|
Jose posted:He could at least pull off his moustache unlike all the former Soviet country dictators these days Waitaminute, Stalin's moustache was a stick-on? Unexpected bombshell. E:1275 AD - the Zohar, book of the cabala, compiled by Moses de Leon in Spain. EmptyVessel fucked around with this message at 23:39 on May 16, 2017 |
#
?
May 16, 2017 23:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 07:07 |
|
|
Don't think you need any photoshop to make Young Jeremy Corbyn a solid Would.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 23:37
|
|
|
All the sex appeal of a young Noel Edmonds.
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
Noel Edmunds has a weird lumpy head.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 23:46
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Noel Edmunds has a weird lumpy head. ..with weird lumpy ideas in it.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:The Independent seems to be publishing a lot of pro Corbyn/Labour stuff at the moment, though I don't buy it so I only see the articles people link online I'd be very surprised if a paper owned by Evgeny Lebedev is pro Corbyn. This was a paper (when it was still a paper anyway) that said the best outcome for the 2015 election was the continuation of the Tory/Liberal coalition! Which isn't to say it hasn't, I don't pay enough attention to it to say either way, but it would be a surprise. I've also just found out that The I is no longer owned by them. And hasn't been for a year. Odd that.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MrHarryCole/status/864612248635011072 Dennis Skinner ending his parliamentary career by losing his seat to a Tory would be quite something.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:03
|
|
|
Time to sit in a pub in Westminster and loudly proclaim the rise of international socialism I guess. I mean that seems to be the way to influence journalism.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:05
|
|
|
My uncle works at Labour and he said that Corbyn is going to lose his seat.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
Looke posted:Meanwhile in Oxford... Is being a female the easy mode of life? (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:Is being a female the easy mode of life? 
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:Is being a female the easy mode of life? You shouldn't post
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:18
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:Is being a female the easy mode of life? Wow.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
LemonDrizzle posted:https://twitter.com/MrHarryCole/status/864612248635011072 The votes of the Tory, Lib Dem and UKIP candidates all added together would not have beaten Skinner at the last election. It's nonsense.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
A non-medic using "female" in tyool 2017
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
Intrinsic Field Marshal posted:Is being a female the easy mode of life? Thread has reached peak Tory, nowhere to go but down from here folks 
Pochoclo fucked around with this message at 00:30 on May 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
They have a vagina and men have to work to get access to it. How is it fair? How is any of it fair? It's bullshit. Females literally have vagina welfare. No wonder they all love Stalin.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
Hi I work for the national vagina service
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
Namtab posted:national vagina service Sounds like a proper vote-winner
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
jabby posted:The votes of the Tory, Lib Dem and UKIP candidates all added together would not have beaten Skinner at the last election. It's nonsense. He has literally never had below 50% of the vote (2010). Check out that 81.55% in 1966 
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
jabby posted:The votes of the Tory, Lib Dem and UKIP candidates all added together would not have beaten Skinner at the last election. It's nonsense. Yeah it's inconceivable that it could happen.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
Pochoclo posted:Thread has reached peak Tory, nowhere to go but down from here folks It says everything you need to know about the Mail that I didn't realise IFM hadn't just quoted without attribution until I got to his name.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
Alt joke was the notional vagina service
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
namesake posted:Time to sit in a pub in Westminster and loudly proclaim the rise of international socialism I guess. I mean that seems to be the way to influence journalism. Nandos Journalism
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
There's a good quote by a second waver (I await TinTower's shocked reaction at that) that I can't find but basically amounts to "the justice system treats violence against women as a joke and violence by women as a joke, because it treats the idea of a woman as an agent as a joke."
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 01:12
|
|
|
Namtab posted:Hi I work for the national vagina service It's important to get regularly serviced: at least once every two years or ten thousand miles.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJGpBgWHEh8&t=9s
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 01:25
|
|
|
Listening to Richard Burgon on Newsnight was an exercise in frustration. First question: what would be the tax take as a percentage of GDP if Labour got into power and implemented all of it's policies? Second question: in what previous year was the ratio of tax take to GDP this high? Is it considered hard-hitting political interviewing now to pick a figure at random from either the manifesto or economy in general and then ask a politician to regurgitate it? She could just as easily have asked about the deficit, borrowing, total debt, debt to GDP ratio, etc. etc. It's just a cheap tactic that can only either embarrass someone or provide no useful information whatsoever.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 01:36
|
|
|
jabby posted:Listening to Richard Burgon on Newsnight was an exercise in frustration. First question: what would be the tax take as a percentage of GDP if Labour got into power and implemented all of it's policies? Second question: in what previous year was the ratio of tax take to GDP this high? Was this the first time you've ever watched television?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
Lord of the Llamas posted:Was this the first time you've ever watched television? I swear it's gotten a lot worse since Diane Abbott screwed up a figure she should have known. Now every interviewer is out to force a similar moment. Take McDonnell and Nick Robinson this morning. He was asked to give the deficit. He gave the actual figure from 15/16 and was proclaimed wrong because Robinson wanted the projected figure from 16/17. Even though the question was vague it sparked a slew of headlines about him getting the answer wrong, none of which said where McDonnell's answer came from. Robinson also accused him on-air of being passed a piece of paper, which McDonnell denied. That was widely reported in the press too. Robinson then went on to retract the accusation on Twitter after a crew member from the radio car told him McDonnell definitely wasn't passed anything. How is it reasonable to retract something on Twitter that was said on national radio and reported in national newspapers? It's lazy journalism that panders to headline writers, and it's a real shame to see the BBC indulging in it quite so much.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 02:01
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Don't think you need any photoshop to make Young Jeremy Corbyn a solid Would. Better then Tim Farron anyway. 
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 02:53
|
|
|
jabby posted:I swear it's gotten a lot worse since Diane Abbott screwed up a figure she should have known. Now every interviewer is out to force a similar moment. It's clearly to serve the Labour Has No Credibility and Can't Even Be Trusted With Basic Maths narrative they're pushing and it's so blatantly obvious when they do it that it makes me want to tear my loving hair out. And then their hair, one loving strand at a time in Nick Robinson's case, the baldy, speccy bastard oval office. gently caress knows what I'd do with Evan Davis, presumably I'd use long-nosed pliers for that stubbly pate of his. EDIT: nostril hairs, he must have nostril hairs, right? TomViolence fucked around with this message at 05:40 on May 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 05:30
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Don't think you need any photoshop to make Young Jeremy Corbyn a solid Would. 
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 05:50
|
|
|
On an individual level, it's obviously beneficial for women on trial that they frequently get more lenient sentences - although I wonder whether the judge's comments would have been the same here, if the future Dr Woodward had been from an ethnic minority or not attractive. But it is a problem, and one that (amusingly) both feminists and MRAs agree on, but probably for different reasons. I seem to remember reading that female defendants get more lenient sentences irrespective of whether the judge is a man or woman, so it is a societal/cultural issue.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
She's on the cover of the sun today, coincidentally they found a picture of her in a tank top not wearing a bra
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 06:38
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAzYn70jq8E
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 07:17
|
|
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:She's on the cover of the sun today, coincidentally they found a picture of her in a tank top not wearing a bra Of course. Christ, the papers are mad as hell at the Labour manifesto. That's how you know it's a good manifesto.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 07:44
|
|
|
On the plus side, I convinced my fiancée to vote for the first time ever. Unfortunately I see all the argument in the Furness constituency post Labour guarantee on Trident is that 'still can't vote for Corbyn, he won't use it so it's useless' 
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 07:54
|
|
|
Another Blairite talking down Labour's chances in the run up to the election:quote:The union boss set his close ally Jeremy Corbyn a target of holding onto just 200 parliamentary constituencies after 8 June, a performance which would be Labour's worst since 1935. The extent of Labour's ambition is clearly damage limitation at this point. Do we agree with Len that the worst Labour performance for over 80 years would be a good result?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 08:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 07:07 |
|
|
McCluskey said that Labour winning would be difficult given that it faces spectacular hostility from the media, and given that would probably doing pretty well to get ~200 MPs. I wonder which part of this statement has been focused on
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 08:04
|
|