(Thread IKs:
weg, Toxic Mental)
|
Hollismason posted:Someone just posted it... No, those are completely different things, it is extremely ethically dubious to be perusing criminal charges against someone that you are attacking politically, you are allowed to gently caress coworkers, most companies have written workplace policies on loving coworkers ethically.
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 00:01 |
|
|
I have hosed a couple coworkers ethically before (one was my boss, I just had to tell HR about it and sign a love contract)
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:08
|
|
|
Isn't she his boss? I'm pretty sure that's unethical in every situation. It's not a conflict of interest but their being horny has definitely tainted the prosecution in one of the most important cases in the history of the US.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:09
|
|
|
if you aren't having consensual sex with your coworkers can you really say you're working as a team player?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:09
|
|
|
BigglesSWE posted:https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1753442173935075593?s=46&t=G1x8XWIwrNxUQoXItlkh2w Meanwhile, buy my TRUMP coin and my TROMP NFTs!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:10
|
|
|
mobby_6kl posted:Paying your fuckbuddy a million bucks There are some iffy questions about his qualifications, maybe, but no one is suggesting he is being paid fair market rate for services rendered. Also they are saying their relationship started well after he was hired and started working, that is basically alleging some quid pro quo that basically makes him a sex worker with a J.D.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:11
|
|
|
it's a little different here because i think wade is functionally her employee or her report, rather than her peer? so like, again, depending on the specifics, i could see disciplinary charges being lodged - but that's akin to saying "boy, alina habba is definitely going to get disbarred for lying to and manipulating a victim for durlnd dong drumpf!" yeah, she probably will. it has nothing to do with the cases she continues to lose, though.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:11
|
|
|
HKR posted:if you aren't having consensual sex with your coworkers can you really say you're working as a team player? I mean if you work in a morgue by yourself….
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:11
|
|
|
Silly Burrito posted:I mean if you work in a morgue by yourself…. Those are customers. Can't gently caress customers. I tried.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:12
|
|
|
Silly Burrito posted:I mean if you work in a morgue by yourself…. The would be like loving a chicken carcass if you worked in the poultry department, not like loving a coworker.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:13
|
|
|
It doesn't affect the case in the literal sense of what are the charges and body of evidence. Obviously the process could be affected in particular if she loses reelection (she's up this year and it's her first term as DA). I can't imagine some MAGA DA winning in Fulton County, so it's likely if she did lose whoever replaced her would continue the case. But it's possible that would cause delays or that the person taking over wouldn't be quite as aggressive about it or something. Either way nothing was happening before the election anyway. So Trump will either be president, in which case the GA case means nothing, or already be facing prison time in NY or federal court, in which case it doesn't matter so much if this delays things.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:13
|
|
|
I can tell you this it completely taints the whole loving case and there's going to be nonstop news articles about them loving.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:14
|
|
|
Coolguye posted:it's a little different here because i think wade is functionally her employee or her report, rather than her peer? so like, again, depending on the specifics, i could see disciplinary charges being lodged - but that's akin to saying "boy, alina habba is definitely going to get disbarred for lying to and manipulating a victim for durlnd dong drumpf!" Again, this is why most companies have ethical policies and loving co-workers, even direct reports. The issue is not the loving, the issue is favoritism and coercion. He is by all accounts a skilled attorney, it would be super hard to argue either of those are happening here. What is being being suggested is that this is somehow a kickback scheme, but that is a high bar.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:16
|
|
|
Coolguye posted:what precisely does this have to do with the case at hand How do you suppose this (alleged) disciplinary issue is resolved if it is found that she acted inappropriately? Do they tell her to just not do it next time? TBH I don't know what are the chances that she's DQd over this, there's no remedy specifid in the section I quoted. Obviously we don't really know eerything, maybe she's telling the truth now. But like how loving hard is it not to have an affair with someone you hire in one of the highest profile cases in the history of history? Fuuuck.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:17
|
|
|
All they needed was a crack. If she can hand it off, she might want to do that asap.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:17
|
|
|
Three Olives posted:There are some iffy questions about his qualifications, maybe, but no one is suggesting he is being paid fair market rate for services rendered. Also they are saying their relationship started well after he was hired and started working, that is basically alleging some quid pro quo that basically makes him a sex worker with a J.D. This assumes that they are telling the truth about when the relationship started.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:18
|
|
|
Can you trust people stupid enough to do this poo poo to handle prosecuting a president?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:20
|
|
|
kazil posted:This assumes that they are telling the truth about when the relationship started. One would hope the DA knows better than to straight up lie in court filings.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:21
|
|
|
At this point it's pretty obvious that TRUMP has CHIM
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:24
|
|
|
Mons Hubris posted:One would hope the DA knows better than to straight up lie in court filings. I sure hope so. This whole thing is so stupid though, who knows anymore.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:24
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Can you trust people stupid enough to do this poo poo to handle prosecuting a president? Can you trust people stupid enough to BE TRUMP to be president?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:25
|
|
|
Trump responds:
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:26
|
|
|
I think that this may also give Georgia legislature ammunition to impeach her.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:27
|
|
|
Outpost22 posted:At this point it's pretty obvious that TRUMP has CHIM It's the only logical conclusion at this point, yeah
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:28
|
|
|
I wish more workplaces would have the courage to be like, 'Naw man, this office FUCKS'. Now that would make America great again.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:29
|
|
|
doge and her anti horny bat have failed the nation.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:29
|
|
|
Three Olives posted:Again, this is why most companies have ethical policies and loving co-workers, even direct reports. The issue is not the loving, the issue is favoritism and coercion. He is by all accounts a skilled attorney, it would be super hard to argue either of those are happening here. What is being being suggested is that this is somehow a kickback scheme, but that is a high bar. Here's a quote from my employee manual: quote:It is impermissible under this policy for a manager to date or otherwise have an intimate relationship with an employee who is in the manager's reporting line.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:31
|
|
|
Total Party Kill posted:Those are customers. Can't gently caress customers. I tried. Buddy, ….
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:32
|
|
|
Honestly I'm gonna just consider that case blown and be pleasantly surprised if it ends up that it proceeds forward. Onto the documents case I guess.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:34
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Can you trust people stupid enough to do this poo poo to handle prosecuting a president? Way back when this started I had heard from a few lawyers I trust that they were worried about this. She is apparently not very well respected and there had been rumors of this for a while
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:34
|
|
|
If they both step away from the case right now, it's salvageable.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:34
|
|
|
Why must everybody in any position of authority be a complete and total moron
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:36
|
|
|
Yeah the Georgia case is probably done. I really won't be surprised if Georgia legislature use this as an excuse to impeach her.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:39
|
|
|
Did she do anything that actually mishandled the case itself? LIke, the evidence is still the same, right? I'm not sure how that would even be 'unfair' to Trump in a legal sense, "GETTING" him is indeed what she's supposed to do as the prosecutor. Hell, it's probably a good thing, they can just steam ahead and add some more prosecutors while his defense does nothing to help, and he parades his rear end in there very loudly to attack and bitch about her, which as we know is just an opportunity for him to run his loving mouth and appear/embarrass himself. Waffle House fucked around with this message at 20:44 on Feb 2, 2024 |
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:39
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Can you trust people stupid enough to do this poo poo to handle prosecuting a president? This, I don't know about the legality of it but it sure makes me question their decision making ability
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:42
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:Did she do anything that actually mishandled the case itself? I'm not sure how that would even be 'unfair' to Trump in a legal sense, "GETTING" him is indeed what she's supposed to do as the prosecutor. She didn't to anything that has any bearing on the fairness of the case but when you are doing something like prosecuting a former president for trying to overthrow the government you can't gently caress up and she and wade hosed up, big time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:42
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:I can tell you this it completely taints the whole loving case and there's going to be nonstop news articles about them loving. what, pray tell, would've stopped that? Hollismason posted:Yeah the Georgia case is probably done. I really won't be surprised if Georgia legislature use this as an excuse to impeach her. i dunno if this is a bit you are doing but if it is it sucks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:42
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:Did she do anything that actually mishandled the case itself? I'm not sure how that would even be 'unfair' to Trump in a legal sense, "GETTING" him is indeed what she's supposed to do as the prosecutor. No, but the optics is so bad for probably the highest level court case we've seen in our lifetime. They need to shift it to another prosecutor if they can. It's loving dumb, but this is what Trump does and why he's been so successful in court. He just needs the smallest gotcha and it's loving done.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 00:01 |
|
|
Philthy posted:No, but the optics is so bad for probably the highest level court case we've seen in our lifetime. They need to shift it to another prosecutor if they can. It's loving dumb, but this is what Trump does and why he's been so successful in court. He just needs the smallest gotcha and it's loving done. Hell, it's probably a good thing, they can just steam ahead and add some more prosecutors while his defense does nothing to help, and he parades his rear end in there very loudly to attack and bitch about her, which as we know is just an opportunity for him to run his loving mouth and appear/embarrass himself. Like she can just sit there and be a target and get up in front and demonstrate that no evidence or anything was mishandled while he defames her publicly, which he just got nailed biiiiigtime for.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2024 20:45
|
|