|
Elyv posted:
Rosewater
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 08:23 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 01:31 |
|
https://twitter.com/mtgjp/status/851349377197105153 Censor 1U Instant Counter target spell unless its controller pays 1. Cycling U (U, Discard this card: Draw a card.)
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 10:00 |
|
Rinkles posted:An MTG artist posted and promptly pulled an art piece onto Instagram, tagging it with #Samut #Planeswalker. I really like the art here. Also, she seems to be a very angry lady. I wonder what she's so angry about.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 10:04 |
|
Miscalculation, that is not.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 10:06 |
|
YggdrasilTM posted:https://twitter.com/mtgjp/status/851349377197105153 Miscalculation, this isn't. Still going to see play if there's a cycling-matters deck though.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 10:06 |
|
If you can look at the top of your library at any time... does that mean that you can look at the card on top of your library while you are scrying 1?
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 10:32 |
|
bigperm posted:If you can look at the top of your library at any time... does that mean that you can look at the card on top of your library while you are scrying 1? While you're scrying, the card is still technically on top of your library. So yes, you're allowed to look at the card you're currently looking at.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 10:34 |
|
Jenx posted:I really like the art here. Also, she seems to be a very angry lady. I wonder what she's so angry about.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 10:36 |
|
bigperm posted:If you can look at the top of your library at any time... does that mean that you can look at the card on top of your library while you are scrying 1? When you're Scrying, the top cards of your library don't change. If you have a Lantern of Insight in play and play Serum Visions, you draw a card, reveal the new top card of the library, then scry 2, notably not revealing the second scry card nor the third card in the library. Siivola posted:Fake hours would be my guess. A cropped version was shown in last week's story. I hate when my work schedule goes up and my hours are all fake.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 10:36 |
|
Oketra the True 3W Legendary Creature - God Double strike, indestructible Oketra the True cannot attack or block unless you control at least three other creatures. 3W: Create a 1/1 white Warrior creature token with vigilance.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 11:17 |
|
YggdrasilTM posted:
I want to play this in a Lingering Souls deck.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 11:19 |
|
This seems like a fine use for four mana, if you can just stay on curve?
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 11:43 |
|
I guess the pendulum has firmly swung away from X/X+1 and towards cards that are fantastic if you're ahead but awful if you're on the back foot.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 11:45 |
|
YggdrasilTM posted:
That is a very nice top of the curve for an aggressive tokens deck, though Gideon is more or less better in every way.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 12:32 |
|
I actually like Force Spikulation a lot
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 13:21 |
|
bigperm posted:If you can look at the top of your library at any time... does that mean that you can look at the card on top of your library while you are scrying 1? No, but you can see the extra card if you're casting brainstorm.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 13:33 |
|
Bugsy posted:
So glad I waited to make changes to Animar.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 13:47 |
|
Bugsy posted:
This is a hard card to judge without playtesting. Its card advantage and mana fixing but also doesn't do much the turn its played. Its not a legend though and is a 3/4. Its either busted or never finds a good deck to be in. YggdrasilTM posted:https://twitter.com/mtgjp/status/851349377197105153 ZeroCount posted:Miscalculation, that is not. That might be the best card in the set. Might be the card with the most non-standard play.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 14:02 |
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:So glad I waited to make changes to Animar. Oh god.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 14:03 |
|
YggdrasilTM posted:
It's funny how similar this card is to Heliod, considering how different the red and blue ones are from their Theros counterparts.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:01 |
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:So glad I waited to make changes to Animar. Well that's terrifying. YggdrasilTM posted:https://twitter.com/mtgjp/status/851349377197105153 Ugggghhhhh why couldn't we just get a miscalculation reprint? Not that this is terrible, but still...
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:04 |
|
The Shortest Path posted:
Miscalculation is an extremely good card. At least we didn't get a Spell Snip reprint.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:06 |
|
The Shortest Path posted:Ugggghhhhh why couldn't we just get a miscalculation reprint? Not that this is terrible, but still...
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:07 |
|
Sickening posted:This is a hard card to judge without playtesting. Its card advantage and mana fixing but also doesn't do much the turn its played. Its not a legend though and is a 3/4. Its either busted or never finds a good deck to be in. This is much worse than Courser for one more mana. Seems bad.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:11 |
|
mcmagic posted:This is much worse than Courser for one more mana. Seems bad. The counterspell is really interesting- for the early turns its generally an unconditional 2-mana counterspell, and U cycling removes the big downside of the taxing counterspells (doing nothing later on). If there are U control decks at all I think it'll see play. Sarmhan fucked around with this message at 15:16 on Apr 10, 2017 |
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:13 |
|
Ein Sexmonster posted:You couldn't chain multiple cards off of the top with courser. I don't know if this'll be good in the format, but the ability to chain-cast cheap guys off the top of your deck is strong. You can't get value off this without spending mana (as compared to courser).
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:14 |
|
Ein Sexmonster posted:You couldn't chain multiple cards off of the top with courser. I don't know if this'll be good in the format, but the ability to chain-cast cheap guys off the top of your deck is strong. There could be potential for something with this and Paradox Engine, dunno if it would be any good without Llanowar Elf variants in standard though.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:15 |
|
mcmagic posted:This is much worse than Courser for one more mana. Seems bad. Courser is better all around card because its 3 cmc and pairs well with fetches. Not much of a building cost there. Its a little too early to call this card much worse without seeing what else is going on. Rinkles posted:You can't get value off this without spending mana (as compared to courser). While this is true its still card advantage, potentially powerful one at that.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:16 |
|
Rinkles posted:You can't get value off this without spending mana (as compared to courser).
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:17 |
|
I didn't like what the extra information necessarily did to gameplay, but I did like that courser and Oracle's ability had a real downside (if marginal compared to the average value generated).
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:21 |
|
There are worse things to be than not as good as an almost busted card. I'm guessing there will be a bigger release of spoilers later? We're going to get a Vengeful Pharaoh reprint right?
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:26 |
|
BizarroAzrael posted:There are worse things to be than not as good as an almost busted card. They'll release the rest of the cool cards slowly over the week and then dump all the rest of the commons/uncommons at the end
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:29 |
|
BizarroAzrael posted:There are worse things to be than not as good as an almost busted card. At 11 EST, or more like 10:45 EST when MTGS and/or Reddit find the made-live-but-not-published articles on the Magic website. I'm disappointed the Cat God doesn't make Cat tokens. Cat tokens have lifelink, so I guess having a repeatable source of 1/1 lifelinkers was too good.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:29 |
|
BJPaskoff posted:At 11 EST, or more like 10:45 EST when MTGS and/or Reddit find the made-live-but-not-published articles on the Magic website. It would have been the perfect soul sisters god!
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:30 |
|
Sickening posted:Courser is better all around card because its 3 cmc and pairs well with fetches. Not much of a building cost there. Its a little too early to call this card much worse without seeing what else is going on. Just the fact that Courser helped you hit your land drops and this doesn't is a huge delta.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:31 |
|
So how does the combat limitation on the dumb egyptian god cards work mid-battle? Say Oketra - I think if she block something as a creature but during declare blockers phase you fall below the 3 needed creatures (like, one gets hit by removal before combat damage) she's no longer blocking anything but the thing is still blocked - right? What about when she's attacking? Is she still attacking if you fall below three creatures after declare attackers?
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:32 |
|
mcmagic posted:Just the fact that Courser helped you hit your land drops and this doesn't is a huge delta. This helps you to hit your creature drops!
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:33 |
|
Rynder posted:So how does the combat limitation on the dumb egyptian god cards work mid-battle? Say Oketra - I think if she block something as a creature but during declare blockers phase you fall below the 3 needed creatures (like, one gets hit by removal before combat damage) she's no longer blocking anything but the thing is still blocked - right? This isn't like the theros ones where they stop being creatures.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:34 |
|
Rynder posted:So how does the combat limitation on the dumb egyptian god cards work mid-battle? Say Oketra - I think if she block something as a creature but during declare blockers phase you fall below the 3 needed creatures (like, one gets hit by removal before combat damage) she's no longer blocking anything but the thing is still blocked - right? Once they were declared attacker/blocker even if you remove the condition for their activation, they are still creatures attacking or blocking, and they will inflict damage. In this aspect they are better than the Theros gods!
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:35 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 01:31 |
|
Embalm Roar of the Wurm
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 15:36 |