|
Winner? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas |
|
32 | 14.88% |
| Green Bay |
|
51 | 23.72% |
| Nazi Germany |
|
75 | 34.88% |
| Khmer Rouge |
|
57 | 26.51% |
| Total: | 215 votes | ||
|
fat greasy puto posted:no need to cuss, he had clear control of the ball and only lost it when he reached. just saying, they made the right call on the field and then fouled it up, just like last week No, they did not make the right call on the field. It was over turned as he obviously lost control of the ball during the catch when it hit the ground.mike pereira agreed with the call and so has the current head of officiating. It was a no brainer the way the rule is written dude.
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 21:33 |
|
|
fat greasy puto posted:no need to cuss, he had clear control of the ball and only lost it when he reached. just saying, they made the right call on the field and then fouled it up, just like last week The reach doesn't really count towards making the catch though. For example, if he had caught the ball while upright, reached forward, and immediately dropped the ball, would you call that a fumble? fat greasy puto posted:aside from all that, does anyone know why romo didn't target his wideouts more? we all know dez is a playmaker and it seems like terrance williams was hot, why so many targets for witten today? because GB has pretty good corners and garbage ILBs.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:09
|
|
|
fat greasy puto posted:aside from all that, does anyone know why romo didn't target his wideouts more? we all know dez is a playmaker and it seems like terrance williams was hot, why so many targets for witten today? The Dom Capers scheme. Jimong5 posted:because GB has pretty good corners and garbage ILBs.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:10
|
|
|
Thank god the Packers have no choice but to cut Jones and Hawk in the offseason. Barrington and a rookie here we come. Maybe a Chillar like signing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:13
|
|
|
Watching the game on DVR and LOL at Joe Buck saying "Cole Beasley is like a Welker in his prime." Dude had 420 yards and 4 TDs this season... Nothing like a Welker in his prime.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:19
|
|
|
Hand Row posted:Thank god the Packers have no choice but to cut Jones and Hawk in the offseason. Barrington and a rookie here we come. Maybe a Chillar like signing. Who will be there at ILB late in the 1st round? Anyone worthy of that high of a selection?
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:21
|
|
|
Benardrick McKinney out of Ole Miss and Denzel Perryman from Miami are some decent looking prospects.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:32
|
|
|
Jimong5 posted:The reach doesn't really count towards making the catch though. For example, if he had caught the ball while upright, reached forward, and immediately dropped the ball, would you call that a fumble? his knee was down before he reached so no, he had control of the ball when he reached
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:46
|
|
|
Brannock posted:The Dom Capers scheme. i dunno if i have a guy like dez id try to work him into the game with short stuff and slants and let hom try and make a play, better than having witten barely moving out there
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
If the Cowboys owner wasn't so vehemently opposed to having full time referees, maybe they'd get the rules right when it mattered most for the Cowboys.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 04:56
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 07:19
|
|
|
BGrifter posted:Only from salty fans of bad football teams. It's pretty fantastic really. Its gonna be great when the Seahawks win next week on a questionable call and I empty quote this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 08:22
|
|
|
Mrit posted:Its gonna be great when the Seahawks win next week on a questionable call and I empty quote this. Lol at the idea of this possibility helping you get over the loss. e: how enraged will you be if a questionable call wins the game for the Packers? And what if that call was identical to the Dez Bryant play, but it was Jordy Nelson and they called it a catch.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 08:31
|
|
|
Mrit posted:Its gonna be great when the Seahawks win next week on a questionable call and I empty quote this. The Seahawks don't need questionable calls to win next week. Rodgers is hurt and even 100% healthy Seattle is probably the better team.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 08:32
|
|
|
Butthead posted:Lol at the idea of this possibility helping you get over the loss. Since I thought Dez Bryant's catch should have been a catch, I would be mad that we lost, but couldn't really complain. Edit: Honestly, I think the Seahawks have a better chance against Green Bay anyways. But that should have been a catch.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 08:41
|
|
|
BGrifter posted:The Seahawks don't need questionable calls to win next week. Rodgers is hurt and even 100% healthy Seattle is probably the better team. yeah the only way packers win is if both Wilson and Lynch go down and the packers have no turnovers which, uhhh, isn't happening
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 10:20
|
|
|
Mrit posted:Its gonna be great when the Seahawks win next week on a questionable call and I empty quote this. Or you could just empty quote any Packer fan post from two years ago instead.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 10:46
|
|
|
fat greasy puto posted:his knee was down before he reached so no, he had control of the ball when he reached The problem is that when you're falling down, it's too problematic to say "Well, it seems like he had control." The only way to be consistent is to see a clear-cut catch, which is maintaining control through the process.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 12:49
|
|
|
bwahaha ^^ Grabs ball with 2 hands, takes 3 steps forward, switches hands with the ball, reaches out with the ball.......somehow, not a catch. GG NFL. That subjective "rule" gets changed this off season without a doubt.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 16:03
|
|
|
Josh Lyman posted:Knees and elbows don't matter when you're falling down while making a catch. He was asking about a hypothetical situation with a fumble, the only reason I used the knee being down in my post. Sorry for any confusion
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 16:17
|
|
|
fat greasy puto posted:He was asking about a hypothetical situation with a fumble, the only reason I used the knee being down in my post. Sorry for any confusion I just bring it up because the catch is a separate act from his knee being down. That's what the whole rule is about, and the point I was trying to make.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 16:57
|
|
|
Boon posted:The bandwagonest of teams? Hes right, it is.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
FrankenVader posted:bwahaha ^^ It's too bad he couldn't hold onto it like Cobb did.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
Knightmare posted:It's too bad he couldn't hold onto it like Cobb did. Haha, excellent troll
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 21:33 |
|
|
Knightmare posted:It's too bad he couldn't hold onto it like Cobb did. I wonder if they overturn the call if the ball doesn't pop out at the end
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2015 19:16
|
|