|
https://twitter.com/MattTurner4L/status/822565628020224003
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 09:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 07:47 |
|
|
rudatron posted:I have real WORDS to say aeolius but it's gonna take some time it's cool, don't fret too much about time. i'll probably be around. i mean, unless i get hit by a bus or something, poo poo happens (p.s. don't take anything for granted, you buttholes) anyway i don't have the inexhaustible time/focus i used to for these things, so a leisurely pace is just fine
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 11:11
|
|
|
I'm not a neo-nazi. Oh yeah that pin on my shoulder is Pepe he's become quite a th... Also who was the person getting angry at the guy who punched him? It sounded like one of the girls who was questioning him in which case lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 11:57
|
|
|
jarofpiss posted:good action in houston probably had 120ish people show in spite of flooding rains so i took that as a good sign. crowd had good energy and it went pretty well with no arrests. unfortunately we didn't see any limos to set on fire. im back in texas for a couple months before i move to beijing, let me know if there's any other actions or meetings in houston
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 15:22
|
|
|
So I've signed up to attend the first meeting of my campuse's YDS, it should be pretty interesting!MizPiz posted:No, I'm sick of this flimsy attempts to claim a pervert identity by offering weak versions of the fetishes people demand, and then end up not even delivery on that. *Smiles Tankily* Well comrade, it looks like you're gonna have to be re-educated in the Neko Neko BDSM Gulag! Pener Kropoopkin posted:In The Culture series, anybody can transition their sex with no side effects, genitals are genetically engineered to realize unimagined pleasures, and incest is no longer taboo thanks to full control of genetic reproduction. It's pretty cool that sci-fi authors have to spend part of their first book explaining what fetishes are not allowed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:In The Culture series, anybody can transition their sex with no side effects, genitals are genetically engineered to realize unimagined pleasures, and incest is no longer taboo thanks to full control of genetic reproduction. Oh my god this book sounds fricken awful
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
Dreddout posted:*Smiles Tankily* *commits acts of terrorism tsunderely*
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:Oh my god this book sounds fricken awful It's actually really good, because it's written from the perspective of somebody who's fighting the Culture. There's this weird interlude where the protagonist is almost eaten alive by the morbidly obese living god of a food cult.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:*commits acts of terrorism tsunderely* ugh, these people are beneath bombing. UGH.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:It's actually really good, because it's written from the perspective of somebody who's fighting the Culture. There's this weird interlude where the protagonist is almost eaten alive by the morbidly obese living god of a food cult. Oh ok nvm I'm sorry that sounds great
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
rudatron posted:I have real WORDS to say aeolius but it's gonna take some time I don't consider myself brain dead or funny so those are two pretty strange comparisons as far as I'm concerned. I think you're one of a handful of people who routinely demonstrate original thought rather than adopting an off-the-shelf political stance from some strange corner of the internet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 05:39
|
|
|
asdf32 posted:I don't consider myself brain dead or funny You're right about one of these, at least.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 06:52
|
|
|
we prefer the term "alt-sleeping"
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 07:12
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:In The Culture series, anybody can transition their sex with no side effects, genitals are genetically engineered to realize unimagined pleasures, and incest is no longer taboo thanks to full control of genetic reproduction. Fukkkk don't make me reread the culture series, I can't believe that fuckin bastard author keeled over aggghh
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 09:57
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:Oh ok nvm I'm sorry that sounds great its actually p good
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 10:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 13:26
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:its actually p good I wasn't being sarcastic. I just got the first one on audible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
this thread has been pretty fun so far but i think it's about time to establish bylaws and a party line for the thread so we can get on with the business of splintering into more threads until we choke the entire forum on our sectarianism
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
bylaw 1: asuka > rei
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
jarofpiss posted:this thread has been pretty fun so far but i think it's about time to establish bylaws and a party line for the thread so we can get on with the business of splintering into more threads until we choke the entire forum on our sectarianism What do you think the catgirls were for? Prav posted:bylaw 1: asuka > rei Marxist-Misatism reigns supreme!
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:33
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 06:12
|
|
|
Prav posted:bylaw 1: asuka > rei its stupid to compare them <- pro evangelion take
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/getfiscal/status/823353790397030400
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 06:47
|
|
|
Hey can someone tell me more about democratic centralism? The bit on wikipedia about "That all decisions of higher bodies shall be absolutely binding on lower bodies and on all Party member" seems kinda much but I can see the use in that. Can someone give some examples of countries/tendencies or whatever and how they would view democratic centralism. Obv to M-L it's critical, but idk about anything else.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 06:59
|
|
|
Ruzihm posted:Hey can someone tell me more about democratic centralism? The bit on wikipedia about "That all decisions of higher bodies shall be absolutely binding on lower bodies and on all Party member" seems kinda much but I can see the use in that. it's basically to keep members in agreement on what the platform is. don't want party members off advocating for issues that are against the party line or whatever. if you're in a democratic centralist commie group and you decide you agree with everything except for the part where you're anti trans rights (for example) and want to go off and campaign for anti trans legislation, the group can expel you. lots of groups do that kind of thing because you don't want people speaking for the group when they aren't in agreement with it's principles. orgs that prohibit members from democratic centralist groups are just doing it to keep commies out without using the word communist.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 14:18
|
|
|
~~we could have had it all~~ 1994 Toyota Celica fucked around with this message at 14:26 on Jan 23, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 14:18
|
|
|
jarofpiss posted:it's basically to keep members in agreement on what the platform is. aka the "we had a vote about this Bob, give it a rest already" clause
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 14:31
|
|
|
jarofpiss posted:orgs that prohibit members from democratic centralist groups are just doing it to keep commies out without using the word communist. remind me which ones do this?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
Prav posted:aka the "we had a vote about this Bob, give it a rest already" clause haha, ok I like that
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
R. Guyovich posted:remind me which ones do this? Maybe DSA? http://www.dsausa.org/constitution Section 3. Members can be expelled if they are found to be in substantial disagreement with the principles or policies of the organization or if they consistently engage in undemocratic, disruptive behavior or if they are under the discipline of any self-defined democratic-centralist organization. Members facing expulsion must receive written notice of charges against them and must be given the opportunity to be heard before the NPC or a subcommittee thereof, appointed for the purpose of considering expulsion.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
R. Guyovich posted:remind me which ones do this? it was in the suggested bylaws sent by national DSA but was removed from both the austin and houston chapters at least. i guess it also helps prevent other groups from coming in and taking over but we kept the ability to expel members rather than a blanket ban on members of democratic centralist parties. DSA is a political org, not a party so i dont really see the need for it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
I always derided the liberal concept of Culture Appropriation as cretinous and avoiding the real problem of mass culture destroying minority ones but after seeing the last page here I feel terribly offended. I'm a Stalinist who jacks off to Hentai. This is my culture, and not a costume.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
maybe its not cultural appropriation maybe you just found your long lost motherland
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 18:23
|
|
|
Prav posted:aka the "we had a vote about this Bob, give it a rest already" clause That's its benign version but frankly it seems pointless and Bolshie LARPing compared to just saying by being part of a group you're agreeing to abide by its decisions. So there's a vote to do something and everyone works towards it, good. But what about if it's an absolute loving disaster and the best thing is to try and do damage limitation by pulling back? DC basically means people start throwing a voting result at you rather than arguing on the actual merits of continuing, which is just leveraging bureaucracy at someone rather than discussing it properly with a comrade.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
imagine this: the guy who won't agree is fishmech.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 20:14
|
|
|
imo democratic centralism helps you keep all the other loving idiots disciplined and in line, so its good, but it also gives all the other loving idiots a way to expel you if they manage to outnumber you. there's a season for all things etc.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
you're not a real marxist-lenninist organization unless you also include the 'totally meant to be temporary, pinkie swear guys' ban on 'factions' that lenin instituted after people kept arguing with him
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
Fallen Hamprince posted:you're not a real marxist-lenninist organization unless you also include the 'totally meant to be temporary, pinkie swear guys' ban on 'factions' that lenin instituted after people kept arguing with him Tbf to Lenin this thread is pretty good evidence that commies love arguing amongst themselves
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 07:47 |
|
|
having one political party which mediates the interests of an entire class serve as the locus of state power is the one thing marxist leninists can agree with the founding fathers of the us about the class that's given power is the big, obvious difference
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 20:44
|
|