|
Pac-Manioc Root posted:there were some stand-out performances on that show under the same writers and directors tho so maybe the problem... is her i didn't watch the terminator show 
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 13:04 |
|
|
Moridin920 posted:I feel like people need to be a little more Kubrick and a little less budget watching don't want to upset the talent idk. If she doesn't put up a good performance in a scene that's also on the director for letting it go and not giving her direction and retaking until it's right. Anyone remember when Bungie got Peter Dinklage hot off early GoT fame to be the buddy bot in Destiny and the performance was so awful they ended up redoing the entire role, post-release, with a fresh VA in an update. Then again maybe we can still blame the direction because Destiny just sucked all around.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:43
|
|
|
Chomp8645 posted:Anyone remember when Bungie got Peter Dinklage hot off early GoT fame to be the buddy bot in Destiny and the performance was so awful they ended up redoing the entire role, post-release, with a fresh VA in an update.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:45
|
|
|
listen i just think she's real cute ok sue me
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:45
|
|
|
Zane posted:nah. the core of star wars is joseph campbell monomyth stuff. and the genre influence of serial action adventure movies and tv shows. if you don't have that then you just have a generic sci fi setting and franchise inertia. Which is fine. Not every movie needs to be the original movie in tone. You've got a generic universe to do all kinds of wacky space adventures in. Do we really always need the same thing? Every single time? Esp. with this much timeline to work with? Like you said the influence was generic serial action movies and TV shows...... that went on for years and did exactly what I'm talking about. I mean it's not exactly like cinema is overflowing with successful sci-fi universes right now. Are you really going to be upset watching a kick rear end space-crime movie if it happens to be in the Star Wars universe?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:45
|
|
|
Blazing Ownager posted:ED: Long story short Kathleen Kennedy is awful at this and should go back to producing. For whatever reason in all of Hollywood it seems like only Fiege has any loving idea what he's doing with this. Love, hate or not care about the Marvel movies there's no arguing they are wa, way better handled as a franchise. It is perplexing that she still has a job. All I've ever heard about the movie business adds up to everyone being afraid to take any kind of risk for fear of having your name attached to so much as a single failure. Kathleen Kennedy made one movie for the price of two. She has to be blackmailing someone, right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:48
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:listen if you had just said she pretty and look good stripped down for a scalding bath instead of trying to defend her acting boner-fides, i would have just high fived you and moved on with my life
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:48
|
|
|
Zane posted:it's funny how dinklage is in a bunch of stuff now. because he isn't a great or even necessarily a good actor. he was just lucky enough to have caught lightning in a bottle. and i'm wondering how long of a wave he'll be able to ride. I don't know, I kind of think he's the kind of actor that'd been an actor even if he was just a regular dude. I don't know why you think he's bad. Chomp8645 posted:Anyone remember when Bungie got Peter Dinklage hot off early GoT fame to be the buddy bot in Destiny and the performance was so awful they ended up redoing the entire role, post-release, with a fresh VA in an update. I've got to blame both the direction and the bullshit story of Destiny, and the fact you need an experienced voice actor for something like that. I'm so glad I never got into Destiny
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:49
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:i just think she's real cute ok sue me There's very few goons that'd argue that point, and if they did, they'd be wrong.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:50
|
|
|
Chomp8645 posted:Anyone remember when Bungie got Peter Dinklage hot off early GoT fame to be the buddy bot in Destiny and the performance was so awful they ended up redoing the entire role, post-release, with a fresh VA in an update. peter dinklage was great as the ghost and he played it as a cynical robot because the character is a cynical robot they got nolan loving north to come in and redo the whole thing, as if i needed more nolan north in my loving life, and he played the role as "hey i'm nolan north, you might remember me from every video game released in the last five years, this time i'm a floating robot haha!" also dinklage is a fine actor, i've never seen game of thrones but i really liked him in the station agent and elf
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:51
|
|
|
viral spiral posted:Also Emilia Clarke is the female version Jai Courtney yeah not sure how she keeps getting work.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:52
|
|
|
peter dinklage would have been a better lead for solo: a star wars story than the guy they have
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:52
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:yeah not sure how she keeps getting work. Moridin920 posted:listen
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:53
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:yeah not sure how she keeps getting work. Not sure if you know this but she was in Game of Thrones.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 22:56
|
|
|
Blazing Ownager posted:I still think the whole thing would have been better if like he said, it started with the heroes in charge, then the Empire shows back up and uses it's laser and now they're on the run. The structure of the movies starting with a resistance and poo poo is so insanely bullshit that the entire universe is built on a completely unstable foundation. well they sort of did, TFA had a Republic that presumably had its own military and was running the show, while Leia's group was essentially portrayed as a hardliner faction continuing to duke it out with the First Order (which the movie was vague on the size/power of) TFA hosed up showing us this rather than telling, but even if it was an unstable foundation it was something that could have been expanded upon in a second film by, say, having Leia's faction integrate (or conflict) with the Republic's military (which might be leaderless) that is now in open conflict with a rearmed space germany going HAM on the galaxy the Republic is supposed to be defending - since star wars is WW2 in space treat the planets getting blown up in the first film as pearl harbor or the first european blitzkreig attacks and then actually showing some loving star wars TLJ took a big steaming poo poo on this though by just having the First Order become the Empire again offscreen while the Rebellion is reduced to a half-dozen ships (and inexplicably large bomber fleet) led by the most incompetent fuckers imaginable, and the Republic is nowhere to be seen
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:04
|
|
|
Chomp8645 posted:Not sure if you know this but she was in Game of Thrones. she's the worst part about it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:09
|
|
|
food court bailiff posted:peter dinklage would have been a better lead for solo: a star wars story than the guy they have They're saving him for the Willow reboot.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:32
|
|
|
Cnut the Great posted:But Rey should have an arc. This should be her story, and Finn's story, and Poe's story. Luke already had his arc in the OT. This movie just regresses him, just as it regressed Han Solo in TFA, and for the same reason: These films have absolutely no idea what to do with the new characters, and so they have to lean on the old characters as crutches. And in so doing, they end up damaging the old characters and rendering the triumphant, optimistic ending of the OT depressing and pointless. Same
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:43
|
|
|
food court bailiff posted:peter dinklage would have been a better lead for solo: a star wars story than the guy they have
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:48
|
|
|
Cnut the Great posted:But Rey should have an arc. She's in the middle of hers. Specifically she's at the point where the main villain has called out her problem (that she has extreme abandonment issues and an obsession with being The One). She doesnt have a short arc in TLJ because she served as the foil for Luke's arc. quote:This should be her story, and Finn's story, and Poe's story. Why 'should' it be about them alone? What differentiates what you've said from any of the myriad of people who constructed their own internal TFA sequel, and judged TLJ against that?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:54
|
|
|
Zane posted:it's funny how dinklage is in a bunch of stuff now. because he isn't a great or even necessarily a good actor. he was just lucky enough to have caught lightning in a bottle. and i'm wondering how long of a wave he'll be able to ride. lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:56
|
|
|
food court bailiff posted:peter dinklage would have been a better lead for solo: a star wars story than the guy they have It'd be this  but for two hours I would watch the gently caress out of it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:59
|
|
|
Palpek posted:It will be such a shame if the Solo movie turns out to be bad, oh wait That's a lot of Star Wars. Soon it'll just be a routine for a lot of people to go to the yearly Star Wars movie. At least in our Godless universe we can keep up traditions.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 00:06
|
|
|
food court bailiff posted:the thing that SW has really been missing is sex scenes with full penetration and i must reiterate how glad i am that solo: a star wars story breaks down that longstanding barrier Al Borland Corp. posted:The bad news is it's in a Clint Howard scene food court bailiff posted:it's chewie i'm most excited for. the flamboyantly green anus i mentioned earlier, it haunts my thoughts, like some half-remembered song from my youth. I just want to see Greedo in someone's anus. That is to say, I want to see Greedo buttfuck Clint Howard and/or Chewie. It'll paint his untimely death in ANH with a sad undertone, knowing that Chewie's life debt to Han prevents him from avenging his deceased lover. In the case that it's Clint Howard, he can be inserted in the Mos Eisley scene as one of the Bith jizzers rushing over to Greedo's still-smoking corpse to hold him in one final embrace.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:05
|
|
|
*young han getting buttfucked by a young whatever species greedo is* *young not-greedo cums, is murdered by young han* i always shoot first you bugeyed bitch
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:12
|
|
|
good post
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:14
|
|
|
NOT!
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:14
|
|
|
Nefarious 2.0 posted:good post heck yeah this is so ni what the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:15
|
|
|
bloom posted:*young han getting buttfucked by a young whatever species greedo is* If only young not-greedo had given Han a reacharound with his suction cup fingers. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:18
|
|
|
Bogus Adventure posted:If only young not-greedo had given Han a reacharound with his suction cup fingers. You'd think they'd have made a gun that works better with sucker fingers than the one he was using.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:33
|
|
|
I'm predicting SOLO will be just as bad and worthless as Terminator Genisys
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:36
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:You'd think they'd have made a gun that works better with sucker fingers than the one he was using. I'm sure this will be addressed in Greedo: A Star Wars Story, written by Bret Easton Ellis, directed by the Wachowskis, and starring Daniel Day Lewis as a young Greedo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:37
|
|
|
Greedo would be physically incapable of shooting a blaster using those idiot alien hands. I expect Disney to resolve this problem by removing his blaster shot entirely in the special special edition of New Hope and making Han the cold blooded scum murderer that he is.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 01:43
|
|
|
han gives greedo the kiss of death
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 02:06
|
|
|
Mozi posted:han gives greedo the kiss of death On Greedo's suction-cupped cock.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 02:07
|
|
|
Palpek posted:
Exactly like the original release version. If Disney did this and still churned out the mediocre product they are right now that would be fair enough.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 02:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 13:04 |
|
|
Neurolimal posted:She's in the middle of hers. Specifically she's at the point where the main villain has called out her problem (that she has extreme abandonment issues and an obsession with being The One). She doesnt have a short arc in TLJ because she served as the foil for Luke's arc. None of this comes across very forcefully. It's an anemic arc. It's a formality. Rey is barely a character. Nothing about her feels real. She's a cipher who we're repeatedly told has character traits but never displays them in an emotionally convincing way. And while I can at least recognize that she's supposed to have abandonment issues, I can only LOL at the idea that she has "an obsession with being The One." That is not at all a strongly communicated or acted aspect of her character. Neurolimal posted:Why 'should' it be about them alone? What differentiates what you've said from any of the myriad of people who constructed their own internal TFA sequel, and judged TLJ against that? Because it's a new story and it should be about new characters and new things. I don't care about whatever you're going on about with that last bit and I'll pointedly ignore it. Automatic Slim posted:Exactly like the original release version. If Disney did this and still churned out the mediocre product they are right now that would be fair enough. LOL Han was never a cold-blooded murderer and people claiming that he was are ironically the greatest argument for Lucas making the change. Congrats on being dumbasses. That dumb edit is your own drat fault.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 04:44
|
|