|
also if it were bgp, wouldn't wi-fi calling not work?
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 19:54 |
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:wouldn't the problem being bgp mean at&t-to-at&t calls would work fine Beeftweeter posted:also if it were bgp, wouldn't wi-fi calling not work? i dunno! that’s a good point. boy am i glad i don’t work on anything where bgp is a core, critical functional requirement. oh
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:20
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:also if it were bgp, wouldn't wi-fi calling not work? not a networking person but I would expect wifi calling to be routed differently since the initial connection would be coming from whichever isp the internet service is coming from
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:24
|
|
|
phone to tower does not use IP or BGP so far as I know tower to tower probably uses IP but I don't know enough to guess if it uses BGP tower to internet or internet to tower (any time you are entering or leaving AT&T's private network) definitely uses BGP, so wifi calls are probably broken
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:25
|
|
|
haveblue posted:so wifi calls are probably broken everything I've seen on this calls out wifi calling as a workaround
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:27
|
|
|
my understanding so far seems to place the issue at peering between the towers and the larger att network
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:28
|
|
|
The Fool posted:everything I've seen on this calls out wifi calling as a workaround hmm ok. but is this an official AT&T position or dumb assholes guessing wildly (mlmp)
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:29
|
|
|
I don't think att has said anything officially outside of admitting there was a service issue
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:31
|
|
|
WiFi calling works for me, I’m affected by the att outage
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:37
|
|
|
thinking about putting ¡whoops! on a tshirt
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:38
|
|
|
DELETE CASCADE posted:i'm not necessarily arguing that humans have souls, or that there's anything non-physical going on in the human brain and body. i believe, as a purely theoretical matter of principle, that it should be possible to faithfully simulate a human being using a machine. but i don't think that machine would be anything like a von neumann computer, or that we have the faintest idea of how to even begin constructing such a machine, or that we will in the foreseeable future A lot of companies try to make money by saying that a computer is exactly like a human brain so who can say if it's true or not
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:38
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:A lot of companies try to make money by saying that a computer is exactly like a human brain so who can say if it's true or not https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eW8XoovSlsM
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 17:41
|
|
|
ss7
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 18:00
|
|
|
mediaphage posted:thinking about putting ¡whoops! on a tshirt make it this one and you've got a sale 
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 18:11
|
|
|
haveblue posted:hmm ok. but is this an official AT&T position or dumb assholes guessing wildly (mlmp) worksforme and i'm on an at&t mvno
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:00
|
|
|
The Fool posted:my understanding so far seems to place the issue at peering between the towers and the larger att network yeah, but apparently peering between at&t and other carriers is broken too although i just tried wifi calling from verizon. 5g predictably didn't work, but it almost never does here anyway, so that's no proof of anything really. if i weren't on a nearly free plan with the mvno i would've dropped it like a hot potato half a year ago e: that is, 5g verizon -> at&t wifi. at&t's 5g doesn't work reliably enough here on a normal day to even test it Beeftweeter fucked around with this message at 19:06 on Feb 22, 2024 |
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:02
|
|
|
no issues with t-mobile here either btw, i have all 3 major carriers to play with lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:04
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/stratejake/status/1760333904857497650 lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:13
|
|
|
DALL-E has gone woke??? e: I'm taking "Salvador DALL-E" to the cyberpunk names thread.
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:16
|
|
|
the anti-wokes are absolutely frothing over this because it'll also (sometimes) refuse to create pictures of white people, saying that it can't perpetuate stereotypes that may be included in the training data etc. but the same prompt works for other ethnicities i mean, i'm all for woke chatbots and whatnot but this seems kinda bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:17
|
|
|
Powerful Two-Hander posted:DALL-E has gone woke??? it's some new google thing, not dall-e https://arstechnica.com/information...ccurate-images/
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:17
|
|
|
yeah the problem isn't that it drew a nonwhite guy, the problem is that google seems to be silently inserting "also make sure he's not white!" into certain classes of prompts e: lmao 
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:20
|
|
|
also more like "el salvador dall-e" am i right
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:20
|
|
|
haveblue posted:yeah the problem isn't that it drew a nonwhite guy, the problem is that google seems to be silently inserting "also make sure he's not white!" into certain classes of prompts Tremendous job with the swastika on the black nazi's helmet
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:24
|
|
|
haveblue posted:yeah the problem isn't that it drew a nonwhite guy, the problem is that google seems to be silently inserting "also make sure he's not white!" into certain classes of prompts lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:24
|
|
|
oh my god lmao this is going to melt so many chud brains
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:25
|
|
|
haveblue posted:yeah the problem isn't that it drew a nonwhite guy, the problem is that google seems to be silently inserting "also make sure he's not white!" into certain classes of prompts like its obviously not RIGHT but idk, I kinda feel like on average its less wrong edit: oh maybe thats what we're all agreeing on here? idk maybe i'm not grokking the zeitgeist rn
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:26
|
|
|
haveblue posted:yeah the problem isn't that it drew a nonwhite guy, the problem is that google seems to be silently inserting "also make sure he's not white!" into certain classes of prompts lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:27
|
|
|
rotor posted:like its obviously not RIGHT but idk, I kinda feel like on average its less wrong i feel like its pretty wrong.
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:27
|
|
|
colors of benetton rear end panzer division
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:28
|
|
|
haveblue posted:yeah the problem isn't that it drew a nonwhite guy, the problem is that google seems to be silently inserting "also make sure he's not white!" into certain classes of prompts Forget all I ever said about AIs, they’re actually great.
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:28
|
|
|
oh my god they actually made some "woke nazis", lmao indeed
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:30
|
|
|
good ol' infinite pile o' jank
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:30
|
|
|
rotor posted:like its obviously not RIGHT but idk, I kinda feel like on average its less wrong it's not wrong to try and expand the scope of diversity representation in its images, but it is definitely wrong to say "here's an historically accurate picture of a medieval british king" and show a black guy or multiracial nazis, etc. it refusing to make white people pictures sometimes is just icing on the cake, but that of course is going to lead to some significant backlash from the type of people you'd expect to get whipped into a frenzy about an already decommissioned image generator trying to force "woke" on them like, this is accidentally confirming their worst fears. it's bad.
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:32
|
|
|
rotor posted:its less wrong oh, you're one of those
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:34
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:oh, you're one of those
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:34
|
|
|
word spreads fast...
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:35
|
|
|
if anything i think the hamilton guy, and not joe biden, should get credit for that particular one
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 19:54 |
|
|
this mf easily claims the quad
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2024 19:36
|
|