Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Defenestrategy
Oct 24, 2010

Tiny Timbs posted:

It’s been really amusing seeing all of the goons try to trash talk the AI/ML advances as simultaneously completely worthless and capable of eliminating all their jobs.


It's basically the same poo poo as the block chain.

On one hand useful poo poo where you'd want an immutable record with change logs that need to be shuffled among institutions such as financial transactions or health records. On the other hand absolutely horrible poo poo like NFTs, Buttcoins, and what ever other stupid grifter poo poo that exists.

LLMs and Neural Networks will have useful applications that will be over shadowed by grifters trying to sell it for poo poo it's not really a good solution for.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Hexyflexy
Sep 2, 2011

asymptotically approaching one

Never stop being you snoop

Grip it and rip it
Apr 28, 2020

Tiny Timbs posted:

It’s been really amusing seeing all of the goons try to trash talk the AI/ML advances as simultaneously completely worthless and capable of eliminating all their jobs.

Deep fakes are a terrifying concept that we will see more and more of soon.

GPT can give you imprecise and incorrect information but it can also save you massive amounts of time on a wide variety of tasks

AI art is extremely impressive and nobody outside of forums posters actually cares when half a pinkie is missing, nor expects that to be a problem forever. The ability to imagine some ridiculous concept and see a computer spit out an image of it in a few seconds is incredible.

There’s an element of buzzwordiness and grift going on but the impacts of AI/ML applications hitting the mainstream are very real

The AV aspect of AI is where it's most impressive, imo. The kind of workproduct it produces in terms of coding or legal analysis is more harmful than helpful. I imagine they'll get those applications improved in the future, but generating Audio and Video signals has already reached a pretty dangerous place. There were a couple proof-of-concepts for using AI to crack voice verification security, and I just saw an ad on Twitter for some kind of revenge porn generator program.

I know people use AI in their jobs, but I haven't really yet got a good grasp on what exactly they use it for. It seems like the kind of thing you would offload stupid makework bullshit that might exist in a corporate environment but isn't actually key to operating a business. Using AI to do your accounting or provide legal analysis just seems like you're setting yourself up for failure. Same for medical applications or really any kind of work where being right is important.

Grip it and rip it fucked around with this message at 19:04 on Nov 20, 2023

Pine Cone Jones
Dec 6, 2009

You throw me the acorn, I throw you the whip!
In a surprise to no one.

https://bsky.app/profile/mitchellepner.bsky.social/post/3ken3fmhruh2l

"For months, I have been posting that "Moms For Liberty" was neither composed of "moms" nor "for liberty".

It turns out that I was right. The founder of "Moms for Liberty" is (a) a guy, (b) who is a registered sex offender, and (c) claims that he was framed.

talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/imagi..."

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/imagine-that-5

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon

Defenestrategy posted:

It's basically the same poo poo as the block chain.

On one hand useful poo poo where you'd want an immutable record with change logs that need to be shuffled among institutions such as financial transactions or health records. On the other hand absolutely horrible poo poo like NFTs, Buttcoins, and what ever other stupid grifter poo poo that exists.

LLMs and Neural Networks will have useful applications that will be over shadowed by grifters trying to sell it for poo poo it's not really a good solution for.

Its bad to conflate Block Chains (100% useless garbage) and Cypto (Entirely a scam) with cryptographic signatures. One is a real, well developed, and useful technology, that has minimal impact on computing speed and cost, and the other is entirely a scam.

Defenestrategy
Oct 24, 2010

Need block chain tech for crypto to exist.

Edit: oh you said block chain was useless. Theres been some decent articles written about using block chain ledgers as a way to solve interopperability issues between medical providers. Which seems legit to me.

Defenestrategy fucked around with this message at 19:46 on Nov 20, 2023

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

M_Gargantua posted:

Its bad to conflate Block Chains (100% useless garbage) and Cypto (Entirely a scam) with cryptographic signatures. One is a real, well developed, and useful technology, that has minimal impact on computing speed and cost, and the other is entirely a scam.

Meh, yes, however Blockchain is also largely not nearly as valuable as was promised, since its really just an append only database - we've had that forever. Blockchain and Crypto largely are tied at the hip for being useless marketing buzzwords.

kupachek
Aug 5, 2015

This man’s brain is trembling in the balance between reason and insanity, and as he stalks on with clenched fist and sword in hand, as though he still saw those murderous Russians gunners.

Tiny Timbs posted:

capable of eliminating all their jobs.

No worries, Uncle Sam always needs someone to clean a latrine.

FrozenVent
May 1, 2009

The Boeing 737-200QC is the undisputed workhorse of the skies.

Defenestrategy posted:

Need block chain tech for crypto to exist.

Edit: oh you said block chain was useless. Theres been some decent articles written about using block chain ledgers as a way to solve interopperability issues between medical providers. Which seems legit to me.

Or you could get the medical providers to sit down and agree on an interoperability standard which will require just as much work and political capital.

Defenestrategy
Oct 24, 2010

FrozenVent posted:

Or you could get the medical providers to sit down and agree on an interoperability standard which will require just as much work and political capital.

I mean at the end of the day it'll probably take the form of some sort of append only database, combined with cryptographic signatures hosted probably in a central repository of some sort...

hypnophant
Oct 19, 2012

Defenestrategy posted:

central repository of some sort...

so no need for a blockchain then

e: blockchain doesn't solve any of the actual issues with supply chains/medical data/logistics etc, which are invariably problems arising because of data entry (or fraud at the point of data entry). blockchain does make data entry problems highly resistant to ever being corrected, though

hypnophant fucked around with this message at 20:01 on Nov 20, 2023

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

hypnophant posted:

so no need for a blockchain then

e: blockchain doesn't solve any of the actual issues with supply chains/medical data/logistics etc, which are invariably problems arising because of data entry (or fraud at the point of data entry). blockchain does make data entry problems highly resistant to ever being corrected, though

Basically yes. In fact Blockchain is an absolute pain because it largely returns to being a single point of failure rather than truly distributed, and if anything wrong gets put in, it cannot be undone without forking the chain.

Blockchain is kinda dumb.

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

Grip it and rip it posted:

I know people use AI in their jobs, but I haven't really yet got a good grasp on what exactly they use it for. It seems like the kind of thing you would offload stupid makework bullshit that might exist in a corporate environment but isn't actually key to operating a business. Using AI to do your accounting or provide legal analysis just seems like you're setting yourself up for failure. Same for medical applications or really any kind of work where being right is important.

That sort of clerical and compliance work isn’t trivial though. There’s nothing revolutionary here, how many secretaries did word processors and e-mail put out of work? This enables more complex processes or analysis which can create value, or just plain reduce the costs of documentation heavy services. There are probably a lot of project managers, medical transcribers and other such people that are going to need to learn a different, higher level skillset in the near future.

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

That sort of clerical and compliance work isn’t trivial though. There’s nothing revolutionary here, how many secretaries did word processors and e-mail put out of work? This enables more complex processes or analysis which can create value, or just plain reduce the costs of documentation heavy services. There are probably a lot of project managers, medical transcribers and other such people that are going to need to learn a different, higher level skillset in the near future.

The problem is the word processor didn't actually put secretaries out of work. There is still an important role in the office that a dedicated person can perform and improve upon, however as a cost saving measure companies have simply killed that position and just burdened their other staff with those tasks. Secretaries are now reserved as a status symbol in most corporate culture, even though any team of like 20+ people could really use one.

Hexyflexy
Sep 2, 2011

asymptotically approaching one

Grip it and rip it posted:

I know people use AI in their jobs, but I haven't really yet got a good grasp on what exactly they use it for.

I had a dude I was doing some signal processing work for hand me a new job assignment where he'd asked chatgpt to compare two science papers and tell him what was required to implement the science practically.

Long story short, I'm no longer working with that dude.

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS

Pine Cone Jones posted:

Argentina elected this man

So that's a...thing.

Dude has talked about seizing the Falklands… and also how he looks up to Margaret Thatcher.

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

Grip it and rip it posted:

The AV aspect of AI is where it's most impressive, imo. The kind of workproduct it produces in terms of coding or legal analysis is more harmful than helpful. I imagine they'll get those applications improved in the future, but generating Audio and Video signals has already reached a pretty dangerous place. There were a couple proof-of-concepts for using AI to crack voice verification security, and I just saw an ad on Twitter for some kind of revenge porn generator program.

I know people use AI in their jobs, but I haven't really yet got a good grasp on what exactly they use it for. It seems like the kind of thing you would offload stupid makework bullshit that might exist in a corporate environment but isn't actually key to operating a business. Using AI to do your accounting or provide legal analysis just seems like you're setting yourself up for failure. Same for medical applications or really any kind of work where being right is important.

So I generally use it for tasks that are annoying and time consuming but not difficulty for me to verify as being done correctly.

I use ChatGPT routinely to make little scripts with programming languages or libraries for one-off problems I don’t want to be bothered learning the syntax for, like iteratively grabbing stuff out of a structured file with a bunch of nested file paths.

This week I used it to generate a placeholder dataset with a bunch of items with complex relationships to each other (e.g., 20 aircraft flying between 30 countries with 100 flights in a certain order and with associated travel times). It would have taken me hours to do it by hand but with a little coaching I got ChatGPT to spit out a full table in an hour.

You can get in trouble with it but it kinda seems like mainly an issue for really stupid people at the moment, and the bad part we’ll run into is that stupid people using a tool stupidly will cause problems for everyone else.

A lot of the blowback on AI that I see here comes from digital artists or people friends with digital artists, and I can see where they’re coming from. That field is hosed and there’s not going to be any legislation that can do anything more than help temporarily.

Mappo
Apr 27, 2009

Tiny Timbs posted:

It’s been really amusing seeing all of the goons try to trash talk the AI/ML advances as simultaneously completely worthless and capable of eliminating all their jobs.

Deep fakes are a terrifying concept that we will see more and more of soon.

GPT can give you imprecise and incorrect information but it can also save you massive amounts of time on a wide variety of tasks

AI art is extremely impressive and nobody outside of forums posters actually cares when half a pinkie is missing, nor expects that to be a problem forever. The ability to imagine some ridiculous concept and see a computer spit out an image of it in a few seconds is incredible.

There’s an element of buzzwordiness and grift going on but the impacts of AI/ML applications hitting the mainstream are very real

I am eagerly awaiting the day AI eliminates my job. Then I don't have to support this buggy, outdated, overly complex, daisy-chained house of cards piece of crap web application anymore.

That day won't arrive.

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

M_Gargantua posted:

The problem is the word processor didn't actually put secretaries out of work. There is still an important role in the office that a dedicated person can perform and improve upon, however as a cost saving measure companies have simply killed that position and just burdened their other staff with those tasks. Secretaries are now reserved as a status symbol in most corporate culture, even though any team of like 20+ people could really use one.

But it just plain wouldn't have been possible to make people do their own secretarial work without word processors (and e-mail, and electronic calendars, etc). Excel means you need fewer accountants per analyst, you get the idea. Large language models are probably going to do the same for meeting notes, data entry, you name it. None of these fundamentally change how a company runs or even necessarily produce better results than dedicated employees, but each turn of the crank means some combination of decreased costs and letting people more people focus on "higher level" work that can't just be automated away because it requires human input. My prediction, for whatever little it's worth, is that in 5-10 years a lot of office workers are going to need to know how to use "AI" tools in the same way they need Outlook and Google today just as a bare minimum to get in the door.

AreWeDrunkYet fucked around with this message at 21:42 on Nov 20, 2023

Kesper North
Nov 3, 2011

EMERGENCY POWER TO PARTY

Defenestrategy posted:

I don't believe social engineering will improve as a tool against everyday people*. Corporations will have to worry about it, because already emails from bosses saying "I'm in meeting please send 50$ google play" already work randomly. Give those kinds of scams an audio generator trained on a large corporations boss's public speeches and you'd probably end up with the keys to the kingdom eventually.


edit: *The elderly, particularly gullible, and those who don't have enough social anxiety to ignore their phone outside of text messages and known numbers.

I'm not sure what you're basing this comment on, but as a cybersecurity incident responder I've seen a dramatic increase in social engineering attacks against everyday people in the last year and it's definitely not impacting only the elderly and the corporations.

People in their 20s, 30s and 40s are sending money to deepfaked friends and relatives who need to get their car out of impound, or pay a ticket, or get bail money, or emergency rent help, etc. I know of half a dozen successful attacks in the last three months just among people I know personally. Sophistication of the attacks is increasing, and peoples' vigilance is dropping due to fatigue because everybody is hosed and in trouble right now financially.

Hyrax Attack! posted:

Legit wonder how good AI is getting at skunkworks and tech company research labs. Not trying to be :tinfoil: but feels like they are slow walking how powerful video/image/audio tools are publicly available, because of the obvious malicious potential, but it’s still wild what’s free. In FB chat they added AI generated stickers & as of this morning it still happily creates images of Zuckerberg & Mickey Mouse kissing.

As this stuff doesn’t have borders wonder how society will deal with anyone being able to use audio AI to make thousands of calls a minute pretending to be Amazon or your bank with enough personalized details to have a high success rate. Wonder if phone calls will just be unusable for any transactions.

I've been working with municipalities and 911 call center operators to try to find ways to determine if someone is mass-generating fake emergency calls and develop a plan for what to do if it happens. In my region they're required by statute to respond to all calls and if they start getting a million robocalls, it can get them in serious regulatory trouble if that results in inability to respond. It's a serious problem that public safety and emergency management professionals are very concerned about - but nobody has a good solution for.

In other words, this space is ripe for exploitation and I consider it to be a matter of time before a city's emergency response during a major disaster is paralyzed by a storm of false but realistic-seeming reports.

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

But it just plain wouldn't have been possible to make people do their own secretarial work without word processors (and e-mail, and electronic calendars, etc). Excel means you need fewer accountants per analyst, you get the idea. Large language models are probably going to do the same for meeting notes, data entry, you name it. None of these fundamentally change how a company runs or even necessarily produce better results than dedicated employees, but each turn of the crank means some combination of decreased costs and letting people more people focus on "higher level" work that can't just be automated away because it requires human input. My prediction, for whatever little it's worth, is that in 5-10 years a lot of office workers are going to need to know how to use "AI" tools in the same way they need Outlook and Google today just as a bare minimum to get in the door.

AI is just the latest in the Enshitification of the human experience.

Milo and POTUS
Sep 3, 2017

I will not shut up about the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. I talk about them all the time and work them into every conversation I have. I built a shrine in my room for the yellow one who died because sadly no one noticed because she died around 9/11. Wanna see it?

bird food bathtub posted:

Argh he set the marshmallow on fire that just ruins the whole thing and results in such an inferior treat. Gotta go slow with that kind of thing and brown the outside over time while heating the entire marshmallow to gooey, tasty goodness. This works especially well with my family tradition of roasting Peeps instead of marshmallows. Go slow and caramelize the sugar coating into a wonderful, crunchy shell and then the inside is all melted, delicious diabetes but those are REALLY terrible to set on fire. The sugar coating just turns into carbon and all you taste is burnt terribleness if you aren't going to be patient and put in the work for something good.

Yes I have strong opinions on campfire roasting of foods. Suck it. :colbert:

I think he would know munchies better than you

Crab Dad
Dec 28, 2002

behold i have tempered and refined thee, but not as silver; as CRAB


Kesper North posted:

I'm not sure what you're basing this comment on, but as a cybersecurity incident responder I've seen a dramatic increase in social engineering attacks against everyday people in the last year and it's definitely not impacting only the elderly and the corporations.

People in their 20s, 30s and 40s are sending money to deepfaked friends and relatives who need to get their car out of impound, or pay a ticket, or get bail money, or emergency rent help, etc. I know of half a dozen successful attacks in the last three months just among people I know personally. Sophistication of the attacks is increasing, and peoples' vigilance is dropping due to fatigue because everybody is hosed and in trouble right now financially.



I must be a cheap bastard because nobody has asked me to send them money.

bengy81
May 8, 2010
My old man was/is getting scammed by someone, apparently he sent someone at least $500 in Razer gift cards.
I've been getting lots of fake invoices from Geek Squad and Microsoft lately.

The world's in a weird way right now. Cut off from all external things, my life is reasonably ok, which I'm very grateful for, but holy hell are we staring down the barrel of an absolute nightmarish pile of poo poo in the extremely near future. I just feel super uncomfortable thinking about anything more than a few weeks in the future.

Grip it and rip it
Apr 28, 2020

Kesper North posted:

I'm not sure what you're basing this comment on, but as a cybersecurity incident responder I've seen a dramatic increase in social engineering attacks against everyday people in the last year and it's definitely not impacting only the elderly and the corporations.

People in their 20s, 30s and 40s are sending money to deepfaked friends and relatives who need to get their car out of impound, or pay a ticket, or get bail money, or emergency rent help, etc. I know of half a dozen successful attacks in the last three months just among people I know personally. Sophistication of the attacks is increasing, and peoples' vigilance is dropping due to fatigue because everybody is hosed and in trouble right now financially.


Wouldn't that level of personalization suggest that those individuals are being targeted by somebody they know? The efficacy of large scale phishing campaigns or redirects or whatever seem to rely on the fact that many people use certain sites and could expect an invoice from apple/amazon/whoever based on their recent activity. Getting enough information to specifically suggest that somebody is at the local jail / garage and needs money for their ${carMakeandModel} or whatever would suggest a level of granularity that should be hard to maintain

Grip it and rip it fucked around with this message at 00:14 on Nov 21, 2023

Wingnut Ninja
Jan 11, 2003

Mostly Harmless

Grip it and rip it posted:

Wouldn't that level of personalization suggest that those individuals are being targeted by somebody they know? The efficacy of large scale phishing campaigns or redirects or whatever seem to rely on the fact that many people use certain sites and could expect an invoice from apple/amazon/whoever based on their recent activity. Getting enough information to specifically suggest that somebody is at the local jail / garage and needs money for their ${carMakeandModel} or whatever would suggest a level of granularity that should be hard to maintain

I don't think so, you just need to gain access to someone's friends/contacts list and blast a phishook out to all of them. 99% will recognize it as a scam, but if you do it thousands of times you get enough hits to make it worthwhile.

Nick Soapdish
Apr 27, 2008


https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1726710073370816944?t=C849R7ggpDl8yTqCzp4R3Q&s=19

Your good (great) favorite President is healthy and smart due to good genes

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Nick Soapdish posted:

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1726710073370816944?t=C849R7ggpDl8yTqCzp4R3Q&s=19

Your good (great) favorite President is healthy and smart due to good genes

Given his diet and lack of exercise, his genes probably are pretty drat good for him to be alive and functioning.

ThisIsJohnWayne
Feb 23, 2007
Ooo! Look at me! NO DON'T LOOK AT ME!



Stultus Maximus posted:

Given his diet and lack of exercise, his genes probably are pretty drat good for him to be alive and functioning.

Considering all his psychological issues and mental decline, I'm more doubtful

Kesper North
Nov 3, 2011

EMERGENCY POWER TO PARTY

Grip it and rip it posted:

Wouldn't that level of personalization suggest that those individuals are being targeted by somebody they know? The efficacy of large scale phishing campaigns or redirects or whatever seem to rely on the fact that many people use certain sites and could expect an invoice from apple/amazon/whoever based on their recent activity. Getting enough information to specifically suggest that somebody is at the local jail / garage and needs money for their ${carMakeandModel} or whatever would suggest a level of granularity that should be hard to maintain

Lord no, people put loving everything on social media and half of them have publicly viewable profiles that make scraping the necessary information trivially easy. And a surprising number of people fall victim to obviously fake pretexts. Humans, for the most part, are credulous idiots; I am astounded on a daily basis that we survived long enough to gently caress up the planet.

People who produce video content and podcasts are especially vulnerable since there are lots of samples of their voices, but attackers can, will and have created audio deepfakes based on recordings of your voice when you answer a spam call. Like, you know when you get a call, pick up, say "Hello"? With enough "hellos" they can deepfake your voice; if they get you to answer some questions ("no", "yes", "why the gently caress are you calling me about car insurance when i don't have a car", etc) then that gives them even more of a sample.

This criminal business model synergizes well with spam call center operators overseas; they're already calling people and asking them inane questions all the time! But now they can augment that income by collecting audio datasets for future deepfakes at the same time.

There's a huge growth industry in this, you just don't see it because it's mostly in very poor countries.

Wingnut Ninja posted:

I don't think so, you just need to gain access to someone's friends/contacts list and blast a phishook out to all of them. 99% will recognize it as a scam, but if you do it thousands of times you get enough hits to make it worthwhile.

It's this. A surprising amount of people will do things just because their "friend" asked them to in FB messenger.

Sometimes it doesn't even require hacking that Facebook account; you can grift suckers with cloned accounts too.

A few hundred bucks is worth a lot of effort if you live in Lagos!

Crab Dad posted:

I must be a cheap bastard because nobody has asked me to send them money.

For a while I was getting multiple daily texts from "my CEO" asking that I send him gift cards. If I'm bored I gently caress with the attacker by wasting their time and pretending to be stupid. If I'm busy I just send them dickbutte.jpg

Kesper North fucked around with this message at 00:49 on Nov 21, 2023

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010

Tiny Timbs posted:

AI art is extremely impressive

https://twitter.com/EnBuenora/status/1716169798269522402?t=GRszjNOc2gkEK0ZKSaqowg&s=19

:hmmyes:

Crab Dad
Dec 28, 2002

behold i have tempered and refined thee, but not as silver; as CRAB


Kesper North posted:


For a while I was getting multiple daily texts from "my CEO" asking that I send him gift cards. If I'm bored I gently caress with the attacker by wasting their time and pretending to be stupid. If I'm busy I just send them dickbutte.jpg

in my work career of 30 years I have never once given a gift to anyone over me from a boss to a lol CEO. Who are these idiots thinking the CEO cares who they are I got a bridge to sell them.

Kesper North
Nov 3, 2011

EMERGENCY POWER TO PARTY

Crab Dad posted:

in my work career of 30 years I have never once given a gift to anyone over me from a boss to a lol CEO. Who are these idiots thinking the CEO cares who they are I got a bridge to sell them.

It probably works super well on executive assistants who get sent on personal errands all the time

GD_American
Jul 21, 2004

LISTEN TO WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AS IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT!

Great, another loving role goes to Chris Pratt

ThisIsJohnWayne
Feb 23, 2007
Ooo! Look at me! NO DON'T LOOK AT ME!



Crab Dad posted:

in my work career of 30 years I have never once given a gift to anyone over me from a boss to a lol CEO. Who are these idiots thinking the CEO cares who they are I got a bridge to sell them.

Might I interestes you in a bussness opportunity for black fuel saving engine boxes? We only use the high-tech usb cable! I also got a crystal that will make new horsepowers

GD_American
Jul 21, 2004

LISTEN TO WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AS IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT!
OOOOh oooohhhh Big Army shitcanned Allen West's nephew

https://twitter.com/davis_winkie/status/1726728692129485310

Pine Cone Jones
Dec 6, 2009

You throw me the acorn, I throw you the whip!
https://bsky.app/profile/akivamcohen.bsky.social/post/3keo2c3iews2s

"Hey, Litigation Disaster Tourists!

Musk went and did it. He filed the SLAPP suit against Media Matters. This thing will likely rival the Trump election suits for frivolity so let's read it together, why don't we?

Complaint is here. First thing I want to do when someone files a transparently ridiculous lolsuit is look at both jurisdiction and which lawyers filed it.

And ... hooo. Boy. Wow. Does this ever tell some stories

Let's start with the choice of counsel.

In the Merger Agreement litigation between Musk and Twitter, he was represented by Skadden Arps, the whitest of white-shoe biglaw firms.

In the litigation with Twitter's former employees, X Corp is represented by biglaw - Morgan Lewis.
AkivaMCohen @akivamcohen.bsky.social
·
11m
In Concord Music v. X Corp, X is defended by Quinn Emanuel - biglaw. Gjoni v. Twitter? Morgan Lewis. Gerber v. Twitter? Quinn Emanuel.

Case after case, big and small, Musk's twitter is represented by the largest law firms in the country.

Stone Hilton and SL Law? Not in that category
AkivaMCohen @akivamcohen.bsky.social
·
9m
And if you look at that sig block closely, it doesn't seem like anyone from biglaw is riding to the rescue for Elon here. The folks from Stone Hilton are "admission pending" - meaning they're not local counsel who happens to be already admitted in the court of choice. They're the ones who are asking
AkivaMCohen @akivamcohen.bsky.social
·
7m
to be allowed to practice in the Northern District of Texas. (Typically, you get local counsel who is already admitted, and then lead counsel asks to be admitted "pro hac vice" [for this one case]).

So why isn't Elon using biglaw this time?
AkivaMCohen @akivamcohen.bsky.social
·
5m
Well, one reason is he went with politically connected Texas lawyers, reflecting the extent to which people think that Texas courts are political actors, not legal actors. All three of the lawyers in that signature block have backgrounds with the Texas AG's office or Solicitor General's office
AkivaMCohen @akivamcohen.bsky.social
·
4m
But also, I think Brian has this EXACTLY correct.

All those big firms Elon usually uses? They probably went "gently caress, no, are you out of your mind? This is a baaaaad idea"
Brian Griffith @qlippot.bsky.social
·
6m"

Sorry, blue sky doesn't embed great all the time so I figure a link to the post and a bunch of copy and pasted text would be better than just a bare link.

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS

https://twitter.com/MikeSington/status/1726296039798480945

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

bone shaking.
soul baking.
here's the complaint

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.383454/gov.uscourts.txnd.383454.1.0_1.pdf

It's laughably thin and there's no reason whatsoever to be in NDTX.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

Mr. Nice! posted:

here's the complaint

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.383454/gov.uscourts.txnd.383454.1.0_1.pdf

It's laughably thin and there's no reason whatsoever to be in NDTX.

Between TX district courts and stacked circuit courts this may be going to the supreme court.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply