|
A Sneaker Broker posted:Delmar Glaze. Learn the name. what dishes do you recommend this for
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 19:20 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 00:53 |
|
kidcoelacanth posted:what dishes do you recommend this for Pancake Dishes.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 19:22 |
|
I think I'm coming around on the notion of JJ McCarthy being QB3. I was reminded, that Jim Harbaugh didn't let loving Andrew Luck throw the ball much more in college. God his draft process is gonna be fun.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 22:34 |
|
JJ is the perfect Bears QB let’s go
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 22:44 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:JJ is the perfect Bears QB let’s go Dear god no, He can stay QB 3/4 and the Vikings or Falcons can have him.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 22:49 |
|
Dexo posted:Dear god no, He can stay QB 3/4 and the Vikings or Falcons can have him. Accept your fate
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 22:50 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Accept your fate Nah. The one thing I haven't seen the Bears pull off is ruining the near unanimous QB1(Mitch doesn't count, Mitch was a failure in the the GM overthinking things, thinking he was smarter and not taking the QB that most people wanted in Watson) that was preordained the QB1 for like 2 years. They've failed every other possible way at QB. I'm excited to see what happens with Williams.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 22:53 |
|
If JJ is QB3 it's based entirely on potential and zero what he showed at Michigan. Even for a Jim Harbaugh offense he was a checkdown machine. He's got not timing on sideline routes or middle seams. I think it's going to be a disaster pick but who knows?
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 22:54 |
|
Dexo posted:I think I'm coming around on the notion of JJ McCarthy being QB3. And yet Luck still managed to be way more productive than JJ and also put a lot more on tape.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 23:04 |
|
Luck passed 300 more times than JJ he didn't run at all the same offense and was way more effective as a runner with the same amount of attempts. Granted JJ didn't start freshman year but Luck would still eclipse him with 122 more passes.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 23:08 |
|
Doltos posted:If JJ is QB3 it's based entirely on potential and zero what he showed at Michigan. Even for a Jim Harbaugh offense he was a checkdown machine. He's got not timing on sideline routes or middle seams. I think it's going to be a disaster pick but who knows? This is what I’m so baffled by. Usually this type of pick is because he can rip hard outs or seams or is a ridiculous athlete where you know the scrambles will work. He’s not big enough to run consistently or fast enough to avoid getting closed down at the edge (he’s basically the same type of runner Burrow was in college). His deep balls routinely got bailed out by having a very very good deep ball guy in Wilson and a guy he could safely overthrow in Johnson. I just don’t understand what the potential here is, because no trait he has shown screams upside to me right now, unless he’s secretly a complete prospect and Jim is just fundamentally opposed to passing now.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 23:15 |
|
If it boosts the chances of Joe Alt falling to 7, then I'm all aboard the JJ Hype Train.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2024 23:17 |
|
Mega64 posted:If it boosts the chances of Joe Alt falling to 7, then I'm all aboard the JJ Hype Train. The Titans won't need to do anything for Joe Alt. Just sit pretty. I'm concerned about the possibilities that the Packers will not be able to pick Playmaking Cornfed Corner.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 00:06 |
|
Doltos posted:If JJ is QB3 it's based entirely on potential and zero what he showed at Michigan. Even for a Jim Harbaugh offense he was a checkdown machine. He's got not timing on sideline routes or middle seams. I think it's going to be a disaster pick but who knows? JJ is cool and good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7WRl0clL0U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3tu815YEb8
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 00:10 |
|
Gonz posted:JJ is cool and good. I have a better angle of that play earlier in this thread. It was an impressive pass among a myriad of checkdowns and outs. Not to mention the pass only worked because the safety played off and the LB turned his back on a trailer.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:05 |
|
Malik Nabers should be a Top 3 pick.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:08 |
|
I mean he shouldn't but he should be taken before Jayden Daniels and anyone other than Williams, Maye, MHJ
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:10 |
|
Dexo posted:I mean he shouldn't but he should be taken before Jayden Daniels and anyone other than Williams, Maye, MHJ His film is absolutely bonkers.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:12 |
|
I could see that. The QBs this year are all pretty good but all have their faults. MHJ -> Joe Alt -> Nabers/Odunze isn't the craziest.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:17 |
|
Nabers = OBJ Cutting / Burst + AB Acceleration / Deceleration. He will probably run a low 4.3, and then the hype will continue immensely.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:24 |
|
https://x.com/RyanDePaul/status/1758870600616169509?s=20 https://x.com/Nate_Tice/status/1758323293667655960?s=20 https://x.com/Nate_Tice/status/1759631391476883921?s=20 There's a chance the Chargers brass will see this and go, "Nah. Give us the bowie boy."
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:27 |
|
Bowers would be a great pick at 5. So would Nabers. So would Alt.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:40 |
|
Mims gonna skyrocket soon
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 01:59 |
|
a neat cape posted:Bowers would be a great pick at 5. how about a QB with more killer instinct than some pretty boy social media QB
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 02:06 |
|
There would be nothing. and I mean nothing funnier, than Jim Harbaugh trading Herbert and drafting JJ. I know it won't happen, but just thinking about it is cracking me up.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 02:07 |
|
Dexo posted:There would be nothing. and I mean nothing funnier, than Jim Harbaugh trading Herbert and drafting JJ. The sound you'd hear is me throwing myself in front of an amtrack
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 02:19 |
|
a neat cape posted:The sound you'd hear is me throwing myself in front of an amtrack no c in amtrak bud
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 02:25 |
|
Amy Pole Her posted:Mims gonna skyrocket soon I expect he's the third tackle off the board, and I think many already have him there. I also expect his combine to be nuts. I do not like Guyton, I don't think he's a first rounder. I'm not even sure he's a second rounder.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 02:43 |
|
A fun thing to do with Mims tape is bet how many snaps he'll see before getting pulled for an ankle injury
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 03:22 |
|
A Sneaker Broker posted:Nabers = OBJ Cutting / Burst + AB Acceleration / Deceleration. He will probably run a low 4.3, and then the hype will continue immensely. As good as he is, MHJ had a higher ypc with freaking Kyle McCord throwing him the ball.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 03:23 |
|
Doltos posted:If JJ is QB3 it's based entirely on potential and zero what he showed at Michigan. Even for a Jim Harbaugh offense he was a checkdown machine. He's got not timing on sideline routes or middle seams. I think it's going to be a disaster pick but who knows? this is my least favorite type of prospect, where both numbers and eye test say …🤷 But there’s all this hype about how real scouts love them due to winning and secret traits that didn’t show on the field do those guys pan out? ever? genuinely asking
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 03:41 |
|
Dejan Bimble posted:this is my least favorite type of prospect, where both numbers and eye test say …🤷 So the thing is, JJ's thing is just age and a complete lack of reps/opportunity. It's not that he's been bad, but has been winning. It's just like he has the traits to make the throws he needs to, it's just like he has like maybe 10 reps a year doing them, and he was decent when it was time to do them. But just a functionally impossible person to scout on game tape. I get people who are completely out on him, If I were a GM I would extremely be out, but too many people I genuinely respect who do this, who don't just do the INTANGIBLES LEADER AND WINNER™ thing, think there is something more there. probably a bit of wishcasting because there is so little tape, but I get it.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 03:53 |
|
Having maybe the best defense in college football helps with winning.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 04:17 |
|
something else on JJ that helps the "but projections" mindset is that he only just turned 21 in January so he's still got a lot of room for physical growth that a guy two or three years older than him doesn't have I don't think I want the Vikings to draft him (if they don't trade up to grab one of the top three and the draft shakes out like I expect then I would rather they trade down a few spots to try and grab an extra day 2 pick) but it's not going to feel like a disaster pick like Ponder did if they do
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 04:44 |
|
a neat cape posted:Bowers would be a great pick at 5. Absolutely not.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 05:16 |
|
https://twitter.com/MoveTheSticks/status/1759968900316275048?s=20
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 18:09 |
|
I think we're going to get at least a week of McCarthy to the Patriots buzz/speculation at some point during this draft cycle
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 18:40 |
|
wandler20 posted:Absolutely not. I'm curious now
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 18:42 |
|
In terms of just bottom line production taking a tight end in the top 10 probably isn't good value. There aren't a ton of guys who can put up wide receiver numbers. Maybe Bowers is one of them, but it's a bigger gamble than taking someone at a higher value position.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 19:03 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 00:53 |
|
Oh the positional value argument? Yeah, I'm the guy who doesn't mind taking a RB in the top 10 either, so meh
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 19:07 |