weeks trading blows and deliberating over whether to end the world.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2007/R3235.pdf

ETA: Even if there are a few duds, I'm certain that at least a few will work as intended or at least partially work, in that you still get a nuclear blast but it's lower yield, that or a glorified dirty bomb. Duds would probably be even worse since they will just launch more, which will cause the other side to launch more, and that's the road to insensate war.

This is all to say, there are increments to nuclear war and isn't strictly a binary between conventional only and launch everything

skooma512 has issued a correction as of 23:00 on Oct 20, 2023

VomitOnLino
Jun 13, 2005

Sometimes I get lost.

skooma512 posted:

TBF, they prefer lower tech solutions because of EMP concerns.

Though a floppy disk is not what I would call robust.

All of my 1980ies 5 1/4" floppies read/write fine and held onto their data for 4 decades.
Yet 90% of my 1.44meg floppies are dead or have errors. And my loving SSD won't even last 3 years...

So ... err.. I mean I hate the military industrial comp.... actually wait yes. They should totally modernize to SSD and SD cards!

Turtle Sandbox
Dec 31, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

ProfessorBooty posted:

I was on the USS Connecticut, SSN-21, from 2007 to 2011. Due to the difficulty in procuring parts for that platform we always had some thing that was just permanently broken.

The submarine ran aground in 2021 I guess, due to faulty bottom sounders.

There is no way the US Navy is in operating condition.

lol.

I thought we still had a seawolf we were scrapping for parts for you guys? Im pretty sure you guys gave us your lovely lithium hydroxite canisters when we needed some while we were up north working with you guys lol.

hubris.height
Jan 6, 2005

Pork Pro
i am becoming geniuinely concerned that ww3 is going to be a real thing and that it is being driven by the oldest and most insane amongst our populace

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

atelier morgan posted:

the silos are in hilariously bad shape and have been for decades (though in ways that terrify about the possibility of accidental leak or launch; command and control is a good read) unfortunately the submarines still work and have active maintenance all the time

Yeah only 30% of them have substandard steel with unknown strength because the company that made it faked the tests.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply