Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Dokapon Findom
Dec 5, 2022

They hated Futanari because His posts were shit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObbLapUaZd4

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

Hooplah posted:

i had the same reaction as someone not involved in your "debate"

also i get the vibe that you think full communism will cure your sadbrains which, while i like the optimism, may not be the case. also not everyone that does drugs is looking for escape from capitalism specifically

Yeah, I get the urge to think a lot of problems just won't be problems when capitalism is gone, but it's like claiming <insert crime here> is a product of capitalism and so once we have communism there won't be <insert crime here> anymore.

People have been getting hosed up for as long as there have been people because it's fun. No need to overthink this.

Spergin Morlock
Aug 8, 2009

Bar Crow posted:

They only admitted Liz was dead because they needed the space to store Kate.

they admitted Liz was dead once Boris was gone lol

Dokapon Findom posted:

I'm not a big MKULTRA guy

you're an Epstein thread poster lol

Dokapon Findom
Dec 5, 2022

They hated Futanari because His posts were shit.

Spergin Morlock posted:


you're an Epstein thread poster lol

Yeah but I don't buy the villain edit that Jolly West gets itt. Killing the elephant is really the only bad thing he's done

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




oh ok i get it. another sydney gottlieb stan coming around to dis our boy joly

maxwellhill
Jan 5, 2022
i'm not MKUltra, but,

scary ghost dog
Aug 5, 2007

Azathoth posted:

Yeah, I get the urge to think a lot of problems just won't be problems when capitalism is gone, but it's like claiming <insert crime here> is a product of capitalism and so once we have communism there won't be <insert crime here> anymore.

People have been getting hosed up for as long as there have been people because it's fun. No need to overthink this.

very defeatist and pessimistic language here. reminiscent of the primary thesis of the famous book, capitalist realism. is this any different than saying “people have been racist/sexist for as long as there have been people” and admitting you cant imagine the world changing?

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

scary ghost dog posted:

very defeatist and pessimistic language here. reminiscent of the primary thesis of the famous book, capitalist realism. is this any different than saying “people have been racist/sexist for as long as there have been people” and admitting you cant imagine the world changing?

At some point you really need to learn to read if you're gonna keep posting.

scary ghost dog
Aug 5, 2007

Azathoth posted:

At some point you really need to learn to read if you're gonna keep posting.

oh, word? mr “no need to overthink this” in the thread for overthinking things?

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




was straight edge culture an op?

DJJIB-DJDCT
Feb 1, 2024

Hardbodied socialist asceticism and temperance would rule and I’m all for it, but it’s a big leap for a population that thought Methodism was so restrictive and stifling of their individuality they ran away to Haight-Ashbury to indulge themselves for a decade and fell into the CIA’s grasp.

mycomancy
Oct 16, 2016
scary ghost dog your posts are poo poo

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

scary ghost dog posted:

oh, word? mr “no need to overthink this” in the thread for overthinking things?

If you want to start thinking, everyone who reads your posts would greatly appreciate it.

scary ghost dog
Aug 5, 2007

DJJIB-DJDCT posted:

Hardbodied socialist asceticism and temperance would rule and I’m all for it, but it’s a big leap for a population that thought Methodism was so restrictive and stifling of their individuality they ran away to Haight-Ashbury to indulge themselves for a decade and fell into the CIA’s grasp.

yes, this is correct. even the ostensibly hardline marxists of the cspam subforum are crippled in this way. vice is perhaps the ultimate weapon of capital

scary ghost dog
Aug 5, 2007

Azathoth posted:

If you want to start thinking, everyone who reads your posts would greatly appreciate it.

it honestly feels like nobody here is reading my posts. just pithy :rolleyes: after droll :crossarms: ending with meaningless insult

Perry Mason Jar
Feb 24, 2006

"Della? Take a lid"

scary ghost dog posted:

yes, this is correct. even the ostensibly hardline marxists of the cspam subforum are crippled in this way. vice is perhaps the ultimate weapon of capital

Don't worry, it recently shut down :v:

inchworm
Jun 23, 2023
jolly was a bad dude

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

scary ghost dog posted:

it honestly feels like nobody here is reading my posts. just pithy :rolleyes: after droll :crossarms: ending with meaningless insult

No, we are reading them, you just really suck at writing and when you clarified your points at length, it was apparent that you're a loving moron. As such, no one really feels like explaining to you in more detail why you're a loving moron because it's pretty clear you aren't capable of understanding.

my bony fealty
Oct 1, 2008

poor people do drugs which is why they deserve to be poor

scary ghost dog
Aug 5, 2007

Azathoth posted:

No, we are reading them, you just really suck at writing and when you clarified your points at length, it was apparent that you're a loving moron. As such, no one really feels like explaining to you in more detail why you're a loving moron because it's pretty clear you aren't capable of understanding.

alright. im sorry if ive caused offense.

Regulus74
Jul 26, 2007

scary ghost dog posted:

very defeatist and pessimistic language here

This is funny coming from the :qq: you're pathetic if you had fun with your drugs :qq: guy

post hole digger
Mar 21, 2011

Dokapon Findom posted:

Yeah but I don't buy the villain edit that Jolly West gets itt. Killing the elephant is really the only bad thing he's done

lol what the gently caress

multistability
Feb 15, 2014
I'd srill do MDMA under communism because it's really fun to take a load of it and dance to jungle music or whatever. It's called "ecstasy" for a reason, idiot. QED

CaptainBeefart
Mar 28, 2016


I'm rereading Pynchon's The Crying of Lot 49. I feel like he knows some stuff.

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:
if your revolution does not have mescaline, its not my revolution

Spergin Morlock
Aug 8, 2009

Real hurthling! posted:

was straight edge culture an op?

the most obnoxious straight edge guy I knew in high school recently passed away after relapsing and overdosing :(

scary ghost dog
Aug 5, 2007

Regulus74 posted:

This is funny coming from the :qq: you're pathetic if you had fun with your drugs :qq: guy

thats not what im saying. im saying that in a hypothetical communist world where none of the indoctrinations and influences of capitalism ever took root, recreational psychedelic drug use probably wouldnt exist, and might not even be fun. that is the specific point i am arguing. i do psychedelic drugs and have fun on a monthly basis and have for some years

Son of Thunderbeast
Sep 21, 2002
Maybe. But maybe not

rex rabidorum vires
Mar 26, 2007

KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN KASPERI KAPANEN
You are dumb as gently caress and a lovely troll. Great work.

scary ghost dog
Aug 5, 2007

Son of Thunderbeast posted:

Maybe. But maybe not

i wish everyone else were so reasonable

my bony fealty
Oct 1, 2008

[Scythian outrider ripping a huge toke over the brazier] I love capitalism

maxwellhill
Jan 5, 2022
what would it look like if a fed asset got lazy and used their main account to try to produce a wedge issue

DJJIB-DJDCT
Feb 1, 2024

just to differentiate my own stance here. The whole reason for the temperance movement was because people realized that alcohol was a social poison, mostly affecting the working class, that was preventing them from organizing against the cause of their problems. Capitalism was causing misery, alcohol was used to alleviate the symptoms but made things much worse.

People have this idea that temperance organizers were stuck up, scolding schoolmarms. So, for example if you think about Major Barbara or Sergeant Sarah Brown, two of the most iconic female characters in theatre of the era, both are members the Salvation Army, both are involved in temperance in the plots of their respective plays. The thing is, George Bernard Shaw and Frank Loesser made it very clear that those characters were right. The Demon Rum was ruining the lives of working class men, and women’s lib entailed turning down men who wouldn’t put down the bottle.

I think we have this idea about prohibition that was a bad idea or, like I said, that it was scolding or based on social judgement: to paraphrase Shaw, middle-class morality. The reality is the drinking habits of the English-speaking world changed dramatically through the temperance movement, even before prohibition, and certainly after - and changed for the better. This didn’t take place in a vacuum, however, because temperance was part and parcel with as I said, women’s liberation, but also a variety of working class movements. Emma Goldstein was involved with the temperance movement, so was Helen Keller, and nearly every other important reformer of the era.

Now, there’s two books I always suggest people read when the subject of temperance comes up: London Labour and the London Poor and People of the Abyss.

Let me interject by saying that, unlike George Bernard Shaw, I don’t have a lot of nice things to say about Jack London. However, his writing about living among the working class, and poor of London at the turn of the century pretty definitively shows that alcohol was not a harmless vice. Alcohol was a critical part of the structure of oppression that affected all of the working class. There is a YouTuber based in LA who is doing a similar sort of thing right now, name escapes me, and just like Jack London I don’t necessarily like it. I think it’s gratuitous and how much time he spends interviewing sex workers, it’s a bit salacious, but I think the throughline there is that all of them grew up in circumstances where drugs and alcohol were a huge problem, and all of them now use drugs and alcohol to cope with the situation.

Anecdotally, of course, whenever I talk to people, I know who come from lower socioeconomic stations - for example, enlisted soldiers, who were getting written up for disciplinary issues - not only did their issues, including several domestic incidents we had to deal with, stem from their own alcohol use, in their testimony at Charge Parades their families of origins were often blighted by liquor or drugs. Not for nothing do the National Defence Act and Queens Orders & Regulations include so many sections on alcohol in regards to discipline.

So let’s tie it all together. I understand that upper middle-class professionals can indulge in drug use every now and then, and I understand that this definition applies to almost everybody in the conversation right now. However, the exact same thing was true of alcohol use among the same class during the last two centuries. Yes, upper middle-class professionals could indulge in a glass of port every now and then without incident. What we should be talking about is the real problem here - that people without the tools to cope with their conditions, the most immiserated people in our society, are the ones who are going to fall back on drug and alcohol use. We can see that every day with the opioid epidemic and fentanyl.

Our model should be the same as leftist organizers in the late 1800s and first part of the 20th century - we should steadfastly promote temperance, while at the same time realizing that liberation from vice can only come through liberation from capitalism. This doesn’t make us prudish or unfun or stuck up - it’s an appropriate response to the real harm caused by vice in our society, a respite so we can fight the origin of those vices.

if you want to use the vanguard model, you have to realize that in many countries, Italy and Russia in particular, socialist organizers essentially acted as secular monks. They practiced what they preached. We can’t talk about our own hedonistic pleasures, and our own individual wishes and desire for self actualization, or whatever, and use the same drugs and alcohol we know are poison to the people we want to liberate . We have to lead by example and put the bottle down too.

DJJIB-DJDCT has issued a correction as of 23:40 on Mar 14, 2024

multistability
Feb 15, 2014

scary ghost dog posted:

thats not what im saying. im saying that in a hypothetical communist world where none of the indoctrinations and influences of capitalism ever took root, recreational psychedelic drug use probably wouldnt exist, and might not even be fun. that is the specific point i am arguing. i do psychedelic drugs and have fun on a monthly basis and have for some years

What if I wanted to stay up all night dancing to music op, how would I achieve that without drugs?

*edit* noticed you wrote "psychedelic drugs", MDMA is a psychedelic drug and is my go-to drug for staying awake at raves etc

Mandel Brotset
Jan 1, 2024

scary ghost dog posted:

thats not what im saying. im saying that in a hypothetical communist world where none of the indoctrinations and influences of capitalism ever took root, recreational psychedelic drug use probably wouldnt exist, and might not even be fun. that is the specific point i am arguing. i do psychedelic drugs and have fun on a monthly basis and have for some years

i think this is getting into utopian speculation and it is anti-dialectical to categorically dismiss epic drug benders

DJJIB-DJDCT
Feb 1, 2024

I suppose the critical question here is what is more important to you: staying up all night to party, or relieving poor families from a vice that leads to all sorts of emotional, physical and sexual abuse?

Poverty is the cause of their substance abuse, there’s no mistaking that. However, that doesn’t mean that it’s not an important factor contributing to their misery.

Social reform is important. Temperance is an important part of social reform. We can’t ask anyone to do anything that we wouldn’t do ourselves. So, if we want the working class to be relieved from the suffering caused by their drug and alcohol use, it stands to reason that we have to be willing to put aside drugs, and alcohol, even if we don’t think it’s a problem for us, because we realize it’s a problem for society.

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:

DJJIB-DJDCT posted:

I suppose the critical question here is what is more important to you: staying up all night to party, or relieving poor families from a vice that leads to all sorts of emotional, physical and sexual abuse?

Poverty is the cause of their substance abuse, there’s no mistaking that. However, that doesn’t mean that it’s not an important factor contributing to their misery.

Social reform is important. Temperance is an important part of social reform. We can’t ask anyone to do anything that we wouldn’t do ourselves. So, if we want the working class to be relieved from the suffering caused by their drug and alcohol use, it stands to reason that we have to be willing to put aside drugs, and alcohol, even if we don’t think it’s a problem for us, because we realize it’s a problem for society.

im fine with banning alcohol but hard drugs should be available as part of regular healthcare if their use is appropriate

scary ghost dog
Aug 5, 2007

multistability posted:

What if I wanted to stay up all night dancing to music op, how would I achieve that without drugs?

*edit* noticed you wrote "psychedelic drugs", MDMA is a psychedelic drug and is my go-to drug for staying awake at raves etc

interesting proposal, i hadnt considered ecstasy a psychedelic drug, but youre right. i imagine ecstasy would have been discovered at some point to be the ultimate ptsd treatment, and while ptsd certainly wouldnt be anywhere near as common it would still exist all over society. mdma would have to be easily accessible, and probably not criminalized in any fashion, and it would be well known how enjoyable it is. maybe everyone would have some kind of ecstasy ration that they could requisition, no questions asked. i wont speculate about communist raves

ram dass in hell
Dec 29, 2019



:420::toot::420:

DJJIB-DJDCT posted:

just to differentiate my own stance here. The whole reason for the temperance movement was because people realized that alcohol was a social poison, mostly affecting the working class, that was preventing them from organizing against the cause of their problems. Capitalism was causing misery, alcohol was used to alleviate the symptoms but made things much worse.

People have this idea that temperance organizers were stuck up, scolding schoolmarms. So, for example if you think about Major Barbara or Sergeant Sarah Brown, two of the most iconic female characters in theatre of the era, both are members the Salvation Army, both are involved in temperance in the plots of their respective plays. The thing is, George Bernard Shaw and Frank Loesser made it very clear that those characters were right. The Demon Rum was ruining the lives of working class men, and women’s lib entailed turning down men who wouldn’t put down the bottle.

I think we have this idea about prohibition that was a bad idea or, like I said, that it was scolding or based on social judgement: to paraphrase Shaw, middle-class morality. The reality is the drinking habits of the English-speaking world changed dramatically through the temperance movement, even before prohibition, and certainly after - and changed for the better. This didn’t take place in a vacuum, however, because temperance was part and parcel with as I said, women’s liberation, but also a variety of working class movements. Emma Goldstein was involved with the temperance movement, so was Helen Keller, and nearly every other important reformer of the era.

Now, there’s two books I always suggest people read when the subject of temperance comes up: London Labour and the London Poor and People of the Abyss.

Let me interject by saying that, unlike George Bernard Shaw, I don’t have a lot of nice things to say about Jack London. However, his writing about living among the working class, and poor of London at the turn of the century pretty definitively shows that alcohol was not a harmless vice. Alcohol was a critical part of the structure of oppression that affected all of the working class. There is a YouTuber based in LA who is doing a similar sort of thing right now, name escapes me, and just like Jack London I don’t necessarily like it. I think it’s gratuitous and how much time he spends interviewing sex workers, it’s a bit salacious, but I think the throughline there is that all of them grew up in circumstances where drugs and alcohol were a huge problem, and all of them now use drugs and alcohol to cope with the situation.

Anecdotally, of course, whenever I talk to people, I know who come from lower socioeconomic stations - for example, enlisted soldiers, who were getting written up for disciplinary issues - not only did their issues, including several domestic incidents we had to deal with, stem from their own alcohol use, in their testimony at Charge Parades their families of origins were often blighted by liquor or drugs. Not for nothing do the National Defence Act and Queens Orders & Regulations include so many sections on alcohol in regards to discipline.

So let’s tie it all together. I understand that upper middle-class professionals can indulge in drug use every now and then, and I understand that this definition applies to almost everybody in the conversation right now. However, the exact same thing was true of alcohol use among the same class during the last two centuries. Yes, upper middle-class professionals could indulge in a glass of port every now and then without incident. What we should be talking about is the real problem here - that people without the tools to cope with their conditions, the most immiserated people in our society, are the ones who are going to fall back on drug and alcohol use. We can see that every day with the opioid epidemic and fentanyl.

Our model should be the same as leftist organizers in the late 1800s and first part of the 20th century - we should steadfastly promote temperance, while at the same time realizing that liberation from vice can only come through liberation from capitalism. This doesn’t make us prudish or unfun or stuck up - it’s an appropriate response to the real harm caused by vice in our society, a respite so we can fight the origin of those vices.

if you want to use the vanguard model, you have to realize that in many countries, Italy and Russia in particular, socialist organizers essentially acted as secular monks. They practiced what they preached. We can’t talk about our own hedonistic pleasures, and our own individual wishes and desire for self actualization, or whatever, and use the same drugs and alcohol we know are poison to the people we want to liberate . We have to lead by example and put the bottle down too.

no

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:
trying to imagine what the russian revolution would have looked like if anyone involved was sober

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply