|
Here's what you've all been waiting for: a thread to talk about your favorite smartphone systems that aren't WebOS, Windows Mobile, or Symbian. Also Macintoshes and iPods and smart TVs, I guess, you weirdo. Have fun haha just kidding.
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 11:49 |
|
|
hows symbian these days are there any devices left?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:11
|
|
|
my dad has a symbian phone and he really likes that phone
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:12
|
|
|
i destroyed the last threads for a purpose ban panda op
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:13
|
|
|
I'll start with the jokes: anroid, lol.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:14
|
|
|
iphone is the best
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:27
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:I'll start with the jokes: anroid, lol. hosed up if true
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:27
|
|
|
mr adder why did u shut down the other threads?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:28
|
|
|
because they were rly rly bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:32
|
|
|
symbian is great for dumb phones and old people phones
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:36
|
|
|
theadder posted:because they were rly rly bad but all ur threads are rly rly bad... why close that rly bad 1 to open up a shittier 1..
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:39
|
|
|
i didnt open another
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:50
|
|
|
this panda guy did
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:50
|
|
|
theadder posted:because they were rly rly bad They were what? Also don`t sign your posts
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:57
|
|
|
stellar
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:58
|
|
|
ohhh i signed my post
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 10:59
|
|
|
theadder posted:ohhh i signed my post It's more accurate than the previous one, to be sure. Your posting is usually quite good
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 11:03
|
|
|
if yospos did not have an android lol thread it would be necessary to create one
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 12:51
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:They were what? Also don`t sign your posts LMFAO !!
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
someone post pics of their Sailfish OS or Firefox Mobile phones or ubuntu phone ban me if someone actually has their own ubuntu phone and can post screenshots of it
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 08:16
|
|
|
 text me, etc
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 08:18
|
|
|
cthulhoo posted:
YEA@ SAILFISH OS FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 08:49
|
|
|
Smythe posted:YEA@ SAILFISH OS FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 10:14
|
|
|
The "standard" and "singleTop" modes differ from each other in just one respect: Every time there's new intent for a "standard" activity, a new instance of the class is created to respond to that intent. Each instance handles a single intent. Similarly, a new instance of a "singleTop" activity may also be created to handle a new intent. However, if the target task already has an existing instance of the activity at the top of its stack, that instance will receive the new intent (in an onNewIntent() call); a new instance is not created. In other circumstances — for example, if an existing instance of the "singleTop" activity is in the target task, but not at the top of the stack, or if it's at the top of a stack, but not in the target task — a new instance would be created and pushed on the stack. i'm the person who thought this retarded poo poo makes any sense whatsoever and is a good design cthulhoo fucked around with this message at 10:23 on Feb 6, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 10:19
|
|
|
cthulhoo posted:The "standard" and "singleTop" modes differ from each other in just one respect: Every time there's new intent for a "standard" activity, a new instance of the class is created to respond to that intent. Each instance handles a single intent. Similarly, a new instance of a "singleTop" activity may also be created to handle a new intent. However, if the target task already has an existing instance of the activity at the top of its stack, that instance will receive the new intent (in an onNewIntent() call); a new instance is not created. In other circumstances — for example, if an existing instance of the "singleTop" activity is in the target task, but not at the top of the stack, or if it's at the top of a stack, but not in the target task — a new instance would be created and pushed on the stack. isnt that just open new window without taking focus?? idk i dont udnerstand it, and, also, ur posting is severaly SHSC and this isnt a flame but u shoudl attempt to correct it before the floamethrowers come out
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:47
|
|
|
idk my brain started hurting when i tried to read that paragraph so i decided to inflict this suffering on everyone itt no gods no masters etc
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:47
|
|
|
well dont u have disturbed smythe
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:53
|
|
|
i dont like that 1 hit me with another
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 13:01
|
|
|
how about this one
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 13:06
|
|
|
dont usurp echis job plz
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 13:07
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 13:09
|
|
|
$$$
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 13:16
|
|
|
relevant cause whatever the pop clocky is probably runs on android
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 15:34
|
|
|
cthulhoo posted:
that's a huge phone holy moley
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 15:38
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:that's a huge phone holy moley New Verizon commercial has this clown phone, look how this loving clown has to hold it 
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 16:50
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:New Verizon commercial has this clown phone, look how this loving clown has to hold it its beautiful
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 17:00
|
|
|
clop pocky
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 17:09
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:New Verizon commercial has this clown phone, look how this loving clown has to hold it second-hand embarrassment simulated
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 17:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 11:49 |
|
|
wish this milf would tickle me, so I'm helpless and giggling. how pathetic that tickle torture victim is. LOL what a fag. I hope none of my coworkers see this... Especially not the buff sexy sales bros
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 17:54
|
|