Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
LanceHunter
Nov 12, 2016

Beautiful People Club


Badger of Basra posted:

Straus was unanimously reelected speaker. As in, even the conservatives who always complain about him openly voted for him.

I don't know if this means that Strauss exacted sufficient retribution on the people who tried to oust him last time and everyone has fallen in line out of fear, or if even the crazies in the house realize that letting in a pro-Patrick speaker would lead to inevitable and massive ruin for the state.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

LanceHunter posted:

I don't know if this means that Strauss exacted sufficient retribution on the people who tried to oust him last time and everyone has fallen in line out of fear, or if even the crazies in the house realize that letting in a pro-Patrick speaker would lead to inevitable and massive ruin for the state.

The TribCast folks speculated that the conservatives probably realized they couldn't realistically beat him and didn't want to abstain because then Straus would be able to gently caress them over. I'm not sure if it was Straus's people or the conservatives who wanted a public vote though - they could have just done it by acclamation.

Hot Dog Day #91
Jun 19, 2003

I have some respect for Strauss. When I worked for a house democrat, Strauss came by and briefed in private. Very respectful, very knowledgeable of some of the..flaws... of his colleagues. There's a reason the democratic minority supports him.

blue squares
Sep 28, 2007

And you got the impression he was being genuine with the Rep you worked with rather than just saying what he knew you wanted to hear?

Hot Dog Day #91
Jun 19, 2003

blue squares posted:

And you got the impression he was being genuine with the Rep you worked with rather than just saying what he knew you wanted to hear?

Yes. It was a republican super majority year and my rep had a thing she needed done (legislatively and personally). He had no reason to help her, but he did. She appreciate it.

I know it's anecdotal, but he seemed genuinely kind. That's not to say I'd support him at all if we had a chance at a democratic house/speaker. But of all the house republicans, he's my favorite.

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.
Isn't he reasonably well liked by the democrats in general?

Spacebump
Dec 24, 2003

Dallas Mavericks: Generations
For the second time, the gov has decided his opinion matters more than Texans' votes.
http://www.statesman.com/news/local/abbott-seek-law-remove-texas-sheriffs-who-don-help-immigration-officials/B3KdvqZqi8XclXg7VvKg9I/

Jiro
Jan 13, 2004


I swear to God Abbot is such an annoying shitheel. I really really hope someone can knock him and Patrick out of the Gubernatorial office.

Nancy
Nov 23, 2005



Young Orc
He's doing a "State of the State" right now in the House, and Rep. Thompson behind him is pretty funny contrast as he's spewing his dumb bullshit. He's also making GBS threads all over the Senate and House budgets.

She went from polite light clapping to sitting during all of the ovations and very obvious non-clapping.

FBS
Apr 27, 2015

The real fun of living wisely is that you get to be smug about it.

I was browsing through the Governor's Budget http://gov.texas.gov/budget and he's really going after local government:

Greg Abbott posted:

REGULATORY REFORM
Businesses need regulatory certainty to make investments and create jobs. To achieve this certainty, the state must enact laws that reduce and restrain burdensome regulations that hinder economic growth. However, reducing state regulations alone will not protect the Texas economy. In a pro- business state like Texas, the greatest threat to economic growth is not the state’s already reasonable regulatory regime — it is overreaching local regulations that strangle businesses and drag out even simple permitting processes for unimaginable amounts of time. Consequently, the state must act to restrict cities, counties and special districts from maintaining and expanding this unseemly patchwork quilt of bans, rules and regulations that are eroding the Texas model. These regulations have resulted in the loss of millions of dollars in economic growth and have subjected people who reside in affected areas to burdensome costs. This loss of economic revenue directly correlates to a loss in wages and jobs, not to mention an unsavory regulatory climate that is anathema to Texas’ pro-business principles. The legislature must enact critically necessary reforms that will restrict local government regulatory regimes from micromanaging business and threatening private property rights.

LOCAL CONTROL
If local control is interfering with economic freedom, it is the job of the state to intervene and create a regulatory climate that actually makes sense for our citizens, rather than hinders their lives. It is time that we create a streamlined process under which affected citizens have a real stake — and a real voice — in the local regulatory process. The governor proposes to give citizens that stake in the process by first imposing an independent economic impact analysis so that voters know the actual economic cost of their locality’s new regulation. With the benefit of that knowledge, citizens can then petition for an election and hold local governments accountable to the voters, who would be given the opportunity to vote down the regulation in question before it negatively impacts the local economy.

To further protect Texas homeowners’ and business owners’ private property rights, the governor proposes to waive sovereign immunity so that individuals who are financially harmed by local ordinances can challenge them in court. Finally, the governor proposes to cut through bureaucratic red tape by imposing an expedited permitting process at the local level. Under this proposal, local governments could not drag out the permitting process for weeks or months, but would instead be required to make a final determination on any and all permits within 30 days of the property owner’s application submission. Accomplishing these proposals would give true meaning to the words “local control” because far greater control would lie in the hands of the voters — not municipal bureaucrats.

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

He's doing it so he can turn the screws on people like the Travis County Sheriff because they're doing things he doesn't like. So it's not okay when the Federal Government tells him what to do, but gently caress the municipal governments if they don't get in line.

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.
Waiving sovereign immunity would be such a poo poo show

Number Ten Cocks
Feb 25, 2016

by zen death robot

No Safe Word posted:

He's doing it so he can turn the screws on people like the Travis County Sheriff because they're doing things he doesn't like. So it's not okay when the Federal Government tells him what to do, but gently caress the municipal governments if they don't get in line.

The Constitution of the United States specifically reserves powers to the states and limits the federal government. Most state constitutions, oddly enough, don't do that to sub-state entities. So it's literally anc constitutionally not ok (sometimes) when the feds tell him what to do, and constitutionally just fine when he pushes municipal governments around.

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

Number Ten Cocks posted:

The Constitution of the United States specifically reserves powers to the states and limits the federal government. Most state constitutions, oddly enough, don't do that to sub-state entities. So it's literally anc constitutionally not ok (sometimes) when the feds tell him what to do, and constitutionally just fine when he pushes municipal governments around.

I'm not saying he can't do it, I'm saying it's hypocritical when he does do it.

Hot Dog Day #91
Jun 19, 2003

EwokEntourage posted:

Waiving sovereign immunity would be such a poo poo show

It would provide me with job security though, as a specialist attorney in how local ordinances cause financial/developmental harm (not a joke).

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


Lighting a fire under planning and zoning commissions would be a net positive. I know he wants to primarily stop the intentional foot-dragging which is done to try and discourage development without actually banning it (often done to placate local NIMBY groups or) but at least in Austin there are significant delays caused by sheer incompetence and a culture of "not our problem if it takes so long".

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

https://twitter.com/GregAbbott_TX/status/826833495989305345

Welp, looks like we don't need courts for testing legality of things, just swing the big dick

Parachute
May 18, 2003

No Safe Word posted:

He's doing it so he can turn the screws on people like the Travis County Sheriff because they're doing things he doesn't like. So it's not okay when the Federal Government tells him what to do, but gently caress the municipal governments if they don't get in line.

See also: That Denton fracking ban that ultimately failed.

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.

No Safe Word posted:

https://twitter.com/GregAbbott_TX/status/826833495989305345

Welp, looks like we don't need courts for testing legality of things, just swing the big dick

Can't test it unless Abbott does it first

illcendiary
Dec 4, 2005

Damn, this is good coffee.

No Safe Word posted:

https://twitter.com/GregAbbott_TX/status/826833495989305345

Welp, looks like we don't need courts for testing legality of things, just swing the big dick

It's less swinging and more dragging across the seat

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

EwokEntourage posted:

Can't test it unless Abbott does it first

You can sue them and get them a court order to compel them to act, and then you can take punitive measures.

Or just take punitive measures first and then hope you don't get sued

LanceHunter
Nov 12, 2016

Beautiful People Club


Today would have been Sandra Bland's 30th birthday. KERA's Think has a podcast episode on police interaction with the black community in Texas.

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

Travis County is crowdfunding to replace what Abbott took away

I agree with the blog post that it's good and bad. Good that they can band together and do something, bad for the example it sets and unsustainable :sigh:

Spacebump
Dec 24, 2003

Dallas Mavericks: Generations
Don't elect political outsiders with no experience to run things. Corpus Christie learned this the hard way.
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/02/09/corpus-christi-new-mayor-resigned-after-37-days-what-happened

https://www.texastribune.org/2017/02/09/corpus-christi-mayor/

TapTheForwardAssist
Apr 9, 2007

Pretty Little Lyres
Yesterday I went to a lobbying day in Austin for Texans for Responsible Marijuana Policy (backed by NORML and MPP); they had 200 folks pre-register and 350 showed up to visit their senators and reps, so pretty good turn-out. Mainly the goal was to support two bills, one to reduce cannabis criminal penalties to civil penalties, and one to substantially expand Texas' weaksauce MMJ program.

If you're interested in the topic, sign up for their mailing list for any future events. I'm planning to attend a Veterans cannabis lobbying day in two weeks, use some of my ARE TROOPS! cred to help nudge policy.

https://www.texasmarijuanapolicy.org/

Spacebump
Dec 24, 2003

Dallas Mavericks: Generations
It's a long shot but does anyone here know anybody in the SA area that speaks Arabic?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

So ICE has been conducting a secret roundup in Austin today. Cool, totally normal.

Greg Casar said they are looking for bilingual volunteers to help, send a message to his official page if you have some time to spare.

LanceHunter
Nov 12, 2016

Beautiful People Club


No Safe Word posted:

Travis County is crowdfunding to replace what Abbott took away

I agree with the blog post that it's good and bad. Good that they can band together and do something, bad for the example it sets and unsustainable :sigh:

All of this is law enforcement money that's being taken away, and a chunk of that was going to broken-window policy things like anti-sex work efforts. I'll throw in another donation to the Red Umbrella Fund instead of this crowdfunding effort.

EDIT:

Badger of Basra posted:

So ICE has been conducting a secret roundup in Austin today. Cool, totally normal.

Greg Casar said they are looking for bilingual volunteers to help, send a message to his official page if you have some time to spare.

It was weird to see the initial reports of this on Facebook. For some reason everyone has gotten into this whole "don't share this post, copy and paste all the text and post it as your own post". Of course, since in the past that's been a huge format for spreading STDH, so a lot of people who initially heard about it were pretty suspicious.

LanceHunter fucked around with this message at 08:09 on Feb 11, 2017

Number Ten Cocks
Feb 25, 2016

by zen death robot

Badger of Basra posted:

So ICE has been conducting a secret roundup in Austin today. Cool, totally normal.

Do you mean they didn't announce it in advance, per SOP? I remember when I was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq we'd sometimes do secret raids on insurgents, I guess we were doing it wrong by not issuing a press release and telling them we were coming.

long-ass nips Diane
Dec 13, 2010

Breathe.

Number Ten Cocks posted:

Do you mean they didn't announce it in advance, per SOP? I remember when I was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq we'd sometimes do secret raids on insurgents, I guess we were doing it wrong by not issuing a press release and telling them we were coming.

Totally the same thing

corn in the bible
Jun 5, 2004

Oh no oh god it's all true!

Number Ten Cocks posted:

Do you mean they didn't announce it in advance, per SOP? I remember when I was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq we'd sometimes do secret raids on insurgents, I guess we were doing it wrong by not issuing a press release and telling them we were coming.

Die

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO

Number Ten Cocks posted:

Do you mean they didn't announce it in advance, per SOP? I remember when I was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq we'd sometimes do secret raids on insurgents, I guess we were doing it wrong by not issuing a press release and telling them we were coming.

Go gently caress yourself with a rusty length of rebar.

Jiro
Jan 13, 2004

Number Ten Cocks posted:

Do you mean they didn't announce it in advance, per SOP? I remember when I was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq we'd sometimes do secret raids on insurgents, I guess we were doing it wrong by not issuing a press release and telling them we were coming.

So I dunno what you did or saw overseas, if you actually went and aren't just being some edge lord troll, but if your SOP for conducting raids against enemy soldiers is the same as taking a law abiding mom and or dad or kid away that entered this country illegally fleeing, poverty, pressed into organizations like MS13, used as drug mules or fleeing the sex trafficking rings down there, on HOME SOIL you have a big loving problem.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Number Ten Cocks posted:

Do you mean they didn't announce it in advance, per SOP? I remember when I was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq we'd sometimes do secret raids on insurgents, I guess we were doing it wrong by not issuing a press release and telling them we were coming.

Catch a ride on an Osprey.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

If anyone learns of a raid or arrest by ICE in the austin area you can call 512-402-7999 and the law office of Mark Kinzler has been coordinating rapid legal response.

CARL MARK FORCE IV
Sep 2, 2007

I took a walk. And threw up in an English garden.

Number Ten Cocks posted:

Do you mean they didn't announce it in advance, per SOP? I remember when I was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq we'd sometimes do secret raids on insurgents, I guess we were doing it wrong by not issuing a press release and telling them we were coming.

Choke on a forest of dicks, you loving chode

D-Pad
Jun 28, 2006

LanceHunter posted:


It was weird to see the initial reports of this on Facebook. For some reason everyone has gotten into this whole "don't share this post, copy and paste all the text and post it as your own post". Of course, since in the past that's been a huge format for spreading STDH, so a lot of people who initially heard about it were pretty suspicious.

I have my Facebook privacy settings configured so if someone shares a post of mine only our mutual friends can see it. I post a lot of political stuff and I have friends that share it and I am constantly having to tell them to take it down and copy/paste it instead otherwise nobody is going to see it that aren't already able to.

Number Ten Cocks
Feb 25, 2016

by zen death robot
:unsmith: To my fans who are apparently really mad at having the absurdity of complaining about "secret" immigration raids pointed out.

LanceHunter
Nov 12, 2016

Beautiful People Club


D-Pad posted:

I have my Facebook privacy settings configured so if someone shares a post of mine only our mutual friends can see it. I post a lot of political stuff and I have friends that share it and I am constantly having to tell them to take it down and copy/paste it instead otherwise nobody is going to see it that aren't already able to.

I totally understand that, but if you're making a post that is specifically "Hey, here's some important information (including things like phone numbers to call) that I need spread far and wide", then it would probably be a good idea to set that particular post as public.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Hmmmmm

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/ted-cruz-tax-survey/

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply