|
i think the price is less an indictment of fields and more the fact that the bears have zero leverage in asking for more
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2024 23:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 20:01 |
|
|
It’s a 4th if he plays 51% of the Steelers snaps.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:01
|
|
|
trade salvaged
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:04
|
|
|
Zack Wilson about to be traded to the Winnipeg Blue Bombers for a case of Molson.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:16
|
|
|
kidcoelacanth posted:i think the price is less an indictment of fields and more the fact that the bears have zero leverage in asking for more No its 100% an indictment on the bad player
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:17
|
|
|
kidcoelacanth posted:i think the price is less an indictment of fields and more the fact that the bears have zero leverage in asking for more It’s also an indictment of Fields.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:18
|
|
|
Like everyone expected, Mac Jones was worth more than Fields
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:18
|
|
|
Omega brain Steelers signed Russ to plummet Fields' value.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:19
|
|
|
Harlock posted:Omega brain Steelers signed Russ to plummet Fields' value. imagine putting in effort to plummet fields's value
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:21
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/statmusenfl/status/1769135364856230291
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:25
|
|
|
kidcoelacanth posted:i think the price is less an indictment of fields and more the fact that the bears have zero leverage in asking for more The fact that only 1 team was interested is absolutely an indictment of Fields. He’s an expensive 1 year backup, same as Zach Wilson. No one wants that poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:30
|
|
|
The first time i might make a sports bet in my life will be the game when Fields plays the Bears.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:31
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:The fact that only 1 team was interested is absolutely an indictment of Fields. 3 million is an expensive backup?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:42
|
|
|
Fields is good. The bears loving suck.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:45
|
|
|
Justin Fields has always been bad actually and it’s not surprising at all that he didn’t fetch much in a trade
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 00:46
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:Fields is good. The bears loving suck. Fields sucks and the Bears suck
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:08
|
|
|
I can't fathom they couldn't get just a bit more. Like maybe some cash?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:08
|
|
|
Steelers new GM owns
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:10
|
|
|
This remains the best fake account https://twitter.com/WesSteinberg/status/1769141302430486765?s=20
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:10
|
|
|
https://x.com/notjdaigle/status/1769138539931844860?s=46&t=LyazzCPH3hQ_fa9hCI7C-w
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:10
|
|
|
I mean if you want to do that ledger. Carolina Panthers Receive: • Bryce Young Chicago Bears Receive: • Darnell Wright • CB Tyrique Stevenson • DJ Moore. • Keenan Allen • Caleb Williams • 2025 2nd round pick  Win some you lose some, also man Justin was a QB with the production of like the 20th-25th ranked QB in the league.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:23
|
|
|
BrownThunder posted:https://x.com/notjdaigle/status/1769138539931844860?s=46&t=LyazzCPH3hQ_fa9hCI7C-w God, that Claypool trade has to be one of the most baffling decisions by an NFL team ever. The next best thing to a 1st round pick for a 1 year rental of at best a mid WR (and turned out even worse) for a team nowhere near ready to really compete.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:27
|
|
|
Gully Foyle posted:God, that Claypool trade has to be one of the most baffling decisions by an NFL team ever. The next best thing to a 1st round pick for a 1 year rental of at best a mid WR (and turned out even worse) for a team nowhere near ready to really compete. I mean, there were other teams offering a second for Claypool, this was like pretty heavily reported at the time. The Packers were one team that were interested for a second for example. Bears won because the Steelers(correctly) guess the Bears would have the worst pick of the teams going for him. Why he did it, was because I think Poles was tanking that year, was also doing draft prep, and saw how dire the WR draft was upcoming, and also realized that the recievers they had were not good enough to get a remotely decent evaluation on Fields in the middle of the season. So he wanted to jump the market, and traded for Claypool who he liked. Turns out Claypool was a headcase and hurt and didn't even play much that year, and then yeah was dire the next year in the lockerrom. Poles went through the same process this past year and it worked out with Montez sweat, when everyone said "lmao chase young had da better PFF grade and San Fran got him for a 4th while the bears payed a second for Sweat" You win some trades you lose some trades. Poles has won 2 out of his 3 major trades, I'll take it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:36
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:Fields is good. The bears loving suck.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:43
|
|
|
Anybody thinking Caleb's fixing this poo poo overnight, best of luck. Add it to the pile https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chicago_Bears_starting_quarterbacks https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/chi/career-passing.htm
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:44
|
|
|
The Broncos are so hosed on QB. Go BPA and tank the season for a shot next year I guess.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 01:44
|
|
|
Gully Foyle posted:God, that Claypool trade has to be one of the most baffling decisions by an NFL team ever. The next best thing to a 1st round pick for a 1 year rental of at best a mid WR (and turned out even worse) for a team nowhere near ready to really compete. It was a perfect storm of factors to make an awful decision look almost justifiable -The WR market was at peak craziness (Christian Kirk had just signed an $18m contract, Green Bay was also offering a second for Claypool, Kadarius Toney got traded around the same time for a 3rd and a 6th despite having 41 career receptions) -The Bears were desperate and devoid of offensive talent around Fields, who looked like he might be starting to develop bad habits because he was in such a bad environment -Plus when the deal went down it looked like they might be regular bad instead of worst-in-the-league bad (3-5 at the time of the trade, 3-14 at the end of the season) -The upcoming FA market for WRs was trash (headliners were OBJ and Jakobi Meyers) -Steelers QB play was so awful that you could squint and convince yourself Claypool's slide into mediocrity wasn't his fault (He averaged 60 catches + 860 yards a year in his first two season with the corpse of Big Ben!) I think since then people have realized that rookie WRs are hitting at a high enough rate that you don't need to pay a premium to acquire anyone at the position who isn't legitimately great
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:00
|
|
|
3 DONG HORSE posted:The Broncos are so hosed on QB. Go BPA and tank the season for a shot next year I guess. I'm shocked Taysom Hill isn't in a Denver uni already
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:08
|
|
|
I'm shocked Fields went for that little: I think he's def shown more juice than Kenny Pickett or Mac Jones ( damning with faint praise there).....The Jets are going to keep Zach Wilson, aren't they?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:26
|
|
|
I don't think they can. I mean the Jets know they're cursed, if they keep Wilson as the #3, no way do Rodgers and Tyrod avoid horrible injuries that lead to Zach starting half the season again.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:30
|
|
|
Joe Douglas 100% wants to keep him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:32
|
|
|
Forrest on Fire posted:I'm shocked Taysom Hill isn't in a Denver uni already he can be if Payton pays up but honestly, unless he gets a good return, why bother? Taysom was one of the legit bright spots of the season last year. Even though you KNOW what's coming when he's in, 9 times out of ten he's getting that 4-5 yards.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:43
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Joe Douglas 100% wants to keep him. No way. Not at this point. Only reason he’s on the team still is no one has offered a future 7th pick swap yet. They’ll have to release him soon enough.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:47
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:No way. Not at this point. Only reason he’s on the team still is no one has offered a future 7th pick swap yet. Notice I said he "wants" to keep him...... I agree with you that they won't be able to because of the complete media shitshow that it would cause.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:49
|
|
|
Kurgarra Queen posted:I'm shocked Fields went for that little: I think he's def shown more juice than Kenny Pickett or Mac Jones ( thinking of the 2022 game where Justin on a dogshit bears team absolutely balled out while Mac kicked a guy in the penis and then got benched for Zappe.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:52
|
|
|
It's funny that people are absolutely ball washing the Steelers for acquiring 2 bad QBs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 02:55
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:It's funny that people are absolutely ball washing the Steelers for acquiring 2 bad QBs. They had three bad QBs before, and they got two new bad QBs but Denver is paying 99% of the salary and the other cost a 2025 6th rounder
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 03:18
|
|
|
The Eagles should've gotten Fields for a 6. That always made the most sense to me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 03:20
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:It's funny that people are absolutely ball washing the Steelers for acquiring 2 bad QBs. Oh no this is hilarious, but at the same time they're paying next to nothing for these two chumps so it's not like they're in the same situation as the Browns or Broncos.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 03:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 20:01 |
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:whyd they make bryce life sized in this graph Fuckin lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2024 03:22
|
|
