Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique


National Service returning to present day, post no such thing as society, UK is loving hilarious.

I keep saying it, but these people have no idea how any of this stuff works.

The Dutch Army already had to let their conscripts wear their hair however they wanted because the court ruled that it was barely acceptable to impose military service on them, it certainly couldn't impose military discipline related to anything but critical job functions.




Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Sonare the Euros gonna be another bunch of armies that wont get out of their APCs to protect the tanks?

Justin Tyme
Feb 22, 2011


Paying less than McDonald's then trying to say "but you get free healthcare, during the short time you are in, in the prime of your life where you likely will not need to use it, and you get physically screened before entry anyway" always came off as bullshit to me especially in the context of people who just do their time and get out. It's a mystery why recruitment is down though!

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

KomradeX posted:

Sonare the Euros gonna be another bunch of armies that wont get out of their APCs to protect the tanks?

Good news! Wait until you hear about how many tanks and APCs the Europeans have and their ability to produce more! It won't be a problem, trust me BAE.

The Belgians literally got rid of their inventory of tracked vehicles entirely

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Frosted Flake posted:

Good news! Wait until you hear about how many tanks and APCs the Europeans have and their ability to produce more! It won't be a problem, trust me BAE.

lol, yeah I did remember about that right after posting

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

KomradeX posted:

Sonare the Euros gonna be another bunch of armies that wont get out of their APCs to protect the tanks?

It'll be more the Ukraine model than the Israeli model imo.

In other words this time around the Russians will definitely run out of shells before the West run out of manpower.

Skaffen-Amtiskaw
Jun 24, 2023

Playing WARNO as BLUFOR, only all my decks are human waves after a single wheeled command vehicle.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Skaffen-Amtiskaw posted:

Playing WARNO as BLUFOR, only all my decks are human waves after a single wheeled command vehicle.

Honestly, works pretty okay*

*works well if you actually have even a modicum of artillery to suppress the enemy, but deck-based war is hell

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

Frosted Flake posted:

National Service returning to present day, post no such thing as society, UK is loving hilarious.

I keep saying it, but these people have no idea how any of this stuff works.

The Dutch Army already had to let their conscripts wear their hair however they wanted because the court ruled that it was barely acceptable to impose military service on them, it certainly couldn't impose military discipline related to anything but critical job functions.






My dad (voluntarily) joined up during those days and he fondly told me a number of times that foreign armies would refer to the Dutch soldiers as "longhaired scum" but during joint exercises the Dutch would generally achieve the objectives they were set and be rather flexible because they basically flatly refused to "just follow orders" (the hair being one expression of that) and instead insisted on being told in detail what the plan was and why, which allowed even low ranks to adjust on the fly in keeping with the larger plan.

He also told me not an exercise went by without a few Americans KIA because they were morons who just did as they're told without understanding any of it.


No idea how embellished it all is, but if he's any indication the Dutch boomers in favour of conscription were themselves those people in your pictures and look back on that fondly.



Also speaking of typical Dutch things, the Dutch armed forces are the only ones in the world who have a union.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

"nationalism is dumb, ideology is a gently caress, we're global capitalism now, free market owns, market yourself for the better job"
everyone leaves the job where you get abused for months by a dumbass drill sergeant
"huh where did everyone go???"

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Orange Devil posted:

He also told me not an exercise went by without a few Americans KIA because they were morons who just did as they're told without understanding any of it.

Unfortunately, in my experience, plus ca change.

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!
What do you mean "unfortunately"?

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Orange Devil posted:

What do you mean "unfortunately"?

You hate to see people killed by their dumb bosses.

Hatebag
Jun 17, 2008


Justin Tyme posted:

Paying less than McDonald's then trying to say "but you get free healthcare, during the short time you are in, in the prime of your life where you likely will not need to use it, and you get physically screened before entry anyway" always came off as bullshit to me especially in the context of people who just do their time and get out. It's a mystery why recruitment is down though!

you get $26k to get abused by a bunch of freaks and get brain damage lol. they'd probably have to increase salaries like 50% to get people signing up and i guess that'd mean they'd have to give everyone else a raise too. quick estimate puts that at like $100 billion. compare that to just hiring mercenaries and i guess the us will lose ww3 lol

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Hatebag posted:

you get $26k to get abused by a bunch of freaks and get brain damage lol. they'd probably have to increase salaries like 50% to get people signing up and i guess that'd mean they'd have to give everyone else a raise too. quick estimate puts that at like $100 billion. compare that to just hiring mercenaries and i guess the us will lose ww3 lol

It's impossible to earn that little money in the US military, unless maybe you're in prison or have been punished with forfeiture of pay as part of the punishment. The enlisted pay is low, but you're getting bad info from somewhere.

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

Zodium posted:

president xi, my name is little joseph. i am eighty one years old. please send chengdu j-20 multi-role stealth fighter

Hatebag
Jun 17, 2008


mlmp08 posted:

It's impossible to earn that little money in the US military, unless maybe you're in prison or have been punished with forfeiture of pay as part of the punishment. The enlisted pay is low, but you're getting bad info from somewhere.

well, that was the listed salary for an e2 private on https://www.goarmy.com/benefits/while-you-serve/money-pay.html
now that i actually clicked the link an e1 is $23k with a note that pay is lower for the first 4 months lol

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Hatebag posted:

well, that was the listed salary for an e2 private on https://www.goarmy.com/benefits/while-you-serve/money-pay.html
now that i actually clicked the link an e1 is $23k with a note that pay is lower for the first 4 months lol

Right, but to get to that number you have to ignore other pay and entitelments, such as untaxed $460/month for BAS, untaxed clothing allowance, and government matching tax-advantaged retirement plan contributions. So you are missing about $7k+ of compensation, assuming the person is an E-1 and has no dependents. Which, again, is very low pay for the hardships they are expected to deal with, but whether on purpose or not, you are omitting entitlements and pay.

In fairness, military members and rightwing grandpas do like to pull up the basic pay chart and refuse to acknowledge any of the other pay and entitlements when bitching that kids these days want $15/hr minimum wage. And these grandpas won't mention the tax-free part of about 1/3 of the pay of a young sergeant or specialist, so it's a common misunderstanding.

Mandel Brotset
Jan 1, 2024

Honky Mao posted:

capital in the Twenty first century. Idk anything about and haven't read it but by name alone I will strongly recommend it

lol just in case any lurkers get the wrong idea, this is the path to havana syndrome

500excf type r
Mar 7, 2013

I'm as annoying as the high-pitched whine of my motorcycle, desperately compensating for the lack of substance in my life.
Take your annual salary and subtract all your bills except maybe internet cellphone and car+insurance and see if you have more or less than 23k imo

Hatebag
Jun 17, 2008


mlmp08 posted:

Right, but to get to that number you have to ignore other pay and entitelments, such as untaxed $460/month for BAS, untaxed clothing allowance, and government matching tax-advantaged retirement plan contributions. So you are missing about $7k+ of compensation, assuming the person is an E-1 and has no dependents. Which, again, is very low pay for the hardships they are expected to deal with, but whether on purpose or not, you are omitting entitlements and pay.

In fairness, military members and rightwing grandpas do like to pull up the basic pay chart and refuse to acknowledge any of the other pay and entitlements when bitching that kids these days want $15/hr minimum wage. And these grandpas won't mention the tax-free part of about 1/3 of the pay of a young sergeant or specialist, so it's a common misunderstanding.

but if you're trying to increase enlistment by raising the salary, you'd need to raise the actual salary. people don't shop for jobs looking at the total benefit amount. i doubt the typical prospective e1's eyes boggle at a 401k and an untaxed clothing allowance

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Hatebag posted:

but if you're trying to increase enlistment by raising the salary, you'd need to raise the actual salary. people don't shop for jobs looking at the total benefit amount. i doubt the typical prospective e1's eyes boggle at a 401k and an untaxed clothing allowance

Yeah, fundamentally, I think they should get paid more for what they’re expected to put up with.

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

All that and you can get rancid MREs and black-mold infested housing too, what's not to love.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Hatebag posted:

but if you're trying to increase enlistment by raising the salary, you'd need to raise the actual salary. people don't shop for jobs looking at the total benefit amount. i doubt the typical prospective e1's eyes boggle at a 401k and an untaxed clothing allowance

I hate to say this again, but this is something that has been understood since at least the Bronze Age

Fighting for a Living: A Comparative Study of Military Work Around the Globe

Fighting for a Living investigates the circumstances that have produced starkly different systems of recruiting and employing soldiers in different parts of the globe over the last 500 years. It does so on the basis of a wide range of case studies taken from Europe, Africa, America, the Middle East and Asia. The novelty of "Fighting for a Living" is that it is not military history in the traditional sense (concentrating at wars and battles or on military technology) but that it looks at military service and warfare as forms of labour, and at the soldiers as workers. Military employment offers excellent opportunities for this kind of international comparison. Where many forms of human activity are restricted by the conditions of nature or the stage of development of a given society, organized violence is ubiquitous. Soldiers, in one form or another, are always part of the picture, in any period and in every region. Nevertheless, Fighting for a Living is the first study to undertake a systematic comparative analysis of military labour. It therefore speaks to two distinct, and normally quite separate, communities: that of labour historians and that of military historians. This title was made Open Access by libraries from around the world through Knowledge Unlatched.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bs07OvqXp4

"All gentlemen that have a mind,
To serve the queen that's good and kind,
Come list and enter into pay,
Then over the hills and far away."

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

now this is podracing geopolitical analysis

quote:

Among specialists who follow China most closely, the two main causes cited for this new conventional wisdom have been known for years. The first is that China’s growth model has been overreliant on policies such as financial repression and extraordinary levels of investment. Here, repression has nothing to do with the usual political usage of the word. It means, rather, that the state controls domestic interest, exchange rates, and capital outflows in such a way that citizens receive little accrual or benefit from their high rates of savings. Instead, these are captured by the state and channeled into industries that are favored or prioritized by bureaucrats, including many that are state-owned.

Some of the problems that might arise from financial repression can seem apparent even to lay people. Bureaucrats tend to know little about business and are unlikely to be in the best position to make the smartest and nimblest economic bets about the industrial future. Some features of this setup may be less than obvious, though. When the state captures and invests the nation’s savings according to its own whims, capital becomes scarcer and more expensive for private investors. This also suppresses the domestic consumption that most mature economies depend on for growth. Finally, as the state channels more and more investment into industries of its choosing, average return on investment falls. :ironicat: China is now at the point where it must invest huge amounts of capital to produce each new dollar of economic growth, and everything points to this continuing to worsen. :ironicat:
-
Signs of this strategy can be found nearly everywhere one looks, from China’s muscling into the seas of the Western Pacific, where it has rebuffed its neighbors’ territorial claims while building artificial islands that host military outposts, to its enormous capital expenditures on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). :ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat: Now in something of a retreat, :ironicat: :ironicat: :ironicat: the BRI is the program through which China has invested massively in infrastructure projects throughout Eurasia and other regions of the world.

I don’t just find fault with Krugman’s statement of the new conventional wisdom, though. I also fault myself. I saw China’s window of geopolitical opportunity closing in the face of swift aging and population decline sometime in the 2030s. The reality is that the window has already begun to narrow.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/01/23/china-decline-economy-demographics-geopolitics-growth/

no imperial japan no imperial japan youre the imperial japan

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Or the more, lol probably a bit more honest, version

"We all shall lead more happy lives
By getting rid of brats and wives
That scold and bawl both night and day
Over the hills and far away"

"Courage boys 'tis one to ten
We'll return all gentlemen
All gentlemen as well as they

Over the hills and far away"



Trying to get men to endure conditions like this without paying them more than they'd making staying at home is frankly nonsensical, I am bewildered that our lords and masters think they figured out One Weird Trick every previous state in history, worldwide, never thought of - pay soldiers very little, but also rely on volunteers.

Frosted Flake has issued a correction as of 18:10 on Jan 24, 2024

bij
Feb 24, 2007

Relying on mercenaries seems risky with the lack of slashed sleeves and opportunities to go whoring in the baggage train.

bedpan
Apr 23, 2008

Frosted Flake posted:

Trying to get men to endure conditions like this without paying them more than they'd making staying at home is frankly nonsensical, I am bewildered that our lords and masters think they figured out One Weird Trick every previous state in history, worldwide, never thought of - pay soldiers very little, but also rely on volunteers.

Pay and wages have displaced other forms of social ties and indications of respect. To pay the soldiers more means they must be respected more. The lords and masters do not want to elevate anyone much less the soldiers.

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

Frosted Flake posted:

Trying to get men to endure conditions like this without paying them more than they'd making staying at home is frankly nonsensical, I am bewildered that our lords and masters think they figured out One Weird Trick every previous state in history, worldwide, never thought of - pay soldiers very little, but also rely on volunteers.

Conditions at home will be degraded until recruitment improves

Nothus
Feb 22, 2001

Buglord
I have trouble believing that neoliberal regimes that can barely manufacture munitions will have the wherewithal to pay for general conscription.

FirstnameLastname
Jul 10, 2022

Zodium posted:

president xi, my name is little joseph. i am eighty one years old. please send chengdu j-20 multi-role stealth fighter

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

bij posted:

Relying on mercenaries seems risky with the lack of slashed sleeves and opportunities to go whoring in the baggage train.

Been saying this

Justin Tyme
Feb 22, 2011


mlmp08 posted:

Right, but to get to that number you have to ignore other pay and entitelments, such as untaxed $460/month for BAS, untaxed clothing allowance, and government matching tax-advantaged retirement plan contributions. So you are missing about $7k+ of compensation, assuming the person is an E-1 and has no dependents. Which, again, is very low pay for the hardships they are expected to deal with, but whether on purpose or not, you are omitting entitlements and pay.

In fairness, military members and rightwing grandpas do like to pull up the basic pay chart and refuse to acknowledge any of the other pay and entitlements when bitching that kids these days want $15/hr minimum wage. And these grandpas won't mention the tax-free part of about 1/3 of the pay of a young sergeant or specialist, so it's a common misunderstanding.

In the context of doing one enlistment then getting out, the only real solid benefit is the GI Bill, which is actually a really significant benefit but is more of a service reward than compensation if you ask me. Why should a Joe give a poo poo about BAS (it lets you eat at the dfac for free, big deal, half the time it is closed on weekends anyway and the BAS is deducted before you even see it and military cooks are paid regardless), access to the TSP (oh boy, I get an absolute pittance of a retirement account that will account for one month of bills once I retire), or a once a year clothing allowance that amounts to the world's worst performance/yearly bonus at a regular job?

The GI Bill and in certain circumstances you can get professional certification are the only real draws in terms of "what do I get out of service? Or is this a waste of my time and health?"

Justin Tyme has issued a correction as of 18:56 on Jan 24, 2024

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
https://twitter.com/IranObserver0/status/1750198226987180110?t=2BsWfcszojR9Tot-CvwB-A&s=19

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

Justin Tyme posted:

In the context of doing one enlistment then getting out, the only real solid benefit is the GI Bill, which is actually a really significant benefit but is more of a service reward than compensation if you ask me. Why should a Joe give a poo poo about BAS (it lets you eat at the dfac for free, big deal, half the time it is closed on weekends anyway and the BAS is deducted before you even see it and military cooks are paid regardless), access to the TSP (oh boy, I get an absolute pittance of a retirement account that will account for one month of bills once I retire), or a once a year clothing allowance that amounts to the world's worst performance/yearly bonus at a regular job?

The GI Bill and in certain circumstances you can get professional certification are the only real draws in terms of "what do I get out of service? Or is this a waste of my time and health?"
Don't forget about the housing benefits. If you get married to a cashier at the Dollar General you can even move out of the barracks and into a moldy triplex!

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012


Did they run out of oil to steal or something

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003


quote:

According to reports, the US-backed Kurdish militias are also in negotiations to align themselves with Bashar al Assad

they know who must go

Justin Tyme
Feb 22, 2011


I guess there's more abstract benefits too like hiring preference for federal jobs and access to VA home loans but when you tell that to a high school senior their eyes will glaze over vs "you'll get x amount of dollars per month deposited into your checking account tax free"

bedpan
Apr 23, 2008

Slavvy posted:

Did they run out of oil to steal or something

my guess is this is a prelude to an intensified campaign by ISIS

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mandel Brotset
Jan 1, 2024

Nothus posted:

I have trouble believing that neoliberal regimes that can barely manufacture munitions will have the wherewithal to pay for general conscription.

hmm turns out that the wages of whiteness don’t make up for actual wages

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply