Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
small butter
Oct 8, 2011

The only argument that you need against bitcoin investment is that it is illogical to expect a positive return on a negative sum game. Sure, some will win completely at the expense of others, but the average return can only be a loss.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Foo Diddley
Oct 29, 2011

cat
that's a really succinct way of putting it, nice

Foo Diddley
Oct 29, 2011

cat
not that any of these bitcoin dipshits will ever listen

Boxturret
Oct 3, 2013

Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish

small butter posted:

The only argument that you need against bitcoin investment is that it is illogical to expect a positive return on a negative sum game. Sure, some will win completely at the expense of others, but the average return can only be a loss.

This is the only part a bitcoiner would listen too, and they'd be confident they'll be the one winning rather than the one losing

Mercury_Storm
Jun 12, 2003

*chomp chomp chomp*

TheOneAndOnlyT posted:

Are these the ones that are all like "wow it sure is hosed up that our parents and grandparents could afford houses just by getting normal jobs, but our generation is barely making ends meet, the system needs to change!"? Because they're running these on sports games too and I think it's the first ad I've seen in awhile that actively pissed me off.

It unironically makes a great point about how something needs to be done about unpayably huge student loans and a vastly overpriced housing market! And then the "solution" they propose isn't to actually do anything about this, but instead it's to have the generation that barely has enough money to survive gamble their scant remaining funds on loving crypto. loving hell.

Oh I just switch to another tab or switch my VPN to Poland where Twitch ads are banned, so I haven't seen what they actually are :newlol:

BigBadSteve
Apr 29, 2009

Boxturret posted:

This is the only part a bitcoiner would listen too, and they'd be confident they'll be the one winning rather than the one losing

Buy low, sell high HODL til you die, easy!

Songbearer
Jul 12, 2007




Fuck you say?

notwithoutmyanus posted:

The quotes in this article are on par with the bad decision, and compete with eachother.

https://coinpaper.com/2711/netflix-s-conquest-director-turns-4-m-into-27-m-on-wild-doge-bet

headline: Netflix’s ‘Conquest’ Director Turns $4M Into $27M on Wild DOGE Bet

Wow!! Amazing news! That $27M has become... 60.5 GABRILLION!! That's right, we've had to invent a whole new word to describe how RICH you are! Now you can tell everyone you're a multi ultra super mega bazillionare, rich in Dogecoin!! Imagine all the things you can spend that money on! No, really, imagine it! Please!

Betjeman
Jul 14, 2004

Biker, Biker, Biker GROOVE!
Sounds blatantly criminal to me

Also, below that article:

quote:

Dogecoin to Join Bitcoin in Lunar Mission: Astrobotic's Peregrine Mission One

Littering the moon? Is that what we're doing now?

zedprime
Jun 9, 2007

yospos

Foo Diddley posted:

not that any of these bitcoin dipshits will ever listen
The illusion of utility has been selling junk securities since we stopped bartering. Why should we expect to fix it now?

BigBadSteve
Apr 29, 2009

notwithoutmyanus posted:

The quotes in this article are on par with the bad decision, and compete with eachother.

https://coinpaper.com/2711/netflix-s-conquest-director-turns-4-m-into-27-m-on-wild-doge-bet

headline: Netflix’s ‘Conquest’ Director Turns $4M Into $27M on Wild DOGE Bet

It's that director who shook down Netflix and is trying to take them for even more in court.

"Rinsch allegedly spent a significant portion of his newfound wealth lavishly, including approximately $9 million on high-end furniture, designer clothing, a luxury watch worth over $380,000, and a fleet of extravagant automobiles, including five Rolls-Royces and a Ferrari. These expenditures came to light during divorce proceedings when a forensic accountant hired by Rinsch's ex-wife scrutinized his spending."

Nice guy.

Scratch Monkey
Oct 25, 2010

👰Proč bychom se netěšili🥰když nám Pán Bůh🙌🏻zdraví dá💪?
https://screenrant.com/who-is-carl-rinsch-netflix-55-million-conquest-show/

Methed up hack director squanders millions

Alan Smithee
Jan 4, 2005


A man becomes preeminent, he's expected to have enthusiasms.

Enthusiasms, enthusiasms...
oh welp it looks like it's back down to 2 million because he didn't sell

Tom Tucker
Jul 19, 2003

I want to warn you fellers
And tell you one by one
What makes a gallows rope to swing
A woman and a gun

small butter posted:

The only argument that you need against bitcoin investment is that it is illogical to expect a positive return on a negative sum game. Sure, some will win completely at the expense of others, but the average return can only be a loss.

Yeah plenty of people made money from Ponzi too doesn’t mean it was a good idea to invest

Impossibly Perfect Sphere
Nov 6, 2002

They wasted Luanne on Lucky!

She could of have been so much more but the writers just didn't care!

Strategic Tea posted:

The fact that people who try to day trade don't understand why they can never win doesn't make the market itself corrupt.

The scumbag scam artists IMO are the heavily advertised, low friction trading apps that wow you with absurd infographics and overwhelming stat panels, encouraging users to believe they have the slightest clue what any of it means.

The thing that drives me crazy is all the "due your own research and due diligence" mantras that get spouted in ape communities.

You are not qualified to do you your own loving stock research. If you were you wouldn't be seeking help from a bunch of randos on the internet.

SettingSun
Aug 10, 2013

They say that as an attempt to limit their personal liability for when someone following their advice loses all their money.

Iron Chef Ramen
Sep 15, 2007

HA HA! YOU HAVE CHOSEN POORLY!
It's an argument of "if you'd actually done your research and looked into this, you'd obviously have arrived at the same viewpoint as me."

small butter
Oct 8, 2011

The funny thing about any bitcoiner gloating about the price right now compared to 2017 (and to be clear, the average "investor" is down) is that you could have bought the 2017 top of practically any major tech stock and you'd be better off than buying the 2017 bitcoin top. Why the top? Well, that's because most people buy around then and not when the price is low. So if you bought META, you'd be about even with bitcoin, and if you bought AMZN, GOOGL, AAPL, or MSFT you would have beaten bitcoin by as much as over 2x. Buying the 2017 NVDA top is like having bitcoin be worth $170k now. AMD, bitcoin like $190k now. And this is without all the bullshit: the extreme volatility based on nothing, possibly losing your keys or getting hacked, the buying and selling fees, the possibility of losing it all because the government decides to ban your dumb and worthless coins.

Since coiners love charts and looking at past performance and equating it to future performance, they need to face reality: almost everyone knows about the corn and the bottom-to-top and top-to-top gains are getting smaller and smaller since inception for very obvious reasons. $12 top in 2011 to $1k top in 2013, $1k top in 2013 to $20k top in 2017, $20k top in 2017 to $70k top in 2021. There will be no million dollar bitcoin. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a pump to $90k or whatever, but that's little consolation for the buyers at $70k when the S&P would likely match it or any random tech stock would trounce it.

EDIT: To get these kinds of gains again, you'd have to hunting for shitcoins, most of which will lose everything. But if you want to do that, you can save yourself a couple of crypto steps and the headache and hunt for biotech stocks that can net you 20x in months. At least you'd be funding cancer research or some poo poo while you lose most of your money.

small butter fucked around with this message at 21:45 on Dec 11, 2023

cruft
Oct 25, 2007

small butter posted:

almost everyone knows about the corn

I would like to know more about the corn.

MechaCrash
Jan 1, 2013

I, too, have no idea what "the corn" means in this context.

cruft
Oct 25, 2007

I heard it's got the juice.

small butter
Oct 8, 2011

The bitcorn.

cruft
Oct 25, 2007

small butter posted:

The bitcorn.

Thank you, small butter!

Impossibly Perfect Sphere
Nov 6, 2002

They wasted Luanne on Lucky!

She could of have been so much more but the writers just didn't care!

small butter posted:

The funny thing about any bitcoiner gloating about the price right now compared to 2017 (and to be clear, the average "investor" is down) is that you could have bought the 2017 top of practically any major tech stock and you'd be better off than buying the 2017 bitcoin top. Why the top? Well, that's because most people buy around then and not when the price is low. So if you bought META, you'd be about even with bitcoin, and if you bought AMZN, GOOGL, AAPL, or MSFT you would have beaten bitcoin by as much as over 2x. Buying the 2017 NVDA top is like having bitcoin be worth $170k now. AMD, bitcoin like $190k now. And this is without all the bullshit: the extreme volatility based on nothing, possibly losing your keys or getting hacked, the buying and selling fees, the possibility of losing it all because the government decides to ban your dumb and worthless coins.

Since coiners love charts and looking at past performance and equating it to future performance, they need to face reality: almost everyone knows about the corn and the bottom-to-top and top-to-top gains are getting smaller and smaller since inception for very obvious reasons. $12 top in 2011 to $1k top in 2013, $1k top in 2013 to $20k top in 2017, $20k top in 2017 to $70k top in 2021. There will be no million dollar bitcoin. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a pump to $90k or whatever, but that's little consolation for the buyers at $70k when the S&P would likely match it or any random tech stock would trounce it.

EDIT: To get these kinds of gains again, you'd have to hunting for shitcoins, most of which will lose everything. But if you want to do that, you can save yourself a couple of crypto steps and the headache and hunt for biotech stocks that can net you 20x in months. At least you'd be funding cancer research or some poo poo while you lose most of your money.

friggen MSFT is up 250% over five years lol

Desert Bus
May 9, 2004

Take 1 tablet by mouth daily.
BitCorn comes in with the fall harvest. Invest now!

Impossibly Perfect Sphere
Nov 6, 2002

They wasted Luanne on Lucky!

She could of have been so much more but the writers just didn't care!

Desert Bus posted:

BitCorn comes in with the fall harvest. Invest now!

Great thing about bitcorn is even after you use it it's still whole.

Songbearer
Jul 12, 2007




Fuck you say?
Investing in Bitcorn is pointless, you get exactly as much out as you put in

Space Fish
Oct 14, 2008

The original Big Tuna.


cruft posted:

Thank you, small butter!

Butt...er...coin?

Boxturret
Oct 3, 2013

Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish

small butter posted:

EDIT: To get these kinds of gains again, you'd have to hunting for shitcoins, most of which will lose everything. But if you want to do that, you can save yourself a couple of crypto steps and the headache and hunt for biotech stocks that can net you 20x in months. At least you'd be funding cancer research or some poo poo while you lose most of your money.

I loved seeing this a few years ago where they would say they weren't intrested in anything less than 4 digit pecentage increases.

cruft
Oct 25, 2007

Space Fish posted:

Butt...er...coin?

Buttercorn :colbert:

Hello Sailor
May 3, 2006

we're all mad here

cruft posted:

I would like to know more about the corn.



https://clickhole.com/please-look-at-this-corn-please-1825124687/

Three Olives
Apr 10, 2005

Don't forget Hitler's contributions to medicine.
The toaster was worth it just for the content.

MEIN RAVEN
Oct 7, 2008

Gutentag Mein Raven

Facts vs Feelings posted:

Clearly it bothers you that I am posting here. Given that:

1. I am not going away
2. You can't place me on ignore effectively

The only logical conclusion is for you to stop reading and posting in the Bitcoin threads.

If you fail to do that, and continue whining about me here, you are logically inconsistent and self-defeating.

(USER WAS PERMABANNED FOR THIS POST)

Lol pretty sure that's a type of terrorism rear end in a top hat. A really sad, 5 year's old version.

cruft
Oct 25, 2007

MEIN RAVEN posted:

terrorism rear end in a top hat

How does bitcorn interact with the terrorism rear end in a top hat?

notwithoutmyanus
Mar 17, 2009

cruft posted:

How does bitcorn interact with the terrorism rear end in a top hat?

Depends on when the oil hits the anus, or was that slurp juice? Ah nomenclature of corn.

notwithoutmyanus fucked around with this message at 00:05 on Dec 12, 2023

small butter
Oct 8, 2011

Another point is that, even if you wanted to compare bitcoin's fresh lows of the past year to its current highs, you'd have been better off buying stock in the "blue chip" companies dealing with magic beans than holding onto magic beans themselves. For example, COIN's and RIOT's recent lows to highs were 4.5x, while the corn's was 2.9x. That's like corny poop going for $70k now.

Seems like investing in the casino that sells gamblers chips is a wiser strategy than hoping for the chips to magically appreciate in value.

MEIN RAVEN
Oct 7, 2008

Gutentag Mein Raven

I'd be happy to invent the term "terrorism rear end in a top hat." Way better gift to mankind than bitcoin.

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

small butter posted:

The only argument that you need against bitcoin investment is that it is illogical to expect a positive return on a negative sum game. Sure, some will win completely at the expense of others, but the average return can only be a loss.

The insidious thing about Bitcoin is how they wrapped it into some pseudo historical/social movement. It's the future of economics and you will be on the ground floor of the revolution!

cruft
Oct 25, 2007

small butter posted:

The only argument that you need against bitcoin investment is that it is illogical to expect a positive return on a negative sum game. Sure, some will win completely at the expense of others, but the average return can only be a loss.

I really like this, by the way.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

TheOneAndOnlyT posted:

Are these the ones that are all like "wow it sure is hosed up that our parents and grandparents could afford houses just by getting normal jobs, but our generation is barely making ends meet, the system needs to change!"? Because they're running these on sports games too and I think it's the first ad I've seen in awhile that actively pissed me off.

It unironically makes a great point about how something needs to be done about unpayably huge student loans and a vastly overpriced housing market! And then the "solution" they propose isn't to actually do anything about this, but instead it's to have the generation that barely has enough money to survive gamble their scant remaining funds on loving crypto. loving hell.

Well it's not like you're allowed to try to do anything else about those problems.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DerekSmartymans
Feb 14, 2005

The
Copacetic
Ascetic

Songbearer posted:

Investing in Bitcorn is pointless, you get exactly as much out as you put in

Put in…where?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply