(Thread IKs:
Stereotype)
|
SixteenShells posted:Ah okay. So it's not a wrong baseline but nothing else is wrong, it's more like "if you were puzzled at the effects we've been seeing at 1.5C, that's because we're actually at 1.7C"? They're not saying that explicitly but yeah I wouldn't say that's an unreasonable conclusion to draw from this except that the IPCC consensus position is that we aren't even at 1.5C yet.
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 20:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 16:58 |
|
|
Fried Watermelon posted:Obama knew Everyone in positions of power knew, guess that's why they've been building bunkers  I wonder when the upper class all realized where things were headed? ik Exxon knew since the 80s.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 20:53
|
|
|
Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Cucks
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 20:53
|
|
|
It's El Nino it's supposed to be hot.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 20:59
|
|
|
Greenhouse earth is gonna be so fuckin good 🥵
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:03
|
|
|
lol *crying, sobbing* lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:04
|
|
|
doc said i got early onset industrial era warming. not looking great, you know how it is.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:15
|
|
|
Stevie Lee posted:is that an all-time record in loving february??? march is usually the peak of all those older lines but also maybe it will just keep going up forever
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:17
|
|
|
staring to think if the ufos don't come to straighten our poo poo out we might be in for a bit of a rocky time here. might be like a rough few weeks or something.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:24
|
|
|
JAY ZERO SUM GAME posted:the "yet" in "not that bad yet" grows closer 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:24
|
|
|
windows down, heater on. big bolt of lighting hanging low over the coast. everyone's convinced it's a government drone or an alien spaceship. either way, we're not alone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:26
|
|
|
I feel queazy in daily life at this point
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:28
|
|
|
This sucks rear end, dude
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:28
|
|
|
The Oldest Man posted:They're not saying that explicitly but yeah I wouldn't say that's an unreasonable conclusion to draw from this except that the IPCC consensus position is that we aren't even at 1.5C yet. would be extremely funny if the “if we can act now we can limit warming to 1.5C” COP talks were happening about when we hit that number
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:31
|
|
|
Samuel Glompers posted:This sucks rear end, dude don't be sad that it's ending, be happy that it happened
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:32
|
|
|
I'm happy to be with u all
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:35
|
|
|
actionjackson posted:I'm happy to be with u all just post! 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:38
|
|
|
I only ask that a mod embeds NearerMyGodToThee.mid and has it loop endlessly when the time comes
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:53
|
|
|
Gentlemen, it has been an honour posting with you this holocevening
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 21:53
|
|
|
what can you say? we truly did it 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 22:03
|
|
|
always lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 22:06
|
|
|
hm. if we're at 1.7, i think it's time for someone to do something
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 22:20
|
|
|
Could we bomb a volcano or something All we know is explosions
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 22:24
|
|
|
graph. chart. https://twitter.com/ZLabe/status/1754610629191815552
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 22:30
|
|
|
*obama-ishly* I did that
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 22:32
|
|
|
like a fart in the wind
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 22:36
|
|
|
Demon Of The Fall posted:lol Col, smao
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2024 23:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 00:06
|
|
|
so they're good for the next 999 years. glad that's sorted.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 00:12
|
|
|
1-in-1,000 event? Meh, we get those every year
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 00:15
|
|
|
I don't condone baseless conspiracy theorizing, but this line correlates with the wide availability of Mexican food in the Western world.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 00:16
|
|
|
kyojin posted:Col, smao
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 00:35
|
|
|
The Oldest Man posted:I guess I'll just say it in plain language: this study doesn't change anything about the pre industrial baseline temperature. We didn't just oopsy that. What they found is a near-term historical ocean temperature record that they believe is better than other historical records that have been available to date for a few reasons**. What that record contains is evidence of a bunch of hidden warming - starting both earlier and proceeding further than other records indicate. Estimating the actual mean global temperature is really, really hard. They're saying they found a better thermometer for a major component of the global temperature that has thus far been under or unmeasured, and what that thermometer says is that we started warming earlier and have warmed more than we otherwise would have believed. Does this make Hansen's recent increased estimate of C02 sensitivity being higher than previously believed more likely? It seems logically that it would to me. In other words, lol, lmao.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 00:42
|
|
|
bullshit nothingburger storm. i was counting on it to make my work easy this week and it doesn’t even park over SD? climate change is over
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 00:44
|
|
|
unprecedented earlier than expected not. that. bad. yet
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 00:45
|
|
|
on the contrary I'm confident we'll look back and think it was very precedented
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 01:07
|
|
|
comedy option: the starlink constellation kicks off kessler syndrome into high gear, encasing the earth in a cooling shroud of shiny particles and inadvertently buying us a lot more time to continue doing the exact same thing
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 01:12
|
|
|
Even better it fucks up just enough to lock us in and prevent any last ditch attempts, but not do anything to the climate
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 02:05
|
|
|
im buying the biggest most pollutingest truck and ripping out everything related to emissions we got this guys
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 02:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 16:58 |
|
|
i support energy 
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2024 02:33
|
|