Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fatherboxx)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

OddObserver posted:

Apparently one of these things:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarantul-class_corvette
(And anti-ship ~500t Corvette)

Going by Wikipedia sources, another of the class was reported sunk in Sevastopol earlier, leaving two of them operational in the Black Sea?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tuna-Fish
Sep 13, 2017

Nenonen posted:

Going by Wikipedia sources, another of the class was reported sunk in Sevastopol earlier, leaving two of them operational in the Black Sea?

I think these boats are designed to fit the canal system, so they can move more in. Still, it's gotta hurt.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Nenonen posted:

Going by Wikipedia sources, another of the class was reported sunk in Sevastopol earlier, leaving two of them operational in the Black Sea?

I suspect the particular article mentioning the earlier loss may have been a mistake --- and the mention seems gone now?

Edit: Wow, just realize that one of the images is the IR view of the nose of the ship sticking out of the water and not a weird explosion. The perils of reading on the phone...

OddObserver fucked around with this message at 12:58 on Feb 1, 2024

SixFigureSandwich
Oct 30, 2004
Exciting Lemon

The EU threatened to block all further funding to Hungary beyond the existing block on some funds due to rule of law concerns. There will probably have been a carrot as well somewhere to get him to fall in line

d64
Jan 15, 2003

SixFigureSandwich posted:

The EU threatened to block all further funding to Hungary beyond the existing block on some funds due to rule of law concerns. There will probably have been a carrot as well somewhere to get him to fall in line
They always try to play it up like they used threats, and probably that is part of it, but want to downplay the bribes part by using some unobvious way to pass some benefit to Hungary. I just don't think EU is capable of playing as tough as they want it to look like.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!
They agreed to revisit the numbers annually after two years, which is what Orban wanted as a domestic win. In two years Orban will be able to do the same thing again, and hey, what do you know, 2026 is an election year. Just in time for Orban to pose as the sole protector from Brussels' tyranny.

lilljonas
May 6, 2007

We got crabs? We got crabs!

d64 posted:

They always try to play it up like they used threats, and probably that is part of it, but want to downplay the bribes part by using some unobvious way to pass some benefit to Hungary. I just don't think EU is capable of playing as tough as they want it to look like.

They threatened, afaik, to stop Hungary from having access to the structural funds that is like, a third of the EU budget.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

It looks like the first drone hit the ship right in the stern while the ship was moving at high speed. I guess this flooded the engine room and damaged both props because in all the other clips the ship seems to be dead in the water.

DTurtle
Apr 10, 2011


Paladinus posted:

They agreed to revisit the numbers annually after two years, which is what Orban wanted as a domestic win. In two years Orban will be able to do the same thing again, and hey, what do you know, 2026 is an election year. Just in time for Orban to pose as the sole protector from Brussels' tyranny.
Not quite. The EU Commission will review the budgetary framework in two years. If needed there will be a debate on the budgetary framework, but no veto:

The Guardian posted:

Two additional paragraphs were added to the draft conclusions agreed by leaders but sources say neither amounted to a win for Orbán. “He didn’t get anything,” said one source close to those in the room.

One new paragraph calls for the European Council to invite the European Commission to review the budgetary framework in two years’ time.

“There is no veto,” said a spokesperson for the European Council. However, the new paragraph allows for a “debate” on the fund “if needed”.
...
By 11.30am some of the leaders were talking of going home early, furious that they had been dragged to Brussels only for Orbán to cave to pressure at the last minute.
Now everyone is angry at Orban for caving in so quickly :D

geonetix
Mar 6, 2011


I reckon the "You're going to lose your voting rights and all subsidies" stick worked well enough. Orban overplayed his cards.

ummel
Jun 17, 2002

<3 Lowtax

Fun Shoe

OddObserver posted:

I suspect the particular article mentioning the earlier loss may have been a mistake --- and the mention seems gone now?

Edit: Wow, just realize that one of the images is the IR view of the nose of the ship sticking out of the water and not a weird explosion. The perils of reading on the phone...



Looks bad but I'm not a boat guy.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

DTurtle posted:

Not quite. The EU Commission will review the budgetary framework in two years. If needed there will be a debate on the budgetary framework, but no veto:

Now everyone is angry at Orban for caving in so quickly :D

Okay, that's a very good caveat. Orban will still probably use it for his election campaign, but at least he won't actually be able to do anything.

Gravitas Shortfall
Jul 17, 2007

Utility is seven-eighths Proximity.


ummel posted:



Looks bad but I'm not a boat guy.

it's just been converted into one of those research ships that can submerge half of its length, it's fine.

Fidelitious
Apr 17, 2018

MY BIRTH CRY WILL BE THE SOUND OF EVERY WALLET ON THIS PLANET OPENING IN UNISON.
It seemed completely ineffective in taking out small boats. Having looked at the armaments, yeah. It's just anti-ship missiles and anti-air defensive weapons.

I assume none of those defensive guns can even decline low enough once a drone boat gets within a certain range.

Seems like the kind of ship that should have some kind of escort.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

ummel posted:



Looks bad but I'm not a boat guy.

My Blyat Will Go On

Just Another Lurker
May 1, 2009

ummel posted:



Looks bad but I'm not a boat guy.

The front DIDN'T fall off, my expectations subverted!!! :stonk:

Icon Of Sin
Dec 26, 2008



Just Another Lurker posted:

The front DIDN'T fall off, my expectations subverted!!! :stonk:

The rest of the boat fell off, the front did nothing wrong! :colbert:

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Just Another Lurker posted:

tldr: Kremlin spokesperson Dimitri Peskov is named in original article as the source.

A little fact checking goes a long way folks.

The irony of you getting this fact wrong with a tut tut about fact checking is pretty funny.

ought ten
Feb 6, 2004

ummel posted:



Looks bad but I'm not a boat guy.

Russian Navy demonstrating that they too can perform the fearsome Pugachev’s Cobra maneuver.

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2024/02/01/how-one-blast-shut-down-production-of-russias-deadliest-drone/?sh=150cf7f87355

quote:

The Lancet has been one of Russia’s most effective weapons in its war with Ukraine, a small kamikaze drone which can find and destroy targets from 40 miles away with deadly precision. Lancets knock out Leopard tanks, artillery and even parked aircraft. Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine’s Commander-in-Chief, singled the Lancet out as a problem in his recent paper on the current military situation. Only a few appeared at first, dozens per month, but in July 2023 numbers were set to soar. Instead, something interrupted the supply.

That month Russian news media showed a video of Lancet makers Zala Aero, featuring their flamboyant CEO Aleksandr Zakharov touring a giant new production facility in a converted shopping mall on a Segway. The video showed racks of hundreds of Lancets, and one article suggested that production could increase by a factor of fifty. This looked like bad news for Ukraine. But instead of surging, Lancet strikes dropped off markedly. There was initially no clue as to what had happened.

Information from Molfar, a Ukrainian OSINT group looking at sabotage operations in Russia, suggests that the cause may have been a well-targeted strike by Ukrainian forces.

Some more good news.

Tigey
Apr 6, 2015

ummel posted:



Looks bad but I'm not a boat guy.

This is not funny - boats only do this when they are in extreme distress

Just Another Lurker
May 1, 2009

mlmp08 posted:

The irony of you getting this fact wrong with a tut tut about fact checking is pretty funny.

Yes, i embarrassingly did not understand what he was saying.

My 4:30am posting sucks but i would probably have still gotten it wrong even with coffee. :downsowned:

Until Zaluzhnyi actually loses his position it's just propaganda. :shrug:

notwithoutmyanus
Mar 17, 2009

Tigey posted:

This is not funny - boats only do this when they are in extreme distress

Blyaty mc Blatyface! Noooo!

LifeSunDeath
Jan 4, 2007

still gay rights and smoke weed every day

Nenonen posted:

That seems like a crazy amount of drones hitting it again and again. And they still had at least one drone left to relay the results...

also crazy is you can see the spray of gunfire as they're trying to hit the drone. like that's a little jetski type thing they're shooting at but can't even hit that. what modern warships can't even hit a small craft that's trying to get near them? russia's navy being a joke is an old joke, but also LOL.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Just Another Lurker posted:

Until Zaluzhnyi actually loses his position it's just propaganda. :shrug:

That’s not what propaganda means….

If it was a mistaken rumor, that’s a rumor.

If the reporting is accurate that Zelenskyy floated the idea and backed away after seeing political responses, that’s not propaganda either.

If it was a fake news story planted by Russia that is being repeated by pro-Ukrainian sources in Ukrainian media out of Ukrainians falling for it, that would be propaganda.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!
Someone else was sacked instead of (or more likely with no relation at all to) Zaluzhnyy.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/02/1/7439879/

quote:

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has dismissed Roman Semenchenko, the head of the Department for the Protection of National Statehood of the Security Service of Ukraine. The Security Service themselves said they would continue to "strengthen and optimise" the department to ensure the unimpeded work and safety of the media.
[...]
Background: The Security Service of Ukraine announced that it was investigating the circumstances of illegal bugging and video recording of representatives of the Bihus.Info investigative project. Criminal cases were opened under Article 359 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (illegal acquisition, sale or use of special technical devices for obtaining information).

Some EU officials met with Ukrainian journalists recently and heard their complaints about pressure on independent media, and I imagine also relayed those concerns back to Ukrainian officials. The whole situation with Bihus is obviously antithetical to Ukraine's commitment to democratic values, but to Zelenskyy's credit, there was no attempt to sweep it under the rug and blame journalists for not being patriotic enough.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

mlmp08 posted:

That’s not what propaganda means….

If it was a mistaken rumor, that’s a rumor.

If the reporting is accurate that Zelenskyy floated the idea and backed away after seeing political responses, that’s not propaganda either.

If it was a fake news story planted by Russia that is being repeated by pro-Ukrainian sources in Ukrainian media out of Ukrainians falling for it, that would be propaganda.
More accurately it's like every "leak": journalists helping play internal political games in exchange for access.

MonkeyOnFire
Jun 3, 2004
I LOVE MONKEYS

Tigey posted:

This is not funny - boats only do this when they are in extreme distress

stern down, bow up
that's the way your ship gets hosed

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

Fidelitious posted:

It seemed completely ineffective in taking out small boats. Having looked at the armaments, yeah. It's just anti-ship missiles and anti-air defensive weapons.

I assume none of those defensive guns can even decline low enough once a drone boat gets within a certain range.

Seems like the kind of ship that should have some kind of escort.

So is there a chance sinking this boat makes a dent (even a minor one) in how many missiles Russia can lob into Ukraine? I'm a little rusty on how much they're leaning on ships to launch cruise missile attacks at various cities and infrastructure points.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Eric Cantonese posted:

So is there a chance sinking this boat makes a dent (even a minor one) in how many missiles Russia can lob into Ukraine? I'm a little rusty on how much they're leaning on ships to launch cruise missile attacks at various cities and infrastructure points.

Not likely since the ship type carries anti-ship missiles and not the kind that have been previously used against ground targets (and it's pretty short range). It does make the fleet overall somewhat more vulnerable, though.

Orthanc6
Nov 4, 2009
Sinking the entire Black Sea fleet is a strategic goal, including the ships that are not being much use right now (ie: most of them) cause they can still mess with Ukraine's shipping. And losing the fleet is a political hit that is extremely difficult to sweep under the rug even in Putin's world.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

OddObserver posted:

Not likely since the ship type carries anti-ship missiles and not the kind that have been previously used against ground targets (and it's pretty short range). It does make the fleet overall somewhat more vulnerable, though.

My understanding is that it also carried a radar system and it was probably used in Crimea's air defence to some extent.

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

OddObserver posted:

Not likely since the ship type carries anti-ship missiles and not the kind that have been previously used against ground targets (and it's pretty short range). It does make the fleet overall somewhat more vulnerable, though.

The Ivanovets seems to have been a Project 12411 so would have had SS-N-22 Sunburn missiles (there's two different missiles called this)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarantul-class_corvette

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS-N-22

The Tarantula could carry the P-270 missile:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-270_Moskit

The air launched version of this is the Kh-41

So.... it probably did launch missiles. Or could.

KillHour
Oct 28, 2007


notwithoutmyanus posted:

Blyaty mcBlyatface

New title.

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010

KillHour posted:

New title.

Two months into 2024 and the last remnant of Prighozin will be gone. Man really burned bright and fast.

Dirt5o8
Nov 6, 2008

EUGENE? Where's my fuckin' money, Eugene?
Wikipedia is a confusing mess for me trying to figure out an Active list for the Black Sea Fleet.

What Russian ships are left in the fleet after 2 years of attrition?

Nervous
Jan 25, 2005

Why, hello, my little slice of pecan pie.

Dirt5o8 posted:

Wikipedia is a confusing mess for me trying to figure out an Active list for the Black Sea Fleet.

What Russian ships are left in the fleet after 2 years of attrition?

Many ships are still active, they have just been sent on long term scouting missions to the Black Sea's depths.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

notwithoutmyanus posted:

Blyaty mc Blatyface! Noooo!

Mc is way too "Anglo-Saxon". As is face. Should be something like Blyaty Blyatmordov.

OddObserver fucked around with this message at 19:53 on Feb 1, 2024

ringu0
Feb 24, 2013


Nenonen posted:

My Blyat Will Go On

:perfect: considering the imagery

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Dirt5o8 posted:

Wikipedia is a confusing mess for me trying to figure out an Active list for the Black Sea Fleet.

What Russian ships are left in the fleet after 2 years of attrition?

Most of them.

https://x.com/jayinkyiv/status/1753033435512213929?s=46&t=fppHBZSlD4AbSz5pJxjFMQ

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply