|
I'm going with landscape here since it doesn't really fit anywhere else...(ignore the weird artifacts that happen on the 500px thumbnails that happen for some reason) Taking A Break by Paul Frederiksen on 500px
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 02:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 11:45 |
|
|
maxmars posted:I like how you made the long exposure work here, but man, those highlights.. Why not to use a grad ND filter for the upper part? I may have a darker exposure for the sky, would have to check, at least on my monitor (calibrated a few weeks ago) it looks pretty good. Made the sky a bit darker in this version, any better? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 03:14
|
|
|
Dread Head posted:I may have a darker exposure for the sky, would have to check, at least on my monitor (calibrated a few weeks ago) it looks pretty good. Definitely an improvement. What if you brought up the shadows in the clouds quite a bit. The dark in the clouds changes the focus to them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 03:15
|
|
|
Pukestain Pal posted:Definitely an improvement. What if you brought up the shadows in the clouds quite a bit. The dark in the clouds changes the focus to them. Take 3: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 03:20
|
|
|
Dread Head posted:Take 3: I like that a lot better
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 03:22
|
|
|
Dread Head posted:Take 3: Beauty
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 03:24
|
|
|
David Pratt posted:I once saw a tip in a magazine which suggested using multiple exposures. Like, a lot - 50 to 100. Then when you combine them you get a mix between the smoothness of a single long-exposure with the water-drop detail of much shorter exposures. I remember it looked pretty good and was a nice change from the typical boring long-exposure shots. I'm going to assume that whoever is doing this is eating a whole shitload of drugs beforehand because otherwise it sounds like the worst possible way to enjoy a waterfall.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 03:28
|
|
|
Gone with that, thanks for opinions! As for waterfalls I think it is a personal choice on what you want to capture. I tend to prefer a long exposure but that is more of a personal preference. It also depends on the situation and what you are trying to show. I am not sure on combing both fast and long shutter speeds when it comes to the water, seems like a lot of work for something that is going to look heavily edited likely but I won't pass too much judgement until I see an example...
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 03:32
|
|
|
voodoorootbeer posted:I'm going to assume that whoever is doing this is eating a whole shitload of drugs beforehand because otherwise it sounds like the worst possible way to enjoy a waterfall. Why wouldn't you just take one long exposure and take a few fast exposures, maybe with a higher iso to get that shutter speed high, and make a simple composite. seems like a lot less effort with the same effect. I doubt you need 50-100 shots and creating a proper HDR is needed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 03:33
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 04:05
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 04:32
|
|
|
So many nice mountains and rivers and nature and stuff, so here's a carpark for balance. Way Out by garbutto7vxg1, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 11:24
|
|
|
I feel myself getting lost in there. Each one has its own feeling, but they all have _depth_. elgarbo posted:So many nice mountains and rivers and nature and stuff, so here's a carpark for balance. This is really nice. I love that serpentine. I went to Rio, but didn't bring a tripod.  Looking down from Pão de Açúcar by thetzar, on Flickr  Untitled by thetzar, on Flickr  Untitled by thetzar, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 16:01
|
|
|
Went for a drive and got some nice light.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 23:02
|
|
|
 Glassilaun Beach
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2014 23:05
|
|
|
Fart Amplifier posted:Went for a drive and got some nice light. yah, you did. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 00:21
|
|
|
David Pratt posted:I once saw a tip in a magazine which suggested using multiple exposures. Like, a lot - 50 to 100. Then when you combine them you get a mix between the smoothness of a single long-exposure with the water-drop detail of much shorter exposures. I remember it looked pretty good and was a nice change from the typical boring long-exposure shots. I'm back, and I definitely did not do this. I can't say I'm too happy with how the pictures turned out. In all the hubbub and excitement I thought the pictures looked decent enough (on the camera's LCD). But now that I'm home I'm seeing so many things I could have at least tried to do better. Oh well, hopefully I'll have more chances in the future. In the meantime, does anyone have tips on how to post-process these? I did what I could but I'm wondering if anyone has another take.  DSCF9356-Edit.jpg by Geektox, on Flickr DSCF9374.jpg by Geektox, on FlickrFull album (8 photos) here. Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 08:02
|
|
|
Geektox posted:
I actually kind of dig this. Maybe it seems a little underexposed in the shadows? The grass on the bottom right could probably be brought up a little instead of the dead space. I dig the composition of it though..
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 08:10
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:
That's really great, makes me wish I could own a point and shoot for more than a month without breaking it.  Brisbane 2014 by Haught, on Flickr somewhere 2013 by Haught, on Flickr Toowoomba 2014 by Haught, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 11:42
|
|
|
Found a windmill, took a picture: Untitled by vexborg, on FlickrPlayed around with the colours:  egeskov by vexborg, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 13:32
|
|
|
 R0001330 by spf3million, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 13:57
|
|
|
 Ming Lounge Photobeers, Portland by Ashade76, on FlickrGoons drink here.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 18:07
|
|
|
Kidney Stone posted:Played around with the colours: I like the colors and tighter crop makes a stronger composition, but the radial blur is kind of distracting. I'd prefer it to all be sharp. Musket posted:Goons drink here. Bullshit, I don't see a 2 liter Mountain Dew in the photo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 18:27
|
|
|
Musket posted:
Nice!  DSC_4223 by Stingray of Doom, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2014 19:51
|
|
|
 5B4A7831 by Jason the Hutt, on Flickr 5B4A7874 by Jason the Hutt, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
Bubbacub posted:
This.
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2014 00:35
|
|
|
 Schmeer Road by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr  Farragut Substation by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2014 05:40
|
|
|
Bubbacub posted:I like the colors and tighter crop makes a stronger composition, but the radial blur is kind of distracting. I'd prefer it to all be sharp. I'll get a sharp version online when I get home from work. Here we go...  P8257622a by vexborg, on Flickr
Kidney Stone fucked around with this message at 15:43 on Sep 5, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2014 06:48
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2014 19:05
|
|
|
I don't do landscape often, but I'd really like to do it more. DSC_0038 by straygiraffe, on Flickr This is amazing 
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2014 22:34
|
|
|
Glacier National Park is basically the Iceland of North America. You could kick a camera down a hill and get great pictures.
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2014 23:22
|
|
|
xzzy posted:You could kick a camera down a hill and get great pictures. Somebody please do this.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 03:21
|
|
|
xzzy posted:You could kick a camera down a hill and get great pictures. hey quit taking all the good art ideas
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 03:29
|
|
|
 Farragut Substation by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr MrBlandAverage fucked around with this message at 05:58 on Sep 6, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 05:43
|
|
|
totally a landscape: _DSC5999 by Stingray of Doom, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 08:58
|
|
|
 La Jolla by jemuelb, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 13:43
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 16:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 17:04
|
|
|
Geektox posted:Somebody please do this. Please don't, wikipedia will claim the work is public domain.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 20:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 11:45 |
|
|
Are those...fake bricks? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2014 20:07
|
|
