|
750$ just doesn't go as far as it used to.
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 06:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 20:22 |
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:750$ just doesn't go as far as it used to. Someone get Jim Jeffries comments
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:20
|
|
|
Non Compos Mentis posted:why does his lawyer know the costs? Because proceedings said what the costs were
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:28
|
|
|
Bunch of squares itt
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:34
|
|
|
Surely you could get a bag and a cheap hooker for the night for $750
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:37
|
|
|
Back in my day, maybe. But these days, you kids are getting ripped off.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:39
|
|
|
gay picnic defence posted:Surely you could get a bag and a cheap hooker for the night for $750 *Rearranges spectacles scholarly* no I don't think so.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:45
|
|
|
gay picnic defence posted:Surely you could get a bag and a cheap hooker for the night for $750 Yeah but this was supposed to last two days.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:48
|
|
|
JBP posted:*Rearranges spectacles scholarly* no I don't think so. Show your workings
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:49
|
|
|
gay picnic defence posted:Show your workings Bag: $400-450 There is no way in Sydney that the bag was a $300 or a $350 job. Particularly when we are talking about procurement by a Liberal staffer or a channel 7 pro muckraker. To think it would be less is laughable. Also one bag? Child's poo poo. Laughable. Haha. Sex worker: ?idk Late night call and all night? That's got to be $500 minimum. Coming to a residence from a service? Come on. They're not picking up the phone for $300.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:54
|
|
|
Double your minimum to be anywhere near to close.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 07:59
|
|
|
hambeet posted:Double your minimum to be anywhere near to close. Thank you, learned colleague.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 08:22
|
|
|
JBP posted:Bag: $400-450 gently caress this really is a cost of living crisis
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 08:52
|
|
|
JBP posted:Thank you, learned colleague. *nods* A lot of field research.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 09:14
|
|
|
This is turning out so well for seven and bruce
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 09:15
|
|
|
hambeet posted:Bunch of squares itt 
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 09:21
|
|
|
gay picnic defence posted:Surely you could get a bag and a cheap hooker for the night for $750 Cheap hooker was about 100 bucks an hour 30 years ago, Google tells me 250-300 now. The woman who was Richard Pratt's mistress was 5 grand an hour or over 20K a night if you want to know what high end starts at. Synthbuttrange posted:This is turning out so well for seven and bruce I'd laugh but gg what a bunch of shitstains Seven / Bruce are. Hope they get put to the sword by the judge when he makes hi ruling
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 09:29
|
|
|
this is another defamation own goal for seven + some dickhead
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 09:49
|
|
|
hambeet posted:*nods* Time spent hanging with lobster dinner paying off
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 09:58
|
|
|
Catching up on today’s court on abc, hard agree that $750 wouldn’t even do even one night of that kind of partying. Still don’t know quite how much of this guys story to believe: more than none but less than most I guess. I hope Seven cleans house now, starting with Kerry Stokes. quote:"He [Brucie] said that he appreciated the fact that I wasn't sitting with the rest of the 'feminazis' in the press pack," Mr Auerbach told the court.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 10:35
|
|
|
Eediot Jedi posted:Hooman with their big dick privilege can't recognise a small penis joke Turn on your monitor 
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 10:38
|
|
|
Auspol 2024: Wow hookers and blow cost a lot more these days
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 11:51
|
|
|
Inflation really is out of control in this country.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 12:11
|
|
|
Ok we’ve established that Bruce has expensive tastes, from hookers to golf to eyewateringly expensive lawsuits. Who is funding this guy now that channel 7 isn’t? Because disgraced former ministerial staffer doesn’t pay real well. Could this be a CIA operation?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 12:19
|
|
|
Bucky Fullminster posted:ever noticed how a river system looks like the veins on a leaf Not really, no. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 13:34
|
|
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:Not really, no. I don’t think that’s to scale
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 13:36
|
|
|
I'm not an expert but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say atoms don't look like anything
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 13:38
|
|
|
They are a bunch of tiny things orbiting a much bigger thing with a hell of a lot of empty space in between
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 13:42
|
|
|
Bucky Fullminster posted:They are a bunch of tiny things orbiting a much bigger thing with a hell of a lot of empty space in between So they look like your ears? 
Rust Martialis fucked around with this message at 13:59 on Apr 5, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 13:57
|
|
|
They look like lovely computer art
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 14:01
|
|
|
I was never good at these puzzles
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 14:13
|
|
|
Bucky Fullminster posted:They are a bunch of tiny things orbiting a much bigger thing with a hell of a lot of empty space in between The common depiction of atoms in the manner of solar systems is a simplification, electrons behave much more weirdly than perfect orbits on a common plane.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 14:15
|
|
|
Captain Theron posted:The common depiction of atoms in the manner of solar systems is a simplification, electrons behave much more weirdly than perfect orbits on a common plane. There are differences yes, but fundamentally they are still tiny things weirdly orbiting a much bigger thing, with a lot of empty space in between In a way that I don’t think anything else does at any scale between them, does it? Fucken nerds
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 14:46
|
|
|
Captain Theron posted:The common depiction of atoms in the manner of solar systems is a simplification, electrons behave much more weirdly than perfect orbits on a common plane. I heard that the way atomic level stuff is taught at the basic level is all wrong but it aids in understanding so they just keep using it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 14:47
|
|
|
I would simply just look at the atoms and describe them
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 15:02
|
|
|
Jezza of OZPOS posted:I would simply just look at the atoms and describe them Stop interfering
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 15:23
|
|
|
have you guys been spending some of Bruce's $750?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 17:18
|
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Ok we’ve established that Bruce has expensive tastes, from hookers to golf to eyewateringly expensive lawsuits. Who is funding this guy now that channel 7 isn’t? Because disgraced former ministerial staffer doesn’t pay real well. Could this be a CIA operation? Did he really think this kind of thing would never get out?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 17:26
|
|
|
The man that has yet to face any real consequences is probably not thinking about consequences
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 22:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 20:22 |
|
|
Bucky Fullminster posted:There are differences yes, but fundamentally they are still tiny things weirdly orbiting a much bigger thing, with a lot of empty space in between Only in the very most superficial sense. Electron orbits are more of a probability space for where it could be. With planetary orbits you can accurately predict their position at any moment, even centuries from now. That's why we know exactly when every lunar eclipse will be, and what sort it will be for any given location on earth. With electrons, we can say where they will probably be, but not with complete certainty. And if we know exactly where it is, we can't know it's velocity, and vice versa.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2024 02:19
|
|