|
Commander karnov
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 07:55 |
|
|
If they don't have Krark as either the URBG commander or as one of the dual-colored partners that can go into URBG they messed up, that's all I'm gonna say
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:28
|
|
|
ZeroCount posted:I'm gonna buy the UBRG chaos deck and all my friends will laugh for exactly one game from the novelty before it dawns on them that this hideous rng poo poo will be happening every game One of my friends has a deck like that with Maelstrom Wanderer. I remember he played a game where a single turn took over an hour to resolve.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:28
|
|
|
Undaunted might actually be the single dumbest keyword I've seen in this game.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:32
|
|
|
edh chat is the literal worst chat.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
I'm not sure Legacy can survive a 4-mana white sorcery that says destroy all creatures, better slap an extra clause on it that makes it completely unplayable outside of multiplayer.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:edh chat is the literal worst chat. were you not here when mtg dude tried to grope Amanda Stevens?
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:41
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:I'm not sure Legacy can survive a 4-mana white sorcery that says destroy all creatures, better slap an extra clause on it that makes it completely unplayable outside of multiplayer. Sorry you're looking for legacy playables in a multiplayer supplemental set?
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
Evil Badman posted:Sorry you're looking for legacy playables in a multiplayer supplemental set? I mean in fairness that's mostly where legacy and vintage get their playables these days
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:Sidar reads really weirdly to me. The partner mechanic is a cool way to make 4 color decks but the generals don't seem very impressive. Not only your guys, this is multiplayer remember? Not sure why it doesn't just give them flying while attacking your opponents, but maybe there's an obvious reason I'm not thinking of.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:47
|
|
|
Evil Badman posted:Sorry you're looking for legacy playables in a multiplayer supplemental set? Yes? They sure aren't printing stuff like Council's Judgment or Sanctum Prelate into standard.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:I mean in fairness that's mostly where legacy and vintage get their playables these days Incidentally, sure, but you shouldn't be counting on it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:I'm not sure Legacy can survive a 4-mana white sorcery that says destroy all creatures, better slap an extra clause on it that makes it completely unplayable outside of multiplayer. Yeah but what if you're in a 7-player EDH game huh? I mean besides the fact that it will be a terrible experience in general, what about the ONE MANA wrath.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
What can you even do with Ox man other than a voltron gimmick that many other better commanders already do
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:52
|
|
|
Serperoth posted:Yeah but what if you're in a 7-player EDH game huh? We have a rule that we will only do anything higher than a 5 player pod if we start it before 10PM because nobody wants to be there till 2AM.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:52
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:What can you even do with Ox man other than a voltron gimmick that many other better commanders already do admire what a real man looks like first of all
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:53
|
|
|
Evil Badman posted:Sorry you're looking for legacy playables in a multiplayer supplemental set? I'm not asking them to go out of their way to make new playables, I'm just saying that if they're already making reasonable cards there's zero reason to slap an ugly CAST ONLY IN MULTIPLAYER tag on them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
Nobody around here ever plays a game of Commander with a pod of more than four people under any circumstances, so it's worse than Wrath of God always.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:00
|
|
|
I can kindof see the point of that mechanic on something like a one-for-one removal spell that naturally gets worse in a multiplayer environment where you're going down on cards compared to most of the table. It's loving stupid on a wrath though since that scales up just fine. Are you going to board it in in 8 player pods or what.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:03
|
|
|
I don't dislike any of these cards
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
Elyv posted:oh good, the bad archetype and the archetype everyone hates 80s James Hetfield posted:What can you even do with Ox man other than a voltron gimmick that many other better commanders already do
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:I can kindof see the point of that mechanic on something like a one-for-one removal spell that naturally gets worse in a multiplayer environment where you're going down on cards compared to most of the table. It's loving stupid on a wrath though since that scales up just fine. Are you going to board it in in 8 player pods or what. I can't even fathom what an 8 player EDH game would be like.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:I can't even fathom what an 8 player EDH game would be like. You ever watched a video of a glacier? That's pretty close.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:I can't even fathom what an 8 player EDH game would be like. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:I'm not asking them to go out of their way to make new playables, I'm just saying that if they're already making reasonable cards there's zero reason to slap an ugly CAST ONLY IN MULTIPLAYER tag on them. I understand that, but given that Commander, as WOTC sees it, is primarily multiplayer creating cards with mechanics that work that in aren't surprising. However, if I wrote undaunted, I'd have had it count commanders or opponents, whichever is larger, instead of just opponents, but I'm a jerk. Side note: The Packaging article shows that each deck with come with 4 foils, so a Four Color, 2 Two Color Partners and maybe a mono color Partner?
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
Evil Badman posted:Side note: The Packaging article shows that each deck with come with 4 foils, so a Four Color, 2 Two Color Partners and maybe a mono color Partner? two enemy color partners and one ally.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:I can't even fathom what an 8 player EDH game would be like. It becomes two 4-player pods loosely joined together with the people on other end asking, "what's happening on the other end of the table?" or getting up and walking over. And then you lose focus on what's going on because keeping tabs on what's happening on seven other boards is difficult and one person goes off after 2-5 hours of everyone knocking each other down.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:22
|
|
|
STANKBALLS TASTYLEGS posted:two enemy color partners and one ally. Fair. It was pointed out to me by a wiser person that you can has two partners share a color and just roll a 3 color deck. That thought didn't even cross my mind.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:25
|
|
|
man i want to know what kind of edh players you are playing with so i can play with them. my group of friends and i do 6+ pods and it lasts like half an hour to an hour at most and there's always some kind of lame infinite combo that no one enjoys dealing with
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:edh is the literal worst.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:25
|
|
|
I have played an 2-headed giant 4pod before so I guess it would be relevant there. The design still sucks though since it's not something you can try to set up in-game.
Irony Be My Shield fucked around with this message at 17:34 on Oct 24, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
So Bruce is played by Tom Hardy?
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
Not really a card that'll show up in Eternal ever but that ability's pretty funny with Brainstorm
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
This card in a kruphix deck may at some point start a fist fight.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:46
|
|
|
either i'm super loving jaded about magic or these kinds of designs are so uninspired.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
jassi007 posted:either i'm super loving jaded about magic or these kinds of designs are so uninspired. nah they are because they're meant to be played with another card so they have to be super generic and safe.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
I really wish R/W would get something for Commander other than a 4 mana 3/3 with doublestrike. Like, maybe a 3 mana 3/2 with double strike?
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
lol this is actually a cool concept, but instead you just jam it with a boros partner you never plan to cast just so you can get access to more cards. I believe the term for this is "Getting Nagled".
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 07:55 |
|
|
Toshimo posted:I believe the term for this is "Getting Nagled". This has nothing to do with his vore fetish, so no?
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 17:56
|
|
