|
Are you a This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| homeowner |
|
39 | 22.41% |
| renter |
|
69 | 39.66% |
| stupid peace of poo poo |
|
66 | 37.93% |
| Total: | 174 votes | ||
|
fong posted:They need more Paul Henry. I want to see Paul Henry on my TV while I eat breakfast, I want to hear him on my radio on the way to work and I want him on TV by 6pm when I turn on the news. I want to see his smug face grinning down at me while I drink my morning coffee. I won't be happy until every person in the country has been surgically altered to look like Mike Hosking.
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 10:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 03:50 |
|
|
Vote Paul Henry 2015 for gooberest goober that ever goobered
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
The man is a loving goober is what I'm saying why are you on TV Paul Henry isn't there like a goober convention your sposed to be at
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 00:06
|
|
|
Lock Paul Henry in a cage with a 50s sitcom interior on Tuesday's you can pay a dollar to watch him pratfall and drop Ming vases and throw pebbles at him for extra
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
That? Oh that's just the new Paul Henry I got it giggles retardly and shits itself in a vaguely racist way tv3 sent it to me after I mailed them an envelope filled with belly button lint and ignorance
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
That's a lot of bats
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
Please remember your meds.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 01:13
|
|
|
The Australian Aborigines believe that every time Paul Henry's photo is taken it steals a piece of the world's collective soul
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
I'm not going to accuse Paul Henry of being a pedophile without any evidence but
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 05:45
|
|
|
Xik posted:I'm not going to accuse Paul Henry of being a pedophile without any evidence but But even if he is, is that really reason to deny him a constant overwhelming presence in the lives and minds of all New Zealanders
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
Xik posted:I'm not going to accuse Paul Henry of being a pedophile without any evidence but #nzpol
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 06:04
|
|
|
Somfin posted:But even if he is, is that really reason to deny him a constant overwhelming presence in the lives and minds of all New Zealanders
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
I bet john key could get away with loving a pig
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 05:23
|
|
|
he'd loose out in the unfunny comedian demographic tho
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 05:43
|
|
|
Who would be New Zealand's Princess that would get kidnapped before he'd do it though?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 05:54
|
|
|
Richie McCaw.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 05:56
|
|
|
They'll break Richie McCaw's knees unless JK has sex with Mike Hosking
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 06:19
|
|
|
As if the three of them aren't constantly frotting each other already
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 06:58
|
|
|
You're not a real bloke till you've had a bloke.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 07:07
|
|
|
All good things cum in threes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 07:14
|
|
|
Interesting
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
OK, Key's an rear end, but I'm not going to stand by everything I said seven years ago and I wouldn't expect anyone else to. What is this about?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
Leospeare posted:OK, Key's an rear end, but I'm not going to stand by everything I said seven years ago and I wouldn't expect anyone else to. What is this about? When your statements are "here's exactly what I am going to do in power and why" then you don't loving do it you should be held accountable No one gives a gently caress what you stand by because you're not the lying shitsack running this country.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
Also maybe not saying you stand by everything all the time so people will stop catching you out.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
It'll be different! This time he won't get away with it! 
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
Leospeare posted:OK, Key's an rear end, but I'm not going to stand by everything I said seven years ago and I wouldn't expect anyone else to. What is this about? "Does he stand by all his statements" is a standard primary question; if they're any more specific he's liable to transfer them to another Minister. The 7 years thing is new and I think valid if we're talking about broken election promises etc, but I'm guessing it's mostly designed to counter the "Labour did X", "Labour had 9 years to do X" excuses, which the Nats continue to use even in tyool 2015. But the most interesting thing is that a) all questions are directed at Key and b) it shows opposition parties actually working together. It's also enough of a gimmick that it might actually make the 6:00 news 
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
Leospeare posted:OK, Key's an rear end, but I'm not going to stand by everything I said seven years ago and I wouldn't expect anyone else to. What is this about? Basically if the primary question is about anything specific then he will fob it off on to the relevant minister. E.g if it is about a Kim Dotcom related this he will deflect it to Finlayson who will just shrug it off since he wasn't responsible for the GCSB at the time. By getting him to say he stands by his statements then on the supplementals they can try to nail him on a specific statement.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
It gets really pathetic too:quote:Does she stand by the Prime Minister's statement that "I'd hate to see New Zealanders as tenants in their own country"; if so, how many applications by overseas investors to buy land were declined under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 between January 2012 and June 2015? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dee5Rr5L40
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
At least John will be working for his money today instead of leaving at 2:05
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:43
|
|
|
Did Gerry Brownlee really just say that Helen Clark answered questions from the opposition rather than shuffle them to the rest of her cabinet because she was more competent than her cabinet?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:43
|
|
|
Ghostlight posted:Did Gerry Brownlee really just say that Helen Clark answered questions from the opposition rather than shuffle them to the rest of her cabinet because she was more competent than her cabinet? That's what I heard too. I first thought "incompetence". But "Head and shoulders in competence above anybody else." edit: Jesus, Carter really gets me frustrated whenever I see almost anything from the House. Spiteski fucked around with this message at 03:50 on Sep 22, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:46
|
|
|
It's no wonder John Key and David Cameron are such good friends: David gets the pig's head and John gets the pigtail.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:52
|
|
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:It's no wonder John Key and David Cameron are such good friends: David gets the pig's head and John gets the pigtail. lol if you think Key would ever get invited to gently caress a pig head by anyone important.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
Unlike Barons I appreciate the pun.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
 Christ
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10653798 http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11516977 What was going badly in June 2010 that the National Party felt it needed a distraction?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 07:09
|
|
|
I'm going to take a gamble and go for 'Everything', Alex. Sweet Jesus, this country. I might even go so far as to say that Key's the Prime Minister this lovely lot deserve.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 07:28
|
|
|
Clearly the Wellington City Council is full of Nat supporters who want to offer Key a platform for a distraction.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 08:10
|
|
|
Exclamation Marx posted:http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10653798 Has anything in this country not been going badly since about November 2008?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 10:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 03:50 |
|
|
Capital gains on Auckland property.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 20:31
|
|