|
richard wolff's november meeting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPv8gpZSpqI
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 13:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 13:20 |
|
punk rebel ecks posted:I think you guys aren't showing libertarianism the respect it deserves. It's a legitimate political philosophy. Come to the libertarian thread, we have such wonders to show you.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 14:27 |
|
Donna Brazile seems to be taking the Dick Morris route to Clinton-hating fame. It's kinda pathetic.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 14:47 |
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:Come to the libertarian thread, we have such wonders to show you. is it in cspam
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 14:48 |
|
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 14:51 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:
Ralph Northam was such a mediocrity that he had to be carried by downticket candidates lol
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 14:55 |
|
Agean90 posted:is it in cspam It is not, but as I've said elsewhere just because a thread is in D&D that does-*is immediately tarred and feathered*
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:13 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:19 |
|
Rand Paul got owned
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:22 |
|
Cerebral Bore posted:Ralph Northam was such a mediocrity that he had to be carried by downticket candidates lol Now look, you can't prove that. No one can. It's just as likely that he excited enough downballot people into running
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:26 |
|
Cerebral Bore posted:Ralph Northam was such a mediocrity that he had to be carried by downticket candidates lol Northam outperformed the entire downticket
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:34 |
|
I think Northam was a mediocre candidate who ran a pretty bad campaign but had enough decent positions to be able to reap the rewards of running against a historical unpopular president.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:39 |
|
GOOD TIMES ON METH posted:I think Northam was a mediocre candidate who ran a pretty bad campaign but had enough decent positions to be able to reap the rewards of running against a historical unpopular president. Most importantly, he had a D next to his name in a wave election
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:40 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:Northam outperformed the entire downticket No, he didn't: https://twitter.com/samstein/status/928275979428036608 Dems won house elections 53 to 44, while Northam won by 54 to 45, a similar margin. But there were about 11 house races without a democrat on the ballot.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:47 |
|
Maybe Northam'll surprise us like McAuliffe did? I can still remember everyone holding their nose over a Hillary bagman being elected governor.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:51 |
|
joepinetree posted:No, he didn't: There's were like 30 races without a Republican. But in competitive races Northam outperformed most Delegate races. Some by quite a bit (Danica)
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:52 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:But in competitive races Northam outperformed most Delegate races. Concerned Citizen posted:Northam outperformed the entire downticket "Most" "Entire" E: VVV I'm relatively new here, thanks (unironically)
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:54 |
|
WampaLord posted:"Most" you're forgetting the most important thing about the suck zone: immediately disregard anything cc says
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:55 |
|
https://twitter.com/RoseAnnDeMoro/status/928411303135215621
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:58 |
|
WampaLord posted:"Most" I meant the statewides but he outperformed every Delegate with a Republican I've seen, but I haven't looked at all of them and there's probably a few out of 100 where the Dem did better
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 15:58 |
|
immediately
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:07 |
|
"Yeah well if you stop being flagrantly bought off by us, we'll just have to stop buying you off, what do you say to that??? " e: wait does not work anymore
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:10 |
|
I think something was wrong with that specific post I can't edit smilies into it either but the s in the quote still work for some reason
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:12 |
|
i think there's a limit on smilies and quoted posts count
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:17 |
|
i've never heard of this guy but apparently he's a big time landlord so
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:17 |
|
https://twitter.com/GideonResnick/status/928629276798275588 “If you’re to the left of Barry Goldwater, Republicans are going to call you a socialist anyway, so you may as well just own the label." “If you’re to the left of Barry Goldwater, Republicans are going to call you a socialist anyway, so you may as well just own the label." “If you’re to the left of Barry Goldwater, Republicans are going to call you a socialist anyway, so you may as well just own the label."
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:17 |
|
Well Lowtax is going broke, for a second I thought maybe he had to cut some costs and didn't clear the bar
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:18 |
|
Lawman 0 posted:immediately
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:20 |
|
https://twitter.com/politico/status/928643614074392577
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:26 |
|
Over Easy posted:So I procured the Donna Brazile audiobook and I am 3 hours in and you have got to listen to it. She says gently caress and drat the correct number of times and her quips are like when James Carville makes sense. wait, is this story supposed to make Donna Brazile look good? the duck is dumb, but not "go on a long profanity-filled rant about how they need to get rid of it" dumb. she's way madder about a guy in a duck suit than she was about the rigging of the goddamn primaries. of course, shes not mad because it's dumb, she's mad because it pisses off her corporate overlords. in the end, she only manages to get rid of the duck by claiming that they'll piss off a big corporate donor and lose out on some of that sweet sweet campaign cash. truly, an unsung progressive hero
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:35 |
|
i dont think it makes her look good, i do think it's funny as all gently caress how mad she gets about that drat duck + the reveal that it was basically hillary's pet tactic that folks were too scared to talk to her about
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:37 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:wait, is this story supposed to make Donna Brazile look good? the duck is dumb, but not "go on a long profanity-filled rant about how they need to get rid of it" dumb. she's way madder about a guy in a duck suit than she was about the rigging of the goddamn primaries. of course, shes not mad because it's dumb, she's mad because it pisses off her corporate overlords. in the end, she only manages to get rid of the duck by claiming that they'll piss off a big corporate donor and lose out on some of that sweet sweet campaign cash. truly, an unsung progressive hero I also thought the part where she didn't want to deal with the duck because she was trying to enjoy being waited on by several handsome professional athletes whose boss wanted to curry favor with her was maybe in poor taste but no one else said anything about that so
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:39 |
|
For comparison, imagine if Howie Dean mentioned in a book that he didn't want to deal with such-and-such issue from the Obama camp because some Hollywood producer was having some aspiring starlets cook him brunch that's skeevy as hell, right? This is basically the same thing
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:42 |
|
i'm not surprised no one told her "no" on the duck. it's not worth really fighting over. if you give the candidate low-cost things they want, it's easier to say "no" when it's something actually consequential
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:43 |
|
this duck thing is breaking my brain, and not for the reasons brazile intended we're all going to die because a handful of people don't know how to function in human society
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:52 |
https://i.imgur.com/iBEGXNo.gifv
|
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:53 |
|
hello it has been a while since i have posted in the suck zone
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 16:56 |
|
loquacius posted:I also thought the part where she didn't want to deal with the duck because she was trying to enjoy being waited on by several handsome professional athletes whose boss wanted to curry favor with her was maybe in poor taste but no one else said anything about that so honestly it just makes the whole passage funnier, several tall sportsmen making breakfast for a neurotic women pacing the floor going "that duck, that loving duck!!" is such a bizarre image
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 17:05 |
|
Business Gorillas posted:hello it has been a while since i have posted in the suck zone you can go but you’ll never leave the succ zone
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 17:09 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 13:20 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:wait, is this story supposed to make Donna Brazile look good? the duck is dumb, but not "go on a long profanity-filled rant about how they need to get rid of it" dumb. she's way madder about a guy in a duck suit than she was about the rigging of the goddamn primaries. of course, shes not mad because it's dumb, she's mad because it pisses off her corporate overlords. in the end, she only manages to get rid of the duck by claiming that they'll piss off a big corporate donor and lose out on some of that sweet sweet campaign cash. truly, an unsung progressive hero It doesn't make Donna look good, but it also makes Hillary's desire for the duck seem really loving dumb. And the whole "ABC/Disney donates to us and there's a copyright issue" part is the cherry on top. They only stopped because the donors threatened them.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2017 17:20 |