|
Hadlock posted:I have a very snarky post about well heeled non profits needed for housing for young families instead of the richest generation ever, but this is the wrong thread gently caress me for helping poor people I guess? And increasing the housing supply helps everyone. so there.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 05:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 17:52 |
|
I didn't post it because it wasn't deserved. I'm sure your mission is valid. I currently work for soul sucking vultures so I have little room to talk*. Just making commentary on lack of focus on housing for families. I have infinite respect for your mission, sir. My apologies. *Before this I worked in health care and green products, but the mortgage must get paid
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 05:28 |
|
Baddog posted:I bitch a lot about the SEC, but we should be thankful our stock markets are as transparent as they are. Because for most Chinese there was no real place to put their money besides real estate. It's down to gold or like, bottles of baijiu now. Its funny that you mention this, as the largest publicly traded Chinese company is... a liquor company that specializes in baijiu
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 05:34 |
|
drk posted:Its funny that you mention this, as the largest publicly traded Chinese company is... a liquor company that specializes in baijiu "Investing" in baijiu is an actual thing And it might actually be safer to buy the bottles than the shares, heh.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 05:55 |
|
I strongly recommend if you're not already familiar with baiju, you just turn off your phone and walk away right now, unless you're interested in perfumed horse piss futures. I mean, it's an acquired taste, but in the same way weaponized Limburger cheese is I guess to trade the stuff you don't have to open the bottle, but, yeah. You've been warned
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 06:00 |
|
you forgot to mention gasoline
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 06:06 |
|
That's not normalized for population size, nor does it give averages (almost all the billionaires are old). But in the interest of doing my own homework instead of asking someone else to do it: https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/finance/average-net-worth-by-age The median is the useful figure, since it shows a number below which half the people sit, and we can see that it currently does peak with boomers. This also makes sense as they're the ones who are at or well into retirement, and typically your lifetime wealth peaks just before or early in retirement as you are no longer earning a wage, your savings are still making large returns and can be more aggressively invested, you are more likely to own your house debt free/paid off, and you're less likely to have had catastrophic medical expenses. However, the median figures as compared to the mean figures show just how skewed the means are by the extremely wealthy.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 06:45 |
|
Yeah it'd be weird if the aged 60-79 group wasn't the biggest by a pretty large margin. That'd be a bigger problem.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:46 |
|
note how the median is like, a fifth of what's actually required for a non-penurious retirement
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:53 |
|
Who are these Millenials born after 1981 that are getting 2.5 trillion dollars worth of pensions?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:57 |
|
Teachers, police, fire, state local federal employees, university jobs, utility employees. Union employees in the auto industry Starting in 2008 a lot of pensions got cut to the bone, but if you joined before 08 you usually got grandfathered into the "pull the ladder up behind us" pension plan with the much higher payout A lot of those "lifers" joined the company in 98-07 The pension I'm most familiar with, the cut off for the good pension was 2010, the company still offers a pension but the minimum number of years to qualify is ~5 years higher, and the payout is only a ~third of the good pension. I think number of years to get max payout is higher too Hadlock fucked around with this message at 15:11 on Jan 31, 2024 |
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:06 |
|
They lumped in "Defined Contribution Pension Entitlements" (read: 401k plans) into the pension bucket for purposes of that chart. Only about half of that millennial bucket is defined benefit pensions, and that includes both traditional and non-traditional DB pension plans, but excludes social security entitlements. https://www.federalreserve.gov/rele...ll;units:levels esquilax fucked around with this message at 15:29 on Jan 31, 2024 |
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:26 |
|
Gologle posted:Who are these Millenials born after 1981 that are getting 2.5 trillion dollars worth of pensions? Mostly government, military, firefighters, police, etc I’d think. I mean I have one.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 17:01 |
|
esquilax posted:They lumped in "Defined Contribution Pension Entitlements" (read: 401k plans) into the pension bucket for purposes of that chart. The funny thing is, if you add 401(k)'s in to that number, it becomes a crazy number in a different, far more sort of way. $2.5T / 72.24M millennials = $34.6K per millennial. We're not young anymore; that number is horrifying.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 18:39 |
|
Sundae posted:The funny thing is, if you add 401(k)'s in to that number, it becomes a crazy number in a different, far more sort of way. $2.5T / 72.24M millennials = $34.6K per millennial. We're not young anymore; that number is horrifying. But have you considered how much avocado toast we have?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2024 03:20 |
|
A good number of folks just keep working it’s like %20-25 above 65 and even 5-10 % above 75. (It varies depending on where one looks for the statistics) That’s the “rich” boomer generation. It’s going to be more than for generations that had less as a cohort.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2024 03:36 |
|
SpartanIvy posted:But have you considered how much avocado toast we have? Toast? IN THIS ECONOMY??
|
# ? Feb 1, 2024 04:33 |
|
Jobs report is out! Here's a free link to the NYTimes reporting on it. Two different write-ups in there deserving some attention... Lydia DePillis posted:U.S. employers added 353,000 jobs in January. Jeanna Smialek posted:The blockbuster jobs report bolsters the Fed’s patience as it waits to cut rates. It feels like the Fed is in a bit of a "did we actually pull this off? How? Are you sure? Let's just wait for a minute to triple-check" phase of the soft landing.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 15:33 |
|
Such a weird mix of economy adding jobs and layoff announcements dominating the employment news. I know these aren't mutually exclusive at all but it still feels odd.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 15:47 |
|
Lockback posted:Such a weird mix of economy adding jobs and layoff announcements dominating the employment news. It kinda feels like there's a recession of sorts in high paying white collar jobs (or maybe just revision to the mean of tech employment trends) but if you wanna work at a Whole Foods or something you can get a job today with a pulse and a valid I-9 document. This doesn't necessarily translate into people feeling good about the economy though. If you and everyone you know is getting laid off from knowledge worker jobs and you can't get another one or can't get one for more than 80% of your previous wage, it doesn't make the Biden economy feel "good" to you. I really should try to see if there's any actual data on this though, since my opinion is really just "vibes" at this point.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 16:44 |
|
mrmcd posted:It kinda feels like there's a recession of sorts in high paying white collar jobs (or maybe just revision to the mean of tech employment trends) but if you wanna work at a Whole Foods or something you can get a job today with a pulse and a valid I-9 document. It's a bit more complicated than that there's a need for workers in aerospace and medicine both white collar and blue collar. We've been hiring people who left for tech startups 20 years ago back into aerospace in droves. It seems more like the economy is reshuffling towards different sectors than towards lower paying jobs.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 17:03 |
|
Funny enough, a friend just announced that they were leaving their job at Whole Foods because they had been hired on for a copywriting job. So I'm inclined to suspect that this isn't a case of lots of jobs opening but only downward-mobility occurring. Add in the fact that wage growth is continuing (and outpacing inflation) and it's clear that most of the people in the economy are moving up rather than down. Of course, tech is one of those fields (like media) that tends to take up a lot more attention than its actual share of the economy. So the downturn there could have the people with the biggest platforms saying that the "Biden economy" is bad even when the majority of people are doing a whole lot better than they were 4 years ago.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 17:04 |
|
LanceHunter posted:
Yeah that's also a very plausible explanation.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 17:13 |
|
Also tech companies needed some readjustment down, they over hired after being injected with cash during Covid
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 17:24 |
|
The salary outpacing inflation seems to indicate it's not a move downward, but I do think there's reshuffling and "Company X lays off 10,000" is a headline while "1000 companies each hire 100+" is not.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 18:54 |
|
journalists and instagram influencers are losing jobs while everyone else is doing better, basically, so hmm, I wonder why the news "feels like" it's all layoffs
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 19:02 |
|
Leperflesh posted:journalists and instagram influencers are losing jobs while everyone else is doing better, basically, so hmm, I wonder why the news "feels like" it's all layoffs I mean, not really? It's extremely dependent on what your specific industry and even profession is. Both me and my wife are in white collar, non-tech jobs where poo poo has gotten noticeably tighter in the last quarter. We're both very actively looking for new jobs and things feel a lot more like 2018 than 2022. Frankly if we'd been doing this last year we probably would both have different employers now. The one good interview I had a few weeks ago ended up making me an offer at $10k less than I'm being paid now. Meanwhile I've got friends in different industries where they are absolutely hiring for 6 figure + positions. Manufacturing in particular seems to be doing well. Given how regional industries are I suspect the general economic outlook is also going ot vary pretty widely depending on where you live.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 19:26 |
|
Leviathan Song posted:It's a bit more complicated than that there's a need for workers in aerospace and medicine both white collar and blue collar. We've been hiring people who left for tech startups 20 years ago back into aerospace in droves. It seems more like the economy is reshuffling towards different sectors than towards lower paying jobs. I'm seeing vaguely similar trends My limited friend group (so weak data point) mostly norcal tech folk, has all changed jobs in the last five years. Most of us were in tech startups. All but one of us moved to traditional larger companies like financial services/payments/banking, heavy industry manufacturing, or big pharma. Basically got laid off and a couple cases literally walked across the street to go work for a more traditional company. And always for more money, usually 10-20% more than their last gig. The people with an MBA all did I see a lot of headlines about people getting laid off from tech companies, but I'm not hearing anyone crying about it either
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 19:26 |
|
the economy wasn't poo poo in 2018. it wasn't like, insane like 2021 but it just wasn't that poo poo. no 2008, no 1930, no 1979
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 19:38 |
|
The "you have to laugh because the alternative is crying" joke in gamedev is that the only people who still have jobs are indies, who can't be fired but aren't being paid anyway.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 19:45 |
|
TooMuchAbstraction posted:The "you have to laugh because the alternative is crying" joke in gamedev is that the only people who still have jobs are indies, who can't be fired but aren't being paid anyway. Gamedev has always been big boom and bust cycles though. My wife was let go from a big medical tech company that is going through reductions, but she's also getting a lot of interest from similar jobs so it doesn't seem like the whole market is squeezed. Similarly we're hiring in software, but we're a boring financial SaaS company.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 19:59 |
|
My company is offering a $5K referral bonus for a senior level IT position. Seems like they're having a hard time finding applicants even.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 20:14 |
|
Lockback posted:Gamedev has always been big boom and bust cycles though. While this is true, usually the cycles are less synchronized across companies. Like, an individual company laying off a bunch of people is commonplace, but every company laying off 25+% of their workforce in the space of one year? Anyway, point is more to reinforce that some industries are suffering badly, even if the average person is doing better.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 20:18 |
|
absolutely routine in tv and film. to a first approximation, only mobile games actually earn money
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 20:19 |
|
I certainly see currents of "it was the best of times, it was the worst of times" vibe when I look at LinkedIn. There's a senior-level Program Manager talking about how she's only had 10 interviews after submitting 104 applications in the 100 days since she was laid off. There's a QA engineer who went to the same coding academy as me celebrating her 5 year anniversary at her current company. There's a guy who does front-end dev who was laid off a few weeks ago but just got a senior position at a new company. There are former co-workers who do pre-sales/solution engineering (the area where I used to be) who are talking about being impacted by layoffs at their companies. Meanwhile a different co-worker who co-founded a startup has gotten funding from Y Combinator and is celebrating their 3rd year in business. Things are weird out there, and it's really hard to get a good look at the big picture from any individual viewpoint.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 20:31 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:Manufacturing in particular seems to be doing well. It’s all extremely automated though. There’s a lot of growth in specific manufacturing sectors particularly the ones targeted by the IRA and CHIPs. I watch these cargoes come in and it’s been unprecedented how fast it’s happening. But unless one lives where it’s happening or is directly involved one would never know.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 20:36 |
|
LanceHunter posted:There's a senior-level Program Manager talking about how she's only had 10 interviews after submitting 104 applications in the 100 days since she was laid off. 10 from 104 is actually fine, her problem is 104 applications in 100 days lol
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 20:38 |
|
bob dobbs is dead posted:10 from 104 is actually fine, her problem is 104 applications in 100 days lol Well yeah, but she's also in a really rough spot and thus very stressed about not having a job. Her severance package was apparently pretty bad, and she's the sole bread-winner with a school-age kid and a chronically-ill husband.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 20:46 |
|
I'm not even sure if Bob thinks that is too many or too little. I'm from the school of carefully selecting and responding to job offers, but everyone under 40 seems to spray and pray. A recent masters grad was telling me he was doing more like 100 a *day*, heh.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 21:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 17:52 |
|
Yeah the impression I get, which I have not validated with data, is that a lot of tech companies did layoffs last year in anticipation of the coming recession. Which hasn't happened, and now looks more and more like it won't. Those companies will find themselves understaffed as demand continues to rise for their products - or, in some cases, falls because their products are already suffering from the lack of development and support.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2024 21:42 |