Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Wafflecopper
Nov 27, 2004

I am a mouth, and I must scream

Lobsterpillar posted:

A government that will deliver for all New Zealanders? I didn't know that was the plan from National.

delivering cuts to benefits and public services is still delivering!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

El Pollo Blanco
Jun 12, 2013

by sebmojo
How are they going to get their cuts by Xmas with only a week of Parliament lol

voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

There will be three weeks before the Christmas shutdown, assuming parliament sits not next week but the week after. Plenty of time for each minister to write to the CEO and direct them to find 6.5% in cuts, then dust their hands, say job well done and get on with borrowing a shitload of money to pay for the tax cuts.

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.
they can just use hyefu, parliament isn't involved

voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

They can't pass tax cuts without parliament, which is what I assume he was talking about

Confusedslight
Jan 9, 2020
I wonder how many times luxon will say "strong and stable goverment" tomorrow.

echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

Progressive JPEG posted:

fully expect that winnie will be the only reason we'll still have pharmac at the end of this term

what makes you say this

echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
can the govt use afterpay to pay for
things

Progressive JPEG
Feb 19, 2003

echinopsis posted:

what makes you say this

old people are NZF's main constituency and it'll hurt them the most

echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

Progressive JPEG posted:

old people are NZF's main constituency and it'll hurt them the most

what I mean is that is there any other reason to think they’d scrap it


not everyone agrees with some of the funding decisions they make but scrapping pharmac would be one of the most wildly unpopular moves a govt could make outside of idk illegalising cars

Varkk
Apr 17, 2004

Pretty sure one of Acts core health policies was to kill off pharmac. Or at least severely hamstring it.

echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
very lame

huge volumes of kiwis have avoid normal pharmacies just to save a total of $100 a year


a single symbicort inhaler costs about $75 to a patient


people wouldn’t be happy if drugs stopped be funded. we got kiwis addicted to cheap and then free drugs. which would be an awful pill for many to swallow if people had to start paying for meds

tbf I have no idea what the implications would really mean but man I can tell you very few people are ok with paying for drugs, unless it’s boner pills

Content to Hover
Sep 11, 2009
It's easy to forget how many New Zealanders are ignorant about things like pharmac. They regularly make the news for medications they don't fund, rather than the fact they make healthcare affordable for the average person.

ACT obviously want to kill it, free market libertarians and all that. National need to find money. They made a lot of promises that they couldn't fund with the plan their coalition partners won't let them use.

Looking at the UK as an prime example, underfunding public health until it fails is a common way the right use to push private health. While Winston is bad, some aspects of what a National/Act government would offer will be curbed.

I expect more regressive policy on race will be the big comprise the others will demand from National. The failure of the voice in Australia, immigration as a justification in the UK and generic racism in the US, probably make it look politically palatable.

Varkk
Apr 17, 2004

I just checked and while Act doesn’t outright say they want to kill Pharmac they do have a very ghoulish policy of directing Pharmac to have a productivity focus on which medicines get funded and for whom. They also want to remove Pharmac’s single buyer status which gives them enormous bargaining power when purchasing medicines. They also have made noises about not increasing funding available.

Spiteski
Aug 27, 2013



Content to Hover posted:

It's easy to forget how many New Zealanders are ignorant about things like pharmac. They regularly make the news for medications they don't fund, rather than the fact they make healthcare affordable for the average person.





Pharmacies should put on the receipt how much medication costs, and then tell people "That'll be 150 dollars, but with Pharmac's funding it's going to cost you... zero dollars today"


edit: quoted wrong post

sebmojo
Oct 23, 2010


Legit Cyberpunk









Varkk posted:

I just checked and while Act doesn’t outright say they want to kill Pharmac they do have a very ghoulish policy of directing Pharmac to have a productivity focus on which medicines get funded and for whom. They also want to remove Pharmac’s single buyer status which gives them enormous bargaining power when purchasing medicines. They also have made noises about not increasing funding available.

I think this equates to killing pharmac.

the productivity focus would be insanely unpopular with nz first since presumably it would eliminate meds for everyone past retirement age.

my biggest concern with nzf would be how far they lean into anti trans culture war stuff, my instinct is that it's just bigot bait and will be dropped in the bargaining, but we'll see i guess.

Spiteski
Aug 27, 2013



https://twitter.com/nzherald/status/1727818051150602287/photo/1


Hahah Winnie and Seymour sharing deputy for 18months each.

Taitale
Feb 19, 2011
https://www.documentcloud.org/app?q=%2Bproject%3Anational-act-nz-first-coa-216035%20

Agreements in there.


sebmojo posted:

I think this equates to killing pharmac.

the productivity focus would be insanely unpopular with nz first since presumably it would eliminate meds for everyone past retirement age.

my biggest concern with nzf would be how far they lean into anti trans culture war stuff, my instinct is that it's just bigot bait and will be dropped in the bargaining, but we'll see i guess.

Well the NZ First agreement has these:

quote:

Refocus the curriculum on academic achievement and not ideology, including the removal and replacement of the gender, sexuality, and relationship-based education guidelines.

and

quote:

Ensure publicly funded sporting bodies support fair competition that is not compromised by rules relating to gender.

So I don't think it's all dropped.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Lmao that they settled on the Roman way

Varkk
Apr 17, 2004

Winston to be deputy for 18months and push through some red meat for his base. Then do a rug pull when it is Seymour’s turn?

bssoil
Mar 21, 2004

There were go

Confusedslight
Jan 9, 2020
Like I said earlier it's going to be a long 3 9 years.

Spyderizer
Feb 18, 2004

RNZ posted:

Brooke van Velden will be Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety...

Read more 🔗 https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/503138/live-updates-new-coalition-government-being-announced

Got some 3rd World Labour conditions to look forward to.

cptn_dr
Sep 7, 2011

Seven for beauty that blossoms and dies


bssoil posted:

There were go

Weatherman
Jul 30, 2003

WARBLEKLONK
Man, Seymour is such a whiny britches about renewable energy:
"Repeal the Clean Car Discount."
...
"Work to replace fuel excise taxes with electronic road user charging for all vehicles, starting with electric vehicles."

Such a testicle. Why are fragile men so attached to petrol engines in gigantic fuckoff trucks? What makes your brain look at those and think "I will make that a defining part of my identity"?

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



i believe it's mostly motivated by the fact that electric vehicles currently don't pay any kind of road user charge.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Tiny dick + a totally unmoored sense of identity because all the traditional pillars of manhood have been (rightfully) destroyed by progress. So you need to have something to show you're one of the boys but you also don't really know what that even means anymore so you settle on the packaged up, weaponised mediocrity peddled by ford et al

klen dool
May 7, 2007

Okay well me being wrong in some limited situations doesn't change my overall point.
What makes the road user charges "electronic"?

redleader
Aug 18, 2005

Engage according to operational parameters

Ghostlight posted:

i believe it's mostly motivated by the fact that electric vehicles currently don't pay any kind of road user charge.

it's motivated by culture war bullshit, op

victorious
Jul 2, 2007

As a youth I prayed, "Give me chastity and continence, but not yet."

klen dool posted:

What makes the road user charges "electronic"?

Maybe some kind of connected e-road thing? Where your vehicle tracks mileage via a GPS module and reports it to a central location?

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

victorious posted:

Maybe some kind of connected e-road thing? Where your vehicle tracks mileage via a GPS module and reports it to a central location?

They already do this for commercial trucks, it's a seperate digital odometer that sits under the windscreen

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



klen dool posted:

What makes the road user charges "electronic"?
they spy on you with gps and cameras and send you the bill.

victorious
Jul 2, 2007

As a youth I prayed, "Give me chastity and continence, but not yet."

Slavvy posted:

They already do this for commercial trucks, it's a seperate digital odometer that sits under the windscreen

Yeah that's why I suggested it, the technology already exists.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Imo a toll style system would be better, as in you pay depending on the roads you use not necessarily the mileage you cover

redleader
Aug 18, 2005

Engage according to operational parameters
government gps, with occasional letters saying things like "why did you drive to mcdonalds at 3am on a tuesday"

voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

imo the govt should ban cars and fund public transport for everyone

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

They should do full communism immediately yeah

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



bike tory posted:

imo the govt should ban cars and fund public transport for everyone
handout for the private bus industry

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

In the pocket of big rail

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

victorious
Jul 2, 2007

As a youth I prayed, "Give me chastity and continence, but not yet."

Slavvy posted:

Imo a toll style system would be better, as in you pay depending on the roads you use not necessarily the mileage you cover

They technically should be able to incorporate road tolling into the same system as they could geo-fence certain areas for extra tolling. Although there'll no doubt be workarounds for it in similar ways to how people disconnect their odometers to dodge paying RUCs now.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply