Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Primus
May 14, 2007

Greater than the sum of his parts.

McGavin posted:

Please tell me you didn't get a variable rate mortgage in early 2022. The writing was clearly on the wall regarding future rate hikes by then.

Yes I was/am the idiot. I got worn down by years of everyone around telling me I was worrying about nothing and bla bla bla. I made my bed and I’ll lie in it. We’re not in financial distress nor will we be anytime soon, so I consider it a cautionary tale for others to not be so stupid.

I still think the stress test was too easy to pass, and I still think the GDS is too generous.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes

McGavin posted:

Please tell me you didn't get a variable rate mortgage in early 2022. The writing was clearly on the wall regarding future rate hikes by then.

What's the clear writing on the wall now? BoC stops raising rates because households are at breaking point, americans keep raising and canadian dollar tanks? I'd love to hear your thoughts cause I have no idea

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

I got a variable rate in 2020, but our mortgage is like $1600 a month so even with a big rate hike we won't be homeless or anything. I hope.

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Postess with the Mostest posted:

What's the clear writing on the wall now? BoC stops raising rates because households are at breaking point, americans keep raising and canadian dollar tanks? I'd love to hear your thoughts cause I have no idea

gently caress if I know. We're in uncharted territory. Lots of variables like what you mentioned plus inflation and the war in Ukraine.

From 2020 to early 2022 the BoC rate was 0.25%. It's pretty hard to go down from there. The only question was how much it was going to increase and how fast.

large hands
Jan 24, 2006
We got fixed 2% in 2020 and will definitely put any extra cash that comes our way down on the mortgage. But we put %30 down and the assessment has gone up a quarter million since, so I'm not too worried, although it will suck getting any size mortgage at 6% or w/e.

redbrouw
Nov 14, 2018

ACAB
Bought a townhouse at 1.39 for 370k until March 2026 in West end Toronto on the subway. Then all my friends packed up and left.

I want my friends to come back home. Crash, baby crash.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

redbrouw posted:

Bought a townhouse at 1.39 for 370k until March 2026 in West end Toronto on the subway. Then all my friends packed up and left.

I want my friends to come back home. Crash, baby crash.
When did you buy and where about? I live in the west near near the subway and I'm trying to think of the last time I saw townhomes for that cheap. Maybe 2010 or so?

redbrouw
Nov 14, 2018

ACAB

Mr. Apollo posted:

When did you buy and where about? I live in the west near near the subway and I'm trying to think of the last time I saw townhomes for that cheap. Maybe 2010 or so?

I had help from a dead parent and in laws that were seriously considering fleeing Hong Kong and substantial savings of my own from living like a gremlin goon. The 370k was just the mortgage.

Edit: all of the help was predicated on it being used to buy a house and make grandchildren, or take care of them in bad times. So I can't really consider it an opportunity cost. Regardless, I bought a house and then got pinned like a bug on a board while all my friends left.

redbrouw fucked around with this message at 23:34 on Jan 23, 2023

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

Mr. Apollo posted:

When did you buy and where about? I live in the west near near the subway and I'm trying to think of the last time I saw townhomes for that cheap. Maybe 2010 or so?

Same, I haven’t seen anything like that since I moved back in 2016.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

redbrouw posted:

The 370k was just the mortgage.
Ah, got it. That makes sense.

Segue
May 23, 2007

Even just as a renter it sucks as all my friends having kids increasingly bug out to the burbs chasing homeownership and more bedrooms. But they've all gone to different suburbs so there's not even a point to moving to be near them because they all chose different residential wastelands

I guess that's just part of life, but man it sucks when cities can't sustain their people.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




Segue posted:

Even just as a renter it sucks as all my friends having kids increasingly bug out to the burbs chasing homeownership and more bedrooms. But they've all gone to different suburbs so there's not even a point to moving to be near them because they all chose different residential wastelands

I guess that's just part of life, but man it sucks when cities can't sustain their people.

Contrariwise, see the discussion some time back in this thread about how downtown Vancouver was never designed with the expectation that people would raise their kids there, but the population of kids has exploded over the past twenty years, and now they're having a problem of not enough schools. Versus the (near/City of Vancouver) suburbs, which have almost halved the numbers of kids.

(Not contradicting the bit about it sucking when cities can't sustain their people tho. There are also plenty of stories of folks just outright leaving due to cost/availability of daycare too.)

HookShot
Dec 26, 2005

Primus posted:

Yes I was/am the idiot. I got worn down by years of everyone around telling me I was worrying about nothing and bla bla bla. I made my bed and I’ll lie in it. We’re not in financial distress nor will we be anytime soon, so I consider it a cautionary tale for others to not be so stupid.

I still think the stress test was too easy to pass, and I still think the GDS is too generous.

I think calling you an idiot for making this decision is harsh, too. Sure, in hindsight it wasn't the best financial move, but if interest rates were still hanging around zero then you'd be ahead.

Hindsight is 20/20 and making decisions that have repercussions five years down the road is not always a given.

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

The inflation rate was ticking up steadily throughout 2021, so there was no way interest rates were going to stay at 0.25% for much longer. It was pretty obvious.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

We got a 5 year fixed because I was sure there was no way things could stay that low

We then went on to have a kid and are eyeing up fixes and renovations and a van

I guess it’s a good thing I’ll have my upgrade before we get a new, higher rate

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

Postess with the Mostest posted:

What's the clear writing on the wall now? BoC stops raising rates because households are at breaking point, americans keep raising and canadian dollar tanks? I'd love to hear your thoughts cause I have no idea

If it were me today getting a new mortgage or renewing I'd get a fixed for like 2 or 3 years. My guess at this moment of time is that things may rise slightly more, then stagnate and the hope would be that by year three things have declined.

Re: stress test. I'm sure there's plenty of people whom passed the stress test and can "technically" afford to pay 6% or whatever we're at now who are nonetheless Not Happy to have to do so.

OFSI is considering changes...

I love the spin here from the Mortgage Brokers that "boy you'd better Buy Now before it's Too Late!" I'm sure there is absolutely no news where that is not their recommendation.

quote:

Tougher mortgage qualification rules may be coming this year — and some brokers fear a wave of panic buying

As Canada’s banking regulator considers tighter rules for mortgage lending, a “panic” could be coming as some borrowers rush to get into the housing market before it becomes even more difficult.

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) unveiled a consultation last week with three proposals aimed at ensuring borrowers actually have the money to cover the debt they take on — and restricting Canada’s banks from lending to those on the margins.

Consumer debt has increased dramatically in recent years, said OSFI, warning that could bring risks to the finances of federally regulated banks, which hold about 80 per cent of all residential mortgages.

The consultation is open until April 14 and any changes are unlikely to take effect until later in the year, but mortgage brokers expect some clients to make a move before then.

“I think this news from OSFI will create a bit of a panic in the market where buyers that are sitting on the sidelines are probably going to be moving forward a little quicker than they anticipated,” said Victor Tran, a mortgage broker and real estate expert for rate comparison website RATESDOTCA. “I can see a rush before the spring market.”

That’s because the tweaks to the bank financing rules could force some borrowers to put down larger down payments, reduce the size of the mortgage for which they qualify, or push them toward non-bank lenders that charge higher interest rates and offer shorter-term loans.

...

OSFI is seeking input on three measures that could affect borrowers’ ability to service their debt obligations. One focus is on limits on either mortgage debt relative to borrowers’ total income or on overall indebtedness relative to income.

The banking regulator said that a loan-to-income (LTI) ratio of 450 per cent or more is “high” and it’s considering limiting new loan originations that exceed that threshold to no more than 25 per cent per quarter.

OSFI is concerned because high LTI loan originations have accounted for an industry-wide average of 34 per cent since the pandemic, up from a pre-pandemic average of 24 per cent.

The regulator is also looking at making changes to the mortgage stress test and considering limits on debt service obligations (e.g. monthly payments of principal and interest) as a percentage of borrowers’ income.
...

Defenistrator
Mar 27, 2007
Ask me about my burritos
Naked short selling isn't a crime dear scumlord. :agesilaus:

Fidelitious
Apr 17, 2018

MY BIRTH CRY WILL BE THE SOUND OF EVERY WALLET ON THIS PLANET OPENING IN UNISON.

Femtosecond posted:

If it were me today getting a new mortgage or renewing I'd get a fixed for like 2 or 3 years. My guess at this moment of time is that things may rise slightly more, then stagnate and the hope would be that by year three things have declined.

Re: stress test. I'm sure there's plenty of people whom passed the stress test and can "technically" afford to pay 6% or whatever we're at now who are nonetheless Not Happy to have to do so.

OFSI is considering changes...

I love the spin here from the Mortgage Brokers that "boy you'd better Buy Now before it's Too Late!" I'm sure there is absolutely no news where that is not their recommendation.

Nice, that all sounds like good stuff. Protect people from themselves while also having a slight impact on driving housing prices lower (maybe?).

I'm biased here because this will only help me have less competition.

mojo1701a
Oct 9, 2008

Oh, yeah. Loud and clear. Emphasis on LOUD!
~ David Lee Roth

Segue posted:

Even just as a renter it sucks as all my friends having kids increasingly bug out to the burbs chasing homeownership and more bedrooms. But they've all gone to different suburbs so there's not even a point to moving to be near them because they all chose different residential wastelands

I guess that's just part of life, but man it sucks when cities can't sustain their people.

This is why I started putting more effort into my career. It's a depressing reality but if I'm never going to have a stable base of social networks, then I might as well just take that time and chase designations, certifications, and additional courses to pad my resume to afford inevitable rent increases when I have to jump from one job to another.

Cold on a Cob
Feb 6, 2006

i've seen so much, i'm going blind
and i'm brain dead virtually

College Slice

mojo1701a posted:

This is why I started putting more effort into my career. It's a depressing reality but if I'm never going to have a stable base of social networks, then I might as well just take that time and chase designations, certifications, and additional courses to pad my resume to afford inevitable rent increases when I have to jump from one job to another.

This was me, then i burnt out and now I'm at a job way beneath my ability and my salary reflects it. :/

Hubbert
Mar 25, 2007

At a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Come now, my friends, there is more than enough debt for all of us - whether we are sacred homeowners or horrible renters!

RBC
Nov 23, 2007

IM STILL SPENDING MONEY FROM 1888
Comical post on reddit, surely everyone can handle these interest rate increases. After all, canadians have definitely not taken on too much debt:

quote:

First time home owners, we’ve had our home for 13 months.
Purchased with a mortgage of $960,000 on a variable rate of 1.35% at the time. 25 yr amortization, 60 month term.
Since then, it’s increased to 5.6% and we have a balance of $936,309. With each and every single BOC rate hike, we’ve worked with our mortgage specialist (in writing) to increase our payments accordingly so that we are kept on track with our contracted amortization schedule. For reference:
$3,772.10 Dec 1 2021, 1.35% interest
$3,772.10 Jan 1, 1.35% interest
$3,772.10 Feb 1, 1.35% interest
$3,772.10 Mar 1, 1.35% interest
$3,883.68 Apr 1, 1.6% interest
$4,115.90 May 1, 2.1% interest
$4,362.85 June 1, 2.6% interest
$4,362.85 July 1, 2.6% interest
$4,842.76 Aug 1, 3.6% interest
$4,842.76 Sept 1, 3.6% interest
$5,230.18 Oct 1, 4.35% interest
$5,500.00 Nov 1, 4.85% interest - EDIT: actual payment $5,230, plus $270 as lump sum
$5,500.00 Dec 1, 4.85% interest - EDIT: actual payment $5,230, plus $270 as lump sum
$6,230.00 Jan 1 2023, 5.35% interest - EDIT: actual payment $5,230, plus $1,000 as lump sum

RBC
Nov 23, 2007

IM STILL SPENDING MONEY FROM 1888
oh and they're also a landlord and renting out their basement in vancouver lmao

quote:

First-time landlords, vetted thoroughly, called all 4 references etc (minus a credit check - will do next time). First tenant, 4 months in with ongoing issues, summarized below.

Has paid part of his rent late 3/4 months.

Abuse of utilities. Heat at 28° C (included, I know - lesson learned) with window/door often cracked open. We put in Smart Thermostats, (max temp 22° C).

Shouted at me about how there is no way it is 22° C. Told him we'd come down with a thermometer to ensure. All of a sudden its "all good now". He clearly bought a space heater (not allowed in contract), as room temp often upwards of 25° C.

Leaves trash around outside his door, vs. putting it in the trash can & sorting his recycling around other side of house (accessible).

Opened the door to us with a vape in hand (not allowed in contract).

Smoking weed in the suite, or right outside it. When we went down (and texted so its on record) that this is a non-smoking suite as per our contract, he said oh sorry I was standing outside and it must have blown in. Note it was a very potent smell inside our house.

Garbage piled up in kitchen.

Fidelitious
Apr 17, 2018

MY BIRTH CRY WILL BE THE SOUND OF EVERY WALLET ON THIS PLANET OPENING IN UNISON.

RBC posted:

Comical post on reddit, surely everyone can handle these interest rate increases. After all, canadians have definitely not taken on too much debt:

I guess at least this example can handle it. But still.
I just don't understand who buys into a variable when there's basically nowhere lower to go. The up side is that it might go down a tad and save you a few hundred dollars, the down side is technically unlimited but realistically even an increase of 2-3% is highly possible.

RBC
Nov 23, 2007

IM STILL SPENDING MONEY FROM 1888

Fidelitious posted:

I guess at least this example can handle it. But still.
I just don't understand who buys into a variable when there's basically nowhere lower to go. The up side is that it might go down a tad and save you a few hundred dollars, the down side is technically unlimited but realistically even an increase of 2-3% is highly possible.

Can they? They're relying on a tenant that pays late every month for at least a thousand a month. And parents money to buy:

quote:

... we borrowed $200k from our parents to get into the market...

The more I read their post history the funnier it gets. It's like the perfect example of everything wrong with the canadian housing market right now.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

We found out that the people we bought our house from, who according to the rumour mill sold due to being in heavy consumer debt, bought a local McMansion that had been on the market for years and was considered extremely overpriced, likely using the proceeds they gained from selling to us combined with flipping the next house they bought and sold exactly one year later.

Fidelitious
Apr 17, 2018

MY BIRTH CRY WILL BE THE SOUND OF EVERY WALLET ON THIS PLANET OPENING IN UNISON.

RBC posted:

Can they? They're relying on a tenant that pays late every month for at least a thousand a month. And parents money to buy:

The more I read their post history the funnier it gets. It's like the perfect example of everything wrong with the canadian housing market right now.

Ah okay, I didn't realize there was more to your quote. Just because they managed their payments to keep their amortization period I figured they were at least in decent shape.

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

quote:

With each and every single BOC rate hike, we’ve worked with our mortgage specialist (in writing) to increase our payments accordingly so that we are kept on track with our contracted amortization schedule.

I'm so confused by this person. Who loving cares about being "kept on track" with your amortization schedule? Why on earth would you subject yourself to this?

oh no I'm paying more interest to the bank!

Who gives a poo poo? Just let the amortization go out longer.

Why is this person so deadset on paying off their home in exactly 25 years?

Unless it's a specific special product, variable rate mortgages have fixed payments and this persons' woes are entirely self inflicted because they're being a weirdo.

Now obviously they're not terribly likely to get 1.36% on renewal in five years time, but thats a future issue. Seems a lot better to me to to deal with that then (when interest rates are likely less) than to put yourself in extreme financial pain now (and for several years until renewal)

They hosed up and made the wrong choice and now they're gonna have to pay more interest to the bank. Oh Noes! That they've decided that they'll never give more money to the bank and are now penniless is their decision and not one that is being forced on them.

Femtosecond fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Jan 29, 2023

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

Fidelitious posted:

I just don't understand who buys into a variable when there's basically nowhere lower to go. The up side is that it might go down a tad and save you a few hundred dollars, the down side is technically unlimited but realistically even an increase of 2-3% is highly possible.

Selecting variable can also be a bet on neutrality, that vaguely everything will mostly stay about the same. Typically variable rates are at a discount to fixed, pricing in the risk that they could go higher. So this is why so many folks point to the data showing variable often outperforms fixed, in that typically rates don't change, so if you have a discounted rate that doesn't change you do better, even if the rate rises slightly.

So even if we were still in a low interest rate environment with little movement opportunity to the downside at all, if you thought that the rate wasn't gonna go up or down in the next few years, variable could still be a good bet.

(interestingly we're now in an environment where this is inverted, as the expectation is for lower rates in the future, and so variable is more expensive than fixed.)

Does anyone know if as part of a Banks' risk assessment process if they ever restrict the purchaser from selecting a variable rate because it's too risky? I thought this was true, but maybe this sort of risk check was ostensibly captured by the stress test (which we've now passed lol).

qhat
Jul 6, 2015


If the interest rate is lower it’s because the bank considers it a less risky (for them) to give you. Lender doesn’t really care about whether you can afford a 3 point increase, they are only going to sell the mortgage to an investment bank hopefully for a profit, which is really the only criteria they care about when deciding who gets a loan.

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

qhat posted:

If the interest rate is lower it’s because the bank considers it a less risky (for them) to give you. Lender doesn’t really care about whether you can afford a 3 point increase, they are only going to sell the mortgage to an investment bank hopefully for a profit, which is really the only criteria they care about when deciding who gets a loan.

Looking around at the mechanisms of how Canadian Banks bundle and re-sell mortgages and I found this passage which I find interesting.

quote:

...in Canada, payments from mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed by the Canada Mortgage Housing Corporation CMHC (and by extension, the Canadian government). Furthermore, in order to further protect Canadian [Mortgage Backed Securities] MBS from default, it is only loans that are insured against default, either by necessity or by the borrower's choice, that are eligible to be pooled for the purpose of an MBS. This, along with restrictions such as the mortgage stress test, make investing in Canadian mortgages very robust and secure, so long as the government has the ability to back up their guarantees.
https://www.canadianrealestatemagazine.ca/expert-advice/canadian-mortgagebacked-securities-explained-335026.aspx

The immediate question that comes to mind is whether there are any other mechanisms at all by which the banks are able to repackage and resell mortgages that don't have CMHC insurance. If they don't have any other options well that sort of puts a lid on the amount of risk that the banks can indulge in. If it's too much for CMHC then they can't do it, and those buyers are going to have to go elsewhere to MICs (or maybe credit unions?).

I've always been under the impression that banks are extremely reluctant to put themselves into some sort of situation where someone is going to default and they have to go to the effort and drama to foreclose yada yada and this is the reason (along with regulations forced on them ie. stress test) that drives them to be cautious, but if they're only able to resell "low risk" mortgages at all well that would certainly drive the banks away from the high risk stuff.

Fuzzy Mammal
Aug 15, 2001

Lipstick Apathy

Femtosecond posted:

I'm so confused by this person. Who loving cares about being "kept on track" with your amortization schedule? Why on earth would you subject yourself to this?

oh no I'm paying more interest to the bank!

Who gives a poo poo? Just let the amortization go out longer.

Why is this person so deadset on paying off their home in exactly 25 years?

Unless it's a specific special product, variable rate mortgages have fixed payments and this persons' woes are entirely self inflicted because they're being a weirdo.

Now obviously they're not terribly likely to get 1.36% on renewal in five years time, but thats a future issue. Seems a lot better to me to to deal with that then (when interest rates are likely less) than to put yourself in extreme financial pain now (and for several years until renewal)

They hosed up and made the wrong choice and now they're gonna have to pay more interest to the bank. Oh Noes! That they've decided that they'll never give more money to the bank and are now penniless is their decision and not one that is being forced on them.

I bet their mortgage has an amortization trigger point that when the interest takes up too large a precent of the payment (possibly >100%) then the payment jumps. I doubt they'd be doing that if they didn't have to.

HookShot
Dec 26, 2005

RBC posted:

Can they? They're relying on a tenant that pays late every month for at least a thousand a month. And parents money to buy:

The more I read their post history the funnier it gets. It's like the perfect example of everything wrong with the canadian housing market right now.
Given the size of their mortgage the place cost over a million which means they needed to have 20% down, not that they can’t afford it. Do you really expect the average Canadian to have $200k saved up and just sitting around even if they can afford the monthly payments on a property? No, and it’s one of the problems caused by this housing bubble that ensures that the poor can’t get a toe in, because if you require a large deposit you make it less likely that people who don’t have access to generational wealth can buy, even if they earn enough money to pay the mortgage.

linoleum floors
Mar 25, 2012

Please. Let me tell you all about how you're all idiots. I am of superior intellect here. Go suck some dicks. You have all fucking stupid opinions. This is my fucking opinion.
Yes I absolutely expect someone who can carry a million dollar mortgage to be able to save 200k.

Change thread title to "discriminating against the poor with a one million dollar mortgage."

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

Seems bad.

Some real remarkable stats here about just how much rent control is keeping a lid on rent appreciation from seriously insanely spiking.

quote:

There are fewer apartments available to rent in Canada than at any time since 2001

Canada’s apartment vacancy rate dropped to 1.9 per cent last year, the lowest level in more than two decades as the country took in additional newcomers and many residents were priced out of the real estate market.

That was well below the 3.1 vacancy rate in 2021, when the country started to reopen after the end of pandemic border restrictions and government shutdowns. It marks the tightest rental market since 2001 when the vacancy rate was 1.7 per cent, according to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp’s annual rental report released on Thursday.

“The message I am getting is that there is severe stress in the rental system,” said Aled ab Iorwerth, CMHC’s deputy chief economist, who helped lead the research for the report.

The country’s largest rental markets were under particular stress, with Toronto’s apartment vacancy rate dropping to 1.7 per cent last year from 4.4 per cent in 2021; Montreal falling to 2.3 per cent from 3.7 per cent and Vancouver declining to 0.9 per cent from 1.2 per cent.

CMHC said this was a reflection of higher net migration, the return of postsecondary students to the campus and the spike in borrowing costs. Higher mortgage rates have meant that many residents could not qualify for a mortgage and had to stay in their rental unit. Together, the demand for rentals far outstripped the spurt in new housing built over the past year.

The report is based on an in-depth survey of apartment buildings in 37 of the country’s largest metropolitan areas. The survey is conducted every October and collects rental prices, turnover and vacancy-unit data from building owners and managers. The figures apply to apartment units that are specifically built for renting. Many of these buildings are older and are cheaper to rent than condos that are owned and rented out by individual investors.

CMHC found that 21 of the 37 metropolitan areas had a rental vacancy rate at or below 1.9 per cent, including many parts of Ontario such as Hamilton, Kitchener-Waterloo, Kingston, Peterborough, Windsor and London.

In some areas, bidding wars have erupted for rentals, intensifying the competition and pushing up lease rates across the country. The national average monthly rental price for a two-bedroom rose 5.6 per cent to $1,258 last year. Gatineau and Halifax saw rents climb by more than 9 per cent year over year.

Toronto and Vancouver continued to command the highest rents, with Vancouver averaging $2,002 monthly, followed by Toronto at $1,765 and Victoria at $1,699.

For the first time, CMHC looked at how much landlords raised rental rates after a tenant vacated the unit. Although there are numerous anecdotes about landlords jacking up the rent after a tenant leaves, it has never been measured across the country.

The report found that average annual rental rate across the country increased by 18.2 per cent when the apartment unit was turned over to a new tenant. That compared with an average increase of 2.8 per cent when the tenant remained in the unit.

The difference was even greater for Vancouver, Halifax and Toronto and several smaller cities in Ontario. There, the average annual rental price increased by more than 20 per cent after the tenant left. (In Toronto, the rental increase after a turnover was nearly 30 per cent.)


Mr. ab Iorwerth said he was surprised by the results. He had been expecting a jump but not at this magnitude.

In contrast, in Edmonton, which has a large supply of rental-only housing, the pace of rental costs was the same, at 1 per cent.

“The message I am getting is that there is a severe shortage of rental buildings. It is a clear signal from the market that more supply is needed,” said Mr. ab Iowerth.

Because there is a shortage of apartments specifically designed for rental, condos have increasingly become a major supplier of rentals. Condos accounted for 19.3 per cent of the total rental stock in the country, with those units making up the largest share in Vancouver, at 42.5 per cent.


I dunno maybe we should build some more homes for people to live in? :shrug:

But then if we did that developers would make money which is bad so I guess we should do nothing.

COPE 27
Sep 11, 2006

Femtosecond posted:

Seems bad.

Some real remarkable stats here about just how much rent control is keeping a lid on rent appreciation from seriously insanely spiking.

I dunno maybe we should build some more homes for people to live in? :shrug:

But then if we did that developers would make money which is bad so I guess we should do nothing.

I look forward to hearing about how building more homes won't create more homes again itt

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

Despite the alarming big number headline, bankers seem pretty unperturbed about the whole situation in this article from a few days ago.

quote:

Tens of thousands of Canadians could default on mortgages due to rising rates, bank CEOs say


According to the CEOs of the country’s largest banks, tens of thousands of Canadian borrowers could be vulnerable to defaulting on their mortgages as rates rise and homeowners struggle to make monthly payments.

Scotiabank’s incoming CEO said about 20,000 of the bank’s borrowers could be vulnerable, which represents about 2.5 per cent of the bank’s mortgage customers. The CEOs of several of Canada’s other big banks also said Monday that small percentages of their borrowers are at risk, potentially adding up to tens of thousands of Canadians.

On top of that, millions of the banks’ other borrowers are likely to face financial pain this year and next as they renegotiate fixed-rate mortgages or make ever-higher monthly payments on variable-rate loans.

Still, the bank CEOs, speaking at a daylong conference hosted by RBC, emphasized that they don’t expect a wave of mortgage defaults to seriously impact their own bottom lines.

“This is not a bank credit issue. This is an issue of consumer lifestyle,” said CIBC CEO Victor Dodig. “More money will have to go from discretionary spending to interest expense.”

The CEOs said that household savings built up during the pandemic, a strong labour market and an overall increase in home values in recent years should provide a cushion for most of their mortgage customers.

They said only a small percentage of borrowers — BMO’s Darryl White put it at 1 per cent for his bank while RBC’s Dave McKay pegged it as being in the “low single-digit percentage” range — are “vulnerable” to default.

Dave McKay is the president and CEO of RBC.

Those customers tend to have low credit scores and own homes that are not worth much more than their mortgages.

Scott Thomson, who will take over the top job at Scotiabank on Feb. 1, said the bank’s estimated 20,000 vulnerable borrowers should be a “manageable-type situation for us.”

The number of Canadians who actually fall into arrears of three months or more on their mortgage payments is historically low — it hovered between around 0.25 and 0.5 per cent of mortgage holders for most of the past two decades, according to the Canadian Bankers Association. In any given month over that time period, a range of about 10,000 to 20,000 mortgages were in arrears.

When it comes to higher payments, Dodig gave a few examples, noting that fixed-rate mortgage holders renegotiating this year can expect to pay an average of about $350 more per month while variable-rate mortgage payments will go up by about $700 per month.

On the bright side, Dodig said, the mortgage stress test (introduced by the federal government in early 2018 to guard against a rapid rise in interest rates) means that most customers facing renewals had to prove they could carry loans with interest rates of between about 5.2 and 5.4 per cent.

That’s only slightly below the rate they’ll be looking at for a new five-year, fixed-interest rate mortgage (about 5.45 per cent) and not far off from what they might pay for a variable-rate mortgage (6.05 per cent). In short, it might hurt, but they’ve already proven they can probably afford it.

McKay said more than 50 per cent of RBC’s variable-rate mortgage holders will have a “trigger impact,” meaning their monthly payments no long cover anything but interest.

In those situations, borrowers have to make a change, likely increasing their payments, but McKay said the bank’s careful look at its own extensive customer data suggests “the cash flow is there to absorb it and the collateral is there to absorb it to a large degree.”

Resilience in Canada’s labour market — the country added 104,000 jobs in December, Statistics Canada said Friday — should also help, McKay said, noting there is still a “strong demand for jobs.”

“We still have significant demand in construction, retail, hospitality and health care,” he said. “So if you’re displaced in one sector there is a job in this economy for you and that’s different than other recessions that we’ve been through.”

The big bank CEOs generally said they expect a mild recession at worst but added that they’re prepared for a more significant downturn.

They all said they have been able to adapt to new requirements to keep more capital on hand announced in December by the federal banking regulator, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions.

Peter Routledge, who leads the regulator, said during a speech at the conference that OSFI increased the capital requirement because it would “rather err on the side of acting too early than be criticized for acting too late.”

He said OSFI is prepared to respond to changing market conditions quickly and also noted that it is launching a review this week of mortgage-underwriting rules that will consider whether measures that go beyond the stress test are needed.

Routledge said he wants to ensure Canada’s banks are prepared for worse-than-expected credit losses, but he generally sounded an optimistic note, pointing to the recent jobs report and noting, “We’re not in bad times notwithstanding what you may read every day in various journals and newspapers.”

Routledge said he was “staggered” by how low Canada’s mortgage delinquency rate is, pointing to CBA numbers from September that show just 0.14 per cent of Canadians were in arrears on their mortgage payments at the time.

“The notion that we’re dealing with a calamity the likes of which we saw in the United States and other countries in the 2007 to 2009 period is just not realistic from my standpoint.”


To be honest, with the Bank of Canada's recent dovish comments, this attitude may be already out of date, and they might be even more optimistic about the situation now as the sentiment seems to be an expectation that from here on interest rates will stagnate and decline.

HookShot
Dec 26, 2005

linoleum floors posted:

Yes I absolutely expect someone who can carry a million dollar mortgage to be able to save 200k.

Change thread title to "discriminating against the poor with a one million dollar mortgage."

I’m not going to look it up because effort, but at 1.35% interest with the stress test my guess is needed household income would have been around $160-170k. That still requires >one full year of earnings. My parents first house COST them less than a year of earnings TOTAL. Not deposit. Total. This is a problem and it affects everyone who doesn’t have generational wealth.

HookShot fucked around with this message at 03:39 on Jan 30, 2023

tagesschau
Sep 1, 2006
Guten Abend, meine Damen und Herren.

RBC posted:

parents money to buy

I wonder what the odds are that the parents had to borrow this money.

HookShot posted:

Do you really expect the average Canadian to have $200k saved up and just sitting around even if they can afford the monthly payments on a property?

Slightly more than 10% of Canadian households have that kind of money available (not tied up in real estate or retirement funds). That by itself should make it obvious that homes in Toronto cannot possibly all sell for a million dollars, or anything remotely close to that number.

When the prices are fueled by borrowing instead of savings, what happens when the borrowing goes away and/or gets more expensive? It ain't "number go up."

COPE 27 posted:

I look forward to hearing about how building more homes won't create more homes again itt

You can just admit you didn't understand the post instead of continuing to embarrass yourself, y'know.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Femtosecond posted:

Even with all the boomers dying and our lack of natural growth, StatsCan still sees population growth as a giant up and to the right.

Will be real interesting to see what happens if Canada does slip into a real recession. I see that as the only real event that will induce some real severe price declines, but along with that will be a lot of very Big Problems so I suspect none of us will really be able to capitalize on such an event.


a part of me unironically wants to see the US shoot itself in the face via the debt ceiling

because that's one of the few things that would for sure blow up the asset mkt

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply