Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
FuzzySlippers
Feb 6, 2009

I wonder if any listed Western military capability is pure paper power. Like its being counted that country has X when they've only ordered X and delivery is so far away it might as well be prophecy (like Australian subs). Like I couldn't figure out when the US said it planned to double the capacity of Israel's iron dome whether that meant they had it in boxes ready to ship out or that eventually one day they, or their children, would produce equipment that would probably double it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Regarde Aduck posted:

yeah there's some real weird messaging going on

i'm sure we heard that Rheinmetall were having real trouble keeping the lines up because of the ongoing energy crisis and gradual deindustrialisation of Germany. I think it came out that Poland was really unlikely to get their 400+ Leopards for a long time. Maybe 2A8 are pure refits? In which case maybe they have a specific line to just referb old tanks to 2a8 spec? But that means they gotta source all the spare chassis and get them all to the same spec? I don't know what the gently caress is going on. Has there been evidence that the EU is still capable of making anything?

Pretty sure they turned off the line before the war. Don't they have another cat in pre-production?

Zeppelin Insanity
Oct 28, 2009

Wahnsinn
Einfach
Wahnsinn

genericnick posted:

Can you even still buy Leopards? I thought Rheinmetall turned off the line where they built the chassis?

As of 2022, they did not make Leopards. Greece still makes them, but Germany does not.

They do *sell* them, though. Delivery date is vibes-based. If you buy a Leopard 2A8, it doesn't get made new, they get an old Leopard, and refurbish it and put the new bits on it. But that's dependent on them getting their hand on the old Leopard. Which will probably be a lot harder today than it was recently.

As of 2022, there were reports that Rheinmetall were asking some museums to give them back Leopards so they can refurbish them and sell them as new.

It's possible that they started production again since then and I just missed it, but I definitely didn't see any articles about it happening.

genericnick posted:

Pretty sure they turned off the line before the war. Don't they have another cat in pre-production?

They don't. It's pure sales material\expo bait, like a lot of stuff is. They're not going to be producing it until someone buys it. They're not going to finish development until someone buys it. It's basically a pitch, at this point.

It's extremely unlikely that anyone will buy it, because the Bundeswehr has decided on a list of requirements for future tanks, and the Panther does not fulfill them.

The Budeswehr plan is amazing in itself. They decided that a tank has to weigh around 50 tons, but have a lot more capabilities than current tanks do. They also concluded this is impossible, but they won't budge on any aspect of this. So they came up with the best (for profit motive) solution possible: every tank will be replaced by a platoon of 4 tanks, that have different elements of the capabilities they want. So, some will have a big gun, some will have a small gun, some will have missiles, and so on. Also, they'll be partially AI, because you need fewer crew people, you can't just quadruple manpower requirements.

At no point did anyone seem to think about where the gently caress will you put them, in physical terrain. If your single tank is now a platoon of 4, I guess your platoon is now 20. Where do they go?. What if you face an enemy platoon? What if you face an enemy division? It's such a perfect example of thinking by powerpoint.

Zeppelin Insanity has issued a correction as of 02:01 on Nov 19, 2023

Nix Panicus
Feb 25, 2007

FuzzySlippers posted:

I can see why the MIC has no enthusiasm for artillery. Why go through all the tedious effort to setup artillery and blast away with $500 artillery shells when you can bury your opponents in money via easy peasy $2 million dollar cruise missiles?

The found a place in the middle with $125,000 'smart' shells, that were supposed to be more efficient due to their accuracy. Instead of saturating an area with 250 shells just fire one! That will have the same effect, at least according to the MIC

Palladium
May 8, 2012

Very Good
✔️✔️✔️✔️

Nix Panicus posted:

The found a place in the middle with $125,000 'smart' shells, that were supposed to be more efficient due to their accuracy. Instead of saturating an area with 250 shells just fire one! That will have the same effect, at least according to the MIC

xi to bidet, politely: what if i told you i have more drones then you have dumb munitions

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
Shouldn't you keep your heavy tank production active, so your engineering know-how can stay alive and be passed down to the younger engineers (inside the country)?

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

stephenthinkpad posted:

Shouldn't you keep your heavy tank production active, so your engineering know-how can stay alive and be passed down to the younger engineers (inside the country)?

This applies to a lot of industrial production, but keeping "excess" production lines active for the sake of retaining institutional knowledge isn't profitable

Even absolutist Russia dealt with this better than neoliberal capitalism does

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

stephenthinkpad posted:

Shouldn't you keep your heavy tank production active, so your engineering know-how can stay alive and be passed down to the younger engineers (inside the country)?

If you gently caress up the first run of the new tank because your engineers couldn't read the handwriting of Klaus the last guy to build a tank who retired twenty years ago you can just bill the government for the fixes you have to do. It's fine.

FuzzySlippers
Feb 6, 2009

When your MIC optimizes for billable hours lol.

Zeppelin Insanity
Oct 28, 2009

Wahnsinn
Einfach
Wahnsinn

stephenthinkpad posted:

Shouldn't you keep your heavy tank production active, so your engineering know-how can stay alive and be passed down to the younger engineers (inside the country)?

Imagine two choices:

1. You sell tanks, and you make them. You make a lot of money, but you need factory space, materials, labour, machines. All that costs a lot of money.

2. You sell tanks, but you don't make them. You get the same amount of revenue, but now you don't have the costs of actually making them. You also got to sell the factory space and machines.

Which is more efficient by capitalist standards?

In the US, General Dynamics actually did the opposite some years back. The US military said "we don't want any more Abrams. We are not going to buy any more. Stop making them." and General Dynamics said "No. We will keep making them and you will keep buying them." And the military said "OK".

Germans are just more efficient at industry, because they said "We won't make them but you'll keep buying them"

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




vehicles are dumb just make the soldiers very fast and bomb resistant on their own and unite the clans of MIC and guerilla fighting

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

Real hurthling! posted:

vehicles are dumb just make the soldiers very fast and bomb resistant on their own and unite the clans of MIC and guerilla fighting

fps without vehicles are always better pvp.

FuzzySlippers
Feb 6, 2009

it'd solve the IDF issue where everyone camps at the base waiting for vehicles to spawn.

Animal-Mother
Feb 14, 2012

RABBIT RABBIT
RABBIT RABBIT

Real hurthling! posted:

vehicles are dumb just make the soldiers very fast and bomb resistant on their own and unite the clans

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp

gradenko_2000 posted:

This applies to a lot of industrial production, but keeping "excess" production lines active for the sake of retaining institutional knowledge isn't profitable

Even absolutist Russia dealt with this better than neoliberal capitalism does

reinventing FOGBANK every 20 years

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

FuzzySlippers posted:

I can see why the MIC has no enthusiasm for artillery. Why go through all the tedious effort to setup artillery and blast away with $500 artillery shells when you can bury your opponents in money via easy peasy $2 million dollar cruise missiles?

Ending life is expensive, in the occident.

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

Zeppelin Insanity posted:

As of 2022, they did not make Leopards. Greece still makes them, but Germany does not.

They do *sell* them, though. Delivery date is vibes-based. If you buy a Leopard 2A8, it doesn't get made new, they get an old Leopard, and refurbish it and put the new bits on it. But that's dependent on them getting their hand on the old Leopard. Which will probably be a lot harder today than it was recently.

As of 2022, there were reports that Rheinmetall were asking some museums to give them back Leopards so they can refurbish them and sell them as new.

It's possible that they started production again since then and I just missed it, but I definitely didn't see any articles about it happening.

They don't. It's pure sales material\expo bait, like a lot of stuff is. They're not going to be producing it until someone buys it. They're not going to finish development until someone buys it. It's basically a pitch, at this point.

It's extremely unlikely that anyone will buy it, because the Bundeswehr has decided on a list of requirements for future tanks, and the Panther does not fulfill them.

The Budeswehr plan is amazing in itself. They decided that a tank has to weigh around 50 tons, but have a lot more capabilities than current tanks do. They also concluded this is impossible, but they won't budge on any aspect of this. So they came up with the best (for profit motive) solution possible: every tank will be replaced by a platoon of 4 tanks, that have different elements of the capabilities they want. So, some will have a big gun, some will have a small gun, some will have missiles, and so on. Also, they'll be partially AI, because you need fewer crew people, you can't just quadruple manpower requirements.

At no point did anyone seem to think about where the gently caress will you put them, in physical terrain. If your single tank is now a platoon of 4, I guess your platoon is now 20. Where do they go?. What if you face an enemy platoon? What if you face an enemy division? It's such a perfect example of thinking by powerpoint.

This is the most German solution imaginable. The whole country has a furious hatred of standardization and gets ragingly hard/wet at the thought of massively complicating a logistics tail.

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Zeppelin Insanity posted:


The Budeswehr plan is amazing in itself. They decided that a tank has to weigh around 50 tons, but have a lot more capabilities than current tanks do. They also concluded this is impossible, but they won't budge on any aspect of this. So they came up with the best (for profit motive) solution possible: every tank will be replaced by a platoon of 4 tanks, that have different elements of the capabilities they want. So, some will have a big gun, some will have a small gun, some will have missiles, and so on. Also, they'll be partially AI, because you need fewer crew people, you can't just quadruple manpower requirements.

At no point did anyone seem to think about where the gently caress will you put them, in physical terrain. If your single tank is now a platoon of 4, I guess your platoon is now 20. Where do they go?. What if you face an enemy platoon? What if you face an enemy division? It's such a perfect example of thinking by powerpoint.

LMAO, ist that a von der Leyen special?

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp
they invented the mechwarrior/armored core lance

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




some tanks have a big gun
some tanks carry missiles on the flanks
sone tanks have a smaller one
some tanks are just for making bank

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!
but all tanks are beautiful!

Palladium
May 8, 2012

Very Good
✔️✔️✔️✔️

Orange Devil posted:

This is the most German solution imaginable. The whole country has a furious hatred of standardization and gets ragingly hard/wet at the thought of massively complicating a logistics tail.

what if "F-35 is invincible as long as we don't use it to fight" except not even building a single one

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Zeppelin Insanity posted:

As of 2022, they did not make Leopards. Greece still makes them, but Germany does not.

They do *sell* them, though. Delivery date is vibes-based. If you buy a Leopard 2A8, it doesn't get made new, they get an old Leopard, and refurbish it and put the new bits on it. But that's dependent on them getting their hand on the old Leopard. Which will probably be a lot harder today than it was recently.

As of 2022, there were reports that Rheinmetall were asking some museums to give them back Leopards so they can refurbish them and sell them as new.

It's possible that they started production again since then and I just missed it, but I definitely didn't see any articles about it happening.

They don't. It's pure sales material\expo bait, like a lot of stuff is. They're not going to be producing it until someone buys it. They're not going to finish development until someone buys it. It's basically a pitch, at this point.

It's extremely unlikely that anyone will buy it, because the Bundeswehr has decided on a list of requirements for future tanks, and the Panther does not fulfill them.

The Budeswehr plan is amazing in itself. They decided that a tank has to weigh around 50 tons, but have a lot more capabilities than current tanks do. They also concluded this is impossible, but they won't budge on any aspect of this. So they came up with the best (for profit motive) solution possible: every tank will be replaced by a platoon of 4 tanks, that have different elements of the capabilities they want. So, some will have a big gun, some will have a small gun, some will have missiles, and so on. Also, they'll be partially AI, because you need fewer crew people, you can't just quadruple manpower requirements.

At no point did anyone seem to think about where the gently caress will you put them, in physical terrain. If your single tank is now a platoon of 4, I guess your platoon is now 20. Where do they go?. What if you face an enemy platoon? What if you face an enemy division? It's such a perfect example of thinking by powerpoint.

Lmfao

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

They'll just treat those 4 tanks as 4 tanks instead of 1 tank, ez.

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Lostconfused posted:

They'll just treat those 4 tanks as 4 tanks instead of 1 tank, ez.

Winner winner, chicken dinner.

Zeppelin Insanity
Oct 28, 2009

Wahnsinn
Einfach
Wahnsinn
The soldats will love the multiplatform concept when a company of German future tanks face a company of T-72s and it turns out only 1/4 of German tanks have a cannon capable of penetrating them

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
They will just have even less tanks with less capabilities, that seems to be the profit sweet spot.

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!
I'd pay good money to have one of the OG imperialists from the 18th or 19th century react to having army equipment that only exists in a spreadsheet because it's more efficient* that way


*at making shareholder number go up

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Orange Devil posted:

I'd pay good money to have one of the OG imperialists from the 18th or 19th century react to having army equipment that only exists in a spreadsheet because it's more efficient* that way


*at making shareholder number go up

Idk, but Capital 3 has parts about a large scale scam after the UK broke open the Chinese market where traders would end up selling textiles at a loss, but everyone got rich (for a time) on the letters of credit everyone was handing out based on the expected returns. I think they'd give it a thumps up.

Skaffen-Amtiskaw
Jun 24, 2023

What if we just Wag The Dog the war and everyone pretends we had a massive force, but we give all our money to the MIC to spend on hookers and blow?

Just use War Thunder or Arma or something if the stupid public asks for proof.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

The producers but with ww3

Skaffen-Amtiskaw
Jun 24, 2023

Slavvy posted:

The producers but with ww3

Netanyahu in Hitler 2: Arab Spring Time In the Levant.

FuzzySlippers
Feb 6, 2009

Gonna start making big waves among the thinktank crowd with my Air Force In Being concept. It's important you build the best air force you can but absolutely do not use it. Planes getting shot down by nasty SAMs only dilute the political impact of your air force. Then I'll move on to the Transcendent Air Force In Concept where the most perfect air force is one that doesn't fight, can't be destroyed, and can't be measured accurately. Actually building the air force only limits its size by the bounds of material reality. The best air force exists purely within the infinite multitudes of the mind.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Strategic ambiguity wrt whether you have an air force at all

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

Slavvy posted:

Strategic ambiguity wrt whether you have an air force at all

Yes, Lord Buckethead's plan except with the military as a whole

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

FuzzySlippers posted:

Gonna start making big waves among the thinktank crowd with my Air Force In Being concept. It's important you build the best air force you can but absolutely do not use it. Planes getting shot down by nasty SAMs only dilute the political impact of your air force. Then I'll move on to the Transcendent Air Force In Concept where the most perfect air force is one that doesn't fight, can't be destroyed, and can't be measured accurately. Actually building the air force only limits its size by the bounds of material reality. The best air force exists purely within the infinite multitudes of the mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmRpLLs7SNE

Facehammer
Mar 11, 2008

No, of course you can't see an air force - their stealth capabilities are just that good!

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Seymour Skinner's air force

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Regarde Aduck posted:

Has there been evidence that the EU is still capable of making anything?

I think Italy still makes luxury fashion. Spain and France still do good wines. Germany no idea, if it's not available from China then it's probably not worth buying. Um, luxury watches?

War material good luck. Everything is bespoke, limited edition runs, basically unavailable in practical terms. More theoretical than actual.

Edit - forgot to mention you go through all the rigmarole to actually get a euro platform and it's just generic anyway. Nothing class leading or special.

DancingShade has issued a correction as of 02:28 on Nov 20, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FuzzySlippers
Feb 6, 2009


Alpha Centauri was such a cool loving game. There's never been another like it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply