Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
GoutPatrol
Oct 17, 2009

*Stupid Babby*

BrigadierSensible posted:

Entirely unrelated to the current discussion. But Singapore was mentioned, so it made me think of this.

You know how Singapore and Malaysian English speakers add a ".... lah" at the end of most sentences? Like "Hey, come and have a look at this lah", or "Where do you want to go for dinner tonight lah?" etc.

Is there a Hong Kong equivalent?

In Taiwan the la is pretty common as well. Usually means :rolleyes:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ili
Jul 26, 2003


The Taiwanese I know mostly say a not la, and even when they do say la it's a vastly different one to the singaporean lah.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

The ghost town phenomenon is more of a symptom of issues rather than the problem itself. Local governments get tax revenue from land sales so they'd push for new housing development, the economy itself derives a large portion of its growth from new development so it is easy to imagine the central government greasing the wheels, and the individual saw real estate as a safe place to invest so those who could invested in housing. The entirety is an ecosystem of sorts that supports everyone within it. And for years with a growing population it all worked out with a few bad bets along the way.

When that ecosystem hit a combination of slowing population growth, overzealous expansion, and the practice of individuals/investors taking on mortgages before construction, the result is massive loss from construction giants and their lenders down to the most modest individual investor taking it on the chin. The central government can either support the ailing sector as they have done in the past or let the bets come due and allow the system to naturally weed out the bad loans and poor development decisions. The government wields essentially unlimited power so they may be able to pull the strings in such a way to serve up a soft landing but a lot of money in the form of massive unfinished or unwanted construction is going to go poof.

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,

Big rear end On Fire posted:

The ghost town phenomenon is more of a symptom of issues rather than the problem itself. Local governments get tax revenue from land sales so they'd push for new housing development, the economy itself derives a large portion of its growth from new development so it is easy to imagine the central government greasing the wheels, and the individual saw real estate as a safe place to invest so those who could invested in housing. The entirety is an ecosystem of sorts that supports everyone within it. And for years with a growing population it all worked out with a few bad bets along the way.

When that ecosystem hit a combination of slowing population growth, overzealous expansion, and the practice of individuals/investors taking on mortgages before construction, the result is massive loss from construction giants and their lenders down to the most modest individual investor taking it on the chin. The central government can either support the ailing sector as they have done in the past or let the bets come due and allow the system to naturally weed out the bad loans and poor development decisions. The government wields essentially unlimited power so they may be able to pull the strings in such a way to serve up a soft landing but a lot of money in the form of massive unfinished or unwanted construction is going to go poof.

The bright/dark side of this is that since China gets to pick to winners and losers, foreign investors get to eat 100% losses and then domestic investment firms eat more losses than individual investors. Sort of a middle ground between the American model of bailing out the big firms, and the Icelandic model of bailing out the little guys.

Klyith
Aug 3, 2007

GBS Pledge Week

eSports Chaebol posted:

The bright/dark side of this is that since China gets to pick to winners and losers, foreign investors get to eat 100% losses and then domestic investment firms eat more losses than individual investors.

That'd be nice if there were lots of foreign investors to soak, but there aren't. This is almost all internal debt. Also, while "make the foreigners eat all the losses" sounds great in theory, it isn't great when your economy still mostly runs on selling stuff to foreigners.

So yes because it's money that China owes to China, they have a lot of power to distribute the losses. But while they could distribute the losses away from the individual home investors, that means you are soaking the insiders and wealthy connected bigwigs. A good number of whom are gonna be party members with connections in Xi's own camp. Hmmm. Maybe tougher than it sounds.


So I predict they will imprison a few CEOs of real estate companies for show, let all the middle class investors lose their shirts, then deal with the massive public discontent with either crackdowns or god forbid invading Taiwan.

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


It will be interesting/terrifying to see if China can actually just not have an economic meltdown through the sheer force of the government saying nope we're not going to do that. I assume that's not possible but who knows.

Coolguye
Jul 6, 2011

Required by his programming!
i mean internal losses like that don't necessarily matter if the government is willing to exercise its financial sovereignty on the matter. china, along with any other highly independent country (financially), has shitloads of tools for handling and stabilizing those situations. especially in the case of distressed businesses, the government can just wave their hands and say "ok, now you have enough money to pay your debts", and it will just happen.

naturally though, none of those sorts of tools are infinitely powerful, and china has already been using those tools very heavily for the last 20 years to sustain and bluff growth. inflation rates are basically the ultimate canary in the mineshaft for those bluffs being called, and china's having to hold back right now precisely because they're on the edge of those rates going out of control. if they go out of control now, they'll really have to sweat to stop it.

Grand Fromage posted:

It will be interesting/terrifying to see if China can actually just not have an economic meltdown through the sheer force of the government saying nope we're not going to do that. I assume that's not possible but who knows.

it's extremely possible, just not unlimited. that's exactly what the US government did in 2008, and continued to do for like 10 years afterward. the fed was basically like "nope not gonna do the meltdown today" until eventually the market stopped asking.

the issue with china is that they've already been saying "nope not gonna do that today" for decades to lie about their growth in the first place so their ability to say no is already sorely tested.

Baddog
May 12, 2001

Coolguye posted:


the issue with china is that they've already been saying "nope not gonna do that today" for decades to lie about their growth in the first place so their ability to say no is already sorely tested.


When you look back decades, china went from a backwater to building everything for the world. Getting sweaty about them lying over 10% vs 8% annualized growth is missing the forest for the trees.

Coolguye
Jul 6, 2011

Required by his programming!

Baddog posted:

When you look back decades, china went from a backwater to building everything for the world. Getting sweaty about them lying over 10% vs 8% annualized growth is missing the forest for the trees.

if it was 10% vs 8% you'd be correct. but it's 10% vs what is most likely closer to 2-4% in many of these years. that was the entire point that a lot of economists spent the entirety of 200X shouting themselves blue over and nobody believed them. institutional lying was so ingrained in china that their numbers were basically made up from whole cloth, so if you focused on the only thing you COULD reasonably measure - cost and value of exports - it was overwhelmingly likely that the numbers out of china weren't just incorrect, they were wrong on close to an order of magnitude level.

and again - if this happened 2, 4, even 6 years in a row, even then it might not be that bad. these are still percentage points. but it was going on for decades before bluffs finally started getting called.

it's worth noting that when we say decades at this point, we do mean 200X. if you want to go back to 198X okay that's another question, absolutely there was a massive industrialization shift there and massive growth should be expected. but the five year plan doesn't last 40 years.

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

You're not wrong, but when you're borrowing money to invest in China at 9%...

Wonton
Jul 5, 2012
USA has the luxury to hand wave any thing and nope the gently caress out. By virtue of being the reserved back currency of the world, and having the largest military, USA can print however much money they want and be the first ones to spend it before everyone else in the world. Oh and they are also the chair and run the IMF, Swift, other financial laws and tools for worldwide payment systems. Master card/visa sitting on their asses collecting those 2-3% merchant fees.

Basically the rest of the world is subsidizing the American economy. Besides, if the states can hand wave over god knows number of lost lives and wars, hand waving economic meltdowns is easy - as long as the reserved currency is USD and you have swathe loads of immigrants clamoring in.

So how is this related to the other country? The other country wants that power and privilege to dictate the rules of the world. And in some ways is learning from the States to enable wealth extraction.

Service economy my rear end when everything is outsourced and you live off weird financial instruments and rentier crap.

Gaius Marius
Oct 9, 2012

🙄

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



in fact china has the largest military

TrashMammal
Nov 10, 2022

i hear it’s the largest most effective non-woke fighting force in the world these days

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Speaking of institutional lying, how's that record youth unemployment going, China?


Problem solved, I guess.

ili
Jul 26, 2003


27.5% turnout for HK elections, I guess why bother when the choices are already made anyway.

Coolguye
Jul 6, 2011

Required by his programming!

Wonton posted:

USA has the luxury to hand wave any thing and nope the gently caress out. By virtue of being the reserved back currency of the world, and having the largest military, USA can print however much money they want and be the first ones to spend it before everyone else in the world. Oh and they are also the chair and run the IMF, Swift, other financial laws and tools for worldwide payment systems. Master card/visa sitting on their asses collecting those 2-3% merchant fees.

Basically the rest of the world is subsidizing the American economy. Besides, if the states can hand wave over god knows number of lost lives and wars, hand waving economic meltdowns is easy - as long as the reserved currency is USD and you have swathe loads of immigrants clamoring in.

So how is this related to the other country? The other country wants that power and privilege to dictate the rules of the world. And in some ways is learning from the States to enable wealth extraction.

Service economy my rear end when everything is outsourced and you live off weird financial instruments and rentier crap.

🙄

Dandywalken
Feb 11, 2014

Wonton posted:

USA has the luxury to hand wave any thing and nope the gently caress out. By virtue of being the reserved back currency of the world, and having the largest military, USA can print however much money they want and be the first ones to spend it before everyone else in the world. Oh and they are also the chair and run the IMF, Swift, other financial laws and tools for worldwide payment systems. Master card/visa sitting on their asses collecting those 2-3% merchant fees.

Basically the rest of the world is subsidizing the American economy. Besides, if the states can hand wave over god knows number of lost lives and wars, hand waving economic meltdowns is easy - as long as the reserved currency is USD and you have swathe loads of immigrants clamoring in.

So how is this related to the other country? The other country wants that power and privilege to dictate the rules of the world. And in some ways is learning from the States to enable wealth extraction.

Service economy my rear end when everything is outsourced and you live off weird financial instruments and rentier crap.

been saying this!!!

MarcusSA
Sep 23, 2007

Wonton posted:

USA has the luxury to hand wave any thing and nope the gently caress out. By virtue of being the reserved back currency of the world, and having the largest military, USA can print however much money they want and be the first ones to spend it before everyone else in the world. Oh and they are also the chair and run the IMF, Swift, other financial laws and tools for worldwide payment systems. Master card/visa sitting on their asses collecting those 2-3% merchant fees.

Basically the rest of the world is subsidizing the American economy. Besides, if the states can hand wave over god knows number of lost lives and wars, hand waving economic meltdowns is easy - as long as the reserved currency is USD and you have swathe loads of immigrants clamoring in.

So how is this related to the other country? The other country wants that power and privilege to dictate the rules of the world. And in some ways is learning from the States to enable wealth extraction.

Service economy my rear end when everything is outsourced and you live off weird financial instruments and rentier crap.

Many such cases!

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

Wonton posted:

USA has the luxury to hand wave any thing and nope the gently caress out. By virtue of being the reserved back currency of the world, and having the largest military, USA can print however much money they want and be the first ones to spend it before everyone else in the world. Oh and they are also the chair and run the IMF, Swift, other financial laws and tools for worldwide payment systems. Master card/visa sitting on their asses collecting those 2-3% merchant fees.

Basically the rest of the world is subsidizing the American economy. Besides, if the states can hand wave over god knows number of lost lives and wars, hand waving economic meltdowns is easy - as long as the reserved currency is USD and you have swathe loads of immigrants clamoring in.

So how is this related to the other country? The other country wants that power and privilege to dictate the rules of the world. And in some ways is learning from the States to enable wealth extraction.

Service economy my rear end when everything is outsourced and you live off weird financial instruments and rentier crap.

:fart:

Shumagorath
Jun 6, 2001
been a while since this thread had a good Xi Jinping THOT

Toxic Mental
Jun 1, 2019

The US is the reason that china sucks loving rear end! lol!

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

bone shaking.
soul baking.
The USA has been the bad guy in most ways historically.

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

People are so happy they don't even feel the need to go out and vote!

Toxic Mental
Jun 1, 2019

Mr. Nice! posted:

The USA has been the bad guy in most ways historically.

It's more like X-Men, there's not just one The Bad Guy

The USA is Blob, China is Mister Sinister, etc

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


McGavin posted:

Speaking of institutional lying, how's that record youth unemployment going, China?

Problem solved, I guess.

The youth employment crisis is interesting, because it's basically a result of China trying to bootstrap it's way to a western service economy with education - look if everyone goes and does a degree the jobs those degrees require will appear right?

And to a certain extent they did, but when Xi came in and said "actually, kids doing nothing but online tutoring or online gambling in gacha games is bad, shutting it all down", this model of employment disappeared. It might be better for China overall, but it's bad for Number, and providing the type of jobs many of those youth want and have been training for.

Coolguye
Jul 6, 2011

Required by his programming!

Nothingtoseehere posted:

The youth employment crisis is interesting, because it's basically a result of China trying to bootstrap it's way to a western service economy with education - look if everyone goes and does a degree the jobs those degrees require will appear right?

And to a certain extent they did, but when Xi came in and said "actually, kids doing nothing but online tutoring or online gambling in gacha games is bad, shutting it all down", this model of employment disappeared. It might be better for China overall, but it's bad for Number, and providing the type of jobs many of those youth want and have been training for.
there's no way to spin having such massive unemployment as ultimately good. if there's one repeated lesson from the last 100 years of economic activity it's that as long as a job generates something someone else will pay money for, there's no such thing as frivolous employment. 100 years ago US government officials were whining that manufacturing was distracting from the important business of agriculture, 40 years ago they were whining that these newfangled "service" jobs were distracting from the important business of manufacturing. both times they were completely wrong.

you MIGHT be able to make an argument that self-sufficiency is good, actually, if that sort of autarky hadn't led to objectively more misery and poverty in literally every case it was pursued in the last 3 centuries. countries become more self-sufficient by joining larger trading networks and reinvesting their winnings from comparative advantage into home infrastructure and contingencies for if that trade goes south. this is a known good pathway that has led large places like India and small places like Botswana alike to objectively better spots with at least some measure of home grown durability.

that's basically the exact opposite of what China has been doing since Xi took power, though.

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


Coolguye posted:

there's no way to spin having such massive unemployment as ultimately good. if there's one repeated lesson from the last 100 years of economic activity it's that as long as a job generates something someone else will pay money for, there's no such thing as frivolous employment. 100 years ago US government officials were whining that manufacturing was distracting from the important business of agriculture, 40 years ago they were whining that these newfangled "service" jobs were distracting from the important business of manufacturing. both times they were completely wrong.

you MIGHT be able to make an argument that self-sufficiency is good, actually, if that sort of autarky hadn't led to objectively more misery and poverty in literally every case it was pursued in the last 3 centuries. countries become more self-sufficient by joining larger trading networks and reinvesting their winnings from comparative advantage into home infrastructure and contingencies for if that trade goes south. this is a known good pathway that has led large places like India and small places like Botswana alike to objectively better spots with at least some measure of home grown durability.

that's basically the exact opposite of what China has been doing since Xi took power, though.

I don't disagree, but also industries do have negative externalities to consider. I don't think Chinese lives were made better by constant tutoring outside of school by private companies, or but addicting children to gacha games. The issue is more among that China just decided to destroy a industry overnight, and create and chilling effect on other services.

BrigadierSensible
Feb 16, 2012

I've got a pocket full of cheese🧀, and a garden full of trees🌴.

Mr. Nice! posted:

The USA has been the bad guy in most ways historically.

No, you are confusing it with Billie Ellish.

She even wrote a song about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyDfgMOUjCI

Okuteru
Nov 10, 2007

Choose this life you're on your own

Nothingtoseehere posted:

The youth employment crisis is interesting, because it's basically a result of China trying to bootstrap it's way to a western service economy with education - look if everyone goes and does a degree the jobs those degrees require will appear right?

And to a certain extent they did, but when Xi came in and said "actually, kids doing nothing but online tutoring or online gambling in gacha games is bad, shutting it all down", this model of employment disappeared. It might be better for China overall, but it's bad for Number, and providing the type of jobs many of those youth want and have been training for.

So China doesn't really hold the same reverence of the trades as the US does. From what I understand, it's like if the German two track education system were completely honest its class structure.

I remember working in a bilingual school in the boonies of Beijing, near the Hebei border, where students were sent there because they got kicked out of most of the schools they attended (and it's hard to get kicked out of private schools in China!). It was essentially an American title I with money.

Most kids there are just burning time until they inherit their parent's business or until they get a trade, supposedly.

Pretty typical of China really to implement an order from above and not really worry about providing an alternative

Atlas Hugged
Mar 12, 2007


Put your arms around me,
fiddly digits, itchy britches
I love you all
A Chinese influencer was arrested in Thailand and forced to apologize for hurting the feelings of the Thai people after posting a video of the area around Nana Plaza and claiming it was unsafe

Cool Kids Club Soda
Aug 20, 2010
😎❄️🌃🥤🧋🍹👌💯

Atlas Hugged posted:

A Chinese influencer was arrested in Thailand and forced to apologize for hurting the feelings of the Thai people after posting a video of the area around Nana Plaza and claiming it was unsafe

:yeshaha:

StrangersInTheNight
Dec 31, 2007
ABSOLUTE FUCKING GUDGEON

Mr. Nice! posted:

The USA has been the bad guy in most ways historically.

This if course means discussing or most importantly, criticizing any other nations means we ultimately need to pivot to discussing the US. Because, obviously, we're the center of the world, and it should always be about us. No one else's decisions matter or have weight. Other countries? HAH. Not on my watch.

It is only the US in the entire world and, nothing else happens. So obviously, we should only ever focus on the US, in any and every discussion.

StrangersInTheNight
Dec 31, 2007
ABSOLUTE FUCKING GUDGEON
Everyone should criticize the govt always. Every government. Even if it it a communist govt that is 'for the people'. Frankly, the people should be involved and criticizing especially if it a govt for the to people, that's the process of active governance!

StrangersInTheNight fucked around with this message at 01:59 on Dec 14, 2023

Pham Nuwen
Oct 30, 2010



StrangersInTheNight posted:

Everyone should criticize the govt always. Every government. Even if it it a communist govt that is 'for the people'. Frankly, the people should be involved and criticizing especially if it a govt for the to people, that's the process of active governance!

sounds like counterrevolutionary activity to me

GoutPatrol
Oct 17, 2009

*Stupid Babby*

StrangersInTheNight posted:

Because, obviously, we're the center of the world

Talk about a phrase that will hurt feelings

Okuteru
Nov 10, 2007

Choose this life you're on your own

Atlas Hugged posted:

A Chinese influencer was arrested in Thailand and forced to apologize for hurting the feelings of the Thai people after posting a video of the area around Nana Plaza and claiming it was unsafe

Too many "ladies of the night" making propositions?

Okuteru
Nov 10, 2007

Choose this life you're on your own

StrangersInTheNight posted:

This if course means discussing or most importantly, criticizing any other nations means we ultimately need to pivot to discussing the US. Because, obviously, we're the center of the world, and it should always be about us. No one else's decisions matter or have weight. Other countries? HAH. Not on my watch.

It is only the US in the entire world and, nothing else happens. So obviously, we should only ever focus on the US, in any and every discussion.

I've become somewhat dissolutioned with Modern Western Leftism when I realized that it was more important to them to be Anti American that it was to actually pursue and practice leftist tenets

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Okuteru posted:

I've become somewhat dissolutioned with Modern Western Leftism when I realized that it was more important to them to be Anti American that it was to actually pursue and practice leftist tenets

:same: There's lots to hate about America, but other countries shouldn't get a free pass just because their flag is red.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shumagorath
Jun 6, 2001

Okuteru posted:

I've become somewhat dissolutioned with Modern Western Leftism when I realized that it was more important to them to be Anti American that it was to actually pursue and practice leftist tenets
"No You Shut The gently caress Up Dad" has been the entire personality of some people I've met, and it's just loving wild to ask them basic questions about the civil service or human nature.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply