Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
aphid_licker
Jan 7, 2009


Bongo Bill posted:

The Kaktovik numeral system combines the positional notation of Arabic numerals with the tally-like capabilities of Roman numerals.

This is pretty neat!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

aphid_licker posted:

This is pretty neat!



Yeah, that's cool.

e: invented in 1994, a bit less cool

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaktovik_numerals

aphid_licker
Jan 7, 2009


What's kinda wild to me is that that isn't the first idea you arrive at when you're inventing your numeral system. I guess 19 is a bit more economical to write in terms of strokes than its equivalent in the Kaktovik system.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

bone shaking.
soul baking.
That’s a base 20 system because the native languages use the same.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



That rules. And it was invented by some middle school kids??

Koramei
Nov 11, 2011

I have three regrets
The first is to be born in Joseon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXjsp5s2BS0

Kinda cool video of pronunciation of Korean/Japanese/Chinese over time.

Grevling
Dec 18, 2016

drat that's a really nice video.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

I know that I'd have a hard time learning that because I had a hard time telling apart n and m at a glance, the two letters that are just the same kind of squiggles that you need to count which way the squiggle goes.

Nessus posted:

That rules. And it was invented by some middle school kids??

I actually have old scribbles of my own little phonetic alphabet in my old middle school papers, and I think my parents told me they fiddled with doing the same. Once you have the general concept, it's all about just making the characters. If you're clever you can just steal characters from other alphabets, which is why king fictional language man Tolkien's "G" character in his Cirth alphabet is "F" in viking runes.

Carillon posted:

Given all the alphabet talk I was curious about number systems as well. I know a lot of the world has adapted the so called arabic numerals, but how many other approaches are still commonly used and are there any other common ones not based 10?

Also were the roman numerals as bad as they seem? Or was it equivalent/easier one you were used to it?

Last I read, a lot of the more complex math during the dominance of Rome was actually done with Greek numerals, which makes sense, since Greek was the language of scholars and the more common language in the east and part of the major cultural split with the end of the empire. They used a system that I feel like is easier to grasp where they reused the letters in their alphabet as numbers and 1-9 got their own characters, but for the greater magnitudes, each multiple of 10 got its own character, and the same for each multiple of 100 and 1000, and then you'd string together those numbers. There is no zero.

Hebrew actually borrowed the structure of greek numerals and gave every number from 1-20 its own character, then multiples of 10, then multiples of 100, then 1,000, 2,000, 5,000, and 10,000 got their own characters, and they had a system to denote decimal increases in magnitude after there.

What's probably more important to keep in mind though if you're trying to get an idea of the history of math and numbers, is that numeral systems were only one way of representing that, and very often they weren't even the primary method most people used. There were abacuses, hand signs, the native american way of tying string called "nepohualtzintzin", and geometric diagrams, but most importantly, the most common way of representing numbers was words. Just words.

A whole lot of the time, people would just talk out or write out the value in the words of their language, and that can get squirrelly to nail down. Most of us are taught in schools to think in base ten, but classically english as a language seems to denote more significance to base 12. French linguistically has remnants of a base 20. There's more, but I don't really know much and the last time I asked about numbers here, I got a lot of history nerds being averse to math. You might do better at poking through wikipedia.

aphid_licker
Jan 7, 2009


SlothfulCobra posted:

I know that I'd have a hard time learning that because I had a hard time telling apart n and m at a glance, the two letters that are just the same kind of squiggles that you need to count which way the squiggle goes.

Russian is ridiculous with this, you got the p, which looks like an n, the i, which looks like a u, the z, which also looks like a u, the sh, which looks like an upside down m, the t, which can look like an m, the actual m, and the shtsh, which again looks like an upside down m. "Russian cursive" briefly became a meme as a result.

Libluini
May 18, 2012

I gravitated towards the Greens, eventually even joining the party itself.

The Linke is a party I grudgingly accept exists, but I've learned enough about DDR-history I can't bring myself to trust a party that was once the SED, a party leading the corrupt state apparatus ...
Grimey Drawer

FishFood posted:

So, the Archaic Greek alphabet is known as Linear B and is not the direct ancestor of the Classical/Modern Greek alphabet. It is somewhat unique in that it went completely extinct during the Greek "Dark Age" following the Late Bronze Age Collapse. Greek society lost literacy, which is one of the few times that has happened I believe. The later Greek alphabet descends from the Phoenecian alphabet and has a totally different lineage.

Ah, I remember reading something about that phenomenon. Some kind of theory that a certain level of complexity is needed in a society to make it and keep it literal. There are some other ancient civilizations from around Mesopotamia who first started writing in Sumerian, but then later abandoned it.

I'm guessing that's what happened to the Greek here: Due to the simplification process imposed by the Collapse, Greek society didn't "need" literacy anymore to function, so it was lost over time. And then later Greek society recovered, and started needing a writing system again. And hey, fancy that, there are those Phoenician traders hanging around...

Telsa Cola
Aug 19, 2011

No... this is all wrong... this whole operation has just gone completely sidewaysface
The Maya lost literacy when everything went to poo poo and IMO a huge part of that is it was class restricted so when that system went away so did the literacy.

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

Libluini posted:

I'm guessing that's what happened to the Greek here: Due to the simplification process imposed by the Collapse, Greek society didn't "need" literacy anymore to function, so it was lost over time. And then later Greek society recovered, and started needing a writing system again. And hey, fancy that, there are those Phoenician traders hanging around...

All the literacy in pre-dark age Greek society was based in the bureaucracy of the palatial order, which is also precisely what collapsed in the Greek dark age.

cheetah7071
Oct 20, 2010

honk honk
College Slice
Yeah I think in a lot of old societies with low literacy rates, the reason for the low literacy was that it wasn't considered to be a universal skill that everyone who could learn should learn. It was a trade skill for scribes and record keepers, and the people who had to be able to read those records.

CrypticFox
Dec 19, 2019

"You are one of the most incompetent of tablet writers"
Almost all Linear B tablets have been discovered in palace complexes (I believe there has only been one discovery of them outside a palace), so it makes sense that with a rapid and dramatic collapse of the Bronze Age palace system, writing would vanish along with the palaces. Ancient writing systems tend to be quite restricted in who used them, but Linear B writing was even more restricted then most. One theory to explain this, is the idea that in Bronze Age Greece, all (or nearly all) scribes would have worked for the palace. The palaces may have even had a monopoly on training the scribes. This would fit with the highly focused nature of the contents of the Linear B tablets, which are almost exclusively administrative texts. In contrast, in the Near East, scribes were trained by a variety of parties and worked for both government and private employers, making literacy much more durable.

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

Carillon posted:

Given all the alphabet talk I was curious about number systems as well. I know a lot of the world has adapted the so called arabic numerals, but how many other approaches are still commonly used and are there any other common ones not based 10?

Also were the roman numerals as bad as they seem? Or was it equivalent/easier one you were used to it?

Modern people wirking with arabic numerals tend to make a lot of mistakes when subtracting. Roman numerals are good at adding and subtracting! It's if you try to multiply or divide that things fall apart.

FishFood
Apr 1, 2012

Now with brine shrimp!

Telsa Cola posted:

The Maya lost literacy when everything went to poo poo and IMO a huge part of that is it was class restricted so when that system went away so did the literacy.

I think that's what happened in Greece, too. Reading and writing was a specialized skill and pretty restricted to a caste/class of scribes. The scribes were part of the highly organized palace systems of the era, and those were all destroyed and/or abandoned in the collapse.

e: fb

Omnomnomnivore
Nov 14, 2010

I'm swiftly moving toward a solution which pleases nobody! YEAGGH!

aphid_licker posted:

This is pretty neat!



This is strangely reminiscent of the base-25 numeral system I had to learn to beat Riven in middle school.

Power Khan
Aug 20, 2011

by Fritz the Horse

Almond Crunch
Oct 29, 2005
God-damn tasty..

aphid_licker posted:

Russian is ridiculous with this, you got the p, which looks like an n, the i, which looks like a u, the z, which also looks like a u, the sh, which looks like an upside down m, the t, which can look like an m, the actual m, and the shtsh, which again looks like an upside down m. "Russian cursive" briefly became a meme as a result.



real humans put dashes over their lowercase T, and under their (sh), so that reading russian cursive is actually p easy

FreudianSlippers
Apr 12, 2010

Shooting and Fucking
are the same thing!

Cursive in any language is bullshit for olds and should be eliminated.

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

Speaking of Pompeii, here is a nice doc about some recent excavations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2URDdvRo38

Long format, easy pace. Very little artificial TV-drama, illustrating dramatization kept to a decent minimum. Oh and voices are dubbed over. The finds are really cool and include a skeleton which made the news, the one which was trapped under a big stone.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

FreudianSlippers posted:

Cursive in any language is bullshit for olds and should be eliminated.

Right, they should teach shorthand instead. That's much more useful for anyone who might end up using it.

Cessna
Feb 20, 2013

KHABAHBLOOOM

FreudianSlippers posted:

Cursive in any language is bullshit for olds and should be eliminated.

I think that the school forcing me to try to write in cursive in 2nd/3rd grade absolutely ruined my attitude towards school for at least a decade.

Now when I have to write something it's block capitals.

Dalael
Oct 14, 2014
Hello. Yep, I still think Atlantis is Bolivia, yep, I'm still a giant idiot, yep, I'm still a huge racist. Some things never change!

SlothfulCobra posted:

Right, they should teach shorthand instead. That's much more useful for anyone who might end up using it.



Are these distinct language or just your doctor's notes?

Carillon
May 9, 2014






Cessna posted:

I think that the school forcing me to try to write in cursive in 2nd/3rd grade absolutely ruined my attitude towards school for at least a decade.

Now when I have to write something it's block capitals.

It's funny I had an somewhat opposite experience, to this day I can't print well to save my live and it takes forever, but can write cursive a lot better and more legibly. I was pumped when the letters could just flow together rather than me having to figure out the kerning (not that I knew what that was) on the fly.

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
Cursive is way better if you actually need to hand write things, and it’s prettier

Mr. Sunshine
May 15, 2008

This is a scrunt that has been in space too long and become a Lunt (Long Scrunt)

Fun Shoe
Speaking of ancient alphabets, how can we even begin to approximate the pronunciation of ancient letters/symbols?

Are the sounds associated with sumerian cuneiform just guesses, or is there some phonetic source? Was Djoser really named something even close to "djoser", or is that just the compound sound we today have assigned to the symbols making up his name?

Libluini
May 18, 2012

I gravitated towards the Greens, eventually even joining the party itself.

The Linke is a party I grudgingly accept exists, but I've learned enough about DDR-history I can't bring myself to trust a party that was once the SED, a party leading the corrupt state apparatus ...
Grimey Drawer

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

Cursive is way better if you actually need to hand write things, and it’s prettier

It's also very useful if you don't want other people to read your journals and notebooks :v:

cheetah7071
Oct 20, 2010

honk honk
College Slice
I distinctly remember multiple teachers in a row telling me that next grade I'll have to turn in my homework in cursive or it won't count

liars, all

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

Libluini posted:

It's also very useful if you don't want other people to read your journals and notebooks :v:

This is actually how I learned cyrillic and greek alphabet in high school, I brought a transliteration chart with me and took notes down in cyricillicized english

PittTheElder
Feb 13, 2012

:geno: Yes, it's like a lava lamp.

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

Cursive is way better if you actually need to hand write things, and it’s prettier

Pro cursive and anti daylight time? Something is wrong with your head man :v:

ChubbyChecker
Mar 25, 2018

cursive is a scourge on mankind

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

bone shaking.
soul baking.
I handwrite everything in cursive.

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

Cursive dates from when lifting your pen off the page would create blots and drips. It is obsolete.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

Cursive is way better if you actually need to hand write things, and it’s prettier

Prettiness is directly contrary to comprehensibility.

So if you're gonna write some indistinct scribble, you might as well go all the way and do something that writes way faster.

CommonShore
Jun 6, 2014

A true renaissance man


The Lone Badger posted:

Cursive dates from when lifting your pen off the page would create blots and drips. It is obsolete.

Makes nerds mad so imo its utility has actually increased

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Mr. Sunshine posted:

Speaking of ancient alphabets, how can we even begin to approximate the pronunciation of ancient letters/symbols?

Are the sounds associated with sumerian cuneiform just guesses, or is there some phonetic source? Was Djoser really named something even close to "djoser", or is that just the compound sound we today have assigned to the symbols making up his name?

It's complex linguistics poo poo but basically languages evolve in predictable ways, and you can use known languages to figure out what unknown ones sounded like.

The problem with something like Djoser is that Egyptian writing (and a lot of other ancient ones) doesn't include vowels, so those are just best guesses.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-K5OjAkiEA talks about it.

cheetah7071
Oct 20, 2010

honk honk
College Slice

Mr. Sunshine posted:

Speaking of ancient alphabets, how can we even begin to approximate the pronunciation of ancient letters/symbols?

Are the sounds associated with sumerian cuneiform just guesses, or is there some phonetic source? Was Djoser really named something even close to "djoser", or is that just the compound sound we today have assigned to the symbols making up his name?

For the archaic Greek recorded with linear B, one of the big moments where the people working on it thought "we're really onto something here, this is real" was when they deduced that, if the language was greek, it differed from classical greek in ways linguists had already predicted, but which the decipherers were unaware of (so expectation couldn't produce a misinterpretation).

To take a really really really simplified overview, if you have a bunch of languages or dialects with a common ancestral language, then you can reasonably guess that features which are common to many of those languages were probably also present in the ancestral language, and that the modern languages lacking that feature probably lost it. Languages also tend to change in ways that effect a number of different elements of the language all at once in predictable ways, so you can ask whether a certain hypothesized ancestral feature changing into all of the observed modern features is plausible or not. Languages whose changes are well-recorded in writing, and which have firmly documented relationships to each other in the historical record, are key to assessing what's plausible in languages where the records are much shakier.

CrypticFox
Dec 19, 2019

"You are one of the most incompetent of tablet writers"
Reconstructing Sumerian phonology is a lot harder then Mycenean Greek though, since Mycenean Greek can be compared to Attic and Modern Greek. There is no modern language that is even all that similar to Sumerian, so figuring out how that language would have been spoken requires a great deal of guesswork. Egyptian is actually somewhat easier (in some ways, the lack of vowels are still a major issue), even though its about the same age as Sumerian. A direct line can be drawn from Ancient Egyptian to the Coptic language, which is still (barely) in use today.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PittTheElder
Feb 13, 2012

:geno: Yes, it's like a lava lamp.

And our understanding of proto languages seem to be changing a ton. Wikipedia's PIE article has a bunch of reconstructions of the same passage from the last few decades, and today's looks nothing like the early ones. Though that could also be just spelling changes and they'd be pronounced very similarly? Idk.

So far as we know there never was such a thing as written PIE right? It would have only ever been spoken?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply