|
fritz posted:I've been having to do javascript this last couple weeks and : no thanks it's amazing how a relatively simple language with essentially no standard library can be so painful to program in
|
# ? May 6, 2014 19:28 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 18:50 |
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:it's amazing how a relatively simple language with essentially no standard library can be so painful to program in standard libraries are arguably more important than language design e.g. why java is nicer than C#
|
# ? May 6, 2014 19:32 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:standard libraries are arguably more important than language design
|
# ? May 6, 2014 19:34 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:standard libraries are arguably more important than language design not arguably, clearly. the only reason it isn't a truism is the number of dilettantes on the internet. language design matters to the extent that it increases library quality & availability
|
# ? May 6, 2014 19:37 |
|
someone tell me where the java like language with the library options of python is
|
# ? May 6, 2014 19:57 |
|
Valeyard posted:someone tell me where the java like language with the library options of python is java?
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:00 |
|
Valeyard posted:someone tell me where the java like language with the library options of python is java is that language. (use groovy or scala if you want an interactive prompt / scripting features) python library availability is sad by comparison
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:02 |
|
i tried looking for java packages to deal with capturing images from webcam and almost everything either seemed dead or just straight up didn't work, it seemed like something that would have been easier to find is there a package manager for java like pip???
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:04 |
|
wait its maven isnt it
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:05 |
|
Valeyard posted:i tried looking for java packages to deal with capturing images from webcam and almost everything either seemed dead or just straight up didn't work, it seemed like something that would have been easier to find that might be weird because it's OS/webcam specific so you're gonna have to deal with drivers and stuff i'd think but it should still be straight forward i dunno though i dont do java did you look at this? http://webcam-capture.sarxos.pl/ DONT THREAD ON ME fucked around with this message at 20:09 on May 6, 2014 |
# ? May 6, 2014 20:06 |
|
Valeyard posted:i tried looking for java packages to deal with capturing images from webcam and almost everything either seemed dead or just straight up didn't work, it seemed like something that would have been easier to find webcams specifically are a rough point because of JMF. JMF came from Sun, so it became the de facto way to do all media stuff in java. not a lot of 3rd party competition, because why bother trying? the problem is that oracle abandoned JMF. so now in 2014 everything is bitrotten AND there is no obvious 3rd party choice
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:13 |
|
this is pretty much the story for everything client side that isnt javafx or opengl
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:14 |
|
Valeyard posted:wait its maven isnt it yes. its always maven.
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:31 |
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:that might be weird because it's OS/webcam specific so you're gonna have to deal with drivers and stuff i'd think but it should still be straight forward yeah that looks good. I'd try that one. it looks like its a wrapper around a couple of different java webcam implementations
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:36 |
|
are you trying to make JOmegle?
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:38 |
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:that might be weird because it's OS/webcam specific so you're gonna have to deal with drivers and stuff i'd think but it should still be straight forward Shaggar posted:yeah that looks good. I'd try that one. it looks like its a wrapper around a couple of different java webcam implementations yeah thanks i actually have that favourited, i think it is literally the only working one. from what i have seen it does seem...fine but more experiment is needed USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:are you trying to make JOmegle? lol no, i was just thinking of doing something ~fun~ with image recognition, like...trap sprung...some kind of app that you can photograph magic cards or w/e and it just catalogues them all
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:42 |
|
if its a client app do it in wpf instead. java is good but java uis are not.
|
# ? May 6, 2014 21:13 |
|
i think the chief greybeard here wrote a java webcam library for some project and still uses it in classes
|
# ? May 7, 2014 03:39 |
|
Shaggar posted:if its a client app do it in wpf instead. java is good but java uis are not. JMX is a pretty good UI imo
|
# ? May 7, 2014 19:12 |
|
Shaggar posted:if its a client app do it in wpf instead. java is good but java uis are not. ive done some checking lut of this and it looks a little elaborate for what I was thinking of. BUT ive been looking to do something with visual studio for a little while now anyway and this would be an excuse to learn some C# too
|
# ? May 7, 2014 19:19 |
|
xaml is own zone. data bind erry day. if u want ur poo poo to look rad use this: https://mui.codeplex.com/
|
# ? May 7, 2014 19:20 |
|
Shaggar posted:xaml is own zone. data bind erry day. ok yeah that looks great, I love the metro look
|
# ? May 7, 2014 19:26 |
|
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ps2oz8e4i7tqyg/IS3%20mock%20for%20UGS%202014%20Questions_2.pdf a mock paper for the exam i have tomorrow, the class was completely changed last year so we have to guinea pig it this time, which also happened last year with another class this class is ok but the poo poo they ask is jsut annoying
|
# ? May 7, 2014 19:31 |
|
Valeyard posted:https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ps2oz8e4i7tqyg/IS3%20mock%20for%20UGS%202014%20Questions_2.pdf wish you'd send your posts to the gulf of execution
|
# ? May 7, 2014 19:52 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:wish you'd send your posts to the gulf of execution
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:22 |
|
you know what? gently caress git. i'm fine spending 6 hours making a menu item float properly. i spend 5 minutes with git and i want to break something. gently caress linus, gently caress linux and open source. quote:git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree i know most man pages are condescending but holy poo poo.
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:29 |
|
looking at those questions, i think your uni class is a piece of poo poo
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:32 |
|
PleasureKevin posted:you know what? gently caress git. that is dumb, maybe this thread will be of greater help tho
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:33 |
|
PleasureKevin posted:you know what? gently caress git. dont use the man page just google the thing you want to do and someone on stack overflow tells you how to do it i've never even seen the dang man page i just go 'how do i undo push to remote branch !urgent'
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:33 |
|
MeruFM posted:looking at those questions, i think your uni class is a piece of poo poo ok good, i was just making sure it wasnt just me
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:33 |
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:just google the thing you want to do and someone on stack overflow tells you how to do it computer jobs 101
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:34 |
|
Valeyard posted:https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ps2oz8e4i7tqyg/IS3%20mock%20for%20UGS%202014%20Questions_2.pdf 1) i dont know the answers to their history of user interface questions but i dont really care, i think if i did care i could learn it pretty quickly 2) i'm more concerned with the || symbol on 2(a). does it have some special meaning or did a programming professor decide to just confuse people by arbitrarily using it there? 3) don't you guys have a haskell compiler you should be working on??
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:37 |
|
Shaggar posted:computer jobs 101 i could, given a long time, read the git manpage and "git-r-done" but why
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:38 |
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:i could, given a long time, read the git manpage and "git-r-done" Conceptually understanding an important tool to programming is paramount to being a good software engineer Or something... I don't know I'm one of the terrible programmers
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:40 |
|
Careful Drums posted:Conceptually understanding an important tool to programming is paramount to being a good software engineer i do understand it there's a git repo the repo contains many branches, and each branch has commits if i submit a commit, and it conflicts with another commit (which is what git keeps track of idk how they do it i dont think it's timestamps!!) then i have to merge the conflicts (this is the hard part) then there's about 10,000 different commands lines none of which you need. the most important ones are 'i just hosed something up and then pushed it to the remote branch, what do i do' and 'okay save'
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:44 |
|
but git isn't a programming language or IDE*. it's a high-tech "share button" that should "just work" without me having to study it. * unless it is, in which case gently caress it even more.
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:48 |
|
if u have a big team u should probably have one person who understands git pretty well (not me)
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:49 |
|
so you can give them wedgies?
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:51 |
|
man pages are completely unreadable. google forever
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:53 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 18:50 |
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:i do understand it merging is actually p simple. if you have two commits c0 and c1 and a common ancestor a, you calculate the diff of c0 and a and split that up into blocks of changes calculate the diff of c1 and a and split that up into blocks of changes you dont care about blocks that changed in neither diff if a block changed in one diff but not the other, take the changed version if it changed in both diffs but it changed to the same thing, just take the change if it changed in both but the changes arent equivalent, then panic and tell the dev to fix it
|
# ? May 7, 2014 21:54 |