Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

TheDisreputableDog posted:

I refuse to believe it’s normal or ethical to get reimbursed for business expenses, in cash, from your boss, who you’re loving.

That’s putting the conflicting testimony where someone must be lying under oath aside.

This is a total mess and an own goal - if she gets removed, the case is effectively dead.

It is absolutely normal to continue getting paid while you're loving your boss. If it wasn't there would be a whole lot less boss loving. Hell, it would be unethical and illegal for your boss to not continue paying you.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

H.R. Hufflepuff
Aug 5, 2005
The worst of all worlds

Skex posted:

As long as you can find a lawyer willing to cast correct spells the judges have to entertain the bullshit.

why is there a whole lawyer subclass about using swords

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Tatsuta Age posted:

It's so cool that Fox News is just airing the testimony straight up, not even bothering to cut in for commentary. BREAKING NEWS!

Hannity was airing it on his radio show and talking throughout; basically narrating it whenever the This is All a MAGA Witch Hunt thread was getting lost in the weird muck of the whole thing. Actually, it was less narration and more like an annoying friend talking and whispering during a movie.

ElegantFugue
Jun 5, 2012

H.R. Hufflepuff posted:

why is there a whole lawyer subclass about using swords

listen Dave not everyone wants to min-max and build for pens all the time, some of us want to roleplay even if it means being non-optimal

Xiahou Dun
Jul 16, 2009

We shall dive down through black abysses... and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory forever.



If you don’t mind a random derail, the tabletop role-playing game Troika! has “rapier lawyer” as a no-poo poo character class. Right alongside Rhinoman, Bog Wizard and a Dude with a Bunch of Monkeys ; there are 20-30 classes and they’re all the wildest space steampunk prog-rock album art poo poo. Absolutely rules.

The rules are absolute unplayable garbage though. As in, the math is so poorly thought out that the game doesn’t function. So it’s only good as a wild coffee table book or if you want to bolt it to a functioning system (e.g. you can pretty easily make the classes into AW playbooks if you’ve ever done that before).

Kchama
Jul 25, 2007

Fart Amplifier posted:

I didn't say there was anything like that in this case.

The original commenter asked what the conflict in this case was. I explained it.

The original commenter then said that prosecutors aren't required to be impartial. I responded with Willis already being disqualified from prosecuting someone in this very case because she wasn't impartial. I broke up the two quotes and responses and only the fact that they were contained in the same comment connected them in any way.

I was explaining that there's a difference between "don't need to be impartial" and "conflict of interest against the defendant".

They do not need to be impartial. That is not what the DQ you posted was about!

However, with the prior work she did for his opponent, there could easily be a Conflict Of Interest against him. Which is why she was DQ'd from the case.

In short, prosecutors are allowed to not like someone. This is what is meant by "They do not need to be impartial".

They aren't allowed to materially benefit in some way outside of the normal job benefits from prosecuting someone. That is what happened in that case.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Raenir Salazar posted:

*Three Arrows kinda makes the argument that this is all in large part to Germany lacking a history of democracy or democratic institutions but at a glance that seemed to me to be patently incorrect, but this is neither here nor there.

Germany was an absolute monarchy until the end of WW1. Within 15 years Hitler was the Reichsführer. Their democracy was a teenager when it was strangled.

And during that time, elections had instances of being declared null because the elites didn't like the outcome.

Don't want to derail this thread but Dan Arrows is a German historian, so you should probably not dismiss his observations on German democracy, especially since Germany itself wasn't even a country until 1871 and so vitally lacked such a concept as "German" democracy before then.

Anyway back to handwringing about Georgia.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
Has there been any word from the closed hearings in the classified docs case?

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

Tesseraction posted:

Germany was an absolute monarchy until the end of WW1. Within 15 years Hitler was the Reichsführer. Their democracy was a teenager when it was strangled.

And during that time, elections had instances of being declared null because the elites didn't like the outcome.

Don't want to derail this thread but Dan Arrows is a German historian, so you should probably not dismiss his observations on German democracy, especially since Germany itself wasn't even a country until 1871 and so vitally lacked such a concept as "German" democracy before then.

Anyway back to handwringing about Georgia.

Not quite, it had elections and political parties, people could vote, my contention isn't that Germany was a vibrant representative democracy like the US, but there was a core of democratic institutions that did exist prior to Weimar.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Raenir Salazar posted:

Not quite, it had elections and political parties, people could vote, my contention isn't that Germany was a vibrant representative democracy like the US, but there was a core of democratic institutions that did exist prior to Weimar.

I mean I’d agree. I agree with the contention that it was more no one really wanted a democracy outside the socialists and parts of the center. The rest wanted either communist state or some sort of monarchy bullshit. And I don’t think we are there with the US.

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Has there been any word from the closed hearings in the classified docs case?

She denied a Trump motion to delay. And they did get through all the Section 4 issues.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

mdemone posted:

And they did get through all the Section 4 issues.

Did she rule on them, though?

Comstar
Apr 20, 2007

Are you happy now?
Place you bets ladies and gentleman, on how big is the fine going to be today.


My bet is $460 million.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Comstar posted:

Place you bets ladies and gentleman, on how big is the fine going to be today.


My bet is $460 million.

$369,999,999.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
$420,000,069

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Did she rule on them, though?

Not yet.

Edit: even when she does it will be sealed so we can only guess by filings on the docket

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
$500 million even. Just to make it easy for everyone to remember. Like do you know how annoying it will be for everyone reporting on it if it's like $472,345,589.56 or something? So much wasted time by everyone double checking they got the number exactly right. Having it be half a billion exactly is just the kind thing to do.

I'd like to think the judge is kind.

smackfu
Jun 7, 2004

Did they announce the ruling would be today or are we just hoping?

Edit: guess I missed this:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/verdict-expected-friday-trumps-370-million-civil-fraud-trial-rcna138720

Not official official but a leak.

smackfu fucked around with this message at 14:06 on Feb 16, 2024

Xiahou Dun
Jul 16, 2009

We shall dive down through black abysses... and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory forever.



Tesseraction posted:

Germany was an absolute monarchy until the end of WW1. Within 15 years Hitler was the Reichsführer. Their democracy was a teenager when it was strangled.

And during that time, elections had instances of being declared null because the elites didn't like the outcome.

Don't want to derail this thread but Dan Arrows is a German historian, so you should probably not dismiss his observations on German democracy, especially since Germany itself wasn't even a country until 1871 and so vitally lacked such a concept as "German" democracy before then.

Anyway back to handwringing about Georgia.

The idea that the Weimar fell because Germany was new at democracy is called the Sonderweg (Separate Way) and is actually super hotly debated with the Sonderweg people in the minority these days.

It’s a whole thing.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Xiahou Dun posted:

The idea that the Weimar fell because Germany was new at democracy is called the Sonderweg (Separate Way) and is actually super hotly debated with the Sonderweg people in the minority these days.

It’s a whole thing.

Right, but Germany having an infantile democracy is not patently untrue. Arguments over the merits of the Sonderweg is another matter.


On topic I'm thinking $435mn. Something poetic about it being the number of congresscritters.

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Comstar posted:

Place you bets ladies and gentleman, on how big is the fine going to be today.


My bet is $460 million.

A series of sealed and varied values that are reported separately to Donald Trump, John Barron, John Miller, and David Dennison. The trick is figuring out which is the real number among the wildly differing amounts. If he guesses wrong then it goes up $100 million, if he guesses right it goes down $50 million.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
Triple nickel, $555,000,000

SpelledBackwards
Jan 7, 2001

I found this image on the Internet, perhaps you've heard of it? It's been around for a while I hear.

Charlz Guybon posted:

Triple nickel, $555,000,000

In Austin we have a local bailout hotline that has commercials that just say "for jail release, call 777-7777" and then repeats that 3 or 4 times depending on the length of the ad.

But $7,777,777 won't cut it in this case!

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



I'm thinking in the $450 mil ballpark. I'm hoping for plenty more, of course, but I think a modest bump above the asking price is most likely.

Of course that's just the cherry, the real prize will be if Engoron smashes a wrecking ball through the Trump Org by barring business in New York state

smackfu
Jun 7, 2004

My bet is half the asked number, like $200 million. And everyone will be like “he got off easy” despite the fact that is a huge amount of money.

withak
Jan 15, 2003


Fun Shoe
Engoron announces that Trump is to be fined $1, before smirking and donning his MAGA cap.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

withak posted:

Engoron announces that Trump is to be fined $1, before smirking and donning his MAGA cap.

And then Trump furiously appeals and fights it out for the next two years

InsertPotPun
Apr 16, 2018

Pissy Bitch stan
i don't care how much it is, i just want to know when and how much of it is due to trump's own words

Vire
Nov 4, 2005

Like a Bosh
The defense is trying to claim that prepping a witness now is a crime or something I don't know.

Youth Decay
Aug 18, 2015

Vire posted:

The defense is trying to claim that prepping a witness now is a crime or something I don't know.


Yeah that line of questioning was weird.

gregday
May 23, 2003

Who is this guy?

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

gregday posted:

Who is this guy?



He appears to be animorphing

Tuna-Fish
Sep 13, 2017

Tesseraction posted:

Right, but Germany having an infantile democracy is not patently untrue.

I really think it is.

In some ways, late Imperial Germany was a more democratic state than, for example, the UK was at the same time period. Neither of them were absolute monarchies, they both had an established constitutional system, they both had similar nominal split in power between the monarchy and the parliament/reichstag. The big differences were that the actual power available to the monarch was somewhat lower in Britain, as while the king could in principle fire the PM at any time, if he actually did that without a drat good reason it would have resulted in a constitutional crisis that would likely have caused him to lose this power, and everyone knew that so he didn't. But this really shouldn't be overstated, as for all his powers the kaiser lacked the power of the purse and was fully beholden to the reichstag on anything that potentially cost money.

And the way they were more democratic than Britain is that the wide franchise came to Britain very late. When the first world war started, every adult German man had the vote and was represented in the Reichstag, while way less than half of the British men did, most of them denied representation by various property requirements. This was well represented in the composition of the respective legislative assemblies, with the UK parliament mainly consisting of the Tories and Liberals, with 7% of the seats held by Labour, while in the Reichstag the SPD was the largest party at 28%.

The biggest difference between the countries was that of image. The UK was proud of it's liberal, representational heritage, while everyone conveniently ignored that it was very much a government of the small rich minority for the small rich minority. For the Germans, it was important to represent themselves as a powerful, conservative monarchy, while everyone conveniently ignored that the monarch hardly had the power to wipe his own rear end if he couldn't get the reichstag to sign off on it.

It's notable that pre-war Germany was also significantly more democratic than Weimar Germany was. The kind of authoritarian rule by decree that was repeatedly used during the Weimar period would have been unthinkable before the war. It's not that the German people were unfamiliar with democratic institutions; it's that the institutions were eroded away and people lost confidence in them during and immediately after the war. (In 1918, you could argue that Germany was neither a monarchy nor democratic, but instead a military dictatorship.) Post-war the moderate center of the German political field was hollowed out because they were (and not entirely wrongly) held as the culprits of the disastrous war and all the loss caused by it.

Scratch Monkey
Oct 25, 2010

👰Proč bychom se netěšili🥰když nám Pán Bůh🙌🏻zdraví dá💪?

gregday posted:

Who is this guy?



Karma Comedian
Feb 2, 2012

gregday posted:

Who is this guy?



Jean-Paul Shartre
Jan 16, 2015

this sentence no verb


gregday posted:

Who is this guy?



Sepiroth really let himself go

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

gregday posted:

Who is this guy?



"Against the power of Mordor there can be no victory. We must join with him, Gandalf. We must join with Sauron."

OJ MIST 2 THE DICK
Sep 11, 2008

Anytime I need to see your face I just close my eyes
And I am taken to a place
Where your crystal minds and magenta feelings
Take up shelter in the base of my spine
Sweet like a chica cherry cola

-Cheap Trick

Nap Ghost
calling wade's divorce lawyer to testify about his attorney client communications was a bold strategy

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 46 hours!)

Clearly Rick Wakeman

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cimber
Feb 3, 2014

Ms Adequate posted:

I'm thinking in the $450 mil ballpark. I'm hoping for plenty more, of course, but I think a modest bump above the asking price is most likely.

Of course that's just the cherry, the real prize will be if Engoron smashes a wrecking ball through the Trump Org by barring business in New York state

I'm betting half a billion dollars and immediate handing over to a receiver for dissolution of Trump Org. They played too cute with lots of things and really pissed off the judge. Having threats against him and his staff isn't going to go unpunished.

I would also expect to see the words 'flagrant' and 'egregious' peppered all through the document.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply