|
Bolek posted:Was he a wispy little urchin in the book Pretty much.
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2014 05:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 08:03 |
|
|
Ig isn't supposed to be an intimidating dude before he gets the horns.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2014 06:10
|
|
|
That looks loving rad as hell.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2014 18:00
|
|
|
New Interstellar trailer. Sorry, don't have a better youtube link at this time. http://player.ooyala.com/iframe.htm...x.wordpress.com I really wish I hadn't mistakenly read a plot spoiler a few weeks ago.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2014 20:46
|
|
|
Just go to the movie's official site and enter the code 7201969, that's how I watched it. This movie is gonna be so fantastic.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2014 20:54
|
|
|
Trailer gave me goose bumps, god drat
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2014 21:15
|
|
|
If you're like me and give nary a poo poo about spoilers, go read the synopsis of the script in the Interstellar thread, knowing what it's all about makes me exponentially more excited.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2014 21:17
|
|
|
Good lord, it looks amazing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2014 21:28
|
|
|
Just so you guys know, about 50 theaters worldwide will be showing this in true 15-perf 70mm IMAX, most notably the Loews Lincoln Square theater in Manhattan. According to interviews, about two-thirds of it is shot in IMAX, and the 70mm prints will be made off the camera negative, so it'll be a hell of a way to see it. This site will probably be updated around September or October with more info as to where to see it this way.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2014 22:15
|
|
|
Yeah this trailer was so emotional. So pumped, IMAX for the win as it looks like it will be truly beautiful. I honestly thought I couldn't get more pumped than I was for Godzilla...
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 00:51
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:the 70mm prints will be made off the camera negative Huh?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 00:55
|
|
|
Bolek posted:Huh? I'm guessing the print will be taken directly off the camera film as opposed to a digital reproduction?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 01:13
|
|
|
teagone posted:I'm guessing the print will be taken directly off the camera film as opposed to a digital reproduction? I understood the sentence perfectly. The point is it makes no sense. This ain't the 1950s. That ain't how movies work.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 02:07
|
|
|
teagone posted:I'm guessing the print will be taken directly off the camera film as opposed to a digital reproduction?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 02:39
|
|
|
thehomemaster posted:Yeah this trailer was so emotional. Both trailers were cut by the same guy. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 03:06
|
|
|
It's an art, it truly is.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 03:31
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:Pretty much, which is very rare nowadays ("The Master" is one of the only other movies in the past five years to do this; it too was shot large format). Nolan makes his films with no Digital Intermediate stage except for visual effects shots, and all of the color correction is done photochemically rather than through something like a DaVinci system. The reason why movies like "Interstellar" and "The Master" can get away with printing off the camera negative is because only a very limited number of prints will be made this way, rather than 2,000+. I guess I was being too pedantic about it. His whole quasi luddite attitude just rubs me the wrong way and I guess reading how this huge sci fi feature with a massive amount of effects shots is gonna be cut and printed the old fashioned way just made me have a knee jerk, dickish response.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 03:33
|
|
|
kiimo posted:Both trailers were cut by the same guy. I assume he's Legendary's go to dude for their big stuff.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 05:25
|
|
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:I assume he's Legendary's go to dude for their big stuff. Didn't Kiimo talk about how there was a real expert working with him who cut both the 1989 Batman and Man of Steel trailers?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:I assume he's Legendary's go to dude for their big stuff. He's everybody's go-to for tentpoles. We have two guys that are executive vice presidents, the other three are senior vice presidents. Those two guys are responsible for all the big WB films you can think of. Our #1 did this trailer, did Batman, did Inception, etc. He's the king of swells and builds you might say. However he also was responsible for Yogi Bear and the "good things come in bears" poster so they can't all be winners!
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 15:50
|
|
|
So this is a thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwTf3xiBG28
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 15:54
|
|
|
kiimo posted:However he also was responsible for Yogi Bear and the "good things come in bears" poster so they can't all be winners! It certainly got more people talking about the Yogi Bear movie than what would probably be warranted. And you can't say it was forgettable marketing!
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 16:06
|
|
|
tehsid posted:So this is a thing.  Is this poo poo still relevant any more?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 17:51
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:
It is, it still gets WAY higher ratings than any other cartoon Nickelodeon puts out.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 17:59
|
|
|
tehsid posted:So this is a thing. Pirate guy as the villain? Rules. And yet I'm still bothered by them appearing to just breathe out of the water. And not suddenly being a plain sponge and petrified starfish on sticks.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 18:10
|
|
|
davidspackage posted:And yet I'm still bothered by them appearing to just breathe out of the water. And not suddenly being a plain sponge and petrified starfish on sticks. "Missing the point post about how this is a cartoon and you should really just relax you sperg  "
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 22:19
|
|
|
In the first movie they met David Hassleoff and didn't confused him for a porpoise this breaking Spongebob canon
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 22:27
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:"Missing the point post about how this is a cartoon and you should really just relax you sperg It's surprisingly profound, for a narrative about a sponge.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 22:30
|
|
|
Jonny Angel posted:It's surprisingly profound, for a narrative about a sponge. Yeah, if the Goofy Goober bit didn't moisten your eyes a bit, you're probably a soulless husk of a human being.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 22:58
|
|
|
tehsid posted:So this is a thing. Is this pirate dude supposed to be funny?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2014 23:44
|
|
|
Trump posted:Is this pirate dude supposed to be funny? You mean Antonio Banderas? He's the best part of the trailer. He knows he's in a kid's movie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 00:15
|
|
|
I just realized that trailer had a narrator talking about worlds.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:29
|
|
|
Jonny Angel posted:It's surprisingly profound, for a narrative about a sponge. Y'know I've never ever personally seen it, but I resigned myself to not really caring one way or the other like 12 years ago when everyone and their mother proclaimed Spongebob the king of Millennium cartooning. It's a better-than-average kid's cartoon that cribs liberally from the Looney Tunes playbook and has some great one-liners and memorable archetypal characters with great vocal talent. I don't hate it, I think it's really good, but I've never seen the whole "this is AAA cartooning" reputation it has. It just never transcended its trappings into either profundity, emotional resonance, or truly gut-busting comedy in my eyes, but since I never got the impression it was trying to I never begrudged the show itself for that. That said I was being facetious. I assume you were too but I just wanted to voice how weird it is to me that I don't seem to "get" Spongebob the way the rest of the world does, even if I don't hate the little guy at all.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:40
|
|
|
I admit, I laughed at the random Slash impersonator.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 06:01
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:That said I was being facetious. I assume you were too but I just wanted to voice how weird it is to me that I don't seem to "get" Spongebob the way the rest of the world does, even if I don't hate the little guy at all. I was quoting Fringe. Watch Fringe.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 06:48
|
|
|
No, but thank you. I don't like JJ Abrams stuff.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 06:52
|
|
|
MonsieurChoc posted:I admit, I laughed at the random Slash impersonator. That may have actually been Slash.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 06:54
|
|
|
effectual posted:That may have actually been Slash. It would only be funnier, but I didn't want to guess and be wrong. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 07:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 08:03 |
|
|
mind the walrus posted:No, but thank you. I don't like JJ Abrams stuff. He has nothing to do with it past the first episode and it becomes amazing. Watch fringe.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 12:35
|
|
