Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Thomamelas
Mar 11, 2009

spacetoaster posted:

UCIS folks are some stone cold sons of bitches.

My sister is Ukrainian, all her passports are Ukrainian, birth certificate, etc. Russa forced everyone in her region of Ukraine to get Russian passports when they took over. Our request to get her a humanitarian parole under Uniting for Ukraine just got denied because the US says she's not a Ukrainian anymore.

When I pointed out all the supporting documentation that she's a Ukrainian from Ukraine the agents just pointed to her current passport and said that's that.

I guess write a senator or get an immigration lawyer? Can you even argue with these robots in the government?

Get an immigration lawyer. The system for immigration is hosed up beyond belief and you are going to need one to get you through the system and understand it's bullshit.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Skunkduster
Jul 15, 2005




The humor on this will be lost for people who aren't familiar with pool (billiards). Joe Rogan did an impression of Earl Strickland (pro pool player) and said "pool is a beautiful game played by ugly people" in Earl's voice during the impression. Earl never actually said that. Dr. Dave Alcatore is a guy with a doctorate in physics or something that puts out videos about the physics of playing pool and has a merchandise line. One of the things he has is t-shirts with a picture of Earl Strickland with the quote "pool is a beautiful game played by ugly people". Earl asked him to stop selling the shirts with his picture on it and Dr. Dave removed it from his site. All amicable and friendly. No hard feelings between any of the three parties.

Legally speaking - can you put out merchandise with a photo of a celebrity if you own the rights to the photo with a quote that they never said? If I took a picture of William Shatner, could I put that picture on a t-shirt with the quote, "May the force be with you"?

Not relevant to my question, but here is the video I mentioned. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4G0Gx8suAQs

Skunkduster fucked around with this message at 03:44 on Apr 18, 2023

Kalman
Jan 17, 2010

The words you’re looking for are “right of publicity” and the answer is jurisdiction dependent but basically always no.

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.
Outkast got sued over their Rosa parks song

Janky The Clown
Jan 13, 2015
My mother who was a resident of Texas died during the summer of 2022. My brother and I, are her only biological children. My mother also has three step-children, from her late Husband. I do not live in Texas.

Long story short the entire family has been in turmoil for many years. This person doesn't talk with this one, that person won't deal with that one. My mother was kind of the crux of the family turmoil. She was also extremely meticulous, she had an accountant and a lawyer that she worked with who were also her best friends. She was not wealthy by any means, but she liked to think that she was and handled her affairs as such. I know she had a will in her safety deposit box. She always said all her important papers were in her safety deposit box.

I know nothing of the legal world, and quite frankly it scares the hell out of me. With the family turmoil, and not wanting to deal with the legal issues and not really caring about the money, I just kind of shelved it.

Last week I spoke with two different family members. They both told me that they had some concerns that my brother hasn't been handling my mother's affairs correctly. It was a bit odd, as they were from two different branches of the family, and while they know of each other, they aren't exactly close family. This kinda got my spidey senses tingling.

My brother has a felony on his record for financial crimes. He also served time for felony assault against me.

So I did a modest amount of research, and learned that a probate court is the venue to handle such affairs. Doing a record search did not turn up a will, as my mother had never registered it with the court. However, earlier this year (2023) my brother put in a request to the court to get access to her safety deposit box, which was granted. That's where the paper trail ended, at least with my limited knowledge of knowing where to look.

I don't really care about the money. I don't even know if she included me in it, but I know she had a will. I'm sure that there are people in the will (my kids) that I care about that should get what my mother wanted them to have. Taking everything into consideration, I've decided that I should make a stand.

I know my next course of action is to hire a probate attorney to dig into everything.

What are some of the things I need to be on the lookout for, or need to be doing to prepare for this potential fight? What are some realistic goals that I should have?

Nonexistence
Jan 6, 2014
You specifically want a lawyer who does estate/fiduciary litigation. A couple of good questions:

1. Does TX have a statute that allows heirs of a decedent to demand an accounting from the agent of a POA the decedent signed?

2. Can we use a recent past tax return to see all of her assets that issued a 1099 then see if any of them had beneficiaries or joint owners added after she was under brother's undue influence?

3. What's the statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud claims mom's estate has against brother, and is it tolled before an executor is appointed?

4. What's the statute of limitations for beneficiaries bringing breach of fiduciary duty claims against the executor?

5. Can you confirm no executor or administrator has been appointed yet?

6. Can you confirm no real estate has been retitled yet?

7. Can you investigate if brother's convictions were for fraud or a "crime of moral turpitude"?

8. Can we report to her financial institutions that she has passed?

9. Do undue influence cases permit shifting of attorney's fees in TX?

10. If there is an executor or administrator already, is there a surety on their bond?

You'll have a much healthier understanding after these are addressed. Feel free to report back how it resolves itt, and good luck!

Nonexistence fucked around with this message at 17:29 on Apr 18, 2023

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.
don't post anything your lawyer tells you here

Kalman
Jan 17, 2010

EwokEntourage posted:

don't post anything your lawyer tells you here

bird with big dick
Oct 21, 2015

EwokEntourage posted:

don't post anything your lawyer tells you here

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004

Nice piece of fish
Jan 29, 2008

Ultra Carp
post anything your lawyer don't tells you here

Volmarias
Dec 31, 2002

EMAIL... THE INTERNET... SEARCH ENGINES...

EwokEntourage posted:

don't post anything your lawyer tells you here

Volmarias
Dec 31, 2002

EMAIL... THE INTERNET... SEARCH ENGINES...
Oh heck, they got this all wrong again.

EwokEntourage posted:

don't post? anything your lawyer tells you, here!

BigHead
Jul 25, 2003
Huh?


Nap Ghost
To add to what Nonexistence said, you want a lawyer in or near the place she lived, not wherever you are. And those are all questions you can ask your lawyer, not questions you need to research the answer to before finding the lawyer.

This type of situation is specifically what layers are for.

Nice piece of fish
Jan 29, 2008

Ultra Carp
Lawyers are like onions

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.

BigHead posted:

To add to what Nonexistence said, you want a lawyer in or near the place she lived, not wherever you are. And those are all questions you can ask your lawyer, not questions you need to research the answer to before finding the lawyer.

This type of situation is specifically what layers are for.

oh, if we're talking layers, I'll go fetch toona

joat mon
Oct 15, 2009

I am the master of my lamp;
I am the captain of my tub.

Nice piece of fish posted:

Lawyers are like onions

They taste better fried?

BigHead
Jul 25, 2003
Huh?


Nap Ghost

EwokEntourage posted:

oh, if we're talking layers, I'll go fetch toona

Lol

Kalman
Jan 17, 2010

Nice piece of fish posted:

Lawyers are like onions

Responsible for a serious Hep A outbreak? That’s a pretty rude thing to say about Toona.

mercenarynuker
Sep 10, 2008

Nice piece of fish posted:

Lawyers are like onions

Cutting them in half results in tears?

therobit
Aug 19, 2008

I've been tryin' to speak with you for a long time

Kalman posted:

Responsible for a serious Hep A outbreak? That’s a pretty rude thing to say about Toona.

Someone hasn’t learned their HepA, HepB, HepCs.

Phil Moscowitz
Feb 19, 2007

If blood be the price of admiralty,
Lord God, we ha' paid in full!

Nice piece of fish posted:

Lawyers are like onions

Part of the trinity

Yorkshire Pudding
Nov 24, 2006



Crossposting a question here on the very friendly advice of the above poster.

Partner is considering bankruptcy on the advice of a lawyer due to her criminal ex husband wracking up huge amounts of debt in their name, potentially lots more she doesn’t know about. Partner has no debt and pretty standard assets (savings, 401k, vehicles) for a middle aged person.

Lawyer makes it seem like it’s not a huge deal, but feels like something that means we’ll never be able to buy a house in the future?

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
by "partner" do you mean actual partner in a legal marriage or business or just a person you hang out with a lot (legally speaking)

therobit
Aug 19, 2008

I've been tryin' to speak with you for a long time

Yorkshire Pudding posted:

Crossposting a question here on the very friendly advice of the above poster.

Partner is considering bankruptcy on the advice of a lawyer due to her criminal ex husband wracking up huge amounts of debt in their name, potentially lots more she doesn’t know about. Partner has no debt and pretty standard assets (savings, 401k, vehicles) for a middle aged person.

Lawyer makes it seem like it’s not a huge deal, but feels like something that means we’ll never be able to buy a house in the future?

If any of that is debt he signed her up for without her participation or knowledge, such as credit cards or loans he signed up for without her knowledge using her info, then she would not be liable for them but would need to file a police report for identity theft in order Tom get out of it.

Yorkshire Pudding
Nov 24, 2006



Hieronymous Alloy posted:

by "partner" do you mean actual partner in a legal marriage or business or just a person you hang out with a lot (legally speaking)

Romantic partner, not married.


therobit posted:

If any of that is debt he signed her up for without her participation or knowledge, such as credit cards or loans he signed up for without her knowledge using her info, then she would not be liable for them but would need to file a police report for identity theft in order Tom get out of it.

It was an incredibly abusive relationship and she was forced into some “hey sign this real quick, now” type stuff. There was also some forgery. It will be very hard to prove which was which 7 years after the fact. The latest incident was her discovering she’s getting her wages garnished for an apartment lease he signed in a different state. They never contacted her about it, she found out when she looked at a recent paycheck.

She and her lawyer’s reasoning is “there’s no way of knowing how much of this stuff is out there. This will get rid of it”. My concern is that it will basically make her, and by extension us, intelligible to do any sort of loans or financing for 5-10 years.

Yorkshire Pudding fucked around with this message at 02:53 on Apr 19, 2023

Thomamelas
Mar 11, 2009

Nice piece of fish posted:

Lawyers are like onions

When you find them in bars, they are pickled and soaked in booze?

So I have an Alex Jones question. Would the level of scrutiny his fiances are under by the bankruptcy court possibly spot tax fraud? And if it does, is that something the court would pass on to the IRS?

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Yorkshire Pudding posted:

Romantic partner, not married.

It was an incredibly abusive relationship and she was forced into some “hey sign this real quick, now” type stuff. There was also some forgery. It will be very hard to prove which was which 7 years after the fact. The latest incident was her discovering she’s getting her wages garnished for an apartment lease he signed in a different state. They never contacted her about it, she found out when she looked at a recent paycheck.

She and her lawyer’s reasoning is “there’s no way of knowing how much of this stuff is out there. This will get rid of it”. My concern is that it will basically make her, and by extension us, to do any sort of loans or financing for 5-10 years.

The lawyer might not be wrong retrospectively, but what about going forward? If this guy's still out there signing her name to poo poo that's not gonna stop unless he's behind bars.

Yorkshire Pudding
Nov 24, 2006



Hieronymous Alloy posted:

The lawyer might not be wrong retrospectively, but what about going forward? If this guy's still out there signing her name to poo poo that's not gonna stop unless he's behind bars.

He is, and will be for a very long time.

blarzgh
Apr 14, 2009

SNITCHIN' RANDY
Grimey Drawer

Yorkshire Pudding posted:

My concern is that it will basically make her, and by extension us, intelligible to do any sort of loans or financing for 5-10 years.

I bet I know who can answer this question for you - and he's already on retainer!

sullat
Jan 9, 2012
If you hired a bankruptcy lawyer though they basically have one tool, a hammer, and they see every problem as one that can be solved with a good hammering.

e: also if she's filing a chapter 13 bankruptcy it means she's on the hook for potentially 60 months worth of payments. So she's not going to be able to get a loan for at least that timeframe.

sullat fucked around with this message at 05:36 on Apr 19, 2023

Trapick
Apr 17, 2006

When did she divorce him and/or last sign anything for him? Is he in jail for fraud/identity theft? As for “there’s no way of knowing how much of this stuff is out there. This will get rid of it”. - have you gone through credit reports and made sure they're accurate?

therobit
Aug 19, 2008

I've been tryin' to speak with you for a long time
I have the TikTok credit fraud trend but there is a time and place to just dispute every and request they validate the debt and it sounds like that is where she is and right now. If she’s getting garnished there had to be a law suit. Was she properly served? Did she have a chance to dispute the facts?

I would echo the poster above me who is saying she needs to get copies of her consumer reports and figure out what she owes and what isn’t her. Anything she signed for should have paperwork they can provide to back it up. If they can’t produce it or it’s not her signature then they can’t collect.

Also, if it’s been seven years most of those debts are uncollectible anyway unless she’s been sued and had a judgement against her that they have been renewing. Which again, did she get proper service?

She is also t the first or then only person this has happened to. I’d wait and see which creditors can come up with a valid signature before deciding I was bankrupt.

BigHead
Jul 25, 2003
Huh?


Nap Ghost
What state is she in? If he's committed or been convicted of identity theft she might have rights as a crime victim. Washington, for example, has a statute that lays out what she can potentially do, WA RCW 9.35.040. That type of statute might give her some other options to discuss with the lawyer.

Also here's a capitalist answer but maybe if the two of you want a house you could not marry her and buy the house in your name, thus avoiding her credit score (and income) entirely from the equation. That's pretty brutal but worth talking to the lawyer about.

Organza Quiz
Nov 7, 2009


I feel like half of my posts in this thread are just wtf America but here's another one: I'm always amazed/confused by how little American law seems to care about de facto relationships compared to marriage. Does the law really not give romantic partners who are sharing their lives together many rights unless they sign the piece of paper? Over here if you're in a long-term living together partnership it really doesn't make much difference at all if you did the ceremony or not.

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004
There's a lot of stuff anti-welfare type stuff behind it.

Yorkshire Pudding
Nov 24, 2006



As people have pointed out, her credit report is totally clear, but she got hit with a $10,000~ wage garnishment for a place she go-signed on like 7 years ago. So now she’s panicking because she doesn’t know what else is out there.

On one hand she has now had 2 lawyers tell her to declare bankruptcy, on the other hand it’s been 5 years since divorce, so I feel like if he had debts or whatever they would have popped up by now. With this lease, it’s clear that she co-signed, and even if it was under duress (which the law doesn’t care about) it’s totally fair for her to be on the hook since the primary signer didn’t pay up.


BigHead posted:

What state is she in? If he's committed or been convicted of identity theft she might have rights as a crime victim. Washington, for example, has a statute that lays out what she can potentially do, WA RCW 9.35.040. That type of statute might give her some other options to discuss with the lawyer.

Also here's a capitalist answer but maybe if the two of you want a house you could not marry her and buy the house in your name, thus avoiding her credit score (and income) entirely from the equation. That's pretty brutal but worth talking to the lawyer about.

Yeah we’ve talked about that. But I’d rather just…not have that happen.


Trapick posted:

When did she divorce him and/or last sign anything for him? Is he in jail for fraud/identity theft? As for “there’s no way of knowing how much of this stuff is out there. This will get rid of it”. - have you gone through credit reports and made sure they're accurate?

Divorce was 4~ years ago, which would be well after she last signed anything. The big thing is this judgement against her for breaking a lease. That was in 2017~, and she had that judgement against her without ever being served. No notice, no court date, just a sudden deduction for her paycheck with a document by the judge with the ruling.

And we’ve gone through credit stuff, and there’s nothing there. She even had a judgement when he was arrested and taken to jail because she had to leave their rental because the cops were like “he could get bailed out and we can’t protect you”, so she cut the lease short, with landlord’s approval, but had a “reclamation of property” charge or something. We disputed that and got it removed, but before last year she didn’t even know it existed.

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.
why don't you get your lawyer to challenge the garnishment?

Phil Moscowitz
Feb 19, 2007

If blood be the price of admiralty,
Lord God, we ha' paid in full!

Organza Quiz posted:

I feel like half of my posts in this thread are just wtf America but here's another one: I'm always amazed/confused by how little American law seems to care about de facto relationships compared to marriage. Does the law really not give romantic partners who are sharing their lives together many rights unless they sign the piece of paper? Over here if you're in a long-term living together partnership it really doesn't make much difference at all if you did the ceremony or not.

American law is state-by-state. Many states have “common law marriage” or other concubinage/cohabitation laws that create a legal quasi-marriage after a certain amount of time together. It’s complicated.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

therobit
Aug 19, 2008

I've been tryin' to speak with you for a long time

Yorkshire Pudding posted:

As people have pointed out, her credit report is totally clear, but she got hit with a $10,000~ wage garnishment for a place she go-signed on like 7 years ago. So now she’s panicking because she doesn’t know what else is out there.

On one hand she has now had 2 lawyers tell her to declare bankruptcy, on the other hand it’s been 5 years since divorce, so I feel like if he had debts or whatever they would have popped up by now. With this lease, it’s clear that she co-signed, and even if it was under duress (which the law doesn’t care about) it’s totally fair for her to be on the hook since the primary signer didn’t pay up.

Yeah we’ve talked about that. But I’d rather just…not have that happen.

Divorce was 4~ years ago, which would be well after she last signed anything. The big thing is this judgement against her for breaking a lease. That was in 2017~, and she had that judgement against her without ever being served. No notice, no court date, just a sudden deduction for her paycheck with a document by the judge with the ruling.

And we’ve gone through credit stuff, and there’s nothing there. She even had a judgement when he was arrested and taken to jail because she had to leave their rental because the cops were like “he could get bailed out and we can’t protect you”, so she cut the lease short, with landlord’s approval, but had a “reclamation of property” charge or something. We disputed that and got it removed, but before last year she didn’t even know it existed.


Look I don’t want to second guess her lawyer but $10k is not worth filing bankruptcy over. Did she actually co-sign on this one or not? If she wasn’t served and didn’t sign it or did not get notified of the debt then it can be unwound. I bet some amount of that is late fees even if it is a valid debt and if she gets the judgment unwound then they may be willing to negotiate once the judgment is vacated. Yes, it’s possible thee is other stuff out there but at this point if it’s not on her credit and she’s not aware of it it isn’t likely to pop up again.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply