|
gradenko_2000 posted:Strange New Worlds was incredibly racist towards the Gorn. Like worse than TOS-era Klingons are Soviets poo poo.  You mean these guys?
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 04:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 18:18 |
|
|
Danann posted:https://twitter.com/BowTiedDaddy/status/1755062087460495494 Maybe Top Gun isn't so unrealistic with a 60 year old fighter pilot
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 04:14
|
|
|
Please chain probe the last 3 pages, tia.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 06:11
|
|
|
KomradeX posted:Maybe Top Gun isn't so unrealistic with a 60 year old fighter pilot Or that scene in Battleship where the old museum geezers manned a turret.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 07:09
|
|
|
even Chinese firefighters have more artillery than NATO https://twitter.com/roaneatan/status/1754899421782016116
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 07:43
|
|
|
FF I want tables to show area saturation requirements accounting for different fire fighting ordnance used & soil and wind conditions & type of fire STAT.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 10:59
|
|
|
DancingShade posted:Or that scene in Battleship where the old museum geezers manned a turret. battleship turrets explode if a gay person enters them. Did you know that? The US navy does.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 12:01
|
|
|
Regarde Aduck posted:battleship turrets explode if a gay person enters them. Did you know that? The US navy does. Ah so that's why battleships were permanently taken off the USN menu.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 12:02
|
|
|
Orange Devil posted:FF I want tables to show area saturation requirements accounting for different fire fighting ordnance used & soil and wind conditions & type of fire STAT. from the info i saw on the firefighting missiles they are reusable lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 12:41
|
|
|
jetz0r posted:Please chain probe the last 3 pages, tia.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 12:46
|
|
|
I dunno if this is new or I’ve just never seen it mentioned https://x.com/taiwandefenseu/status/1754905398090531278?s=46&t=NfFUqnrTGI_gdViBS3OzCg
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 12:47
|
|
|
JAY ZERO SUM GAME posted:I dunno if this is new or I’ve just never seen it mentioned Seems like one internal faction has made and declared their move. Man I wonder how compromised their comms will be.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 13:13
|
|
|
Lol both Taiwan and Israel have a 101st unit Reddit rear end countries
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 13:31
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Lol both Taiwan and Israel have a 101st unit "Welcome to the 101st Private" Where are the other 100 units sir? "Uhh moving hastily on"
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 13:44
|
|
|
The Oldest Man posted:if you replace "got sent to the other side of a space hole" with "covid happened," michael bay has you covered https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gZ6bpIjeLs In an early episode they go to Guantanamo Bay for supplies but it turns out somebody let all the terrorists out and now the terrorists are in charge. You can tell they're terrorists because they're all dressed like the Mujahedeen. Where they found those clothes in Guantanamo Bay is not explained.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 14:07
|
|
|
Gripweed posted:In an early episode they go to Guantanamo Bay for supplies but it turns out somebody let all the terrorists out and now the terrorists are in charge. Got it from the Hamas tunnel network, clearly.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 14:23
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Lol both Taiwan and Israel have a 101st unit Don't forget Ukraine.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 15:01
|
|
|
also putting troops in Kinmen and Matsu is far more provocative than anything that the PRC has ever done in the South China Sea
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 15:08
|
|
|
NEVER READY: NATO's Flexible Response Strategy, 1968-1989 Was Britain’s implementation of NATO strategy credible? After the adoption of Flexible Response in 1967 NATO relied on conventional forces to defend the West. Britain had a central role in NATO’s plans, but was British defence planning adequate for the task? How did the Government plan for the use of the conventional Armed Forces for the range of operations it was committed to? How were the Armed Forces to be Mobilised, and what was the detail of the planning for mobilisation? In 1967 MC14/3 was adopted as the overall strategic concept by NATO. It relied on an escalatory deterrence, from conventional through tactical nuclear strikes to strategic nuclear attack. This is commonly known as Flexible Response and replaced NATO’s trip-wire response. The declared principal of the strategic concept was to reduce the chance of mistakenly starting a nuclear war, meeting force with like force, and raising the nuclear threshold in the event of actual war. By using newly available documents from British and other archives, this volume will show that far from being a flexible strategy, in the event of a war it was doomed to failure. The concept was compromised by the failure of the Alliance members to provide one of the main legs of the conventional deterrent – sustainability. This book analyses the paradox between the public face of defence policy and the practice. The book assesses whether the planning would have worked, and what would have happened in Europe if war had broken out. To answer this question the research looks at the conflicts in the Falklands and the Gulf to assess the feasibility of the plans in place. Elements upon which British defence depended were still being built more than twenty years after the new strategy was adopted. Defence policy in Britain was concerned less with the threats the country faced than with just how little could be spent on defence. Never Ready is extensively illustrated with contemporary photographs, many in colour, and specially commissioned diagrams, colour artworks and maps. "This is a fascinating if stark and very sobering analysis of Britain's Defence capability during the period and provides clear evidence of the failure to align higher level policy and plans with resources and budgets. I do not doubt that many who served, especially in more senior posts, during this period will find this a familiar if somewhat depressing summary of their Cold War service on the north German Plain and of life in staff appointments endlessly drafting "impact statements" in response to proposed cuts. There are many stark lessons here for today's Government Ministers and Defence Staff and it is highly recommended." Cliver Elderton, Military Historical Society, Autumn 2022 
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 16:43
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1755579499318567148
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 16:59
|
|
|
President Biden has approved retaliatory air strikes in Lebanon.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:10
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Lol both Taiwan and Israel have a 101st unit Probably both smuggled guns to Latin American dictators for CIA.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:17
|
|
|
BearsBearsBears posted:
We have fallen so far as a society
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 20:18
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/AJABreaking/status/1755518868741612007?s=20 every day thread title is not updated to present tense it gets wronger
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 03:17
|
|
|
The Oldest Man posted:https://twitter.com/AJABreaking/status/1755518868741612007?s=20 im not saying your ships might get nordstreamed
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 03:41
|
|
|
The Oldest Man posted:https://twitter.com/AJABreaking/status/1755518868741612007?s=20 Operation abject failure.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 03:44
|
|
|
The Oldest Man posted:https://twitter.com/AJABreaking/status/1755518868741612007?s=20 It's time for US to surrender the mandate of heaven.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 03:48
|
|
|
The Oldest Man posted:https://twitter.com/AJABreaking/status/1755518868741612007?s=20 The translation doesn't load, what does it say?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 04:04
|
|
|
mycomancy posted:The translation doesn't load, what does it say? quote:Urgent | Maersk Company Director: The US Navy told us that it is currently unable to guarantee the safety of navigation of all ships in the Red Sea
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 04:09
|
|
|
mycomancy posted:The translation doesn't load, what does it say? Urgent | Maersk Company Director: The US Navy told us that it is currently unable to guarantee the safety of navigation of all ships in the Red Sea
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 04:09
|
|
|
No big deal. Israel just needs to buy all their poo poo from Europe and Northern Africa.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 04:29
|
|
|
stephenthinkpad posted:No big deal. Israel just needs to buy all their poo poo from Europe and Northern Africa. Maybe they could ask China nicely if that belt & road might have a turn off ramp to Jerusalem. Also build some Australian style road trains.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 04:52
|
|
|
we need to establish a whoopsie fighting task force to figure out how we can stop losing our best soldiers to big oopsies
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 06:41
|
|
|
Fellatio del Toro posted:we need to establish a whoopsie fighting task force to figure out how we can stop losing our best soldiers to big oopsies Bursts through wall into conference room on a palanquin born aloft by 4 boston robotics humanoid robots. "Have I got the solution for you!" Points to unmoving atlas robot wearing ill-fitting combat uniform, poorly holding a rifle that barely fits into its crudly designed hands. After a few moments of silence it slowly topples over with a clatter.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 08:05
|
|
|
The Oldest Man posted:if you replace "got sent to the other side of a space hole" with "covid happened," michael bay has you covered https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gZ6bpIjeLs The original book they adapted the TV show from where a nuclear war kills everyone, renders all the Americans sterile, and the world has to be repopulated by a bunch of Soviet submariners who are the only men alive left capable of impregnating all the female American sailors (on account of being shielded from all the rads underwater) was way better.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 08:44
|
|
|
DancingShade posted:Bursts through wall into conference room on a palanquin born aloft by 4 boston robotics humanoid robots. I like these outcomes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZq7fW6ftlU
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 10:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jseldin/status/1756075192990814558 Wow, interesting!
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 23:13
|
|
|
how many times can i say "iran-backed" in 60 seconds
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 23:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/markets/status/1755513596933546045 McKinsey McKinseyed themselves. BearsBearsBears has issued a correction as of 23:39 on Feb 9, 2024 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 23:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 18:18 |
|
|
a scorpion riding a scorpion's back
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2024 23:56
|
|