|
Kobe Bryant from the Lakers
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2013 17:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 03:01 |
|
|
The Doo Do Chasers posted:i thought this thread moved past the whole black people doing white people things/wearing weird clothes phase it had a year ago that was my point
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2013 20:34
|
|
|
it's kind of lame but you guys are being really loving dumb, it's snoop with a cat looking at him funny.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2013 20:53
|
|
|
Crass Brown
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2013 21:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2013 21:24
|
|
|
 happy new year
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2013 22:10
|
|
|
Rugoberta Munchu posted:Crass Brown i'm just confused
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2013 22:52
|
|
|
het posted:it's kind of lame but you guys are being really loving dumb, it's snoop with a cat looking at him funny. yeah i was about to post basically this
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 03:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 03:18
|
|
|
get hosed, newjack
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 03:25
|
|
|
it continues
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 03:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 03:48
|
|
|
i was just at the hirschhorn a couple of days ago and saw someone try to put their hand in bowls of pearls. (i also was standing beside someone when they decided it'd be cool to feel a barnett newman). people are just dumb as gently caress, full time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 04:25
|
|
|
the retrospective was pretty awesome. glad i could see "dropping a han dynasty urn" in person
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 04:33
|
|
|
i haven't been to the hirschorn in a while. love that place.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 04:36
|
|
|
sector_corrector posted:i haven't been to the hirschorn in a while. love that place. barbara kruger's thing on the bottom floor was bad, like real bad and you gotta go through it to see mueck and the other stuff in the dark matters side exhibitions. also, unrelated, the nat musm for women in the arts also took out a floor of their (always awesome) perm collection to do this lame 'women who rock' hard rock cafe costume display thing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 04:41
|
|
|
that sucks. i should take another lonely depressing trip to dc to do the museums by myself and sulk.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 04:47
|
|
|
i thought the weiwei thing was at the sackler, not the hirschorn because i was planning on going there tomorrow
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 04:49
|
|
|
JehovahsWetness posted:i was just at the hirschhorn a couple of days ago and saw someone try to put their hand in bowls of pearls. (i also was standing beside someone when they decided it'd be cool to feel a barnett newman). people are just dumb as gently caress, full time. ugh wow
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 04:58
|
|
|
ppl just wanna touch
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 05:27
|
|
|
actually toucking art in museums and then acting like it hadnt ovccured to you not to do it is totally awesome, i was doing it at the tacoma glass museum last week
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 06:10
|
|
|
dont touch a barnett newman thats so stupid
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 06:48
|
|
|
I like to touch................... myself  : at night 
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 07:19
|
|
|
touched
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 07:38
|
|
|
Tree Goat posted:i thought the weiwei thing was at the sackler, not the hirschorn the sackler just has a single weiwei sculpture in the lobby right now, the hirschhorn is running the big rear end weiwei exhib, zodiac heads & according to what. monkeys grasping moon and the shadow sites exhibs at the sackler are good though, and there's a lalla essaydi exhib in the african art musuem that's in the connected wing from the sackler.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 12:51
|
|
|
ah that makes way more sense, thanks
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 18:01
|
|
|
weiwei's exhibit is running till feb. 24th if anyone was wondering like i was
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 00:16
|
|
|
 Still 4 more days of CHRISTmas.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 00:17
|
|
|
sector_corrector posted:weiwei's exhibit is running till feb. 24th if anyone was wondering like i was do you want to go on the same day
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 08:31
|
|
|
dumbskull posted:actually toucking art in museums and then acting like it hadnt ovccured to you not to do it is totally awesome, i was doing it at the tacoma glass museum last week putting art that is clearly textural/tactile under glass/behind ropes/whatever is the worst art establishment thing, touch everything for the proletariat
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 19:22
|
|
|
stay depressed posted:do you want to go on the same day not really, i don't like meeting people from the internet
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 20:01
|
|
|
sector_corrector posted:not really, i don't like meeting people from the internet ?? just go meet hi m nerd.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 20:18
|
|
|
mrmanatee posted:putting art that is clearly textural/tactile under glass/behind ropes/whatever is the worst art establishment thing, touch everything for the proletariat   Juan Munoz, First Banister, 1987
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 20:29
|
|
|
mrmanatee posted:putting art that is clearly textural/tactile under glass/behind ropes/whatever is the worst art establishment thing, touch everything for the proletariat 1. no 2. even if that was true i think its pretty obvious that a painting isnt one of those things 3. what kind of a baby do u have to be to literally be unable to restrain yourself from running around + touching everything
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 21:20
|
|
|
honestly its kind of nauseating to think that the typical "serious" way to present art denies 1/5 of your sensory input without regard to artistic intent obviously i dont run around touching everything and obviously a painting isnt going to hold up well with 1000 grubby fingers touching it every day but to me paintings are very tactile, I like being able to feel the ridges and layers and poo poo, it's a big part of the appeal of a painting vs a print. that banister thing is really cool tho
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 23:01
|
|
|
when the tactile is part of the intended experience they generally will tell you
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 23:07
|
|
|
Reichstag posted:when the tactile is part of the intended experience they generally will tell you yes
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 23:38
|
|
|
also if that's what you're looking for in a barnett newman urhm
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 23:40
|
|
|
i just think its sad that the default is "dont you dare touch this priceless work you philistine" and not "interact with this cool object," it encourages a really boring passive worldview and puts art on a pedestal that i dont think it has any right to but maybe you would like to attend my performance piece in which I cover myself in motor oil and caress every single object in the MoMa (including your face + penis)???
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2013 00:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 03:01 |
|
|
Frankly the author is dead and if I want to Experience an Art by seeing how it feels on my tongue thats nobodys business but mine and the fact that anyone would try and stop me is proof of the fundamentally bourgeois nature of the western art establishment.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2013 00:16
|
|
