|
I understand getting the legend up there to do the best picture read but at least check if they can string a sentence together before giving them the job
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:22 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 09:03 |
|
General Dog posted:Was he uh, supposed to read the list of nominees first? They present them across the night
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:22 |
|
Maybe all was just listing movies he saw
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:22 |
|
General Dog posted:Was he uh, supposed to read the list of nominees first? Yeah probably
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:22 |
|
Al doesn’t give a poo poo good for him
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:22 |
|
Ratios and Tendency posted:Stone was phenomenal in PT. Both would have been deserved winners. The Oscars are loving poo poo. She already has one. Lilly Gladstone likely won't get another shot at one.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:22 |
|
https://twitter.com/fleMitchfilm/status/1759374987612266635quote:Putting my owm opinions aside, The Curse is about become an even funnier show if Emma Stone stops the first ever Native American Best Actress win from happening lmao
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:23 |
|
lol good work Pacino!
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:23 |
|
I mean they've been showing the best nominees the whole night, I'm not opposed to getting to the point but it feels like Pacino did his own thing in getting to the point and it was anti climatic indeed.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:23 |
|
Al Pacino adding to his legend
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:23 |
|
mcmagic posted:She already has one. Lilly Gladstone likely won't get another shot at one. Yeah this is true.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:24 |
|
mcmagic posted:She already has one. Lilly Gladstone likely won't get another shot at one. Shoulda given to Gladstone.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:24 |
|
Lmao
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:24 |
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:24 |
|
Al just giving more time for all the producers to talk.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:24 |
|
Did they almost play her off???? lol
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:24 |
|
Hopefully not that James Woods
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:24 |
|
Josh Lyman posted:Hopefully not that James Woods It is. For some reason he had the rights to the book it’s based on.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:25 |
|
There were some things tonight that made me happy (Boy and the Heron, Zone of Interest x2, Godzilla), but Oppenheimer ruined the night. I thought it was solid when I saw it last summer, but I've just seen so, so, so many films since then that I enjoyed and/or appreciated so much more since then.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:25 |
|
Josh Lyman posted:Hopefully not that James Woods It's that James woods lol
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:26 |
|
WeaponX posted:Al doesn’t give a poo poo good for him
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:26 |
|
Pushing Gladstone into the lead category didn't pay off.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:26 |
|
lol at Anatomy dog fake peeing on Damon
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:26 |
|
live with fruit posted:Pushing Gladstone into the lead category didn't pay off. She was the lead of the movie. The fulcrum of the movie. The emotional heart of the movie. And she gave a better performance than Stone did. She was loving robbed and anybody who voted for Stone should be ashamed.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:27 |
|
Well, happy Mother's Day, Yoko.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:27 |
|
emma stone arer you loving kidding me
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:27 |
|
I haven’t seen all the Best Picture nominations but I liked both Barbie and Poor Things more than Oppenheimer. It was good, I’m not saying it wasn’t, but… yeah whatever
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:28 |
|
https://twitter.com/RabbiShmuley/status/1767007110
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:28 |
|
wow. happy i was wrong about the academy giving the sympathy win to gladstone for playing backseat to leo in a three and a half hour movie instead of emma stone who is on screen basically the entire time and carries the movie with her performance. stoked killers didn't get poo poo it was way too long and super overrated. some really good shots but barely held my interest more than a few minutes at a time between me checking my phone and dilly dallying around my apartment. poor things haters can suck it.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:28 |
|
whatever this was is already deleted
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:29 |
|
Lily Gladstone losing is almost as bad as War is Over winning best animated short
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:29 |
|
ShoogaSlim posted:whatever this was is already deleted looks like the poster deleted part of the url https://twitter.com/RabbiShmuley/status/1767007110431179139 Absolutely disgusting!!🤮 Jonathan Glazer who deserves so much credit for his incredible holocaust film “The zone of interest” which I loved, betrayed his people and disgraced himself and trivialized the 6 million martyrs of the holocaust, when he said that Israel’s War in Gaza was hijacking the memory of the holocaust. How dare you compare the two? You fool. The whole purpose of Israel’s war in Gaza is to make sure THERE ISN’T A SECOND HOLOCAUST so we don’t need more of your films because Jews actually remain alive. HAMAS HAS ONE INTENTION. GENOCIDE OF JEWS. How is it the Jews in Hollywood have absolutely no pride in being Jewish and never ever stand up for the only Jewish country on earth, Israel. #HollywoodCowards #NeverAgain
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:30 |
|
Stone had the better performance in the better movie. The Oppenheimer wins are all much more objectionable.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:30 |
|
lmao "that is so beautiful"
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:30 |
|
Ignis posted:Lily Gladstone losing is almost as bad as War is Over winning best animated short The Iranian one was robbed. All the other nominees sucked.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:31 |
|
Oppenheimer is good stuff, solid wins though spreading them around is more fun. Overall many good winners in other categories.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:31 |
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:looks like the poster deleted part of the url
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:31 |
|
CapnAndy posted:I haven’t seen all the Best Picture nominations but I liked both Barbie and Poor Things more than Oppenheimer. It was good, I’m not saying it wasn’t, but… yeah whatever The oppenheimer documentary was way better than the movie.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:32 |
Sio posted:Stone had the better performance in the better movie. The Oppenheimer wins are all much more objectionable. Cillian Murphy carries most movies he's allowed to lead so I don't begrudge that one Giamatti maybe had a shot but he's always just a little bit Giamatti is his roles, never really disappears into it
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:34 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 09:03 |
|
That's fine. You want a little Giamatt sprinkled on top your film
|
# ? Mar 11, 2024 03:35 |