|
Professor Funk posted:This can't possibly be their plan, but I would guffaw if it was There is just no way..........
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 02:33 |
|
|
mcmagic posted:There is just no way.......... There's absolutely a way. There's even a world where of the two choices, it's the better one. I don't think it's this world
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:12
|
|
|
Roman is one of five guys the Bears have interviewed for the job (thus far) and one of the first leaks about Harbaugh's NFL interest was that Roman was very likely to join his staff. I'd be pretty surprised if Roman ended up in Chicago
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:13
|
|
|
Roman is really good at developing qbs its a good hire
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:20
|
|
|
Metapod posted:Roman is really good at developing qbs its a good hire He's the running game guy. Lamar is playing way better with him gone.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:20
|
|
|
If they're sticking with Fields, Roman would make perfect sense. Solid hire if you're that determine to keep Eberflus
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:22
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:He's the running game guy. Lamar is playing way better with him gone. Yes he develops the qb then his system gets stale that's his mo
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:22
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:If they're sticking with Fields, Roman would make perfect sense. Solid hire if you're that determine to keep Eberflus Yeah but there is no way they are going to stick with Fields just because of the reality of what the contracts are going to be.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:25
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Yeah but there is no way they are going to stick with Fields just because of the reality of what the contracts are going to be. If they pick up his 5th year they've got 2 years of control.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:28
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Yeah but there is no way they are going to stick with Fields just because of the reality of what the contracts are going to be. Because the available evidence suggests that they are, in fact, extremely dumb!
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:29
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:If they pick up his 5th year they've got 2 years of control. It's a 25ish million hit in 2025 and then you have to give him 40+ a year vs restarting the clock with a much better prospect. it's really not even a choice. Kurgarra Queen posted:Are you saying the Bears are too smart to do a Danny Dimes?
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:30
|
|
|
Fields can't throw so Roman would be perfect if they are keeping him 
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:31
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:It's a 25ish million hit in 2025 and then you have to give him 40+ a year vs restarting the clock with a much better prospect. it's really not even a choice. They're not short of cap space. If they're really keeping Eberflus and Fields, might as well bring in Roman. If he's a hit who cares about the pay.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:32
|
|
|
The situation with QB contracts is bad for the game, but what do you do? Limit QB contracts against total team salary? The contract math would get even more complicated and I don't think the player's association would go for it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:47
|
|
|
It's fine if the quarterback is the guy. No one's upset about the Allen, Burrow or Jackson deals. They deserve it. Why is it their fault that teams backup the truck for the Daniel Jones and Derek Carrs of the world? Those are bad teams and they are punished by sucking.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:48
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NoraPrinciotti/status/1747092577646428351 lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 04:51
|
|
|
It probably doesn't matter, but I like the concept of Lurie/Roseman and Jones both wanting to stick the other with a worse news cycle when it comes to timing their firing/retaining announcements.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:06
|
|
|
This Eagles team completely fell apart. They have to clean house.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:12
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:This Eagles team completely fell apart. They have to clean house.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:13
|
|
|
It's one minute after the game why isn't Sirianni fired yet
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:19
|
|
|
It's time
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:19
|
|
|
Hiring Greg Roman would mean the Bears are declaring they hosed up the development of Fields as a passer and want him only to run. Pathetic franchise.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:27
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ZBerm/status/1747110921292390799
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:27
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:This Eagles team completely fell apart. They have to clean house.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:29
|
|
|
Kurgarra Queen posted:Yeah, it's not even that they collapsed, it's the how. Every aspect of that team has regressed badly from Hurts to the run game to the tackling on down. Sirianni totally botched replacing his coordinators, hosed it up even further by hiring and subsequently promoting Matt Patricia, and also has pretty obviously lost the locker room. I honestly would fire every single person on staff. You have to rebuild the bottom up completely. Howie can stay since we know he is too good at this poo poo, but goddamn. Fire sale incoming.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:31
|
|
|
I can excuse some of the defensive woes - the secondary is really old and really bad, that's kind of just a personnel situation. But the running game is inexcusable and hiring Patricia is inexcusable.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:32
|
|
|
Ornery and Hornery posted:I can excuse some of the defensive woes - the secondary is really old and really bad, that's kind of just a personnel situation. Which is why you have to fire everyone. Let new staff get their pick of who should come in and play defense next year. OLine is about to be completely different as well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:34
|
|
|
Howie crafting the geriatric back 7 is a concerning line item though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:35
|
|
|
That Hurts contact is looking brutal. They almost need to fire Sirianni just to try and salvage him.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:39
|
|
|
I'm gonna say it. Steichen made Hurts.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 05:40
|
|
|
If we're talking vibes the Eagles have none. They have negative vibes. This entire roster has completely given up. They got destroyed by San Francisco and decided the season was over.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 06:20
|
|
|
The 49ers shell shocked this team into the shadow realm, straight up killed their vibes, and then the Patricia hire killed the locker room it sure feels like
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 06:36
|
|
|
Master Stur posted:then the Patricia hire killed the locker room he is the doom of empires. let us look at the patriots for an example. lo did they take on the patricia curse a full year before the eagles. when they finally return to relevance? one year after that, will be the iggles' first chance at recovery. the cursed pencil is lodged behind our ear until then.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 07:33
|
|
|
Is Sirianni fired yet? Why not
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 09:08
|
|
|
Roman to Chicago would make sense if they're keeping Fields, afterall Roman kind of made his bones taking an extremely limited one read, running QB to a superbowl when Kap was with the 49ers. Even if they were going to go after Caleb they could do a lot worse in terms of someone not to gently caress up the first two years in the NFL. Eagles don't quite need to clean house, in terms of poo poo to fix, a secondary and running game are probably a whole lot easier than most other positions. That being said their defensive line massively underperformed this year and if they don't fire Sirianni, completely new defensive scheme and staff would make sense.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 09:17
|
|
|
Eagles might be able to turn it around pretty quick.
Spend the first, second, and second second on secondary players, grab a rb in the late rounds of the draft and another veteran rb from FA and baby you got a stew going. Won’t happen in reality, but a path is there. Does the eagles FO ever invest top picks in secondary players? They have a reputation as exclusively building the trenches.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 10:33
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:If they pick up his 5th year they've got 2 years of control. Genuine question. Why isn't drafting Caleb and sitting him behind Fields for 1 or 2 years an option? Like, I'm an idiot and the Bears are dumb but I can't see why it's not even talked about.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 12:54
|
|
|
DickEmery posted:Genuine question. It is talked about on the local Chicago ESPN affiliate. It's "not off the table" and I wouldn't be shocked if Poles tries it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 13:02
|
|
|
DickEmery posted:Genuine question. Because fields demands a trade if they do that and he’d be right to do so.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 13:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 02:33 |
|
|
DickEmery posted:Genuine question. 1.Fields is worth something so you'd be best off getting his value 2. There's not really any evidence that sitting works - there's been cases where people have been good after it but also plenty of QBs who came in and were good right away. One of the big benefits of a rookie qb is cost control, sitting them means you are losing out. There's a a big question for the Packers whether Jordan Love might have always been this good in which case they have wasted a lot of his cheap years to sit him for possibly not very good reasons.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2024 13:11
|
|
