|
Destroy all polarized sunlight 
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2013 05:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 23:45 |
|
|
 Four Deities, Outram, 2013 by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2013 05:34
|
|
|
I drink here sometimes. Dont judge. Sofa and Sandy, Portland. by Ashade76, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 01:30
|
|
|
Working on my negative scan post processing: Southwest by voodoorootbeer, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 05:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 17:41
|
|
|
That Ruggle's Mine? Edit: Nope
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 17:53
|
|
|
A mountains butthole. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:44
|
|
|
 DSC_0243 by Geographic Ecotourist, on Flickr  DSC_0260 by Geographic Ecotourist, on Flickr I got 1 1/2 credits towards my degree to just go here and then come back (backpacking class).
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 22:08
|
|
|
 Cafe Terrace at Night by wholesome_, on Flickr Monitor isn't calibrated so my coloring is a shot in the dark.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 00:27
|
|
|
 NW Flanders, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr crappy 5bux grid, speedlite, someones laundry.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 03:39
|
|
|
 Scan-131204-0010 by Dev Luns, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 05:53
|
|
|
 acros100_9 by Alex Gard, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 08:01
|
|
|
Suicide Watch posted:
Is that place de bourg de four in Geneva? Hah, I lived in one of the buildings just off shot. I really like what you've done there, and the colors look fine to me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 10:00
|
|
|
Suicide Watch posted:
You knocked it out of the park dude. I also spent some time looking through your flickr. I think you're a hell of a photographer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 21:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 21:15
|
|
|
Puts the AMC to shame
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 21:42
|
|
|
Goddamn that is a lot of layers. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 22:05
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Goddamn that is a lot of layers. to semi-quote star wars. "That's no cloud"
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 22:18
|
|
|
Beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 22:33
|
|
|
I want this.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:10
|
|
|
Stop it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:33
|
|
|
StarkingBarfish posted:Is that place de bourg de four in Geneva? Hah, I lived in one of the buildings just off shot. I really like what you've done there, and the colors look fine to me. Luscious.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 00:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 01:35
|
|
|
 MITC, Malacca, 2013 by alkanphel, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 02:03
|
|
|
Hiking! Gwynneth on Sharp Edge by Tim Breeze, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 19:17
|
|
|
 Walkway by venusian-weasel, on Flickr  Statue by venusian-weasel, on Flickr  Infinite by venusian-weasel, on Flickr  Catenary Curve by venusian-weasel, on Flickr I wish St. Louis weren't 2 1/2 hours away.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 23:39
|
|
|
erephus posted:
 Axmarby-10-2 by dabrovnijk, on Flickr Sent it through Photoshop and I'm constantly going back and forth with "I went to far" and "I didn't go far enough".
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2013 00:49
|
|
|
erephus posted:
I personally feel this is a bit far but I guess it is kind of a personal thing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2013 01:00
|
|
|
We're stuck below zero in Minnesota, but that can't stop landscape photography! 
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2013 01:01
|
|
|
erephus posted:
I think the sky is where it should be, everything below it seems too far processed. Try a two layer mask and see how it comes out
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2013 02:16
|
|
|
 Hollywood Lanes, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2013 07:52
|
|
|
 DSCF2843.jpg by fuglsnef, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2013 20:42
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2013 04:50
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2013 06:58
|
|
|
nice smooth water, as always
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2013 21:19
|
|
|
I'm brand new to photography in general but have been getting out and practicing as much as I can. This past weekend I got a chance to take some landscape shots, I don't have any specific stuff for landscape shooting like an ND filter or anything but found that I was able to get a very similar result in lightroom (I think?). Is there still a role for a (physical) gradiated ND filter when shooting landscape photography with a DSLR or can you get better control over that stuff in post? If you're shooting RAW I can't see why you'd be too concerned about the overall exposure as it would be changed by using a gradiated ND filter. Here's one of the shots I took, would love any feedback that might help me improve: 
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2013 04:49
|
|
|
I'm really tempted to steal that long exposure frozen waterfall idea from you DreadHead because god damm! I hope you like winter!  Whistler Winter 2013 by hookshot88, on Flickr  Whistler Winter 2013 by hookshot88, on Flickr  Whistler Winter 2013 by hookshot88, on Flickr  Whistler Winter 2013 by hookshot88, on Flickr  Whistler Winter 2013 by hookshot88, on Flickr The perspective is really messing with me on the last one, I swear LR's ruler says the bridge is straight, but the trees being the way they are makes me think it isn't every time I see it and  edit: oops my dog is not a landscape. HookShot fucked around with this message at 06:01 on Dec 11, 2013 |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2013 05:56
|
|
|
Rotate it until it looks straight then, the human visual system is easily tricked.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2013 12:30
|
|
|
VelociBacon posted:Is there still a role for a (physical) gradiated ND filter when shooting landscape photography with a DSLR or can you get better control over that stuff in post?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2013 13:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 23:45 |
|
|
Mathturbator posted:There absolutely is, due to a constraint called dynamic range. A blown out sky is still blown even if you're shooting RAW. It is very easy to recreate this with 2 exposures assuming you have a good tripod. The times that you may need one is if it is a fast moving scene or you are not using a tripod. Out side of that I just use multiple exposures as you get more control this way even if it is less traditional.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2013 17:51
|
|