|
DancingShade posted:There is nothing more statesmanlike that sharing a name with a brand of frozen supermarket pizzas. You've done it again!
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 16:02 |
|
|
I, for one, am proud, blessed, and fully erect to be an American under the rule of President Dr. Donnie "God Emperor" Trump PHD, Esq, PHD.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
quote:WASHINGTON — A Republican-led Senate panel backed away from a plan to restrict media cameras in parts of the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday after Democrats and some Republicans criticized the move as an attempt to curtail press access. https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2017/06/13/us/politics/13reuters-usa-congress-press.html?_r=0 I give 'em a week before they try again. Again, zero fucks given about a reporter ACTUALLY assaulted by a politican. Instead it's "Oh my, someone might trip on these cords!!!!!!!"
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:17
|
|
|
Jose posted:a ridiculous amount of owrk went into it whoever is making them is real skilled and should won up and make an av thread What is this Silent Majority thing anyways? In real life (heh) and its incarnation on SA? How does one earn a MAGA av? So many questions, and preempting any "I don't remember" replies, you little rascals you!
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
Mr Havafap posted:What is this Silent Majority thing anyways? Racist that don't like to admit to racism.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
Mr Havafap posted:What is this Silent Majority thing anyways? 'The Silent Majority' was a rallying cry used by Nixon to tell his base that people who were protesting the Vietnam war were just a vocal minority of upstart kids. If I remember correctly, I think Reagan used it too on the campaign trail. KickerOfMice fucked around with this message at 22:23 on Jun 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
The silent majority is the best thing to claim is on your side when you lack actual supporters. Or when your policy is so shameful that nobody wants to be seen in public supporting it, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
Did I mishear or did McCain actually deliver a wicked burn to Sessions? Cuz Sessions was saying he pushed back against Kislyak about Ukraine and McCain said, "Knowing you, I find that hard to believe"
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Want a  Google Trump surrogate "Scottie Nell Hughes"
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Number of elections the silent majority won = 0
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
the silent majority are the republicans who despite owning all branches cant get much done cus they have terrible ideas and are led by a man who cant admit to looks fading with age
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
my new dog posted:the silent majority are the republicans who despite owning all branches cant get much done cus they have terrible ideas and are led by a man who cant admit to looks fading with age Republicans forgot how to govern because they spend a decade complaining about a black man as their policy
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:41
|
|
|
Skypie posted:Did I mishear or did McCain actually deliver a wicked burn to Sessions? Cuz Sessions was saying he pushed back against Kislyak about Ukraine and McCain said, "Knowing you, I find that hard to believe" The opposite - Sessions said that Kislyak was getting 'salty' when Sessions pressured him on Ukraine. McCain said he found that easy to believe, "knowing you", or words to that effect.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:43
|
|
|
brylcreem posted:The opposite - Sessions said that Kislyak was getting 'salty' when Sessions pressured him on Ukraine. OK. That makes more sense. It's hard to believe McCain could have made a sweet dunk on another Republican, and turns out, he's not a maverick after all
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
it's weird how out of all of this I hate john mccain the most.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
Dang It Bhabhi! posted:it's weird how out of all of this I hate john mccain the most. I used to be mad at Trump for giving him poo poo for being a POW, but gently caress him.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
haljordan posted:I used to be mad at Trump for giving him poo poo for being a POW, but gently caress him. McCain Electoral Votes 173 Popular vote: 58,319,442
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
Jose posted:its really funny just how badly a black man being president broke america It's almost like a large percentage of the USA population are total cunts
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:55
|
|
|
my new dog posted:McCain Sad!
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:55
|
|
|
gender illusionist posted:It's almost like a large percentage of the USA population are total cunts Let's be fair, a large amount of politics has been soundly reduced to team sports and echo chambers. That said, Sir Donald "Grab 'em by the Pussy" Trump is rather blatant about being a real jackass, at least towards women, so it doesn't excuse that. Sexual assault you say? But her emails! lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 22:59
|
|
|
quote:The chairman of a Chinese financial conglomerate who tried to forge a business relationship with President Trump’s son-in-law has been detained by police. lol that guy's dead already
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
haljordan posted:lol that guy's dead already Lmao Wikipedia says they held assets worth $123b USD in 2015 and he's been ceo since they were founded in 2004. This should have a market ripple effect maybe
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 23:35
|
|
|
haljordan posted:lol that guy's dead already Anbang attaboom!
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 23:36
|
|
|
Anbanged up in the gulag
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 23:46
|
|
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:Lmao Wikipedia says they held assets worth $123b USD in 2015 and he's been ceo since they were founded in 2004. That would be the case if China still had something resembling a "market" for things to ripple through.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
I feel like the democrats on the committee really missed an opportunity to drive the wedge in further between Sessions and Trump. I really wanted them to highlight the differences between what Sessions and Trump have said on the record. Fyck Sessions for his "non-privileged, but privileged" non-rule that they were evidently completely unprepared for. I mean did they expect that at any point he would drop juicy details of their conversations? They had no plan B, but what else should be expect at this point? Lol.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:00
|
|
|
angryrobots posted:Fyck Sessions for his "non-privileged, but privileged" non-rule that they were evidently completely unprepared for. I mean did they expect that at any point he would drop juicy details of their conversations? They had no plan B, but what else should be expect at this point? Lol. That's what I don't get. So many "I don't wanna answer and there's no legal reason why" answers. Why isn't there a lawyer there going "That's not a reason answer the question or get charged with perjury"?
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:04
|
|
|
hmmm After months of rejecting multiple job requests, businesswoman Cindy McCain has accepted a State Department position in the Trump administration, sourced told the Daily Beast on Monday. Two senior administration officials, who requested anonymity, claimed it is a "done deal" for both parties. President Trump "aggressively courted" McCain to accept a position in his administration. Her potential title is a "U.S. ambassador-at-large for human rights." https://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/cindy-mccain-joins-trumps-state-department/
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:04
|
|
|
Lime Tonics posted:hmmm quote:According to a White House official, Trump’s daughter and adviser, Ivanka Trump, had a strong role in encouraging her father to pursue Cindy McCain for a position in his administration. Ivanka Trump hosted an anti-human trafficking event at the White House last month and was reportedly impressed by Cindy McCain’s experience in working on global humanitarian issues. Cindy McCain was a former chairwoman of HALO USA, a humanitarian organization which clears war-torn communities of landmines and other unexploded bombs and devices. She has also been an advocate against sex trafficking. lmao how loving dumb is Cindy McCain.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
haljordan posted:lmao how loving dumb is Cindy McCain. You're right, only idiots want to get rid of land mines and end sex trafficking.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:10
|
|
|
Coco Rodreguiz posted:That's what I don't get. So many "I don't wanna answer and there's no legal reason why" answers. Why isn't there a lawyer there going "That's not a reason answer the question or get charged with perjury"? the senate knows he isn't going say anything it's red meat for their base and a chance for grandstanding
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
Coco Rodreguiz posted:That's what I don't get. So many "I don't wanna answer and there's no legal reason why" answers. Why isn't there a lawyer there going "That's not a reason answer the question or get charged with perjury"? He was claiming that he was complying with DOJ policies that have been in place for years and that that in itself gives him immunity/the right to not answer certain questions. Of course, when asked about it he couldn't answer whether he knew if they are actually written somewhere or if he's ever even seen them. And when asked if he could provide proof of these policies if they are written down he basically answered "If I feel like it". lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
Coco Rodreguiz posted:That's what I don't get. So many "I don't wanna answer and there's no legal reason why" answers. Why isn't there a lawyer there going "That's not a reason answer the question or get charged with perjury"? Because there is a legal reason why and he explained it. "I don't like the reason" isn't "there isn't one." Also "gently caress you" isn't perjury. Perjury is lying and "you can go gently caress yourself" isn't a lie.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
ambient robot posted:He was claiming that he was complying with DOJ policies that have been in place for years and that that in itself gives him immunity/the right to not answer certain questions. Of course, when asked about it he couldn't answer whether he knew if they are actually written somewhere or if he's ever even seen them. And when asked if he could provide proof of these policies if they are written down he basically answered "If I feel like it". And as Tom Cotton pointed out, it was totes ok when Holder and others did it so basically gently caress anyone that thinks it's suddenly a problem.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
Kiryen posted:Because there is a legal reason why and he explained it. "I don't like the reason" isn't "there isn't one." Seriously what is up with politics goons and pretending to be a lawyer
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/347191326112112640
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/PY0a8QGy96M
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 16:02 |
|
|
Will you look at that, lol.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 00:23
|
|
