Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Kalit posted:

Once again, Biden showing that things can be accomplished behind the scenes. So much for Biden's "hardline Zionist" stance that I had to argue against earlier ITT

You can still be a hardline Zionist and support a ceasefire. Very few countries think Israel/a Jewish state has no right to exist, but most of them support a ceasefire.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kalit
Nov 6, 2006

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

You can still be a hardline Zionist and support a ceasefire. Very few countries think Israel has no right to exist, but most of them support a ceasefire.

Okay, maybe I’m confusing terminology in that case. I thought Zionism was not only advocating for Israel’s right to exist, but also for their advancement into Palestine territory (believing that it’s “Israel’s land”). Am I mistaken in that?

Kchama
Jul 25, 2007

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

You can still be a hardline Zionist and support a ceasefire. Very few countries think Israel/a Jewish state has no right to exist, but most of them support a ceasefire.

I'm not sure how the second sentence relates to the first, as hardline Zionists are the opposite, they don't think Palestine should exist.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Kalit posted:

Okay, maybe I’m confusing terminology in that case. I thought Zionism was not only advocating for Israel’s right to exist, but also for their advancement into Palestine territory (believing that it’s “Israel’s land”). Am I mistaken in that?

It's the same as how "capitalist" technically describes both Denmark and Ron Paul.

The literal definition of Zionism is supporting "the development and protection of the State of Israel as a Jewish state."

There are expansionist Zionists who think Israel needs to encompass all of historical Judea and there are Zionists who think the 1967 or 1948 borders are acceptable as long as a Jewish state continues to exist.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Kchama posted:

I'm not sure how the second sentence relates to the first, as hardline Zionists are the opposite, they don't think Palestine should exist.

Secular and less "Zionist" groups like Yisrael Beiteinu were some of the groups who were most explicit in the belief that Palestine shouldn't exist.

Yitzhak Rabin was much more of an orthodox Zionist (and he was the head military commander during the 6 day war) than Avigdor Lieberman and Rabin was trying to formalize a Palestinian state before he was assassinated.

You also have the weirdly opposite groups of ultra-orthodox who don't think Palestine should exist, but also don't think modern Israel should exist because they believe that God is going to signal when Israel should be built and all of historical Judea and Palestine reclaimed, but man doing it too early is defying God's timeline. Just the term "Zionist" doesn't outline someone's specific ideology on Palestine.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 02:52 on Feb 27, 2024

reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Secular and less "Zionist" groups like Yisrael Beiteinu were some of the groups who were most explicit in the belief that Palestine shouldn't exist.

quote:

The party describes itself as "a national movement with the clear vision to follow in the bold path of Zev Jabotinsky",[19] the founder of Revisionist Zionism.

I don't think your classification of Zionism is the standard classification of Zionism.

theCalamity
Oct 23, 2010

Cry Havoc and let slip the Hogs of War

Kalit posted:

Once again, Biden showing that things can be accomplished behind the scenes. So much for Biden's "hardline Zionist" stance that I had to argue against earlier ITT

You argued against Biden being a Zionist? That’s a shame.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/i-am-zionist-how-joe-bidens-lifelong-bond-with-israel-shapes-war-policy-2023-10-21/

quote:

When Joe Biden met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his war cabinet during his visit to Israel, the U.S. president assured them: "I don't believe you have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, and I am a Zionist."

Raenir Salazar posted:

Ceasefire Joe has a pretty good ring to it.

Yeah, no, not when he was supporting Israel vehemently throughout and repeated some of their horrible lies.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

reignonyourparade posted:

I don't think your classification of Zionism is the standard classification of Zionism.

That is why I said "less Zionist" and not "non-Zionist."

Why do you think Revisionist Zionism is called something different from orthodox or general Zionism?

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

That is why I said "less Zionist" and not "non-Zionist."

Why do you think Revisionist Zionism is called something different from orthodox or general Zionism?

Because it wanted to distinguish itself from less extreme forms of Zionism that preached things like "coexisting with Palestinians" or "maybe settling for less than the entirety of Palestine". It was one of the most Zionist of the Zionist factions, a far-right Zionism that set itself in clear opposition to the socialist Zionism that was widespread in the early decades of the Zionist movement.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Main Paineframe posted:

Because it wanted to distinguish itself from less extreme forms of Zionism that preached things like "coexisting with Palestinians" or "maybe settling for less than the entirety of Palestine". It was one of the most Zionist of the Zionist factions, a far-right Zionism that set itself in clear opposition to the socialist Zionism that was widespread in the early decades of the Zionist movement.

Right.

If you are explicitly in opposition to the original Zionist movement and opposed to 10 out of 11 different major intellectual forms of Zionism, then I think it is pretty fair to say that you are not an originalist or member of the traditional Zionist movement. It is even literally called "Revisionism."

That is the whole point of the "Zionist means a lot of different things" derail.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 03:13 on Feb 27, 2024

reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Right.

If you are explicitly in opposition to the original Zionist movement and opposed to 10 out of 11 different major intellectual forms of Zionism, then I think it is pretty fair to say that you are not an originalist or member of the traditional Zionist movement. It is even literally called "Revisionism."

Sometimes you can be opposed to an original form of a movement not because you are a lesser version of it, but in fact because you think the original version doesn't go far enough.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

reignonyourparade posted:

Sometimes you can be opposed to an original form of a movement not because you are a lesser version of it, but in fact because you think the original version doesn't go far enough.

Sure, but the original point is that there are anti-Zionists who think Palestine shouldn't exist and Zionists who think it should. Just using the word "Zionist" doesn't actually tell you someone's specific thoughts on Palestine any more than someone being a capitalist tells you their preference on tax policy. Denmark, Adam Smith, and Ron Paul are all capitalists, but they have extremely different opinions on taxes.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



I have not heard of a single professed Zionist who doesn't support this war. All of the usual suspects have been in full throated support since this started.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

FlamingLiberal posted:

I have not heard of a single professed Zionist who doesn't support this war. All of the usual suspects have been in full throated support since this started.

Just about every single major European country has supported Israel and also called for a ceasefire. The United States is also apparently supporting Israel and negotiating a ceasefire.

Roughly 85% of Israelis consider themselves Zionists and about 60% support a ceasefire in exchange for returning hostages.

Madkal
Feb 11, 2008

Fallen Rib

FlamingLiberal posted:

I have not heard of a single professed Zionist who doesn't support this war. All of the usual suspects have been in full throated support since this started.

There have been quite a few Israelis that have been critical of the war and I think most of them want the country of Israel to still exist.
There is a difference between wanting the hostages returned and wanting Gaza to be leveled and there are some that want both but not everyone does, and lumping in those that want the hostages back with those that want annihilation isn't doing anyone any favours.

koolkal
Oct 21, 2008

this thread maybe doesnt have room for 2 green xbox one avs

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Biden announced that the U.S. has been secretly negotiating a ceasefire in Gaza and expects to announce a ceasefire agreement within a week.

The deal includes the release of 40 of the remaining Israeli hostages and dozens of Palestinians convicted of terrorism in Israel.

The initial ceasefire would last 6 weeks and include a negotiation for a permanent cessation of hostilities.

https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/status/1762249127469998113

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/02/26/world/israel-hamas-war-gaza-news

Uh, how is this a secret? These talks have been known for a while.

Like, here's an article about Biden talking about it a couple weeks ago lol: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-israel-hamas-hostage-negotiations-rafah-king-abdullah/

And an article from a month ago!: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/24/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-hostages-ceasefire-talks.html

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

koolkal posted:

Uh, how is this a secret? These talks have been known for a while.

Like, here's an article about Biden talking about it a couple weeks ago lol: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-israel-hamas-hostage-negotiations-rafah-king-abdullah/

And an article from a month ago!: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/24/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-hostages-ceasefire-talks.html

The "secret" part was that the U.S. was pressuring Israel to drop its demands that had prevented the negotiations from continuing and Israel finally accepting. But, yes, I should have been more clear that the secret part was the negotiations with Israel to move the red line in the ceasefire talks and not the hostage negotiations themselves.

quote:

In a major shift, Israeli negotiators have signaled that Israel could release a group of high-profile Palestinian prisoners serving lengthy jail terms in exchange for the freedom of some of the Israeli hostages still being held in Gaza, officials say.

The change in Israeli negotiating strategy, which has not been announced publicly
, is significant because it could help persuade Hamas to release Israeli soldiers captured in October and agree to a deal that would temporarily pause the fighting in the Gaza Strip.

International efforts to reach a truce had stalled over Israel’s refusal to release Palestinians convicted of murder and to commit to a permanent cease-fire, two of the measures that Hamas is holding out for.

GoutPatrol
Oct 17, 2009

*Stupid Babby*

NY legislature talking about ripping up the bipartisan district map and making one more favored for Dems.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/26/nyregion/redistricting-maps-ny-congress.html

quote:

Behind closed doors, Democrats were still haggling over a complex set of legal and political concerns that could determine how aggressive they would be. The choices included a dramatic redraw that would give Democrats an advantage in 22 of the state’s 26 districts; another option would only make slight alterations to a handful of swing seats.

People familiar with the talks said that a middle ground was most likely, offering Democrats enough seats to offset gains that Republicans expect to reap from a fresh gerrymander in North Carolina — ideally without running afoul of New York’s ban on partisan gerrymandering.

The competing pressures were intense after two years of near incessant fighting over New York’s maps. Democrats under the leadership of Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York most recently spent millions of dollars in legal fees fighting for the chance to redraw the maps, a move that could help make Mr. Jeffries speaker.

But they cannot afford a repeat of 2022, when the Legislature overplayed its hand and watched in humiliation as the state’s top court struck down its map as an unconstitutional gerrymander. The court proceeded to put in place a neutral replacement map that helped Republicans flip four seats.

quote:

Democrats in the Senate and Assembly also took steps on Monday to expedite legislation to prevent Republicans from “judge shopping” in redistricting cases. In 2022, Republicans brought their initial lawsuit in a rural county where a Republican judge heard the case.

Under the proposed new law, challenges to legislative maps would only be allowed in Supreme Court in Manhattan or Albany, Westchester and Erie Counties, all more liberal jurisdictions. Republicans skewered the change as blatantly self-serving on Monday.

Democrats have another significant reason to be more optimistic the courts will be on their side this time. Retirements have helped reshape the state’s highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Last year, Senate Democrats successfully fought to install a new chief judge, Rowan D. Wilson, who dissented from the majority opinion faulting the Legislature in 2022.

The stage was set for the current fight when the reconfigured Court of Appeals reopened the mapmaking process in December. Prompted by a Democratic lawsuit, it ordered the 10-member bipartisan commission, created by a constitutional amendment, to guide the process to draft a new plan.

BRJurgis
Aug 15, 2007

Well I hear the thunder roll, I feel the cold winds blowing...
But you won't find me there, 'cause I won't go back again...
While you're on smoky roads, I'll be out in the sun...
Where the trees still grow, where they count by one...

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The "secret" part was that the U.S. was pressuring Israel to drop its demands that had prevented the negotiations from continuing and Israel finally accepting. But, yes, I should have been more clear that the secret part was the negotiations with Israel to move the red line in the ceasefire talks and not the hostage negotiations themselves.

Why should "secret" negotiations be seen as anything but convienant for the powers that be?

Leveraging US influence to give us a win while we vetoe other attempts, to define and channel power. It's only "good" within the perspective of domestic US politics

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see Israel stop exterminating people by the thousands with our support. Just wanna be clear eyed about it.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
Bomb blew up outside the Alabama AG office. No one hurt
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/26/us/alabama-attorney-general-explosive.html

Shammypants
May 25, 2004

Let me tell you about true luxury.


Countdown until the right accuses a trans person and it turns out to be a pro-lifer desperately trying to reclaim the narrative.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

This does not make sense when, again, aggregate indicia also indicate improvements. The belief that things are worse is false. It remains false.

BRJurgis posted:

Why should "secret" negotiations be seen as anything but convienant for the powers that be?

Leveraging US influence to give us a win while we vetoe other attempts, to define and channel power. It's only "good" within the perspective of domestic US politics

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see Israel stop exterminating people by the thousands with our support. Just wanna be clear eyed about it.

There are a lot of reasons to keep negotiations on something secret, in particular because it limits the ability of third parties to sabotage those negotiations. It's "good" within the perspective of actually successfully accomplishing negotiations. It's convienant for the parties to the negotiations, and those who benefit from the outcomes- which in this case appears to be Palestinians.

Paracaidas
Sep 24, 2016
Consistently Tedious!

GlyphGryph posted:

Sure, of course, but I'm never going to accomplish anything if there are ever only single digits percentages of the population I can work with. Progress is always going to be mean working with people who are literal monsters unless you yourself are so monstrous that most of the population is better than you. I don't need to actually find someone tolerable to work with them towards shared goals.

The danger of working with most conservative groups in particular is that they are often straight up lying about their goals and you risk getting played quite badly by giving them the benefit of the doubt, so the extent of beneficial collaboration often looks like "I wrote this bill and you claim to want this sort of thing so why don't you vote for it?"

If you have to give them additional stuff you don't want to get them on board, then the original premise (that you were both working towards the same good goal, that there was ANYTHING you agreed on) was clearly false. It's an entirely different situation. Working together with a group of bigots to write and pass actual antitrust legislation is necessary Working together with a group of bigots to write anti-trans legislation that pretends to be about sticking it to big tech is something else entirely.
Sure, if they're willing to sign on to a good thing without watering it down or adding toxic, abusive elements then I won't object to their support (though, like Ted and Lee jumping on prescription drugs in 2017, you better be drat sure you haven't left any holes). Towards the initial post you responded to though, the comment was "accommodating and making common cause".

The sticky bits are usually the accommodating or else trying real hard not to look too close on their part of the common cause (as with KOSA and Stoller's tech antitrust efforts).

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep

FlamingLiberal posted:

I have not heard of a single professed Zionist who doesn't support this war. All of the usual suspects have been in full throated support since this started.

I know of one, in that they technically still want there to be a jewish refuge state, but even then it's kind of a crude fit by now because they've stopped supporting any of the governmental acts of israel and are somewhat anti-israel by now

The rest, on the other hand? Full support. Divided between "those who don't really believe yet that this is genocidal" versus "know it is genocidal, actively like that part of it."

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



GhostofJohnMuir posted:

i can't articulate why, but this being mentioned as an aside while grabbing ice cream with a b tier late night talk show host doesn't seem appropriate

I kind of feel the same, it seems like such a matter deserves more gravitas. My guess is he is genuinely shaken by Bushnell and wants to pre-empt any danger of copycats (or doesn't care much but doesn't want the political costs of emulators or other serious dissent), so when he saw an opportunity to get it out there he jumped on it while not thinking the circumstances are ready for an official briefing or the like.

Twincityhacker
Feb 18, 2011

Far more people are going to be watching an interview with Seth Myers than an offical breifing, and the last press coference was a shouty mess.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Ms Adequate posted:

I kind of feel the same, it seems like such a matter deserves more gravitas. My guess is he is genuinely shaken by Bushnell and wants to pre-empt any danger of copycats (or doesn't care much but doesn't want the political costs of emulators or other serious dissent), so when he saw an opportunity to get it out there he jumped on it while not thinking the circumstances are ready for an official briefing or the like.

My fear is that this is just Bibi setting up a rug-pull to make Biden look ineffectual. I can't understand why you would ever make such an announcement informally and prematurely.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
This election cycle is likely to be a rematch from 2020.

We might also be getting a second throwback from the last election cycle: Another recall vote in California.

California requires that you give a reason for any recall campaign. In 2020, it was because of unconstitutional covid restrictions. This time, it is because there is a $73 billion budget shortfall that they blame on Newsom traveling across the country instead of being in Sacramento to negotiate a balanced budget for the state.

https://twitter.com/RecallGavinNow/status/1762212771595464841

quote:

[quote]Gavin Newsom faces another recall threat in California

SACRAMENTO, California — Conservative activists are launching another attempt to recall California Gov. Gavin Newsom, seeking to capitalize on anger over the state’s yawning budget deficit and arguing that the top White House surrogate must be stopped before he can make a presidential run of his own.

A citizen-led group plans to formally serve Newsom’s office Monday morning with recall papers, organizers informed POLITICO, the initial step in a long and likely expensive process to qualify their effort for the statewide ballot.

Newsom, unchecked by campaign donation limits and fortified by nearly $75 million in spending from his committees and allies, beat back the prior recall that made it onto the ballot in 2021 and was organized by some of the same activists. Newsom cruised over Republican talk-radio host Larry Elder, who faced an onslaught of criticism, even from among the recall’s own organizers, over differences in message and strategy. At least five other Newsom recalls have been started but did not move forward.

Proponents of the latest attempt, which is led by Rescue California, pointed to Newsom’s ambitions and his role as a super surrogate for President Joe Biden’s 2024 reelection campaign. They contend the governor is too busy occupying himself on national politics while the state is racing to close a massive budget shortfall. Last week, the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office projected that the state budget faces a $73 billion deficit, nearly double Newsom’s own forecast.

“Gavin Newsom has abandoned the state to advance his presidential ambitions, leaving behind a $73 billion budget deficit and a public safety, immigration and education crisis,” said Anne Dunsmore, an Orange County fundraiser and the campaign director for Rescue California. She said more than 400 Californians of varying political persuasion have joined together to serve as official proponents of the new recall. That includes others from the last effort such as Orrin Heatlie, the retired county sheriff’s sergeant from Yolo who helped get the ball rolling in 2020.

“California needs a full-time governor who is fully focused on the serious problems the state and its citizens are facing,” Dunsmore said. “This may be our last opportunity to rescue and restore our state, while we highlight for the rest of the country the destruction Newsom has left in his wake.”

Nathan Click, a spokesperson for Newsom, suggested the governor and his team aren’t brushing off the challenge.

“We are taking it seriously,” Click said. “These Trump Republicans are targeting Gov. Newsom because he is out there defending democracy and fighting for the reelection of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. He’s not going to be distracted from that fight. Democracy’s on the ballot, and he’s going to keep fighting.”

A recall that qualifies for the ballot would be another headache for Newsom, but the campaign as it stands in the early stages could prove to be a blessing: It gives Newsom a conservative boogeyman to fundraise against. In 2021 and 2022, he used the recall to build one of the biggest digital fundraising operations in Democratic politics.

Recall petitions require signatures equal to 12 percent of the turnout in the last election for governor. In this case, that’s roughly 1.38 million signatures, though organizers estimate they would likely need around 1.6 million to account for ones deemed invalid by the secretary of state.

Rescue California and its partners don’t plan to use the paid signature-gatherers outside shopping centers and big-box stores, a standard practice for qualifying, at least not currently. Instead, they will start off with other methods such as reaching supporters through the mail.

Dunsmore and organizers said they were motivated by several policy decisions in California, including the state granting health benefits to undocumented immigrants; laws designed to change the criminal justice system that she said have contributed to crime and the rise of smash-and-grab robberies; high taxes; spending billions of dollars on homelessness and social services that have done little to solve the problem; and prolonged school closures during Covid that led to learning loss.

In an interview with POLITICO, Dunsmore also seized on Newsom’s outreach for Biden and Harris while the state budget is in arrears. “How do you run away from all of that and then flaunt your progress as governor in order to become president?” Dunsmore said.

She pointed to the timing of the Republican and Democratic national conventions this summer and said “blowing up” Newsom’s national efforts for Democrats may not be the chief motivator, but are an “added benefit.”

“Stay home and deal with this issue: Now you’re gonna have a microscope put on you,” she said. “Because he’s actually not so bad when he thinks people are watching … But he thinks he’s got like this free ride.”

Newsom has been traveling the country; headlining fundraisers, debating Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida and appearing on TV to campaign for Biden. On Sunday, Newsom unveiled the first in a series of TV spots that accuses conservative officials of holding women hostage by imposing restrictions on their travel for reproductive care.

Before Newsom spent millions portraying the 2021 recall as a GOP power grab — and Elder as a disciple of former President Donald Trump — the effort eventually benefited from citizen frustrations over Covid-19 and Newsom’s attempts to fight off the virus, which critics charged were overbearing and stifled business.

A judge, citing the pandemic and the governor’s emergency health orders, granted proponents a crucial extension that gave them more time to gather signatures to place the question on the ballot. The proponents also capitalized on Newsom’s decision to attend a birthday dinner at The French Laundry, the celebrated three-Michelin star restaurant in the Napa Valley, where he was pictured maskless.

Organizers have a lower threshold this time, but they would need to move with lightning speed — by sometime in May — to qualify the new recall for the November 2024 ballot. If that doesn’t happen, and they can get the signatures later, an election would be sometime after.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 16:26 on Feb 27, 2024

022524
Feb 25, 2024
he doesn't have the look as Governor of the Homeless

Barrel Cactaur
Oct 6, 2021

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

This election cycle is likely to be a rematch from 2020.

We might also be getting a second throwback from the last election cycle: Another recall vote in California.

California requires that you give a reason for any recall campaign. In 2020, it was because of unconstitutional covid restrictions. This time, it is because there is a $73 billion budget shortfall that they blame on Newsom traveling across the country instead of being in Sacramento to negotiate a balanced budget for the state.

https://twitter.com/RecallGavinNow/status/1762212771595464841

How dare a politician do politics. This is going to die.

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

My fear is that this is just Bibi setting up a rug-pull to make Biden look ineffectual. I can't understand why you would ever make such an announcement informally and prematurely.

https://abcnews.go.com/International/live-updates/israel-gaza-hamas-war/?id=107535302

quote:

A senior Israeli political source told ABC News on Tuesday that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was "surprised" by U.S. President Joe Biden's remarks that he was hopeful a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas could be in place "by next Monday."

perhaps not an intentional rug pull but it absolutely does not sound like a done, or even close to done, deal

Eight-Six
Oct 26, 2007

lobster shirt posted:

https://abcnews.go.com/International/live-updates/israel-gaza-hamas-war/?id=107535302

perhaps not an intentional rug pull but it absolutely does not sound like a done, or even close to done, deal

In my opinion, you make this kind of sudden announcement if you're secretly at an impasse and you want to pressure the other guy into either capitulating or publicly stating that you're not of one mind about this, which means Biden either gets credit for pausing the war or Biden creates an image that there's more distance between the US and Israel than it is currently perceived.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
I think Netanyahu stated in an interview a few days ago that Hamas wasn't even in the same universe as far as demands for the ceasefire so either this is a mistake by Biden, he's trying to put some pressure on Bibi, or the latter (or the source) is lying/wrong

Fork of Unknown Origins
Oct 21, 2005
Gotta Herd On?

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

This election cycle is likely to be a rematch from 2020.

We might also be getting a second throwback from the last election cycle: Another recall vote in California.

California requires that you give a reason for any recall campaign. In 2020, it was because of unconstitutional covid restrictions. This time, it is because there is a $73 billion budget shortfall that they blame on Newsom traveling across the country instead of being in Sacramento to negotiate a balanced budget for the state.

https://twitter.com/RecallGavinNow/status/1762212771595464841

What an absolutely bonkers waste of money that would be again.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Biden is just apparently scheduling multiple different interviews to go on and drop previously secret information about the negotiations. Hamas also says they aren't going to agree to a ceasefire unless Israel fully demilitarizes, so who knows what is going on.

Acording to Biden, Saudi Arabia has already privately committed to recognizing Israel along with several other Arab countries.

https://twitter.com/BarakRavid/status/1762464843859165369
https://twitter.com/BarakRavid/status/1762465829914816531
https://twitter.com/jeremyscahill/status/1762268146218455401

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 16:18 on Feb 27, 2024

BougieBitch
Oct 2, 2013

Basic as hell

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

This election cycle is likely to be a rematch from 2020.

We might also be getting a second throwback from the last election cycle: Another recall vote in California.

California requires that you give a reason for any recall campaign. In 2020, it was because of unconstitutional covid restrictions. This time, it is because there is a $73 billion budget shortfall that they blame on Newsom traveling across the country instead of being in Sacramento to negotiate a balanced budget for the state.

https://twitter.com/RecallGavinNow/status/1762212771595464841

There are a ton of identical repeated paragraphs here and it made me feel like I was losing my mind - is it that way in the original or just an error of transcription?

Edit: for actual content, this kind of poo poo just raises his profile, right? The first recall petition definitely seemed to me to be part of him getting national attention. Sort of seems like a situation where trying to tear him down makes him a figure to rally around rather than tarnishing him.

Like, the whole reason why desantis debating him made sense is because desantis is "the" red state governor and Newsom is "the" blue state governor as far as national media is concerned, and so things like this are just going to cement that further.

I can see how that might benefit Republicans in that it lets them pick who they'll be fighting in 2028 to some extent, but it's definitely gonna accomplish the opposite of what the campaigners are claiming here.

BougieBitch fucked around with this message at 16:36 on Feb 27, 2024

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Biden is just apparently scheduling multiple different interviews to go on and drop previously secret information about the negotiations. Hamas also says they aren't going to agree to a ceasefire unless Israel fully demilitarizes, so who knows what is going on.

Acording to Biden, Saudi Arabia has already privately committed to recognizing Israel along with several other Arab countries.

https://twitter.com/BarakRavid/status/1762464843859165369
https://twitter.com/BarakRavid/status/1762465829914816531
https://twitter.com/jeremyscahill/status/1762268146218455401

I think it’s him trying to get past a last wedge to something. As for both Israel and Hamas statements. I feel like they are gonna say that publicly no matter what. I want to be hopeful about this and Biden and co don’t strike me as the types who just drop the news.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

BougieBitch posted:

There are a ton of identical repeated paragraphs here and it made me feel like I was losing my mind - is it that way in the original or just an error of transcription?

Whoops. No, I just hit paste too many times. I fixed it in the OP.

TheDisreputableDog
Oct 13, 2005

I know he didn’t, but I envision him changing gay marriage policy the same way, as horrified Obama advisors watched. “Gay marriage? Sure, who cares about that, we should legalize it. God drat this is some good rum raisin.”

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BougieBitch
Oct 2, 2013

Basic as hell

TheDisreputableDog posted:

I know he didn’t, but I envision him changing gay marriage policy the same way, as horrified Obama advisors watched. “Gay marriage? Sure, who cares about that, we should legalize it. God drat this is some good rum raisin.”

Nancy Pelosi's ice cream freezer finally explained - it's the secret sauce for getting progressive policy!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply