|
can one of u terrible programmers make a programme to snype even better than i already do?
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 13:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 02:07 |
|
|
Nelson MandEULA posted:can one of u terrible programmers make a programme to post even better than i already do?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 13:59
|
|
|
camh did
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:02
|
|
|
done
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:02
|
|
|
i am a terrible programmer can i post here?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:03
|
|
|
you can but please don't
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:04
|
|
|
u mean this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KaOrSuWZeM
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:05
|
|
|
tomcat and glassfish are both servlet containers, right? should i care about picking one or the other? (i mean, for my immediate purposes, i definitely don't need to care, but i figure i ought to understand things a little bit)
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 14:21
|
|
|
glassfish is a java ee container so it has a bunch of extra poo poo compared to tomcat. basically use tomcat unless you need glassfish...if you need glassfish, you'll know
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 16:51
|
|
|
you don't need glassfish. it is an open sores java ee implementation + app server. last i checked glassfish actually has its own tomcat fork inside of it, just to provide the servlet container feature. 99% of the java ee stuff you might actually want to use, you will just pull down as a library and include in your application. there are very few scenarios where you would prefer to have that stuff provided by your container Notorious b.s.d. fucked around with this message at 16:58 on Feb 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 16:56
|
|
|
When most people hear java ee they think httpservlet which means tomcat. this is wrong, but it doesn't actually matter cause no one anywhere has ever needed a complete java ee stack.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:02
|
|
|
I went to a jboss training thing at jboss world and the entire thing was about removing crap you don't need from the standard jboss configuration. jboss world taught us that we had no use for jboss.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:03
|
|
|
let's say you want a java EE feature. say, JPA. people actually use jpa. so you write some code against standard jpa apis and it is time to deploy it. if you have a hundred thousand dollar j2ee app server license:
if you are just using tomcat/jetty:
also hibernate is the reference implementation, and it's probably the implementation you developed against on your desktop. so it is probably less buggy than the j2ee scenario to start with Notorious b.s.d. fucked around with this message at 17:11 on Feb 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:08
|
|
|
is there a particularly good/standard way to store a postgres db on an external hd, if it's reasonable to do so at all? i have a project where i want to work with openstreetmaps data using postgis, but the entire osm file for just north america is about 130gb, and while i could probably force the space to be available on my rmbp, it'd be sort of unreasonable. i don't have any other machines available to me right now. i came across this answer but haven't tried it yet. also i know it'll probably take for loving ever to load that data but i'm just curious if it's possible.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:18
|
|
|
set up a fixed/permanent DB server in your house, then use an ssh proxy to query it remotely when you are on the road
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 17:21
|
|
|
what happened to them sweet backpack hard drives i heard so much about after ghost busters came out?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
prefect posted:tomcat and glassfish are both servlet containers, right? should i care about picking one or the other? (i mean, for my immediate purposes, i definitely don't need to care, but i figure i ought to understand things a little bit) GlassFish is dead, Oracle has killed commercial support for it after 4.0 was released and are now migrating people to webfail. But more importantly Notorious b.s.d. is right, you don't need a full J2EE Application Container, just use Tomcat or Jetty. https://blogs.oracle.com/brunoborges/entry/6_facts_about_glassfish_announcement
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2014 17:20
|
|
|
Janitor Prime posted:GlassFish is dead, Oracle has killed commercial support for it after 4.0 was released and are now migrating people to webfail. But more importantly Notorious b.s.d. is right, you don't need a full J2EE Application Container, just use Tomcat or Jetty. you scared me for a minute there glassfish isn't dead. it remains the java ee reference implementation for java ee 8 (if that ever comes out) oracle just isn't going to sell support contracts for it
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2014 22:50
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:you scared me for a minute there The writing is on the walls, having two competing application servers doesn't make sense for any company. Also no support contracts means no bug fixes until they make another release, and the open source cycles are dog slow. I give it maybe 1 more release before Web Logic becomes the reference implementation and GlassFish is axed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2014 00:40
|
|
|
Janitor Prime posted:The writing is on the walls, having two competing application servers doesn't make sense for any company. Also no support contracts means no bug fixes until they make another release, and the open source cycles are dog slow. I give it maybe 1 more release before Web Logic becomes the reference implementation and GlassFish is axed. the reference implementation will have to be open source for political reasons. they're not going to open source weblogic, just like they didn't open source jrockit and discontinued source releases of official oracle java. as with openjdk, i expect to see glassfish be open source and actively maintained, but no support contract offered.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2014 02:35
|
|
|
just finished up a day of learning javascript jfc  how is the internet still even working when it's running on this poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2014 23:53
|
|
|
coffeetable posted:just finished up a day of learning javascript uhh my internet runs on c++, java, and oddly maybe some prolog every once in a blue moon. i imagine when im hitting some startups poo poo there might even be a little erlang in there.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2014 23:55
|
|
|
coffeetable posted:just finished up a day of learning javascript spend another day with it and then switch to coffee script also you really actually have to write your functions within the closure for them to work you cant write the function elsewhere and call it from within the closure it wont work, even if it makes your code 100x more readable
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2014 23:55
|
|
|
FamDav posted:uhh my internet runs on c++, java, and oddly maybe some prolog every once in a blue moon. hello 2004
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:07
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:hello 2004 he didnt say flash
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:10
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:spend another day with it and then switch to coffee script any books you'd recommend lookin at this one right now cause its reasonably short but covers a full toolchain (which'd be nice because i dont know arse from elbow when it comes to web-y things)
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:19
|
|
|
i dont think you really need a book for coffee script, i just spent a few hours on the website http://coffeescript.org/ it's literally just semantic sugar over javascript, so if you get a book on something, get a book on javascript.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:23
|
|
|
coffeescript is terrible and already on its way out. i wouldnt bother to be more than passingly familiar
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:38
|
|
|
It's a lot better than writing javascript
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:46
|
|
|
what about typescript
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:46
|
|
|
i find it no better than js, and the whitespace sensitivity chafes me fortunately, it's passe as gently caress and i don't hear js guys talk about it anymore
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:46
|
|
|
if you're writhing javascript or any of its dialects you hosed up.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:47
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:if you're writhing javascript or any of its dialects you hosed up. into every life, a little rain must fall in every .net app, a little js is written
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:48
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:i find it no better than js, and the whitespace sensitivity chafes me i think it comes entirely down to personal preference then. i mean i'm not a javascript connoisseur i just want to get the job done. the less time i have to spend thinking about javascript, the better, and coffeescript enables that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:48
|
|
|
if your life involves a non-trivial amount of javascript it's time to pack it up and move to a hermitage
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 01:51
|
|
|
i was just thinking about learning it because i like webpages that react/feel alive and as far as i know (bad programmer) js it the way to do it should i learn something else instead or just auto-cloister asap
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 02:56
|
|
|
knockout js was a surprisingly not terrible experience. got the job done quick and clean. now onto d3.js
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 03:08
|
|
|
coffeetable posted:just finished up a day of learning javascript this is what i've been asking myself for years Shaggar posted:if you're writhing javascript or any of its dialects you hosed up. amen Notorious b.s.d. posted:into every life, a little rain must fall this is why i must sin
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 04:12
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:i was just thinking about learning it because i like webpages that react/feel alive and as far as i know (bad programmer) js it the way to do it it's not 'the way to do it' it's the only way to do it
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 04:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 02:07 |
|
|
javascript things you "need" to know: 1) jquery 2)
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2014 04:28
|
|