Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

Gyges posted:

Actually that probably is bad news for Biden. A large part of his appeal is not being Trump when the only other option is Trump.

Trump has unparalleled Republican turnout though, even in 2020 after all of his fuckups were fully apparent. He turned out massive numbers of new or at least infrequent voters for a Republican turnout unparalleled in the modern era. To put things in perspective, he got over 30% of eligible voters, not even just registered voters. The only Republicans of the previous 50 years to beat that were Reagan in 1984 and Nixon in 1972. Not their first terms, not any of the three Bush terms, never mind the losers. And he didn't do it by sparking Republican turnout since then, that's for sure. People turned out for him specifically. There's little reason to believe any other Republican candidate can count on those millions of long-time non-voters who turned out for Trump 2020.

For that matter, it's a good question as to how many of them will turn out for challenger Trump. In the runup to 2022 a popular theory from critics of the Dems was that Trump had benefited bigly from signing those stimulus checks, and sending contractor money to rural counties for wall construction. Assuming there's meat to that, it should be less of a factor the more distant that gets in the past and the more Republicans run on ending handouts while the Democrats actually did some big infrastructure/manufacturing bills. Even if a lot of people have tried to bury effects of the IRA, people in the industries directly funded by them tend to know better what all that money was earmarked for.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

KillHour
Oct 28, 2007


Gyges posted:

Actually that probably is bad news for Biden. A large part of his appeal is not being Trump when the only other option is Trump.

That would be bad news for anybody who wants to minimize the chances of being eaten by velociraptors and especially bad news for anybody running on a platform of "I didn't have the government reenact Jurassic Park in order to get revenge on my political enemy."

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

koolkal posted:

You're missing arguably the single biggest factor: Suozzi held the seat for several terms, leaving it to run for Governor instead

He's not technically an incumbent but he is essentially an incumbent

I know people here hate Politico for good reasons, but this piece is probably a good sign of what you're going to hear or see in other Congressional races.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/new-york-playbook/2024/02/14/suozzi-house-election-new-york-00141362

Mainly, they're going to respond to GOP criticism over migrants with the GOP's own failure to back the compromise border bill.

EDIT: Suozzi's a puzzle to me. I went into his background and it looks like he has lost as often as he has won with respect to his other attempts at office. Look at his history with being Nassau County Executive. He was also frequently dealing with multiple primary challengers during his past couple of House terms, so I'm not sure what that says about his incumbency power.

Eric Cantonese fucked around with this message at 15:24 on Feb 14, 2024

Nucleic Acids
Apr 10, 2007

Eric Cantonese posted:

Nassau County votes started coming in and Suozzi was leading in the first batch.

https://twitter.com/umichvoter/status/1757600665306583271

Decision Desk decided to call it already.

https://twitter.com/DecisionDeskHQ/status/1757600237919551981

AP too.

https://twitter.com/AP_Politics/status/1757601637923684352

Yay.

Sucks that he’s a Ritchie Torres level Zionist freak.

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

Nucleic Acids posted:

Sucks that he’s a Ritchie Torres level Zionist freak.

Have you ever been to Long Island? :)

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Nucleic Acids posted:

Sucks that he’s a Ritchie Torres level Zionist freak.

He's from a district in New York City that is mostly made up of Long Island and is 20% Jewish with a huge amount of orthodox. It's kind of amazing that he is only in the top 15% of pro-Israel members of congress instead of #1 with that background.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

https://twitter.com/scottwongDC/status/1757772885110800679

Just wanted to get this out here on the official forums record so we can circle back when she endorses Trump in August.



Trump seems to get that he's not much younger than Biden, it'd be real funny if the GOP was prevented from going after Biden's age because Trump relentlessly pushes against it.

zoux fucked around with this message at 16:36 on Feb 14, 2024

Nucleic Acids
Apr 10, 2007

Eric Cantonese posted:

Have you ever been to Long Island? :)

No, but there’s really nothing that justifies psychotic garbage like this:

https://twitter.com/aaronnarraph/status/1757611151326625966

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Calling other members of congress "clueless" and saying that most people are pro-Israel are probably not even in the top 10,000 most psychotic things said about Israel and Gaza in the last month.

Nucleic Acids
Apr 10, 2007

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Calling other members of congress "clueless" and saying that most people are pro-Israel are probably not even in the top 10,000 most psychotic things said about Israel and Gaza in the last month.

It’s all part and parcel of him being a genocide apologist like Torres and Gottheimer.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Nucleic Acids posted:

It’s all part and parcel of him being a genocide apologist like Torres and Gottheimer.

Sure, but that random tweet was like the weakest evidence ever. He is very pro-Israel, but calling people clueless, telling people to read up on the issue, and saying most people support Israel are all completely boring anodyne things that are weird to call "psychotic" statements. There's surely much better examples out there.

Dude's from Long Island. There's no way he hasn't said something louder and crazier than that.

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

I'm not in agreement. I just don't think he is necessarily out of sync with his district.

EDIT: reading through this Politico interview and I'm not sure what in here is "psychotic." That being said, to the extent you don't like him being strongly pro-Israel, I again am pointing to the district.

Eric Cantonese fucked around with this message at 17:12 on Feb 14, 2024

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Eric Cantonese posted:

I'm not in agreement. I just don't think he is necessarily out of sync with his district.

EDIT: reading through this Politico interview and I'm not sure what in here is "psychotic." That being said, to the extent you don't like him being strongly pro-Israel, I again am pointing to the district.

this. its alot like fetterman. I disagree that he keeps jumping on that train, but it hasnt hurt him popularity wise at all in PA, hell its only helped. Most districts are not dearborn.

Nucleic Acids
Apr 10, 2007
I really do not care about the demographics of his district at all, any level of support for Israel is a moral atrocity.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Nucleic Acids posted:

I really do not care about the demographics of his district at all, any level of support for Israel is a moral atrocity.

I think this is a pretty good example of the tension between a deontologist view of politics and an utilitarian one. That district would never elect someone who didn't massively support Israel. In my view, I would rather have a Democrat who is bad on Israel - to my views on politics - but otherwise voted consistently for Democratic policy proposals that I support rather than a Republican who would be just as bad on Israel and would vote consistently for Republican policy proposals. Would you prefer to have a Democrat who is aligns with your views on Israel but loses to a Republican over a Democrat who only disagrees with you on Israel, because those are the two outcomes. There is no world where that district elects the next member of the Squad. So you have to weigh whether you keep the moral high ground, but lose as far as outcomes go, or cede the moral high ground and win on outcomes.

For me, I prefer actual outcomes over moral victories

https://twitter.com/MonmouthPoll/status/1757797491829821651

What's the mechanism here?
1 - Taylor Swift is popular
2- ?????
3 - Biden wins

zoux fucked around with this message at 17:34 on Feb 14, 2024

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice

Nucleic Acids posted:

I really do not care about the demographics of his district at all, any level of support for Israel is a moral atrocity.

You're not wrong but there's still a whole lot more convincing to do and holding up of mirrors to the entirety of society instead of just railing against politicians on the topic. Support for Israel is finally dropping, but it's been a majority and bipartisan for longer than I've been alive. Politicians are, kinda by definition, political critters. They're generally going to go where the majority is...current Republican open support of fascism aside.

Kagrenak
Sep 8, 2010

Nucleic Acids posted:

I really do not care about the demographics of his district at all, any level of support for Israel is a moral atrocity.

Look when you use the same level of outrage to discuss the types of statements this guy made as one would use to to describe the bombing of hundreds of Innocents you just look like a fool. It's still a moral failing on his part and makes him a lovely person but to describe his words in these terms does nothing for our cause.

How would you describe Ben-Gvir type statements if you're already describing this guy as psychotic and committing moral atrocities? Why should someone listen more attentively when you've so quickly reached the top of the rhetorical ladder?

kdrudy
Sep 19, 2009

You know what, if the government covertly created a global megastar purely to reelect a president (in reality a future president because she's been huge for years) I think they earned it. A government capable of that seems like it'd be pretty competent.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus
I think ongoing support for Israel in the face of current reality can safely be called psychotic, but "psychotic" is also just a popular word right now for whatever reason.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Kagrenak posted:

Look when you use the same level of outrage to discuss the types of statements this guy made as one would use to to describe the bombing of hundreds of Innocents you just look like a fool. It's still a moral failing on his part and makes him a lovely person but to describe his words in these terms does nothing for our cause.

How would you describe Ben-Gvir type statements if you're already describing this guy as psychotic and committing moral atrocities? Why should someone listen more attentively when you've so quickly reached the top of the rhetorical ladder?

If that guy supports Ben-Gvir's policies and sends him money and weapons, how are they different?

WarpedLichen
Aug 14, 2008


I mean at least on the House rep scale, I think it's fair enough to blame the voters instead of fixating on the person they vote in. At the presidential level it's less clear why the candidate isn't ideal but sometimes the lovely part of the democracy are the people doing the voting.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Strange announcement from the House Intelligence Committee just came out about 20 minutes ago.

https://twitter.com/HouseIntel/status/1757805804885823775

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Strange announcement from the House Intelligence Committee just came out about 20 minutes ago.

https://twitter.com/HouseIntel/status/1757805804885823775

UFOs

Craig K
Nov 10, 2016

puck

naw. certainly something like TikTok

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Strange announcement from the House Intelligence Committee just came out about 20 minutes ago.

https://twitter.com/HouseIntel/status/1757805804885823775

It's coming from this pack of assclowns, so the immediate default reaction needs to be "What are they lying about now?"

Personally I'm betting on this being OMG BORDER IN CRISIS CARAVANS OF FENTANYL ARE ON THE WAY RIGHT NOW EXPECTED TO ARRIVE IN NOVEMBER BE AFRAID BE VERY AFRAID.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

We need to know about the emerging swifty threat

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

bird food bathtub posted:

It's coming from this pack of assclowns, so the immediate default reaction needs to be "What are they lying about now?"

Personally I'm betting on this being OMG BORDER IN CRISIS CARAVANS OF FENTANYL ARE ON THE WAY RIGHT NOW EXPECTED TO ARRIVE IN NOVEMBER BE AFRAID BE VERY AFRAID.

Going for Bengahzi 2: 2Bens 2Ghazis.

But asking Biden to declassify something means there is an intelligence report they are trying to get their hands on?

Kagrenak
Sep 8, 2010

Mooseontheloose posted:

Going for Bengahzi 2: 2Bens 2Ghazis.

But asking Biden to declassify something means there is an intelligence report they are trying to get their hands on?

I think the intelligence subcommittee would have already been able to see the contents

volts5000
Apr 7, 2009

It's electric. Boogie woogie woogie.

zoux posted:

https://twitter.com/MonmouthPoll/status/1757797491829821651

What's the mechanism here?
1 - Taylor Swift is popular
2- ?????
3 - Biden wins

Remember, these are the same people who think you can become trans or communist by reading a book. So, if Taylor Swift supports Joe Biden, her fans will have received her programming and automatically become Biden voters. Also, the 29% that don't associate with GOP? I can believe that. There's this subset of Swift fans that think she's secretly a lesbian and has been sending coded messages in her albums and media appearances to indicate so. It's so bizarre but totally in line with conspiratorial thinking.

Kagrenak posted:

I think the intelligence subcommittee would have already been able to see the contents

They're in on it, too! :tinfoil:

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

If that guy supports Ben-Gvir's policies and sends him money and weapons, how are they different?

Does he support Ben-Gvir's policies? Does he want to send Ben-Gvir money and weapons?

To be clear, I'm not just trying to pull some pedantic poo poo here. I'm asking because Ben-Gvir's desired policies are quite a bit worse than what Israel is actually doing right now, and it would legit be big news if non-Republican members of Congress were openly endorsing his stances. Even Biden is going out of his way to prevent Ben-Gvir from receiving money and weapons.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Whatever it is I'm going to place money on "It's so stupid as to make you groan"

Quorum
Sep 24, 2014

REMIND ME AGAIN HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED ONES MOVE?

Mooseontheloose posted:

Going for Bengahzi 2: 2Bens 2Ghazis.

But asking Biden to declassify something means there is an intelligence report they are trying to get their hands on?

No, the House and Senate Intel Committees already have whatever clearances they'd need to see whatever this is, they presumably want either a) for stuff to be declassified so they can yell about it in public or b) for stuff not to be declassified so they can yell about the very spooky things they've read but you haven't, just trust us guys.

Nervous
Jan 25, 2005

Why, hello, my little slice of pecan pie.

RBA Starblade posted:

We need to know about the emerging swifty threat

Swifty Boat Veterans for Truth. Know the threat.

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

Quorum posted:

No, the House and Senate Intel Committees already have whatever clearances they'd need to see whatever this is, they presumably want either a) for stuff to be declassified so they can yell about it in public or b) for stuff not to be declassified so they can yell about the very spooky things they've read but you haven't, just trust us guys.

The our allies wording is weird here though. If it's mirgrant related, our allies could give less of a poo poo. So, it limits it to me three things:

1. Israel and Hamas - so probably a way to axe humanitarian aid to Gaza?
2. Ukraine - Try to sink the ukraine portion of bills.
3. Taiwan - because wildcard?

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

https://twitter.com/elwasson/status/1757816432077811770

Well it's something I guess

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

Professor Beetus posted:

I think ongoing support for Israel in the face of current reality can safely be called psychotic, but "psychotic" is also just a popular word right now for whatever reason.

We do not live in sane times.

Tnega
Oct 26, 2010

Pillbug

Mooseontheloose posted:

The our allies wording is weird here though. If it's mirgrant related, our allies could give less of a poo poo. So, it limits it to me three things:

1. Israel and Hamas - so probably a way to axe humanitarian aid to Gaza?
2. Ukraine - Try to sink the ukraine portion of bills.
3. Taiwan - because wildcard?

Option 4, and where my out of the money bet is: MS13 existing and doing MS13 stuff. Only interesting if there is report-worthy expansion into Spain.

Crows Turn Off
Jan 7, 2008


Still UFOs.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

apperently it has to do with something about russia. so who knows. Is turner pro ukraine? because i could see this as an attempt to light a fire under johnsons rear end.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply