(Thread IKs:
fart simpson)
|
Read a new article abour the chinese spy that was staying in australia. Again the articles never mention that the guy worked for chinese intelligence agency
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 19:05 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 23:59 |
|
https://twitter.com/PDChina/status/1758672616674525394 time to experiment with boreholes
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 05:15 |
|
Sorry China, the US is way too far ahead in the huge bore game.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 05:32 |
|
Danann posted:https://twitter.com/PDChina/status/1758672616674525394 In the borehole pressure mines 100km beneath Planetsurface, at the Mohorovicic Discontinuity where crust gives way to mantle, temperatures often reach levels well in excess of 1000 degrees Celsius. Exploitation of Planet's resources under such brutal conditions has require quantum advances in robotic and teleoperational technology.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 06:23 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:In the borehole pressure mines 100km beneath Planetsurface, at the Mohorovicic Discontinuity where crust gives way to mantle, temperatures often reach levels well in excess of 1000 degrees Celsius. Exploitation of Planet's resources under such brutal conditions has require quantum advances in robotic and teleoperational technology. correctly bet with myself that you were absolutely going to post this quote
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 06:43 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:So a few days ago the Taiwanese side of the coast guard chased after a mainland speed boat and caused it to flip over and two men died. Supposedly the PRC coastguard is going to be doing constant patrols around Kinmen from now on. Source: a tweet
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 07:25 |
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:correctly bet with myself that you were absolutely going to post this quote
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 09:06 |
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:correctly bet with myself that you were absolutely going to post this quote
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 09:47 |
|
You know, I keep wondering how North Korea is getting along, and it made me wonder if they haven't considered joining BRICS? I don't think China is hostile to them, and I don't think the other nations would be either? I'm guessing it has to do with the west likely trying to use any opening up against them/to justify hysterical reaction against such? It seems like if they ever do it would dramatically accelerate the process of South Korea once again being the more backward of the two.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 11:34 |
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:correctly bet with myself that you were absolutely going to post this quote Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 11:50 |
|
thechosenone posted:You know, I keep wondering how North Korea is getting along, and it made me wonder if they haven't considered joining BRICS? I don't think China is hostile to them, and I don't think the other nations would be either? I'm guessing it has to do with the west likely trying to use any opening up against them/to justify hysterical reaction against such? It seems like if they ever do it would dramatically accelerate the process of South Korea once again being the more backward of the two. My impression is they don't trust anyone except maybe China. They probably suspect the West would try to use the new connections to infiltrate. I don't really blame them but it would be nice for them to get more support.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 12:07 |
|
Regarde Aduck posted:My impression is they don't trust anyone except maybe China. They probably suspect the West would try to use the new connections to infiltrate. I don't really blame them but it would be nice for them to get more support. Pretty sure they also don't trust China. It's a there-be-dragons place, even if you're Chinese. They actually shot China's main guy there some years ago. Don't think that was fake. Fake edit: there-be-loongs
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 12:14 |
|
I was just reading a couple Chinese EV articles. We got so many of them from European source now because the EU is trying to put up new kinds of trade tariff barrier to save their own auto industry (all these happened before the energy hike EU did it in themselves) So these articles would say correct things like "Europe car makers are 5 years behind Chinese EV" etc but none of them would say why. To me isn't it obvious? That industrial policy works, and industrial policy is the main reason Chinese EV tech is x year ahead of competition. And this happened before in the solar panel industry, which I guess is smaller and the Brussel people were too busy to take notice. Are the western "economists" capable of saying IP is a viable development model? Or they are 100% mouth pieces of the capitalist class and can not touch this IP topic? Go back to the EV subject, EU can change their own import and tariff policies all they want to stop Chinese EV entering EU market (like what the US did to Chinese cars), but it's not going to help the Germany EV becoming more competitive outside of EU. If they want to be competitive in the world even German cars and Tesla would have to use a lot of Chinese EV components inside to stay in the game. Also Europe still exports a good deal to China so their own goods will be exposed to China's retaliatory tariff.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 12:33 |
|
Wow, a lot of big ups in Chinese economy. Domestic tourism up 34% year over year too.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 13:59 |
|
Yeah, North Korea's probably been having all their paranoia be entirely justified for decades at this point.stephenthinkpad posted:Are the western "economists" capable of saying IP is a viable development model? Or they are 100% mouth pieces of the capitalist class and can not touch this IP topic? Do you really need to ask this question?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 14:10 |
|
North Korea has half the population of SK, they can't open their economy too much without getting too much economical influence from SK. I don't think the BRI model is the best for NK.Ghost Leviathan posted:
I think there are probably a couple economist version of Mearsheimer who gets shut down by the mainstream platforms and only get interview request from the smallest youtube channels. But I don't follow economic academia to know who they are.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 14:37 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:I think there are probably a couple economist version of Mearsheimer who gets shut down by the mainstream platforms and only get interview request from the smallest youtube channels. But I don't follow economic academia to know who they are. they write for like the FT or other newspapers for the elite and are firmly shut away from the general public OP
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 14:57 |
|
North Koreans gather cigarette butts to sell to clothing makers www.rfa.org posted:Hungry North Koreans are swooping in ahead of cleaning crews for large public events to collect the butts of filtered cigarettes, which they then sell for meager sums of cash, residents in the country told Radio Free Asia.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 16:29 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:To me isn't it obvious? That industrial policy works, and industrial policy is the main reason Chinese EV tech is x year ahead of competition. And this happened before in the solar panel industry, which I guess is smaller and the Brussel people were too busy to take notice. In 2009, when I entered econ, the theme of industrial policy was "something that we should review its taboo status, to start a discussion". This was in a heterodox course in Brazil. It's 2024 and industrial policy is now seen as a very difficult topic with too many complications (but no longer taboo). After the neoclassical triumph through neoliberalism and the "validation" through the fall of the USSR, the disciplines of economic planning basically fell into epistemological collapse. This might sound like an exaggeration, but I don't think there is a better way to describe what happened - the ideas of "planning" and "organization" within economics suddenly cratered and were replaced by the ideas in business administration, following the ivy league/london school of economics curricular model. Like, you could learn accounting, cost analysis, econometrics, industrial economics (not the math models but the more in-depth discipline if you were lucky) but there was no "alright let's bring all of this together and let's try planning for a railroad as the state", which is very different than business planning.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 16:41 |
|
just run the government like a business. best of both worlds
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 16:43 |
|
fart simpson posted:just run the government like a business. best of both worlds sell all the assets, fire half the staff and make the other half work twice as hard, got it.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 17:15 |
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:Like, you could learn accounting, cost analysis, econometrics, industrial economics (not the math models but the more in-depth discipline if you were lucky) but there was no "alright let's bring all of this together and let's try planning for a railroad as the state", which is very different than business planning. We solved everything, no need to act on anything anymore. Learn only for the aesthetic pleasure of learning, so you can sound important and knowledgeable at the next meeting or soiree.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 17:28 |
|
crepeface posted:sell all the assets, fire half the staff and make the other half work twice as hard, got it. You also forgot put half as much in the next product, which you then slam twice as much into advertising.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 18:25 |
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:In 2009, when I entered econ, the theme of industrial policy was "something that we should review its taboo status, to start a discussion". This was in a heterodox course in Brazil. It's 2024 and industrial policy is now seen as a very difficult topic with too many complications (but no longer taboo). Wasn't Brazil one of the few countries that tried to build up its own computer industry? And still have electronic appliance import tariff? Even Brazil is taking the Western economy theories almost wholesale.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 19:28 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:industrial policy works, and industrial policy is the main reason Chinese EV tech is x year ahead of competition. Where can I read more about what "industrial policy" is exactly? Any info welcome!
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 20:24 |
|
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:04 |
|
HashtagGirlboss posted:Funny you should mention it because I was just reading Suharto’s son is doing the Bong Bong comeback thing and I was curious if anyone in this thread had thoughts on it. Or maybe it was a bad article and he was just a general under Suharto All these dweebs think they're Napoleon III Soapy_Bumslap posted:I love China bad articles, lots of chances to ask people "so they've been collapsing since 2012, when do they cross the finish line" We've been predicting their collapse for thirty years. We're definite right this time though. PhilippAchtel has issued a correction as of 21:16 on Feb 21, 2024 |
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:12 |
|
genericnick posted:Pretty sure they also don't trust China. It's a there-be-dragons place, even if you're Chinese. They actually shot China's main guy there some years ago. Don't think that was fake. I can't find anything on this, do you mean the ambassador? Any recollection as to when?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:24 |
|
Guam is US territory, not a country
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:33 |
|
Weka posted:I can't find anything on this, do you mean the ambassador? Any recollection as to when? Just from my money, Kim got rid of his uncle from his mother side when he came to power. That uncle was "more pro China" not "very pro China." Both the first Kim and 2nd Kim had their shares of "clamping down factions" so pro China might just be an excuse. Anybody who are familiar with Chinese palace history will immediately recognize Kim Jung Un's ridding his uncle a classical act of young emperor kicking out the "in-law gang". It has happened many times including Kang Xi. North Korea is not a typical communist country so a lot of their own political rules were set around the time of 2nd Kim. stephenthinkpad has issued a correction as of 21:47 on Feb 21, 2024 |
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:44 |
|
Spergin Morlock posted:Guam is US territory, not a country I would like to speak to the manager of this infographic
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:45 |
|
Mandel Brotset posted:I would like to speak to the manager of this infographic same with the Marshall islands. who the gently caress made that thing?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:51 |
|
Germany is also a US territory.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:53 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:Wasn't Brazil one of the few countries that tried to build up its own computer industry? And still have electronic appliance import tariff? Even Brazil is taking the Western economy theories almost wholesale. Oh no, we never had anything of such. We had a couple of industrial capitalists who tried to did come up with some of the very basic stuff - circuitry electronics - but got destroyed by foreign competition. And I wish I could agree with that "even" you used, but it's not true. Brazil has some great original thought in political economy and many related areas, but never managed to reach a dominant position because we are still a latifundia colony. Bolsonaro's pick for minister of economy was a Chicago school boy who openly admitted that he put his money in tax havens. that's the Brazilian elite. There will be a day where we can emulate China about dealing with that
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 21:54 |
|
fart simpson posted:just run the government like a business. best of both worlds Want to buyback some government stocks.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 22:44 |
|
amazed at tiny portugal with 21 US military bases, where did they even fit them all
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 22:47 |
|
BULBASAUR posted:amazed at tiny portugal with 21 US military bases, where did they even fit them all Same, plus I'm pretty surprised that the US doesn't have more in France. I would think that they would like to have some on one or two on the million islands that France has in the Indian/Pacific Ocean. Probably just no point to them. Not securing/projecting anything with troops in the south Pacific
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 23:05 |
|
TeenageArchipelago posted:Same, plus I'm pretty surprised that the US doesn't have more in France. I would think that they would like to have some on one or two on the million islands that France has in the Indian/Pacific Ocean. Probably just no point to them. Not securing/projecting anything with troops in the south Pacific it's because France has an interest in keeping their own capabilities and assets under their own control and wouldn't allow US or UK forces to use them unless poo poo was completely sideways
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 23:10 |
|
TeenageArchipelago posted:Same, plus I'm pretty surprised that the US doesn't have more in France. I would think that they would like to have some on one or two on the million islands that France has in the Indian/Pacific Ocean. Probably just no point to them. Not securing/projecting anything with troops in the south Pacific france demands some pretensions at sovereignty so the us troops in france live on 'french' bases
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 23:12 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 23:59 |
|
yeah France is unique among US subject states in how much effort they put into pretending they're not and that the relationship is actually a completely voluntary association between equals, one in which the French could disobey the Americans at any time if they wanted to, they just don't ever want to
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 00:51 |